12015-11-13T00:06:00  <gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: I hate to expand your patch, but in net.h there is a comment about fRelay which you should probably revise slightly to make it sound like until a filter load isn't the only use.
  22015-11-13T00:06:41  <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, oh the humanity!
  32015-11-13T00:16:31  *** PRab has quit IRC
  42015-11-13T00:16:57  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
  52015-11-13T00:22:19  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  62015-11-13T00:29:21  <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, ok comment changed
  72015-11-13T00:52:47  <phantomcircuit> gmaxwell, i couldn't figure out a sane way to use the constant (which is defined in main.h) in net.cpp
  82015-11-13T01:00:35  <sipa> phantomcircuit: pass that true/false based on blocksonly as a parameter to PushVersion
  92015-11-13T01:01:33  <phantomcircuit> sipa, PushVersion is called from the constructor of CNode::CNode
 102015-11-13T01:01:38  <phantomcircuit> er from...
 112015-11-13T01:01:40  <phantomcircuit> words
 122015-11-13T01:01:56  <sipa> aaargh
 132015-11-13T01:02:25  <phantomcircuit> lol yeah that's why i just gave up and left it as a constant constant
 142015-11-13T01:02:29  <sipa> can you ehm... add an Start method to CNode or so?
 152015-11-13T01:02:29  <gmaxwell> it what?
 162015-11-13T01:04:25  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
 172015-11-13T01:05:55  <phantomcircuit> sipa, the "clean" way is to add a fVersionSent flag and then check that in SendMessages
 182015-11-13T01:06:04  <phantomcircuit> you wont send anything until you get a verack anyways
 192015-11-13T01:08:16  * phantomcircuit lols at CNode flags
 202015-11-13T01:30:00  <dcousens> #d
 212015-11-13T01:30:03  <dcousens> nvm
 222015-11-13T02:01:04  *** randy-waterhouse has quit IRC
 232015-11-13T02:11:33  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 242015-11-13T02:15:06  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 252015-11-13T02:26:35  *** CodeShark has quit IRC
 262015-11-13T02:26:56  *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 272015-11-13T02:29:35  *** skyraider has quit IRC
 282015-11-13T02:32:43  *** sipa_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 292015-11-13T02:32:57  *** skyraider has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 302015-11-13T02:32:58  *** sipa has quit IRC
 312015-11-13T02:37:00  *** Apocalyptic has quit IRC
 322015-11-13T02:37:00  *** lecusemble has quit IRC
 332015-11-13T02:37:02  *** guruvan has quit IRC
 342015-11-13T02:37:03  *** gavinandresen has quit IRC
 352015-11-13T02:44:16  *** guruvan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 362015-11-13T02:44:16  *** gavinandresen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 372015-11-13T02:44:22  *** lecusemble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 382015-11-13T02:45:04  *** Apocalyptic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 392015-11-13T03:01:28  *** dcousens has quit IRC
 402015-11-13T03:05:44  *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 412015-11-13T03:06:28  <dcousens> anyone here use any blockchain analyser tools?
 422015-11-13T03:06:53  <dcousens> sorry, will go to bitcoin-dev
 432015-11-13T03:42:18  *** skyraider has quit IRC
 442015-11-13T03:48:18  <petertodd> CodeShark: lol, and now you made me realise gmaxwell could equally be talking about my MMR ideas - the reinvention cycle just went meta full circle!
 452015-11-13T03:53:44  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 462015-11-13T03:58:36  *** PRab has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 472015-11-13T04:00:46  <jcorgan>  /cl
 482015-11-13T04:01:41  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 492015-11-13T04:14:15  *** zooko has quit IRC
 502015-11-13T04:25:20  *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
 512015-11-13T04:29:38  <gmaxwell> is someone going to update univalue in master?
 522015-11-13T04:29:41  *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 532015-11-13T04:46:37  *** fanquake has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 542015-11-13T04:57:10  * Luke-Jr wonders if we should increase the number of blocks for Core wallet to consider transactions confirmed.
 552015-11-13T04:57:17  <gmaxwell> oh wow, intel mpx when used changes the ABI and makes all pointers bounds checked.
 562015-11-13T04:58:29  <Luke-Jr> gmaxwell: 128-bit wide?
 572015-11-13T05:00:25  <gmaxwell> no, it's done in an odd way that makes mixed systems possible.
 582015-11-13T05:01:09  <gmaxwell> basically there is a seperate bounds table. though dealing with it is still part of the abi.
 592015-11-13T05:02:29  <gmaxwell> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/x86/intel_mpx.txt
 602015-11-13T05:03:33  <Luke-Jr> oh nice, compiling with MPX gracefully noops on old CPUs
 612015-11-13T05:59:30  *** jtimon has quit IRC
 622015-11-13T06:00:06  <CodeShark> if I whitelist a node, other than network/transport issues or misbehaving, is there ever any conceivable situation where the node could get disconnected by bitcoin core
 632015-11-13T06:02:39  <CodeShark> ?
 642015-11-13T06:03:53  <CodeShark> actually, even in the event of misbehaving
 652015-11-13T06:10:47  <cfields> gitian-builders: 0.11.2 detached sigs are pushed
 662015-11-13T06:11:06  <cfields> 0.10.4 is waiting on one more match
 672015-11-13T06:11:46  <fanquake> WIll push up shortly
 682015-11-13T06:11:53  <fanquake> mich is the only one so far?
 692015-11-13T06:13:14  <cfields> his and mine
 702015-11-13T06:13:47  <cfields> er.. i forgot to push
 712015-11-13T06:15:21  <cfields> ok, done
 722015-11-13T06:17:53  *** arowser has quit IRC
 732015-11-13T06:19:15  <fanquake> ok, signed sigs PR'd
 742015-11-13T06:19:24  <fanquake> will build 0.10.4
 752015-11-13T06:20:05  <fanquake> hopefully for the last time..
 762015-11-13T06:20:38  *** jgarzik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 772015-11-13T06:33:55  *** pmienk has quit IRC
 782015-11-13T06:35:42  <Luke-Jr> I wish gitian had a way to pull the yml from the git repo directly, so I didn't need to close out my main git working dir just to build..
 792015-11-13T06:45:43  *** pmienk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 802015-11-13T07:10:58  <fanquake> cfields pushed 0.10.4 sigs
 812015-11-13T07:14:11  <cfields> fanquake: great, thanks! all matches. Pushing up the 10.4 detached sig now
 822015-11-13T07:23:17  <cfields> gitian builders/fanquake: https://bitcoincore.org/cfields/bitcoin-0.10.4/signature.tar.gz
 832015-11-13T07:27:16  <fanquake> cfields great. Sigs PR'd
 842015-11-13T07:29:18  <cfields> fanquake: thanks a bunch. Off to bed now
 852015-11-13T07:43:50  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 862015-11-13T07:49:20  <sipa_> Luke-Jr: you can, i forget how
 872015-11-13T07:49:26  <Luke-Jr> !
 882015-11-13T07:49:57  <sipa_> i wrote a patch for that years ago, which i kept using, but it isn't necessary anymore
 892015-11-13T07:54:00  <gmaxwell> So sipa updated this PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6983  but I can't figure out what changed
 902015-11-13T08:01:43  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 912015-11-13T08:09:00  <sipa_> gmaxwell: i rebased it
 922015-11-13T08:09:22  <sipa_> it conflicted with the PIE change in Makefile.am
 932015-11-13T08:09:50  <sipa_> only the full validation pull conflicted, but Ibdidn't bother looking and rebased both
 942015-11-13T08:16:20  *** mably has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 952015-11-13T08:26:23  *** dcousens has quit IRC
 962015-11-13T08:40:24  *** mably has quit IRC
 972015-11-13T08:40:53  <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli's pgp key isnt signed at all :(
 982015-11-13T08:43:27  *** fkhan has quit IRC
 992015-11-13T08:45:45  *** mably has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1002015-11-13T08:48:30  <wumpus> we should definitely change that
1012015-11-13T08:49:44  *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1022015-11-13T08:56:05  *** fkhan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1032015-11-13T08:56:26  *** pmienk has quit IRC
1042015-11-13T08:56:32  *** aburan28 has quit IRC
1052015-11-13T08:58:53  <BlueMatt> where in .ch is jonasschnelli anyway? could probably go meet up with sipa, if no one else
1062015-11-13T09:00:08  <CodeShark_> in europe, nothing is very far away (except russia) :p
1072015-11-13T09:01:05  <wumpus> he has met up with sipa a few times IIRC
1082015-11-13T09:01:16  <wumpus> and he was in Montreal. I can confirm jonasschnelli is a real person :p
1092015-11-13T09:02:25  *** Arnavion has quit IRC
1102015-11-13T09:02:38  <BlueMatt> wumpus: yes, he was around then
1112015-11-13T09:03:41  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1122015-11-13T09:03:45  <sipa_> BlueMatt: not in Zurich
1132015-11-13T09:04:52  <CodeShark_> there are counties in california with a bigger area than switzerland :p
1142015-11-13T09:05:02  *** mably has quit IRC
1152015-11-13T09:05:35  *** Arnavion has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162015-11-13T09:06:23  <CodeShark_> or at least one county
1172015-11-13T09:06:32  <CodeShark_> san bernadino county is larger than switzerland by area
1182015-11-13T09:08:46  <CodeShark_> incidentally, san francisco is the smallest county in california by area
1192015-11-13T09:11:31  <GitHub86> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/38ed190eefcc...24c4841d1686
1202015-11-13T09:11:31  <GitHub86> bitcoin/master 01afa80 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Remove mention of pulltester from README.md...
1212015-11-13T09:11:32  <GitHub86> bitcoin/master 24c4841 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6998...
1222015-11-13T09:11:41  <GitHub153> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6998: doc: Remove mention of pulltester from README.md (master...2015_11_readme_pull_pulltester) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6998
1232015-11-13T09:12:35  *** pmienk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1242015-11-13T09:35:39  *** jl2012 has quit IRC
1252015-11-13T09:36:08  *** jl2012 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1262015-11-13T09:45:21  *** rubensayshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272015-11-13T09:51:26  *** CodeShark_ has quit IRC
1282015-11-13T10:35:33  *** isis has quit IRC
1292015-11-13T10:45:04  *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1302015-11-13T10:45:12  *** CodeShark_ has quit IRC
1312015-11-13T10:58:29  *** isis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1322015-11-13T11:03:24  <GitHub28> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #7003: doc: Add non-style-related development guidelines (master...2015_11_development_guidelines) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7003
1332015-11-13T11:03:31  <fanquake> Looking forward ot being able to attend one of the meetups some day
1342015-11-13T11:03:43  <wumpus> where are you based fanquake?
1352015-11-13T11:03:53  <fanquake> Western Australia
1362015-11-13T11:04:03  <fanquake> To far away from everywhere
1372015-11-13T11:04:14  <wumpus> whoa, you could say so :)
1382015-11-13T11:05:04  <wumpus> development is pretty distributed over the world as it is, that's nice
1392015-11-13T11:05:08  <fanquake> Yea, even inside West Aus, I used to live on a farm 100km from the nearest city.
1402015-11-13T11:05:30  <fanquake> So building precision agriculture software atm.
1412015-11-13T11:05:56  <fanquake> Only place we wouldn't have a developer might be in asia?
1422015-11-13T11:06:06  <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: yes. I need to get my gpg key signed... will try to get some signatures within the next days.
1432015-11-13T11:06:14  <wumpus> cool. I think agriculture is one place where software can still change a lot
1442015-11-13T11:06:52  <wumpus> did you see my PM about gpg keys jonasschnelli?
1452015-11-13T11:06:53  <fanquake> absolutely, the adoption cycle is quite slow also, lots of oppoutunity for innovation.
1462015-11-13T11:08:05  <wumpus> no I don't think we have anyone in Asia, maybe some drive-by contributores  but no one who stuck around
1472015-11-13T11:34:55  <GitHub106> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #7004: update jonasschnellis gpg key (master...2015/11/signing_key_jonasschnelli) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7004
1482015-11-13T11:36:53  <sdaftuar> \
1492015-11-13T11:40:02  *** d_t has quit IRC
1502015-11-13T11:41:14  <Luke-Jr> jonasschnelli: why a new key? :/
1512015-11-13T11:41:29  <michagogo> Hm, the signer failed on 0.11.2
1522015-11-13T11:41:46  <wumpus> michagogo: what error?
1532015-11-13T11:42:50  <michagogo> tar: signature/osx: Cannot read: Is a directory
1542015-11-13T11:43:14  <michagogo> Maybe it's because I just signed 0.10.4
1552015-11-13T11:43:41  <wumpus> weird - are you using the commands from the right build process, and descriptors from the right version?
1562015-11-13T11:43:42  <michagogo> I rm'd the flag file that tells my script it can reuse the existing target for the mac signer, rerunning now
1572015-11-13T11:44:00  <michagogo> I should be -- I have a script that does all that
1582015-11-13T11:44:15  <michagogo> (checks out the tag, etc)
1592015-11-13T11:44:27  <michagogo> And yeah, I have separate versions for 0.10 and 0.11
1602015-11-13T11:44:47  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: where is the debug file for the test?
1612015-11-13T11:44:48  <michagogo> (I probably could have made it one script, but I was lazy/in a hurry when I made it)
1622015-11-13T11:45:11  <michagogo> Anyway, it's running again now with a fresh vm
1632015-11-13T11:46:05  <wumpus> yes I have a series of scripts for those things too, lots of subtle differenes
1642015-11-13T11:48:09  <michagogo> Hm, wt
1652015-11-13T11:48:10  <michagogo> f
1662015-11-13T11:48:23  <michagogo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/13246889/
1672015-11-13T11:48:47  <michagogo> OH
1682015-11-13T11:48:48  <michagogo> wait
1692015-11-13T11:48:54  * michagogo check something
1702015-11-13T11:48:56  <michagogo> checks*
1712015-11-13T11:49:30  * wumpus blames his lack of ruby chops for, instead of attacking gitian directly, writing tons of wrapper scripts around it :-)
1722015-11-13T11:49:59  <michagogo> Dammit
1732015-11-13T11:50:12  <michagogo> The 0.10 build clobbered the 0.11 unsigned package
1742015-11-13T11:50:28  <michagogo> Got a copy? (don't worry, I'll check the hash)
1752015-11-13T11:50:36  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1762015-11-13T11:51:02  <wumpus> hm not sure I don't have it anymore, which one do you need mac or win or both?
1772015-11-13T11:51:16  <michagogo> Mac
1782015-11-13T11:51:35  <michagogo> (we don't do detached win signing for 0.10, thankfully)
1792015-11-13T11:51:49  <michagogo> fanquake: around?
1802015-11-13T11:52:01  <michagogo> Do you have a copy of the 0.11.2 Mac unsigned tarball?
1812015-11-13T11:52:55  <michagogo> I wish the way gitian did inputs didn't force us to have unversioned filenames
1822015-11-13T11:54:03  <wumpus> agreed
1832015-11-13T11:59:16  *** d_t has quit IRC
1842015-11-13T11:59:32  <Luke-Jr> michagogo: eh, they're not unversioned
1852015-11-13T11:59:35  <Luke-Jr> http://luke.dashjr.org/programs/bitcoin/files/bitcoind/0.11.2/
1862015-11-13T11:59:56  <wumpus> would be nice to fix some long-running complaints about how gitian handles things some time (also the "output files are nuked" on next run), if I wasn't already completely overloaded
1872015-11-13T12:00:12  <wumpus> Luke-Jr: not al, but the intermediate files for signing have to be
1882015-11-13T12:00:31  <michagogo> bitcoin-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
1892015-11-13T12:00:48  <Luke-Jr> the file gitian generates is bitcoin-0.11.2-osx-unsigned.tar.gz
1902015-11-13T12:01:29  <michagogo> The input is unversioned
1912015-11-13T12:01:38  <wumpus> Luke-Jr: you're right
1922015-11-13T12:01:42  <michagogo> Maybe I could move the unsigned bundle,
1932015-11-13T12:01:53  <wumpus> but to copy it into inputs, it needs to be made unversions
1942015-11-13T12:02:01  <michagogo> And then copy it to the generic name prebuild
1952015-11-13T12:02:19  <michagogo> That would probably work, actually
1962015-11-13T12:02:50  <wumpus> 0.11.2 binaries are live: https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.11.2/
1972015-11-13T12:03:43  <Luke-Jr> wumpus: ! but we don't have 3 sigs yet
1982015-11-13T12:03:57  <Luke-Jr> (on the signed bins, that is)
1992015-11-13T12:04:12  <wumpus> OK, won't do the official announcement (and merge it on the site) yet, then
2002015-11-13T12:04:19  <michagogo> Luke-Jr: we will momentarily
2012015-11-13T12:06:08  <michagogo> (Thanks, grabbed the unsigned bundle)
2022015-11-13T12:07:00  <michagogo> wumpus: you could kick off the Travis rebuild on the PR for the site
2032015-11-13T12:09:59  <wumpus> still have to fill in the torrent magnet link anyhow
2042015-11-13T12:10:19  <michagogo> wumpus: can do that after
2052015-11-13T12:10:23  <michagogo> Uh, wtf?
2062015-11-13T12:10:42  <michagogo> gzip: stdin: not in gzip formal
2072015-11-13T12:10:49  <michagogo> Format
2082015-11-13T12:10:59  * michagogo checks something
2092015-11-13T12:11:54  <michagogo> Hmm.
2102015-11-13T12:12:47  <michagogo> Oh, that was me being stupid
2112015-11-13T12:12:52  * michagogo sighs
2122015-11-13T12:13:08  <michagogo> I took the dmg instead of the tarvall
2132015-11-13T12:13:49  <midnightmagic> :-/
2142015-11-13T12:14:01  <midnightmagic> my gitian sigs aren't matching up anymore.
2152015-11-13T12:14:12  <midnightmagic> but I have to go to bed, so I'll debug it tomorrow.
2162015-11-13T12:14:28  <michagogo> Okay, THIS time it should work
2172015-11-13T12:22:51  * michagogo points at the PR page
2182015-11-13T12:27:47  <GitHub22> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/24c4841d1686...d2e987aa1929
2192015-11-13T12:27:48  <GitHub22> bitcoin/master b27e81f MarcoFalke: [net] Cleanup maxuploadtarget...
2202015-11-13T12:27:48  <GitHub22> bitcoin/master 9c3ee3b MarcoFalke: [doc] Add -maxuploadtarget release notes
2212015-11-13T12:27:49  <GitHub22> bitcoin/master d2e987a Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #6958...
2222015-11-13T12:27:52  <GitHub8> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #6958: [trivial] Cleanup maxuploadtarget (doc & log) (master...MarcoFalke-2015-maxupload) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6958
2232015-11-13T12:37:18  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242015-11-13T12:40:27  *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2252015-11-13T13:12:38  <michagogo> Merged \o/
2262015-11-13T13:14:25  <wumpus> yes, sent announcement mail
2272015-11-13T13:16:24  <michagogo> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3snpg9/bitcoin_core_version_0112_released_bringing_the/ as well
2282015-11-13T13:16:44  <michagogo> Erm, oops, forgot the website doesn't update in realtime
2292015-11-13T13:16:54  <wumpus> takes a few minutes at most
2302015-11-13T13:23:59  *** Thireus has quit IRC
2312015-11-13T13:24:34  <wumpus> site is updated
2322015-11-13T13:27:43  <michagogo> Are you opped in #bitcoin?
2332015-11-13T13:27:58  <michagogo> (for the topic)
2342015-11-13T13:37:56  <michagogo> wumpus: hm, my torrent client is telling me the demonii tracker doesn't exist
2352015-11-13T13:40:25  *** sipa_ is now known as sipa
2362015-11-13T13:42:57  <wumpus> "Seeding to 0 of 0 peers" hmm maybe the torrent tracker needs some time to spin up too
2372015-11-13T13:47:30  <wumpus> and all the trackers except tracker.coppersurfer.tk give me "Connection failed"
2382015-11-13T13:50:53  *** sipa has quit IRC
2392015-11-13T13:50:53  *** sipa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2402015-11-13T13:52:22  <fanquake> wumpus Who should be adding their key to trusted-keys?
2412015-11-13T13:52:43  <wumpus> fanquake: people that merge things
2422015-11-13T13:53:37  <fanquake> Is Jonass being given GH merge access?
2432015-11-13T13:53:42  <wumpus> yep
2442015-11-13T13:54:30  <wumpus> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2015-November/011728.html
2452015-11-13T14:29:16  *** jtimon has quit IRC
2462015-11-13T14:30:56  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2472015-11-13T14:40:37  <jonasschnelli> [12:41:14]  <Luke-Jr>	jonasschnelli: why a new key? :/        <-- the new key is not really new, It's just the one that I use for bitcoin-dev posts, etc. The "old" key is used for non-bitcoin software-projects (and sadly, i have used it for gitian signatures)
2482015-11-13T14:47:43  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2492015-11-13T15:11:39  <sdaftuar> Luke-Jr: around?
2502015-11-13T15:16:29  *** Thireus has quit IRC
2512015-11-13T15:21:58  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2522015-11-13T15:25:12  *** zooko has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2532015-11-13T15:25:33  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2542015-11-13T15:33:15  <GitHub147> [bitcoin] jgarzik opened pull request #7005: Add MAINTAINERS file, a user guide to code subsystems (master...2015_maintainer) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7005
2552015-11-13T15:34:19  *** treehug88 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562015-11-13T15:38:38  *** Thireus has quit IRC
2572015-11-13T15:38:46  <GitHub21> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #7006: [Qt] add startup option to reset Qt settings (master...2015/11/qt_resetsettings) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7006
2582015-11-13T15:52:09  <GitHub104> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d2e987aa1929...4f09b77c7fa5
2592015-11-13T15:52:10  <GitHub104> bitcoin/master 1d84107 Pieter Wuille: Squashed 'src/secp256k1/' changes from 22f60a6..2bfb82b...
2602015-11-13T15:52:10  <GitHub104> bitcoin/master 9e475d5 Pieter Wuille: Update libsecp256k1
2612015-11-13T15:52:11  <GitHub104> bitcoin/master 48edf57 Pieter Wuille: Update key.cpp to new secp256k1 API
2622015-11-13T15:52:14  <GitHub8> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #6983: Update libsecp256k1 (master...secp256k1new) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6983
2632015-11-13T15:52:29  <GitHub75> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #7007: Fix bug in unit mempool_tests unit test (master...unitTestBugFix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7007
2642015-11-13T15:54:56  *** fanquake has quit IRC
2652015-11-13T16:06:59  <GitHub121> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #7008: Lower bound priority (master...lowerBoundPriority) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7008
2662015-11-13T16:08:18  <morcos> Luke-Jr: When you get a chance, please see #7008.  I think you had indicated that if at least originally in chain inputs age, that would be close enough.  Upon further reflection, I think this is a much better compromise than trying to put through the full #6357 dynamic priority calculation.  (it's basically a small subset)
2672015-11-13T16:11:19  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: you can set the 'GUI' label yourself now :) say on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7006
2682015-11-13T16:11:52  <jonasschnelli> wumpus: hah. Right. I missed that. Done!
2692015-11-13T16:21:23  <btcdrak> sipa: wonderful!
2702015-11-13T16:46:41  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2712015-11-13T17:04:19  *** rubensayshi has quit IRC
2722015-11-13T17:22:35  *** Thireus has quit IRC
2732015-11-13T17:37:58  <GitHub165> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/4f09b77c7fa5...d3565604e3d9
2742015-11-13T17:37:58  <GitHub165> bitcoin/master a78e6ea Alex Morcos: Fix bug in mempool_tests unit test
2752015-11-13T17:37:59  <GitHub165> bitcoin/master d356560 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7007...
2762015-11-13T17:38:08  <GitHub155> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7007: Fix bug in mempool_tests unit test (master...unitTestBugFix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7007
2772015-11-13T17:55:53  *** zooko has quit IRC
2782015-11-13T18:24:49  *** zooko has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2792015-11-13T19:08:32  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar:
2802015-11-13T19:09:49  <sdaftuar> Luke-Jr: i wanted to follow up on the issue you reported with that bip65-cltv-p2p test this morning.  i updated the issue with my observations
2812015-11-13T19:10:33  <Luke-Jr> k, catching up on emails now, so I haven't seen it yet
2822015-11-13T19:15:53  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2832015-11-13T19:21:02  <Luke-Jr> sdaftuar: I don't have any env vars set related to Bitcoin
2842015-11-13T19:21:28  <sdaftuar> odd.  any ideas why it's running the wrong binary?
2852015-11-13T19:21:42  <Luke-Jr> maybe because the build never puts bitcoind in the checkout dir..
2862015-11-13T19:21:52  <Luke-Jr> why is that the default?
2872015-11-13T19:22:10  <sdaftuar> er, i think i meant checkout-dir/src
2882015-11-13T19:22:23  <sdaftuar> anyway not sure, that's how all the rpc tests have ever worked as far as i know
2892015-11-13T19:22:43  <Luke-Jr> well, setting BITCOIND to $PWD/src/bitcoind fixes it
2902015-11-13T19:23:12  <sdaftuar> ok cool
2912015-11-13T19:23:45  <sdaftuar> oh -- i think you're supposed to run the rpc-tests from the rpc-tests directory.  does that also fix it?
2922015-11-13T19:25:42  * Luke-Jr waits for his new build to finish to test that
2932015-11-13T19:26:27  *** zooko has quit IRC
2942015-11-13T19:32:36  <GitHub138> [bitcoin] gmaxwell pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/dbd2c135ddb96bdc3a4e870c2371cb1fac227135
2952015-11-13T19:32:36  <GitHub138> bitcoin/master dbd2c13 Gregory Maxwell: Merge pull request #6990...
2962015-11-13T19:32:43  <GitHub117> [bitcoin] gmaxwell closed pull request #6990: http: speed up shutdown (master...2015_11_threadexit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6990
2972015-11-13T19:37:57  *** d_t has quit IRC
2982015-11-13T19:40:54  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2992015-11-13T19:43:11  <gmaxwell> Is the torcontrol port password basically ever empty?
3002015-11-13T20:02:00  <morcos> I asked this in bitcion-mining but got no response.  I'm 95% sure this couldn't have been caused by my changes to CreateNewBlock, but of the 20 testnet blocks I mined, one was invalid
3012015-11-13T20:02:15  <morcos> ERROR: CheckBlock(): hashMerkleRoot mismatch
3022015-11-13T20:02:28  <morcos> Anybody have any idea why that might have happened?
3032015-11-13T20:02:55  <morcos> It was invalid after being submitted by the miner, not in the TestBlockValidity from CreateNewBlock
3042015-11-13T20:02:55  <gmaxwell> eerk
3052015-11-13T20:03:27  <morcos> yeah thats kind of my response
3062015-11-13T20:03:29  <gmaxwell> Not a known behavior. Possibly that the transmission from the miner got truncated?
3072015-11-13T20:03:38  <gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: seen anything like that? ^
3082015-11-13T20:43:11  *** zooko has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3092015-11-13T20:46:22  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3102015-11-13T20:55:24  <GitHub157> [bitcoin] petertodd opened pull request #7010: Fix fundrawtransaction handling of includeWatching (master...2015-11-fix-fundrawtransaction-bugs) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7010
3112015-11-13T21:16:32  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
3122015-11-13T21:17:12  *** treehug88 has quit IRC
3132015-11-13T21:20:14  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
3142015-11-13T21:24:21  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3152015-11-13T21:25:39  <phantomcircuit> morcos, what where you using to mine?
3162015-11-13T21:25:54  <morcos> phantomcircuit: antminer s7
3172015-11-13T21:26:19  <kanzure> BlueMatt: strange that fundrawtransaction with watchonlys/includewatching has been so difficult to get correct
3182015-11-13T21:26:34  <kanzure> BlueMatt: maybe we're trying to stuff too much into that function
3192015-11-13T21:27:05  <phantomcircuit> morcos, what stratum software?
3202015-11-13T21:27:22  <phantomcircuit> unless you were running bfgminer w/ getblocktemplate you need something else in the middle
3212015-11-13T21:27:28  <BlueMatt> kanzure: hmm? the latest bugs have been in the rpc wrapper for the function
3222015-11-13T21:27:30  <morcos> phantomcircuit: i was using the installed cgminer 4.8 to connect directly to bitcoind
3232015-11-13T21:27:35  <BlueMatt> kanzure: the actual function was rather doable
3242015-11-13T21:27:48  <kanzure> BlueMatt: well, ok. fair. comment rescinded.
3252015-11-13T21:27:53  <morcos> it seems to support getblocktemplate
3262015-11-13T21:27:59  <BlueMatt> kanzure: and, really, there's only been one actual bug? (the assume-if-argument-bool-is-true)
3272015-11-13T21:28:14  <phantomcircuit> morcos, i doubt very much that cgminer correctly implements getblocktemplate
3282015-11-13T21:28:29  <kanzure> BlueMatt: the previous implementation had some issues too. but your version fixed those.
3292015-11-13T21:28:49  <kanzure> BlueMatt: but yes your point about the rpc wrapper is sufficient to explain this.
3302015-11-13T21:28:52  <gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: would be useful to know how it doesn't assuming it doesn't.
3312015-11-13T21:29:10  <morcos> phantomcircuit: ok...  maybe i'll stick some stratum software in the middle then and try that instead.  what would you recommend
3322015-11-13T21:29:15  <gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: not just cgminer but whatever is on the miner, dunno about s7 but prior ones have all been really old versions.
3332015-11-13T21:29:19  <phantomcircuit> morcos, need a tcpdump of the rpc calls to diagnose
3342015-11-13T21:30:19  <phantomcircuit> morcos, eloipool
3352015-11-13T21:30:31  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
3362015-11-13T21:30:32  <BlueMatt> kanzure: yea, the previous version did, but thats what code review is for :) (it forces us to not implement hacky things and to do it The Right Way (tm) so that we fix subtle bugs)
3372015-11-13T21:30:50  <morcos> phantomcircuit: i was trying to play around with that, and the debugging from cgminer is either a flood or nothing useful.   now i'm hacking up bitcoind to try to just dump any submitted blocks anyway, so if it happens again i can manually inspect the block
3382015-11-13T21:31:24  <morcos> for what its worth, it mostly seems to mine fine
3392015-11-13T21:31:30  <Luke-Jr> morcos: cgminer's GBT "support" is /probably/ broken
3402015-11-13T21:31:32  <gmaxwell> morcos: might be a worthwhile thing to just support as an option. savesubmitblocks=1
3412015-11-13T21:32:06  <Luke-Jr> morcos: I'd suggest BFGMiner over Eloipool FWIW
3422015-11-13T21:32:08  <phantomcircuit> morcos, to debug i'd also need the block templates though, so a tcpdump would be best
3432015-11-13T21:32:09  <morcos> gmaxwell: ha ha, well i'll let someone else write that, my version has already coredumped a few times
3442015-11-13T21:32:46  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3452015-11-13T21:33:13  <morcos> phantomcircuit: ok, well its not happening often enough for that right now.. maybe i'll hack up something to decrease the difficulty or do somehting on regtest, but at this point its all going to have to wait for next week
3462015-11-13T21:33:41  <morcos> thanks for your help... i'll ping you when i have more info.   also.  stop orphaning my testnet blocks!
3472015-11-13T21:34:08  <phantomcircuit> morcos, ha
3482015-11-13T21:34:36  <phantomcircuit> an excellent demonstration of what low block intervals do to centralization :P
3492015-11-13T21:39:05  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
3502015-11-13T21:39:44  <GitHub38> [bitcoin] petertodd opened pull request #7011: Add mediantime to getblockchaininfo (master...2015-11-add-mediantime-to-getblockchaininfo) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7011
3512015-11-13T21:40:56  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3522015-11-13T21:43:25  *** skyraider has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3532015-11-13T21:43:55  *** bsm1175321 has quit IRC
3542015-11-13T21:44:11  *** bsm1175321 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3552015-11-13T21:50:32  *** molly has quit IRC
3562015-11-13T21:52:03  *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3572015-11-13T21:55:15  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
3582015-11-13T22:09:07  <morcos> Luke-Jr: any chance you got to look at 7008?
3592015-11-13T22:09:45  <morcos> I'm hoping you are ok with closing the dynamicPriority pull (6357) and focusing attention on something more likely to be ok with everyone
3602015-11-13T22:10:16  <Luke-Jr> morcos: not planning to, as I strongly prefer #6357
3612015-11-13T22:10:33  <phantomcircuit> CodeShark, can you comment on issue 7012 ?
3622015-11-13T22:10:50  <morcos> Luke-Jr: hmm, ok then maybe i misunderstood you the other day
3632015-11-13T22:11:16  <Luke-Jr> morcos: I may have said something suggesting this, before I understood 6357 to be inexpensive
3642015-11-13T22:11:41  <morcos> I thought you did not like using starting priority as an approximation, but that you thought priority where aging did happen but only affected originally confirmed inputs was ok
3652015-11-13T22:12:09  <Luke-Jr> morcos: it's okay, if the alternative is expensive.
3662015-11-13T22:12:21  <Luke-Jr> but if it's not expensive, there is no reason to cheat on it
3672015-11-13T22:12:46  <morcos> Luke-Jr: well fundamentally part of my problem is just merge conflicts
3682015-11-13T22:13:03  <morcos> I want to fix the issue you pointed out with sigops having a default value
3692015-11-13T22:13:22  <morcos> but both priority pulls and sdaftuars mempool reorg pull all change the signature of TxMemPoolEntry constructor
3702015-11-13T22:13:26  <Luke-Jr> morcos: my plan right now, is to deep-review 6357 and write tests (unless you get to that first)
3712015-11-13T22:13:48  <morcos> 6357 is tested by having the priority recalced in mempool.check
3722015-11-13T22:14:02  <morcos> but yes more tests couldn't hurt
3732015-11-13T22:14:32  <Luke-Jr> morcos: I mean unit tests
3742015-11-13T22:14:36  <Luke-Jr> something Travis will detect breaking
3752015-11-13T22:15:05  <morcos> If I rebased 6357 on top of 7008, would you be willing to get 7008 merged.  its really a precursor anyway, and the change to the constructor is the same.
3762015-11-13T22:15:49  <morcos> i'm going away at the end of next week, and i need to get all these merge conflicts sorted so we can get the createnewblock pull merged
3772015-11-13T22:16:43  <morcos> i'm perfectly happy with 6357, but lets not let the perfect be the enemy of the good..  getting 7008 in at least lets us do everything else.  if we also get 6357, then great. but we haven't held up progress
3782015-11-13T22:21:10  <GitHub74> [bitcoin] petertodd opened pull request #7013: Remove LOCK(cs_main) from decodescript (master...2015-11-remove-cs-main-from-decodescript) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7013
3792015-11-13T22:34:29  <Luke-Jr> morcos: I'm not willing to ACK the createnewblock pull until 6357 is merged, so I'm not sure what the point is.
3802015-11-13T22:34:56  <Luke-Jr> rebasing 6357 on top of 7008 may be better just structually though
3812015-11-13T22:35:43  *** bsm1175321 has quit IRC
3822015-11-13T22:42:30  <morcos> Luke-Jr: I'm not sure whether or not 6357 will get merged.  If not, the original plan was to put createnewblock pull back to the way I first had it.  so it still calls the CCoinsViewCache GetPriority function which is right but slow.
3832015-11-13T22:42:55  <morcos> this will preserve the ability to do old policy, but limit a significant part of the speed up to code that does not use that policy
3842015-11-13T22:44:19  <morcos> to be clear, i'm happy for you or anyone else to appropriate the pulls and do the right thing, but i won't be around to make the changes past the first 4 days of next week
3852015-11-13T22:44:39  <morcos> so i'd like to leave things in the most likely to be merged state before that point.
3862015-11-13T22:45:45  <Luke-Jr> morcos: maybe push branches for each possibility, and I'll do what I can to keep things moving?
3872015-11-13T22:47:02  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
3882015-11-13T22:48:46  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3892015-11-13T22:55:28  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
3902015-11-13T22:56:06  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3912015-11-13T22:56:33  *** zooko has quit IRC
3922015-11-13T23:07:05  *** d_t has quit IRC
3932015-11-13T23:07:29  *** bitdevsnyc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3942015-11-13T23:08:21  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3952015-11-13T23:46:45  *** bitdevsnyc has quit IRC
3962015-11-13T23:47:27  *** d_t has quit IRC
3972015-11-13T23:52:02  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3982015-11-13T23:52:18  *** skyraider has quit IRC