1 2016-11-27T00:00:12  <parsimony_> hi Bitcoin Core devs and affiliated parties... has anyone with some reputation considered offering the big-blockists a method of saving face while coming around to support Segwit?
  2 2016-11-27T00:01:05  <parsimony_> They might actually *want* to support it but can't do to the need to have an out that will allow the saving of face
  3 2016-11-27T00:01:46  <parsimony_> i thought this would be the most appropriate forum for floating this kind of suggestion, i dunno
  4 2016-11-27T00:09:58  <BashCo_> I'm seeing people just look into the benefits for themselves instead of listening to bad info. Most people just want more tx capacity and they don't care about the details. Segwit will increase tx volume more than BIP109 and is backward compatible.
  5 2016-11-27T00:10:27  <BashCo_> https://bitcoincore.org/en/2016/01/26/segwit-benefits/
  6 2016-11-27T00:10:27  <BashCo_> https://medium.com/@WhalePanda/segwit-eli5-misinformation-faq-19908ceacf23#.sri28gl23
  7 2016-11-27T00:10:46  <luke-jr> parsimony_: off-topic here, #bitcoin
  8 2016-11-27T00:14:08  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  9 2016-11-27T00:18:24  *** parsimony_ has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 10 2016-11-27T00:31:22  *** roidster has quit IRC
 11 2016-11-27T00:39:16  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] mruddy closed pull request #9180: WIP: remove script checking dependency on checkpoints v2 (master...isburied) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9180
 12 2016-11-27T00:47:14  *** wasi has quit IRC
 13 2016-11-27T00:47:24  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 14 2016-11-27T01:01:30  *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 15 2016-11-27T01:23:16  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 16 2016-11-27T01:33:33  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 17 2016-11-27T01:36:26  *** dervisher has quit IRC
 18 2016-11-27T01:48:53  *** juscamarena has quit IRC
 19 2016-11-27T01:50:45  *** juscamarena has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 20 2016-11-27T02:15:47  <dcousens> https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/5f23kk/can_i_selectively_pay_segwitsignalling_miners_a/dah0w7m/ - an interesting thought... if that was soft-forked in, would it have any negative implications?  It would allow the economic majority to vote with fees no?
 21 2016-11-27T02:16:03  <dcousens> (may be the wrong channel... #bitcoin?)
 22 2016-11-27T02:16:48  <gmaxwell> bad incentives, signal segwit, take the fees, don't actually enforce it later.
 23 2016-11-27T02:17:33  <dcousens> if you signal though, it would still trigged BIP9 though?
 24 2016-11-27T02:17:38  <dcousens> trigger*
 25 2016-11-27T02:18:01  <sipa> dcousens: we don't want BIP9 to trigger if isn't actually enforced...
 26 2016-11-27T02:19:08  <dcousens> sipa: so the concern would be miners not producing segwit blocks after activation?
 27 2016-11-27T02:19:13  <dcousens> (for example)
 28 2016-11-27T02:20:22  <dcousens> I mean, wouldn't the fee market carry it on past that point,  you'd miss out on fees post-activation since you wouldn't be able to include certain transactions without segwit blocks?
 29 2016-11-27T02:26:31  <gmaxwell> People, perhaps even you, are mistaking version bits for a vote.  It isn't from an engineering perspective, and can't be. A vote is a statement of what you want. What versionbits are attempting to do is quorum sensing-- trying to determine what you will do-- so that all participants can do it at once.   For it to achieve its end there should be little to no incentive to dishonestly signal it.
 30 2016-11-27T02:28:06  <gmaxwell> If in my efforts to contact users of the system or the mailing list thread had indicated that it wasn't universally (or nearly so) wanted, I would have opposed including it. The assumption is that it's wanted. Purpose of BIP9 is so that it will only happen once miners would actually enforce it.
 31 2016-11-27T02:42:40  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
 32 2016-11-27T02:56:24  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] gmaxwell opened pull request #9226: Remove fNetworkNode. (master...node_is_this_i_dont_even) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9226
 33 2016-11-27T03:31:00  <luke-jr> if it was just a minor fee difference, it might be little enough to not produce too-bad false-signal incentives, but rejecting the entire tx is too much IMO
 34 2016-11-27T03:41:18  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] pstratem opened pull request #9227: Make nWalletDBUpdated atomic to avoid a potential race. (master...2016-11-26-nwalletdbupdated-race) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9227
 35 2016-11-27T03:43:23  <luke-jr> (especially if it can function inverted)
 36 2016-11-27T03:53:08  *** harrymm has quit IRC
 37 2016-11-27T03:56:12  *** jcorgan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 38 2016-11-27T03:57:06  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 39 2016-11-27T03:58:12  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 40 2016-11-27T03:59:23  *** fengling has quit IRC
 41 2016-11-27T04:13:38  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 42 2016-11-27T04:16:41  *** justan0theruser has quit IRC
 43 2016-11-27T04:26:55  *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 44 2016-11-27T04:27:24  <dcousens> gmaxwell: I understand it isn't a vote,  but,  it is my understanding that the 'economic consensus' should guide the miners into what they should support (political incentives aside),  my point in referencing the above was to discuss the idea of how users could help inform miners, economically, what they wanted to be using [and be supported]
 45 2016-11-27T04:28:36  <gmaxwell> Sure. but they can send email-- point being, gimmicks are no good if they create bad incentives.
 46 2016-11-27T04:57:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 47 2016-11-27T04:58:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 48 2016-11-27T04:58:37  *** kadoban has quit IRC
 49 2016-11-27T05:03:38  *** gijensen has quit IRC
 50 2016-11-27T05:29:02  *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
 51 2016-11-27T05:30:08  *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 52 2016-11-27T05:40:54  *** arowser has quit IRC
 53 2016-11-27T05:41:15  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 54 2016-11-27T05:44:35  *** arowser has quit IRC
 55 2016-11-27T05:45:50  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 56 2016-11-27T05:53:00  *** go1111111 has quit IRC
 57 2016-11-27T05:59:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 58 2016-11-27T06:00:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 59 2016-11-27T06:18:10  *** jtimon has quit IRC
 60 2016-11-27T06:47:01  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 61 2016-11-27T06:47:29  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
 62 2016-11-27T06:50:49  *** sanada has quit IRC
 63 2016-11-27T06:59:06  *** sanada has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 64 2016-11-27T07:27:16  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 65 2016-11-27T07:28:21  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 66 2016-11-27T07:36:13  *** wvr has quit IRC
 67 2016-11-27T07:37:48  *** wvr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 68 2016-11-27T07:41:06  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 69 2016-11-27T07:42:12  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 70 2016-11-27T08:19:56  *** Atomicat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 71 2016-11-27T08:25:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 72 2016-11-27T08:26:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 73 2016-11-27T08:40:22  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 74 2016-11-27T08:44:02  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 75 2016-11-27T08:45:07  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 76 2016-11-27T08:45:37  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 77 2016-11-27T08:45:47  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 78 2016-11-27T08:45:48  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 79 2016-11-27T08:53:48  *** Atomicat has quit IRC
 80 2016-11-27T08:59:23  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 81 2016-11-27T08:59:49  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 82 2016-11-27T08:59:49  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 83 2016-11-27T09:00:12  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 84 2016-11-27T09:01:17  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 85 2016-11-27T09:04:38  *** Atomicat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 86 2016-11-27T09:13:21  *** Atomicat_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 87 2016-11-27T09:13:30  *** gribble has quit IRC
 88 2016-11-27T09:15:03  *** Atomicat has quit IRC
 89 2016-11-27T09:15:04  *** Atomicat_ is now known as Atomicat
 90 2016-11-27T09:15:39  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 91 2016-11-27T09:19:02  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 92 2016-11-27T09:20:07  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 93 2016-11-27T09:24:56  *** gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 94 2016-11-27T09:40:06  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 95 2016-11-27T09:41:11  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 96 2016-11-27T09:41:38  *** moli has quit IRC
 97 2016-11-27T09:41:44  *** molz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 98 2016-11-27T09:45:56  *** To7 has quit IRC
 99 2016-11-27T10:14:38  *** shepo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
100 2016-11-27T10:45:38  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
101 2016-11-27T11:02:33  *** harrymm has quit IRC
102 2016-11-27T11:23:00  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
103 2016-11-27T11:40:01  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
104 2016-11-27T11:52:54  *** e4xit has quit IRC
105 2016-11-27T11:53:17  *** e4xit has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
106 2016-11-27T12:17:17  *** Anduck_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
107 2016-11-27T12:17:42  *** Anduck_ has quit IRC
108 2016-11-27T12:24:16  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
109 2016-11-27T12:42:36  *** shepo has quit IRC
110 2016-11-27T13:09:43  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
111 2016-11-27T13:32:54  *** dcousens has quit IRC
112 2016-11-27T13:34:56  *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
113 2016-11-27T13:47:52  *** Atomicat_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
114 2016-11-27T13:49:25  *** Atomicat has quit IRC
115 2016-11-27T13:51:18  *** Atomicat__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
116 2016-11-27T13:51:18  *** Atomicat__ is now known as Atomicat
117 2016-11-27T13:53:36  *** Atomicat_ has quit IRC
118 2016-11-27T13:56:18  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
119 2016-11-27T13:59:16  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/76fec09d878d...c4522e71c7e1
120 2016-11-27T13:59:16  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master dd34570 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Improve windows build instructions using Linux subsystem...
121 2016-11-27T13:59:17  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c4522e7 MarcoFalke: Merge #9219: doc: Improve windows build instructions using Linux subsystem...
122 2016-11-27T13:59:24  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9219: doc: Improve windows build instructions using Linux subsystem (master...2016_11_windows_build_update) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9219
123 2016-11-27T14:05:59  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
124 2016-11-27T14:26:30  *** GalvaNation has quit IRC
125 2016-11-27T14:46:59  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
126 2016-11-27T15:22:33  *** harrymm has quit IRC
127 2016-11-27T15:25:59  *** MarcoFalke has left #bitcoin-core-dev
128 2016-11-27T15:28:18  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
129 2016-11-27T15:31:32  *** Atomicat has quit IRC
130 2016-11-27T15:31:37  *** Atomicat_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
131 2016-11-27T15:31:39  *** Atomicat_ is now known as Atomicat
132 2016-11-27T15:39:48  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
133 2016-11-27T15:41:03  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
134 2016-11-27T15:43:07  *** dcousens has quit IRC
135 2016-11-27T15:56:04  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
136 2016-11-27T16:06:47  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
137 2016-11-27T16:16:15  *** shesek has quit IRC
138 2016-11-27T16:20:32  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
139 2016-11-27T16:20:36  *** cryptapus is now known as cryptapus_afk
140 2016-11-27T16:33:39  *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
141 2016-11-27T16:48:26  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
142 2016-11-27T16:50:26  *** adiabat has quit IRC
143 2016-11-27T17:46:40  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
144 2016-11-27T18:00:37  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
145 2016-11-27T18:29:45  *** mol has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
146 2016-11-27T18:32:35  *** molz has quit IRC
147 2016-11-27T18:45:37  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
148 2016-11-27T18:55:45  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
149 2016-11-27T19:11:15  *** adiabat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
150 2016-11-27T19:16:25  *** To7 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
151 2016-11-27T19:34:27  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
152 2016-11-27T20:14:10  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
153 2016-11-27T20:43:34  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9229: Remove calls to getaddrinfo_a (master...2016-11-gai) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9229
154 2016-11-27T20:48:35  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
155 2016-11-27T20:52:32  *** wvr has quit IRC
156 2016-11-27T20:53:17  *** wvr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
157 2016-11-27T20:58:49  *** cheese_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
158 2016-11-27T20:58:56  *** wvr has left #bitcoin-core-dev
159 2016-11-27T21:02:41  *** wvr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
160 2016-11-27T21:10:37  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
161 2016-11-27T21:45:24  *** cysm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
162 2016-11-27T22:00:41  *** cheese_ has quit IRC
163 2016-11-27T22:57:47  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
164 2016-11-27T23:08:41  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
165 2016-11-27T23:08:43  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
166 2016-11-27T23:11:48  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
167 2016-11-27T23:19:18  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
168 2016-11-27T23:25:09  *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
169 2016-11-27T23:35:17  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
170 2016-11-27T23:37:29  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9230: Fix some benign races in timestamp logging (master...2016-11-loglocks) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9230
171 2016-11-27T23:40:03  *** cysm has quit IRC
172 2016-11-27T23:40:53  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
173 2016-11-27T23:40:53  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
174 2016-11-27T23:40:53  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
175 2016-11-27T23:41:43  <BlueMatt> cfields (or someone with more autotols knowledge) want to look at #9229? build fails on windows but autotools looks like it should detect when inet_pton doesnt exist and then ifdef it out?
176 2016-11-27T23:41:44  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9229 | Remove calls to getaddrinfo_a by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9229 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
177 2016-11-27T23:50:22  <gmaxwell> why were we even using the async call there if it had an ifdef fallback to the non-async call?
178 2016-11-27T23:51:20  <BlueMatt> i mean that pr could result in longer shutdown times if your dns server hangs......
179 2016-11-27T23:51:42  <BlueMatt> but, yea, i dont see much reason
180 2016-11-27T23:52:45  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
181 2016-11-27T23:55:47  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC