12015-10-11T00:36:45  *** wumpus has quit IRC
  22015-10-11T01:08:55  *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
  32015-10-11T01:14:13  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  42015-10-11T02:39:57  *** belcher has quit IRC
  52015-10-11T02:52:53  *** jgarzik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  62015-10-11T03:08:18  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  72015-10-11T03:16:05  *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  82015-10-11T05:59:26  *** Thireus1 has quit IRC
  92015-10-11T05:59:39  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 102015-10-11T06:05:36  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 112015-10-11T06:09:46  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 122015-10-11T06:17:14  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 132015-10-11T06:22:32  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 142015-10-11T06:31:42  *** supasonic has quit IRC
 152015-10-11T06:44:31  *** jgarzik_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 162015-10-11T06:44:54  *** jgarzik has quit IRC
 172015-10-11T07:09:50  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 182015-10-11T07:11:25  *** challisto has quit IRC
 192015-10-11T07:16:48  <GitHub84> [bitcoin] jamesob opened pull request #6804: [tests] Add basic coverage reporting for RPC tests (master...rpc_coverage) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6804
 202015-10-11T07:26:56  *** jgarzik_ is now known as jgarzik
 212015-10-11T07:27:03  *** jgarzik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 222015-10-11T07:41:09  <jcorgan> cfields: what is the specific issue with #6681
 232015-10-11T08:21:21  *** Arnavion has quit IRC
 242015-10-11T08:22:14  *** d_t has quit IRC
 252015-10-11T08:23:40  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 262015-10-11T08:23:51  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 272015-10-11T08:26:55  *** wumpus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 282015-10-11T08:31:19  *** Arnavion has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 292015-10-11T08:33:49  <GitHub35> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b94ae81576c1...4ca6ddec4d79
 302015-10-11T08:33:50  <GitHub35> bitcoin/master 28e3249 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Bump minrelaytxfee default...
 312015-10-11T08:33:51  <GitHub35> bitcoin/master 4e2efb3 Wladimir J. van der Laan: tests: update transaction_tests for new dust threshold
 322015-10-11T08:33:51  <GitHub35> bitcoin/master 4ca6dde Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6793...
 332015-10-11T08:33:54  <GitHub99> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6793: Bump minrelaytxfee default (master...2015_10_bump_minrelaytxfee) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6793
 342015-10-11T08:37:38  <GitHub2> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.10: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/842c48dba39e9ad7a74d21106a67e047e3d79ced
 352015-10-11T08:37:38  <GitHub2> bitcoin/0.10 842c48d Wladimir J. van der Laan: Bump minrelaytxfee default...
 362015-10-11T08:38:24  <GitHub198> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.11: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/e7bcc4aac3a1a2b62d53c0261e803786123477a8
 372015-10-11T08:38:25  <GitHub198> bitcoin/0.11 e7bcc4a Wladimir J. van der Laan: Bump minrelaytxfee default...
 382015-10-11T08:45:43  <wumpus> going to tag rc2 for 0.11.1 and 0.10.3 in a min
 392015-10-11T08:47:20  <GitHub69> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.11: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/dad3e98e8f4d2efdcad947631a48b520f01f822e
 402015-10-11T08:47:20  <GitHub69> bitcoin/0.11 dad3e98 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: update release notes for 0.11.1rc2
 412015-10-11T08:47:47  <wumpus>  * [new tag]         v0.11.1rc2 -> v0.11.1rc2
 422015-10-11T08:49:49  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 432015-10-11T08:49:51  <GitHub186> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.10: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/8d598c26e34e36619180f73926043a43bfe68879
 442015-10-11T08:49:51  <GitHub186> bitcoin/0.10 8d598c2 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Update release notes for 0.10.3rc2
 452015-10-11T08:50:18  <wumpus>  * [new tag]         v0.10.3rc2 -> v0.10.3rc2
 462015-10-11T08:52:10  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 472015-10-11T08:55:08  *** Thireus1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 482015-10-11T08:55:19  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 492015-10-11T09:04:33  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 502015-10-11T09:04:33  *** Thireus1 has quit IRC
 512015-10-11T09:09:49  *** challisto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 522015-10-11T09:09:49  *** challisto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 532015-10-11T09:14:21  *** fanquake has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 542015-10-11T09:29:04  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 552015-10-11T09:30:04  <fanquake> wumpus how soon do you want to release 0.11.1 ?
 562015-10-11T09:30:56  <wumpus> at least want to have 0.11.1rc2 out asap
 572015-10-11T09:31:31  <wumpus> can't really predict what the rc process will bump into, but obviously the final release should be as soon as possible too
 582015-10-11T09:31:58  <fanquake> Fair enough. I'll have some sigs up shortly.
 592015-10-11T09:33:12  <michagogo> wumpus: did you see my earlier messages?
 602015-10-11T09:33:26  <wumpus> michagogo: yes -> version bump was forgotten in rc1
 612015-10-11T09:33:36  <michagogo> Ah, I see
 622015-10-11T09:33:44  <wumpus> should be ok now
 632015-10-11T09:33:59  <michagogo> Also re: the VM upgrades
 642015-10-11T09:34:03  <wumpus> don't know about the rest of your VM issues, shouldn't have changed AFAIK
 652015-10-11T09:34:08  <michagogo> And the 0.10 dir name
 662015-10-11T09:34:13  <michagogo> Yeah, I didn't have any issues
 672015-10-11T09:34:17  <wumpus> a few people submitted signatures so it seems to have worked
 682015-10-11T09:34:29  <michagogo> Was responding to you talking about it taking a long time to upgrade
 692015-10-11T09:34:47  <wumpus> oh yes it takes long
 702015-10-11T09:34:51  <fanquake> Yea I didn't have any issue building 0.11.1rc1
 712015-10-11T09:35:20  <michagogo> wumpus: so yes, on KVM recreating the VM should make it not take so long, afaik
 722015-10-11T09:35:29  <wumpus> michagogo: so your take is that creating new images wouldn't makke it faster?
 732015-10-11T09:35:40  <wumpus> michagogo: oh it would?
 742015-10-11T09:35:43  <michagogo> wumpus: on KVM, I think it should make it faster
 752015-10-11T09:36:14  <michagogo> You also may be able to upgrade the base image, I'm not sure
 762015-10-11T09:36:17  <wumpus> but in image generation there isn't much of a difference between LXC and KVM, I think the only difference is grabbing a partition at the ned
 772015-10-11T09:36:28  <michagogo> wumpus: no, that changed
 782015-10-11T09:36:33  <wumpus> okay
 792015-10-11T09:36:42  <michagogo> LXC used to create a KVM image and extract it
 802015-10-11T09:36:53  <wumpus> yes
 812015-10-11T09:36:59  <michagogo> (With vmbuilder)
 822015-10-11T09:37:01  <michagogo> Now it uses debootstrap directly
 832015-10-11T09:37:02  <wumpus> that's changed now?
 842015-10-11T09:37:22  <michagogo> The unfortunate side effect is that the LXC it generates is only packages from precise
 852015-10-11T09:37:29  <michagogo> And not from -updates and -security
 862015-10-11T09:37:38  <wumpus> isn't that a matter of changing the command?
 872015-10-11T09:38:02  <michagogo> wumpus: well, it's a different process generating it
 882015-10-11T09:38:12  * wumpus doesn't know mjuch about debootstrap, I used it to bootstrap debian on ARM boards, but just followed instructions
 892015-10-11T09:38:24  <michagogo> Vmbuilder uses debootstrap as a component, I think
 902015-10-11T09:38:48  <michagogo> I don't remember exactly why the change was made
 912015-10-11T09:38:57  <michagogo> I think the old method was causing some issues
 922015-10-11T09:39:24  <michagogo> This way works pretty smoothly, except for the fact that it doesn't include packages from -security/-updates
 932015-10-11T09:39:57  <michagogo> So you need to do this: https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/vHn9M0LP
 942015-10-11T09:41:45  <michagogo> That should be adaptable for KVM, or you can just recreate the base image
 952015-10-11T10:01:00  <wumpus> thanks, I'll give it a try
 962015-10-11T10:05:56  <fanquake> wumpus would you be able to merge my two sets of sigs for rc1 & rc2 ?
 972015-10-11T10:07:30  <wumpus> fanquake: sure
 982015-10-11T10:08:48  <fanquake> I'm building the 0.10 rc now
 992015-10-11T10:08:52  <fanquake> Cheers
1002015-10-11T10:11:11  <michagogo> Are we doing the detached signing?
1012015-10-11T10:11:35  <wumpus> michagogo: for 0.11 we are, not sure about 0.10 (but I think so)
1022015-10-11T10:11:55  <michagogo> I mean specifically the RCa
1032015-10-11T10:12:00  <michagogo> RCs*
1042015-10-11T10:15:06  <wumpus> for rc2 there will be detached sigs, for rc1 we don't bother because of the lack of version bump and it became superseded so fast
1052015-10-11T10:30:35  *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1062015-10-11T10:32:46  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
1072015-10-11T10:43:55  *** nartac has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082015-10-11T10:44:14  <nartac> if count of forked coin wallets will be >50%. Is it mean new coins will get all old coins wallets
1092015-10-11T10:47:49  *** BashCo_ has quit IRC
1102015-10-11T10:48:24  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112015-10-11T10:49:48  <wumpus> nartac: sounds like a #bitcoin question
1122015-10-11T10:50:08  <wumpus> michagogo: your instructions almost worked - for KVM you need a start-target in there somewhere
1132015-10-11T10:57:47  <wumpus> ...and a stop-target at the end, before copying
1142015-10-11T10:59:57  <wumpus> oh, but I get a new error now:  Could not open 'base-precise-amd64.qcow2': Too many open files
1152015-10-11T11:00:06  <wumpus> it gets in a loop
1162015-10-11T11:00:10  <wumpus> well, create a new image it is
1172015-10-11T11:18:19  *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1182015-10-11T11:43:16  <michagogo> wumpus: yeah, makes sense. I think I mentioned (or if not, I meant to mention) that for KVM, you probably need to adapt the instructions. I think the command for making the image copy is different too, not just a cp -- take a look at make-clean-vm.
1192015-10-11T11:44:19  <wumpus> michagogo: yes, I naively thought it worked - almost literally - for KVM, but that was only apparantly. The qcows keep a reference to the base image, so copying the result back to the base image creates an infinite loop
1202015-10-11T11:45:12  <michagogo> Ah. Yeah, so it's an actual snapshot/forked clone mechanism.
1212015-10-11T11:46:14  <michagogo> So just reversing the command used in make-base-vm wouldn't work either, but I'm sure it's possible to do the same thing if you know how to use the tools.
1222015-10-11T11:48:41  <wumpus> I think most straightforward would be to start the vm using the base image directly, then upgrade that, skip the copy/move step at the end
1232015-10-11T11:48:45  <michagogo> Anyway, for KVM, you're probably just better off creating a new image anyway. If I'm not mistaken, when you upgrade the base image, something about the way the upgrade process works means that the automatic upgrade as part of the building is broken and that breaks the whole build, so you need to repeat the upgrade process every time anything updates
1242015-10-11T11:49:05  <wumpus> right
1252015-10-11T11:49:19  <michagogo> Yeah, probably. I just don't know enough about KVM to get into that… And I'm running inside a VM anyway, so I'm stuck with LXC
1262015-10-11T11:49:57  <michagogo> With KVM, you can just create a new base image and be done with it, whereas with LXE you have to do the whole upgrade-the-base thing because of the debootstrap switch.
1272015-10-11T11:50:30  <wumpus> I first accidentally created a lxc image, that takes quite a bit longer
1282015-10-11T11:51:01  <michagogo> Eh? LXC should take less time than KVM
1292015-10-11T11:51:23  <michagogo> Or maybe not, I don't remember all the details.
1302015-10-11T11:51:48  <michagogo> Anyway, g2g... In a couple hours hopefully I can get someone to boot my computer, remote in and kick off the rc2 builds.
1312015-10-11T11:52:45  <michagogo> (Oh, and just to make sure: you saw my note about the wrong release name for 0.10-win, right?)
1322015-10-11T11:53:07  *** BashCo has quit IRC
1332015-10-11T11:58:49  <wumpus> michagogo: hm?
1342015-10-11T11:58:59  <wumpus> nothing should have changed there
1352015-10-11T12:00:25  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1362015-10-11T12:02:53  <wumpus> oh I see now, using the wrong windows dirname in my script
1372015-10-11T12:03:40  *** PaulCape_ has quit IRC
1382015-10-11T12:06:15  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1392015-10-11T12:14:21  *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1402015-10-11T12:16:50  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
1412015-10-11T12:19:50  <GitHub31> [bitcoin] btcdrak opened pull request #6805: Create btcdrak-key.pgp (master...btcdrakpgp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6805
1422015-10-11T12:43:40  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1432015-10-11T12:48:55  <wumpus> michagogo: removed my 0.10.3rc1 win sigs, indeed, 0.10 was pre-detached windows signatures
1442015-10-11T13:32:20  *** belcher has quit IRC
1452015-10-11T13:33:42  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462015-10-11T14:06:16  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1472015-10-11T14:08:45  *** PaulCape_ has quit IRC
1482015-10-11T14:09:25  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
1492015-10-11T14:10:23  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1502015-10-11T14:17:49  *** sipa_ is now known as sipa
1512015-10-11T14:23:17  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522015-10-11T14:26:49  <fanquake> btcdrak Have you contributed a gitian build to the sigs repo?
1532015-10-11T14:28:03  <btcdrak> I'm just building 0.10.3rc2 now
1542015-10-11T14:29:13  <michagogo> wumpus: yeah, it's a good thing that Friday night I ran the 0.11 build and not the 0.10 build. I only realized later that I probably had to tweak the script for it to do 0.10 right.
1552015-10-11T14:59:39  *** moli has quit IRC
1562015-10-11T15:12:07  *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1572015-10-11T15:16:55  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1582015-10-11T15:24:15  *** Thireus has quit IRC
1592015-10-11T15:38:33  *** nartac has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1602015-10-11T15:45:22  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1612015-10-11T16:25:22  *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1622015-10-11T16:27:18  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
1632015-10-11T16:38:10  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642015-10-11T16:48:30  <fanquake> wumpus Your sig is missing from the 0.10.3rc2 osx dir
1652015-10-11T16:48:52  <wumpus> fanquake: huh, will add
1662015-10-11T16:55:01  <fanquake> Anyone running osx 10.11 that can test mounting the latest RC ? See #6800
1672015-10-11T17:01:18  *** fanquake has quit IRC
1682015-10-11T17:15:36  *** Thireus has quit IRC
1692015-10-11T17:18:06  <michagogo> Side note: I'm kinda surprised nothing breaks when a gitian build is running in LXC in Ubuntu in Virtualbox in Windows and Windows hibernates
1702015-10-11T17:30:26  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1712015-10-11T17:36:22  *** Thireus has quit IRC
1722015-10-11T17:37:59  *** moli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1732015-10-11T17:40:39  *** molly has quit IRC
1742015-10-11T17:55:55  <michagogo> -Whois cfields cfields
1752015-10-11T17:55:59  <michagogo> ...
1762015-10-11T17:56:01  <michagogo> Oops
1772015-10-11T17:57:03  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1782015-10-11T18:02:59  <tripleslash> michagogo, that's quite the chain of environments
1792015-10-11T18:03:28  <michagogo> tripleslash: it's really just 3 layers
1802015-10-11T18:03:41  <michagogo> LXC in VM
1812015-10-11T18:03:43  <michagogo> But yeah
1822015-10-11T18:04:44  <michagogo> wumpus: are you able to detached-sign, or does cfields need to do it?
1832015-10-11T18:07:43  <michagogo> Hm, gitian idea: an option to select inputs dir
1842015-10-11T18:08:30  <michagogo> Could help avoid issues like building multiple versions before detached sigs are posted
1852015-10-11T18:18:39  <tripleslash> I can't speak for Virtualbox, but having used Hyper-V extensively, I know it to be very resilient with regard to suspensions.
1862015-10-11T18:33:18  *** ParadoxSpiral_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872015-10-11T18:36:13  *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
1882015-10-11T18:44:57  *** supasonic has quit IRC
1892015-10-11T18:45:24  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1902015-10-11T19:02:24  *** challisto has quit IRC
1912015-10-11T20:02:29  <michagogo> Okay, 0.10.3rc2 should be PR'd soonish
1922015-10-11T20:02:58  <sipa> PRd?
1932015-10-11T20:03:09  <sipa> oh, gitian sigs :)
1942015-10-11T20:03:20  <michagogo> Giti-yeah
1952015-10-11T20:03:28  <btcdrak> I signed too
1962015-10-11T20:18:32  *** BananaLotus has quit IRC
1972015-10-11T20:18:33  *** guruvan has quit IRC
1982015-10-11T20:19:39  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
1992015-10-11T20:30:12  *** guruvan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2002015-10-11T20:30:42  *** BananaLotus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2012015-10-11T20:47:53  <michagogo> Correction: they've been added to my 0.11.1rc2 PR.
2022015-10-11T21:16:59  <Luke-Jr> are rc2s tagged?
2032015-10-11T21:17:38  <sipa> yes
2042015-10-11T21:21:56  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2052015-10-11T21:53:15  *** CodeShark has quit IRC
2062015-10-11T22:18:15  *** d_t has quit IRC
2072015-10-11T22:18:35  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2082015-10-11T22:23:09  *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2092015-10-11T22:26:19  *** moli has quit IRC
2102015-10-11T22:53:10  *** zxzzt has quit IRC
2112015-10-11T22:54:20  *** zxzzt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2122015-10-11T23:01:12  <PRab> Is there a proper procedure for updating your gitian gpg key? My old one expired and I noticed that new stuff has been tagged, so I was going to build it.
2132015-10-11T23:14:00  *** moli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2142015-10-11T23:16:59  *** molly has quit IRC
2152015-10-11T23:42:14  <GitHub37> [bitcoin] PRabahy opened pull request #6806: Updating my GPG key because my old one expired. (master...NewGPG) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6806
2162015-10-11T23:48:28  <GitHub128> [bitcoin] PRabahy closed pull request #6806: Updating my GPG key because my old one expired. (master...NewGPG) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6806
2172015-10-11T23:49:17  <Luke-Jr> PRab: just update your current key to expire later..
2182015-10-11T23:49:43  <PRab> Luke-Jr: I wanted to go to an online/offline scheme.
2192015-10-11T23:50:00  <PRab> I think I came up with a reasonable solution, but messed up the PR a little.
2202015-10-11T23:50:41  <Luke-Jr> btw: are there detached sigs yet?
2212015-10-11T23:51:08  <Luke-Jr> cfields: ^
2222015-10-11T23:51:27  <GitHub41> [bitcoin] PRabahy opened pull request #6807: Updated Prab's PGP Key (master...NewGPG) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6807
2232015-10-11T23:52:27  <PRab> There we go, that looks good to me. The commit contains data signed by both the old and new key, so once its merged there is permanent proof that I control both keys.
2242015-10-11T23:52:49  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2252015-10-11T23:53:30  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2262015-10-11T23:54:02  <Luke-Jr> PRab: next time just update the same PR with the new branch..
2272015-10-11T23:54:33  <PRab> I couldn't do a force push through SourceTree, so that was easier.
2282015-10-11T23:55:09  <Luke-Jr> :/
2292015-10-11T23:57:49  *** belcher has quit IRC
2302015-10-11T23:58:24  *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2312015-10-11T23:59:29  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev