1 2017-01-02T00:52:26  *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  2 2017-01-02T00:52:57  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
  3 2017-01-02T00:58:55  *** droark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  4 2017-01-02T01:37:26  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  5 2017-01-02T02:14:28  *** windsok has quit IRC
  6 2017-01-02T02:51:32  *** windsok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  7 2017-01-02T02:55:39  <da2ce7> Happy new year! :)
  8 2017-01-02T03:03:48  *** harrymm has quit IRC
  9 2017-01-02T03:22:42  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 10 2017-01-02T04:12:53  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 11 2017-01-02T04:15:01  *** shockoo has quit IRC
 12 2017-01-02T04:29:59  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 13 2017-01-02T05:17:01  *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
 14 2017-01-02T05:18:08  *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 15 2017-01-02T05:34:38  *** cannon-c has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 16 2017-01-02T05:43:26  *** harrymm has quit IRC
 17 2017-01-02T05:44:38  *** Squidicc is now known as squidicuz
 18 2017-01-02T06:04:04  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 19 2017-01-02T06:48:03  <btcdrak> wumpus: can we tag 0.13.2? :-)
 20 2017-01-02T07:32:13  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 21 2017-01-02T07:32:48  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 22 2017-01-02T07:48:16  *** Saucery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 23 2017-01-02T08:09:07  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 24 2017-01-02T08:09:46  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 25 2017-01-02T08:13:47  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 26 2017-01-02T08:30:06  *** blur3d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 27 2017-01-02T08:30:46  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 28 2017-01-02T08:31:09  *** Saucery has quit IRC
 29 2017-01-02T08:35:37  *** Saucery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 30 2017-01-02T08:36:09  *** BashCo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 31 2017-01-02T08:37:30  <wumpus> btcdrak: yes
 32 2017-01-02T08:37:44  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/1d2d67692c74a5539f3736754d84f0aa6a702c56
 33 2017-01-02T08:37:44  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1d2d676 Wladimir J. van der Laan: qt: Set transifex slug to 0.14...
 34 2017-01-02T08:38:58  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 35 2017-01-02T08:43:44  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli pushed 4 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/1d2d67692c74...53442af0aac3
 36 2017-01-02T08:43:45  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 09aefb5 Cory Fields: build: Fix 'make deploy' for OSX...
 37 2017-01-02T08:43:45  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b01667c Jonas Schnelli: Mention RSVG dependency when creating the disk image on OSX
 38 2017-01-02T08:43:46  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 2fb98f6 Don Patterson: Fix bug in dmg builder so that it actually reads in the configuration file
 39 2017-01-02T08:44:02  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli closed pull request #9412: build: Fix 'make deploy' for OSX (master...2016/12/fix_mac_deploy) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9412
 40 2017-01-02T08:52:03  *** udiWertheimer has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 41 2017-01-02T08:55:11  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to 0.13: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/0d719145b018e28d48d35c2646a5962b87c60436
 42 2017-01-02T08:55:12  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/0.13 0d71914 Wladimir J. van der Laan: doc: Remove ... from release notes
 43 2017-01-02T08:57:35  <wumpus>  * [new tag]         v0.13.2 -> v0.13.2
 44 2017-01-02T09:09:37  *** droark has quit IRC
 45 2017-01-02T09:09:46  <jonasschnelli> \o/
 46 2017-01-02T09:11:09  *** blur3d has quit IRC
 47 2017-01-02T09:11:17  <wumpus> *almost* new year tag :p
 48 2017-01-02T09:13:46  *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 49 2017-01-02T09:24:28  <jouke_> I updated a .10 node to .13.1. It connects to an other .13.1 node, but it doesn't seem to sync the blockchain. But when I look at the blockheight, it might already got "stuck" when it was a .10 node. I updated it, because some rpc calls were a bit slow.
 50 2017-01-02T09:27:49  <jouke_> In debug log I see that it is receiving "invs".
 51 2017-01-02T09:35:36  <gmaxwell> jouke_: if you were stuck it is presumably because corruption made you reject a block. you can try running 'reconsiderblock <block hash after your current height>'
 52 2017-01-02T09:40:09  <jouke_> I retreived the blockhash from an other node, but that doesn't seem to do anything.
 53 2017-01-02T09:42:22  <gmaxwell> jouke_: I assume you don't have historic logs from the point where it got stuck?
 54 2017-01-02T09:42:40  <jouke_> no, I don't unfortunately
 55 2017-01-02T09:46:14  <jouke_> It just received information about the latest block and I see it is retreiving and receiving the headers of that block, but that's it.
 56 2017-01-02T09:48:55  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 57 2017-01-02T09:52:20  <jouke_> Hmm, we use that node to gather information about mempool size, and it stopped accepting blocks at around the 29th, but it did receive transactions which it added to it's mempool.
 58 2017-01-02T09:53:08  <gmaxwell> jouke_: do you have logs that cover the 29th?
 59 2017-01-02T09:54:22  <jouke_> no
 60 2017-01-02T09:59:07  <gmaxwell> the reconsiderblock did nothing? can you try invalidateblock <thatblock> then reconsider?
 61 2017-01-02T09:59:44  <gmaxwell> can you also run getchaintips and pastebin the results?
 62 2017-01-02T09:59:56  <jouke_> And thatblock = currentheight+1 right?
 63 2017-01-02T10:00:11  <gmaxwell> right what is your current height?
 64 2017-01-02T10:00:32  <jouke_> It's stuck at 445623
 65 2017-01-02T10:01:15  <gmaxwell> can you getblockhash for 445623 ?
 66 2017-01-02T10:02:12  <jouke_> 000000000000000002c45ed9057608b268a447499fcd8bea8e7930bfed11eaaf
 67 2017-01-02T10:03:27  <gmaxwell> jouke_: okay run reconsiderblock 000000000000000000fc97c4cd1f956f46a420536ca4851c31ad9d32f4e8ec0c
 68 2017-01-02T10:03:57  <jouke_> already did that
 69 2017-01-02T10:04:01  <jouke_> Didn't do anything
 70 2017-01-02T10:04:34  <gmaxwell> jouke_: can you try doing a getblock 000000000000000000fc97c4cd1f956f46a420536ca4851c31ad9d32f4e8ec0c and see if it says anything?  grep your logs for that hash and see if there is any mention?
 71 2017-01-02T10:05:06  <gmaxwell> unfortunately I think there are types of rejection that reconsider will not reconsider, it's really just intended to be the compliment to invalidateblock
 72 2017-01-02T10:05:41  <jouke_> error code: -32603
 73 2017-01-02T10:05:41  <jouke_> error message:
 74 2017-01-02T10:05:42  <jouke_> Can't read block from disk
 75 2017-01-02T10:06:24  <jouke_> chaintips: https://www.zerobin.net/?70af58e5db340709#1i/w7FQhQE0ubu1+9QO5ANJPRSJ+V24C0LgiYVl15gU=
 76 2017-01-02T10:06:26  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1 | JSON-RPC support for mobile devices ("ultra-lightweight" clients) · Issue #1 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
 77 2017-01-02T10:07:29  <gmaxwell> jouke_: okay your blockchain data is corrupted. the block isn't on your disk (or is corrupted on disk) but is in the blockindex.
 78 2017-01-02T10:08:41  <jouke_> Hmm. nothing strange in syslog about file corruption or anything.
 79 2017-01-02T10:09:52  <gmaxwell> any chance you had a unclean power loss? the block isn't added into the block index until its written to disk and fsynced, but if your system is ignoring fsyncs or there is some other misbehavior in your storage it could be lost during a power failure.
 80 2017-01-02T10:10:30  <jouke_> no, system has been up for a whie
 81 2017-01-02T10:10:31  <jouke_> while
 82 2017-01-02T10:10:53  <gmaxwell> oh this was 0.10 before?
 83 2017-01-02T10:10:57  <jouke_> yes
 84 2017-01-02T10:11:02  <gmaxwell> ah ha.
 85 2017-01-02T10:11:24  <gmaxwell> I believe we actually had a bug that could cause that before.
 86 2017-01-02T10:12:09  <jouke_> I was already looking through the issues, but I did not come across it yet.
 87 2017-01-02T10:13:28  <gmaxwell> jouke_: in any case, I believe there is no other resolution right now to your condition but to reindex.  setting a higher dbcache than default, if you have the ram will make it run much faster.
 88 2017-01-02T10:14:33  <jouke_> Shame I don't have the logs. I am making a note to push all bitcoin node logs to a log server.
 89 2017-01-02T10:14:47  <jouke_> gmaxwell: thanks for the help!
 90 2017-01-02T10:22:40  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 91 2017-01-02T10:22:48  *** BashCo_ has quit IRC
 92 2017-01-02T10:23:22  *** BashCo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 93 2017-01-02T10:27:01  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 94 2017-01-02T10:27:57  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 95 2017-01-02T10:28:36  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 96 2017-01-02T10:33:36  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 97 2017-01-02T11:36:11  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #9457: WIP: [qt] translate bitcoin.cpp and libbitcoin_common_a_SOURCES (master...Mf1701-qtTrans) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9457
 98 2017-01-02T12:04:30  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 99 2017-01-02T12:44:47  *** JackH has quit IRC
100 2017-01-02T12:52:07  <jonasschnelli> Hmm... full block SPV with random peers is horrible slow. 10-12 blocks per minute around height 445100
101 2017-01-02T12:52:20  <jonasschnelli> (on a 100MBit link)
102 2017-01-02T12:52:46  <jonasschnelli> Maybe I just had bad luck with remote peers
103 2017-01-02T12:52:50  <gmaxwell> increase your socket recieve buffer maximum size.
104 2017-01-02T12:53:09  <gmaxwell> by like a factor of 10, you'll likely see it much faster.
105 2017-01-02T12:53:36  <gmaxwell> Does your fetching code fetch in parallel?
106 2017-01-02T12:54:18  <jonasschnelli> Yes. Same code.
107 2017-01-02T12:54:26  <jonasschnelli> Maybe I need to unset NODE_NETWORK?
108 2017-01-02T12:54:37  <jonasschnelli> debug=net shows plenty of tx invs
109 2017-01-02T12:55:48  <gmaxwell> increase your socket recieve buffer maximum size.
110 2017-01-02T12:56:50  <gmaxwell> One problem (no doubt there is more) is that it cannot achieve high throughput for transfers because the recieve buffers are so small that almost any processing delay and they fill.
111 2017-01-02T12:57:13  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: Thanks. I'll try that.
112 2017-01-02T13:10:19  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
113 2017-01-02T13:13:22  *** JackH has quit IRC
114 2017-01-02T13:23:24  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: -maxreceivebuffer=50000 = 1block per second. Better,... need to profile.. but I guess SyncTransaction with IsMine, etc. is the bottleneck
115 2017-01-02T13:26:04  <gmaxwell> thanks for checking and, it sounds like, validating my theory.  Not just how long sync takes, but the block deseralization isn't fast, ans I assume your sync runs in order, which means that when blocks arrive out of order and eventually the missing one shows up, it is probably processing many blocks at once, which creates a long delay in the message handling loop which will stall the recieve buf
116 2017-01-02T13:26:10  <gmaxwell> fers.
117 2017-01-02T13:27:24  <jonasschnelli> The blockdownload im using (#9171) does download in parallel, then store them on the disk and, process them in order (unserialize again probably).
118 2017-01-02T13:27:26  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9171 | Introduce auxiliary block requests by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #9171 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
119 2017-01-02T13:29:27  <gmaxwell> right, and say that you recieve blocks 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 will it end up processing 9 of them at the moment it recieves block 1 in the message handler? if so... it is not emptying the recieve buffers during that time.
120 2017-01-02T13:30:45  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: I think it does empty the receive buffer,... ProcessNewBlock gets called for all blocks where only the header gets verified, the stored to the disk. I guess this drains the buffer...
121 2017-01-02T13:30:54  <jonasschnelli> *then
122 2017-01-02T13:32:13  <gmaxwell> the recieve buffer is drained as the blocks are saved to disk. it saves 1 to disk but then processes it and then will connect 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  all within that function call.
123 2017-01-02T13:32:25  <gmaxwell> and during that time the message handler is not handling any messages. :)
124 2017-01-02T13:32:36  <gmaxwell> so the recieve buffers fill.
125 2017-01-02T13:33:40  <jonasschnelli> hmmm...
126 2017-01-02T13:33:56  <jonasschnelli> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9171/files#diff-6905024871a5ac748c4465bb25973c39R37
127 2017-01-02T13:36:49  <jonasschnelli> Ah. Right... all the processing (LoadBlock, SyncTransaction, etc.) is done in thread "bitcoin-msghandler".
128 2017-01-02T13:39:00  <gmaxwell> which fine, but not if it's processing a bunch of blocks at once.
129 2017-01-02T13:39:34  <gmaxwell> e.g. it should just process two and then return control to the message handler loop.
130 2017-01-02T13:39:57  <jonasschnelli> Okay.. I'll try that. Is 16 atm.
131 2017-01-02T13:40:01  <jonasschnelli> *It's
132 2017-01-02T13:41:03  <gmaxwell> where is it limited to 16?  like.. if you get 0 2 3 4 5 ... 999 1 doesn't end up processing 1000 at once?
133 2017-01-02T13:41:15  <jonasschnelli> I guess an explicit thread "process spv" (or similar) doesn't make that much sense. SyncTransaction does hold cs_main anyways.
134 2017-01-02T13:41:47  <jonasschnelli> 16 is the limit for the max amount of blocks per auxiliary request
135 2017-01-02T13:42:01  <jonasschnelli> If block 1 comes in last, it processes 15 blocks in a row.
136 2017-01-02T13:42:20  <jonasschnelli> Once the 16 are processed, it continues with the next batch of 16
137 2017-01-02T13:42:30  <jonasschnelli> (through findNextBlocksToDownload())
138 2017-01-02T13:42:49  <jonasschnelli> Ah. no, MAX_BLOCK_TO_PROCESS_PER_ITERATION == 5
139 2017-01-02T13:44:47  <gmaxwell> oh that isn't many blocks to have in flight at once.
140 2017-01-02T13:45:01  <gmaxwell> it should be possible to have many in flight but only process a few at a time.
141 2017-01-02T13:45:26  <gmaxwell> if you cut the number in flight your throughput will decrease due to round trip delays.
142 2017-01-02T13:46:47  <jonasschnelli> I just got in 16 blocks nice in order. It took more then 5s per block. I think its a slow peer.
143 2017-01-02T13:47:32  <gmaxwell> thats one of the reasons you want to have lots of blocks in flight at once. :)
144 2017-01-02T13:48:21  <jonasschnelli> Okay. Let me try that.
145 2017-01-02T13:48:37  <jonasschnelli> 16 is max per peer. Maybe the request should contain 16*16 or similar.
146 2017-01-02T13:49:18  <gmaxwell> yes 16 max per peer is probably fine.
147 2017-01-02T13:50:45  *** cannon-c has quit IRC
148 2017-01-02T13:51:37  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
149 2017-01-02T13:56:35  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: Oh yes. That was the bottleneck, not enough blocks in flight, parallelism was not ideal
150 2017-01-02T13:56:51  <jonasschnelli> now 450 blocks in 1min.
151 2017-01-02T13:57:23  <jonasschnelli> (at height 445761)
152 2017-01-02T13:58:12  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
153 2017-01-02T13:59:45  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
154 2017-01-02T14:02:29  <MarcoFalke> wumpus: No, the translations were never added back
155 2017-01-02T14:02:52  <MarcoFalke> As of today we are missing the ones that were moved to warnings.cpp
156 2017-01-02T14:03:02  <MarcoFalke> (additionally)
157 2017-01-02T14:03:47  <MarcoFalke> I don't understand the translation process code enough to fix this, but something like #9457 should do it
158 2017-01-02T14:03:49  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9457 | WIP: [qt] translate bitcoin.cpp and libbitcoin_common_a_SOURCES by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #9457 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
159 2017-01-02T14:16:44  <gmaxwell> oh interesting, I didn't really realize translations were file specific, I thought they were string to string conversions?
160 2017-01-02T14:17:47  <MarcoFalke> It is an issue with some files are not picked up by the translation process code
161 2017-01-02T14:20:26  <gmaxwell> oh I see.
162 2017-01-02T14:36:47  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
163 2017-01-02T14:39:38  *** BashCo_ has quit IRC
164 2017-01-02T14:41:25  *** jouke_ is now known as Jouke
165 2017-01-02T14:46:26  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
166 2017-01-02T14:55:47  *** wasi has quit IRC
167 2017-01-02T14:56:20  *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
168 2017-01-02T15:06:01  * BlueMatt is willing to review in exchange for review on #9289, #9419 or #9375 :)
169 2017-01-02T15:06:03  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9289 | net: drop boost::thread_group by theuni · Pull Request #9289 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
170 2017-01-02T15:06:05  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9419 | Stop Using cs_main for CNodeState/State() by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9419 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
171 2017-01-02T15:06:07  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9375 | Relay compact block messages prior to full block connection by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9375 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
172 2017-01-02T15:26:23  <gmaxwell> Is there a reason that make check doesn't run qa/pull-tester/rpc-tests.py  ?
173 2017-01-02T15:26:38  <gmaxwell> the tests in that are far more meaningful than most of the unit tests, IMO.
174 2017-01-02T15:27:56  <BlueMatt> someone was complaining the other day that there is no way (afaik) to run rpc-tests from make ...
175 2017-01-02T15:54:19  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
176 2017-01-02T15:54:20  *** JackH has quit IRC
177 2017-01-02T15:54:45  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
178 2017-01-02T15:56:48  *** BashCo has quit IRC
179 2017-01-02T15:57:24  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
180 2017-01-02T16:01:42  *** BashCo has quit IRC
181 2017-01-02T16:21:49  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
182 2017-01-02T16:22:04  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
183 2017-01-02T16:32:26  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
184 2017-01-02T16:39:42  *** PaulCape_ has quit IRC
185 2017-01-02T16:40:53  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
186 2017-01-02T16:54:10  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
187 2017-01-02T16:54:37  *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
188 2017-01-02T16:56:06  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
189 2017-01-02T16:56:31  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
190 2017-01-02T16:57:24  *** f0nky has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
191 2017-01-02T16:58:05  <f0nky> hi all, can i ask u guys a question?
192 2017-01-02T16:59:32  *** f0nky has left #bitcoin-core-dev
193 2017-01-02T16:59:47  *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
194 2017-01-02T17:02:28  *** udiWertheimer has quit IRC
195 2017-01-02T17:07:51  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
196 2017-01-02T17:51:52  *** NicolasDorier has quit IRC
197 2017-01-02T17:52:14  *** nOgAnOo has quit IRC
198 2017-01-02T17:52:20  *** btcdrak has quit IRC
199 2017-01-02T17:52:50  *** eragmus has quit IRC
200 2017-01-02T17:52:57  *** rubensayshi has quit IRC
201 2017-01-02T17:52:57  *** pindarhk has quit IRC
202 2017-01-02T17:53:11  *** ibrightly has quit IRC
203 2017-01-02T17:54:08  *** limpkin has quit IRC
204 2017-01-02T17:55:27  *** rubensayshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
205 2017-01-02T17:56:40  *** limpkin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
206 2017-01-02T17:57:23  *** btcdrak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
207 2017-01-02T17:57:36  *** pindarhk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
208 2017-01-02T17:58:27  *** ibrightly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
209 2017-01-02T18:02:16  *** Saucery has quit IRC
210 2017-01-02T18:07:26  *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
211 2017-01-02T18:12:01  *** eragmus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
212 2017-01-02T18:18:41  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
213 2017-01-02T18:23:50  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
214 2017-01-02T18:46:21  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
215 2017-01-02T18:48:53  *** bitcog has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
216 2017-01-02T18:53:23  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
217 2017-01-02T19:18:11  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
218 2017-01-02T19:18:22  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
219 2017-01-02T20:02:43  *** lol_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
220 2017-01-02T20:03:32  *** norotartagen has quit IRC
221 2017-01-02T20:03:44  *** nOgAnOo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
222 2017-01-02T20:03:50  *** lol_ has quit IRC
223 2017-01-02T20:04:06  *** lol_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
224 2017-01-02T20:04:45  *** negatratoron has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
225 2017-01-02T20:18:35  *** bitcog has quit IRC
226 2017-01-02T20:19:44  *** bitcog has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
227 2017-01-02T20:21:25  *** negatratoron has quit IRC
228 2017-01-02T20:21:50  *** norotartagen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
229 2017-01-02T20:24:12  *** bitcog has quit IRC
230 2017-01-02T20:26:35  *** bitcog has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
231 2017-01-02T20:27:33  *** droark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
232 2017-01-02T20:29:24  <achow101> are the 0.13.2 detached sigs ready yet?
233 2017-01-02T20:34:33  *** bitcog has quit IRC
234 2017-01-02T20:36:11  *** bitcog has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
235 2017-01-02T20:41:47  <cfields> achow101: running sanity tests. eta ~10 min.
236 2017-01-02T20:50:25  <cfields> gitian builders: 0.13.2 detached sigs pushed
237 2017-01-02T20:56:34  <luke-jr> crap, forgot to save a copy of the intermediate files
238 2017-01-02T21:06:14  *** bitcog0 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
239 2017-01-02T21:08:22  *** bitcog0 has quit IRC
240 2017-01-02T21:08:48  *** bitcog has quit IRC
241 2017-01-02T21:46:08  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
242 2017-01-02T21:48:42  *** wvr has quit IRC
243 2017-01-02T22:00:07  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] isle2983 opened pull request #9459: Improvements to copyright_header.py and some minor copyright header tweaks. (master...PR-copyright-script-improve) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9459
244 2017-01-02T22:44:42  *** Saucery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
245 2017-01-02T22:46:13  *** jannes has quit IRC
246 2017-01-02T23:01:42  <cfields> BlueMatt: right, so does making CNodeState::cs static not enforce the only-one-nodestate-at-once rule?
247 2017-01-02T23:19:00  *** robert__ has quit IRC
248 2017-01-02T23:31:27  *** robert__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
249 2017-01-02T23:48:26  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev