1 2017-01-31T00:21:51 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2 2017-01-31T00:31:40 *** NicolasDorier has quit IRC
3 2017-01-31T00:32:01 *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4 2017-01-31T00:40:24 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9654: Add jtimon pgp keys for commit sigs and future gitian builds (master...jtimon-key-gpg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9654
5 2017-01-31T00:47:40 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6 2017-01-31T00:57:47 *** abpa has quit IRC
7 2017-01-31T01:37:31 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
8 2017-01-31T02:05:27 *** justan0theruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9 2017-01-31T02:08:10 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
10 2017-01-31T02:54:40 *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11 2017-01-31T02:55:08 *** dermoth has quit IRC
12 2017-01-31T02:55:10 *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
13 2017-01-31T03:17:08 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
14 2017-01-31T03:42:36 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
15 2017-01-31T04:46:51 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
16 2017-01-31T04:50:54 *** waxwing has quit IRC
17 2017-01-31T04:55:19 *** chris2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
18 2017-01-31T04:58:08 *** chris200_ has quit IRC
19 2017-01-31T05:35:01 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
20 2017-01-31T05:45:04 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
21 2017-01-31T05:48:12 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22 2017-01-31T05:55:09 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
23 2017-01-31T06:03:48 *** guest23190302109 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
24 2017-01-31T06:04:26 *** guest23190302109 has left #bitcoin-core-dev
25 2017-01-31T06:15:25 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
26 2017-01-31T06:33:17 <luke-jr> what would others think of a feature where you can sign a message using the UTXO set to show you probably run a full node?
27 2017-01-31T06:46:24 *** jtimon has quit IRC
28 2017-01-31T06:56:35 <jl2012> you could outsource this, I suppose
29 2017-01-31T06:57:07 *** jouke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
30 2017-01-31T07:00:29 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
31 2017-01-31T07:12:38 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32 2017-01-31T07:13:20 <sipa> if you do it as a challenge-response, and require a response within not-much-more-than-ping-time, you'd at least prove you're close to a full node
33 2017-01-31T07:15:58 <luke-jr> jl2012: yes, it won't be 100% reliable, but it might be handy
34 2017-01-31T07:16:23 <luke-jr> sipa: that sounds much more complicated (can't really integrate with a browser) :/
35 2017-01-31T07:16:51 <luke-jr> it would also exclude those who have remote full nodes under their own control
36 2017-01-31T07:17:05 <luke-jr> depending on implementation I guess
37 2017-01-31T07:17:37 <luke-jr> I suppose the node can contact the webpage directly, but that seems like not the best idea for security
38 2017-01-31T07:21:57 <sipa> webpage?
39 2017-01-31T07:22:34 <sipa> maybe you have a very different use case in mind than me
40 2017-01-31T07:31:05 *** cjamthagen has quit IRC
41 2017-01-31T07:45:47 *** cjamthagen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
42 2017-01-31T08:01:18 <luke-jr> sipa: I was thinking for polling users
43 2017-01-31T08:07:23 <TD-Linux> that makes no sense if you're trying to make 1 vote per user
44 2017-01-31T08:37:50 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
45 2017-01-31T08:40:45 <CubicEarth> luke-jr: you are interested in poll results, 1 vote per-full node?
46 2017-01-31T08:41:05 <luke-jr> CubicEarth: that's up to the polling website to figure out weights
47 2017-01-31T08:41:40 <luke-jr> eg, one might use a combination of full-node-signature plus coin-control-signature to weigh by coins controlled
48 2017-01-31T08:42:40 <CubicEarth> luke-jr: Nice! Anything with coin-weights is near and dear to my heart
49 2017-01-31T08:44:58 <CubicEarth> luke-jr: any what are you trying to limit by wanting the full-node signature in addition to coin control proof?
50 2017-01-31T08:46:06 <luke-jr> gauging interest and possible consent in protocol change ideas
51 2017-01-31T08:47:12 <CubicEarth> I guessed that part.... but my question stands
52 2017-01-31T08:50:20 *** echonaut3 has quit IRC
53 2017-01-31T08:50:37 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
54 2017-01-31T08:53:55 <CubicEarth> I could see the benefit in giving coins more weight if someone can prove a node as well, but I can't see a point to giving the same amount of coins more weight if two nodes were proved
55 2017-01-31T08:57:37 <luke-jr> I'm not even sure what you're asking about there
56 2017-01-31T08:59:05 <CubicEarth> If you are interested in proof-of-full-node as a voting concept, and if so, curious as to why sybil wouldn't be an issue
57 2017-01-31T09:00:01 <CubicEarth> So, that's why I said I could see it being binary: do the coins that are voting also have a node.... that wouldn't have sybil issues
58 2017-01-31T09:00:40 <CubicEarth> maybe I missed something about the discussion
59 2017-01-31T09:02:58 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
60 2017-01-31T09:03:13 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
61 2017-01-31T09:17:11 *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62 2017-01-31T09:20:08 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
63 2017-01-31T09:23:56 *** paveljanik has quit IRC
64 2017-01-31T09:26:42 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
65 2017-01-31T09:26:43 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
66 2017-01-31T10:43:23 *** lclc has quit IRC
67 2017-01-31T11:01:41 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
68 2017-01-31T11:05:01 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
69 2017-01-31T11:35:54 *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
70 2017-01-31T11:51:41 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
71 2017-01-31T12:27:35 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
72 2017-01-31T12:47:06 <jl2012> luke-jr: wouldn't it be very cheap to run one full node, and pretend to be 100 using 100 ip addresses?
73 2017-01-31T13:18:55 <jl2012> if proof of full node is remotely possible, we don't need pow
74 2017-01-31T13:20:13 <jl2012> finally, people will just invest on resources (e.g. ip addresses), that do not have anything to do with the security of bitcoin
75 2017-01-31T13:24:37 <CubicEarth> I could see a small use case: If someone has a bunch of coins they want to vote with, they could also need to prove they have a full node. There would be no limit to the coins that one node could enable to vote.
76 2017-01-31T13:24:47 <CubicEarth> What would that show?
77 2017-01-31T13:25:05 <CubicEarth> That someone who wanted to vote was able to create a full node
78 2017-01-31T13:25:28 <CubicEarth> I don't know if that would be important to anyone....
79 2017-01-31T13:30:28 *** chjj has quit IRC
80 2017-01-31T14:00:02 *** BCBot has quit IRC
81 2017-01-31T14:00:26 *** BCBot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
82 2017-01-31T14:04:55 <gmaxwell> sipa: no you don't, I can artifically increase my ping time.
83 2017-01-31T14:15:13 *** groot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
84 2017-01-31T14:25:25 <Eliel_> jl2012: isn't it reasonably easy to construct a challenge you can use to verify a full node? There have been ideas for mining algorithms that'd make mining impossible if you don't have the full blockchain available.
85 2017-01-31T14:26:21 <Eliel_> although, the only way to verify that two different looking nodes aren't the same one would be to challenge them both at the same time.
86 2017-01-31T14:26:23 <jl2012> yes, but luke-jr is suggesting a voting system based on that
87 2017-01-31T14:26:51 <jl2012> and that's outsourceable
88 2017-01-31T14:26:55 <Eliel_> I guess I'd better read the backlog
89 2017-01-31T14:27:18 <jl2012> even for the purpose of mining, that's outsourceable
90 2017-01-31T14:30:25 <jonasschnelli> If I create a bloom filter (block filter) of all the COutPoints and inputs scriptSigs of a recent block, it will get pretty big,... It often hits around 15'000 elememts, so, roughly 15kb per block = 2.1MB of filters per day... Any idea how to improve that?
91 2017-01-31T14:46:16 *** rafalcpp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
92 2017-01-31T15:15:07 *** Sosumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
93 2017-01-31T15:16:02 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
94 2017-01-31T15:25:38 <sipa> gmaxwell: sure, but then you have a higher ping time
95 2017-01-31T15:32:47 *** lclc has quit IRC
96 2017-01-31T15:38:06 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
97 2017-01-31T15:53:52 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
98 2017-01-31T15:54:58 *** groot has quit IRC
99 2017-01-31T15:55:07 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
100 2017-01-31T16:09:50 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
101 2017-01-31T16:22:30 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102 2017-01-31T16:45:00 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
103 2017-01-31T16:45:46 *** ratoder has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
104 2017-01-31T16:51:29 *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
105 2017-01-31T16:54:22 *** lclc has quit IRC
106 2017-01-31T17:04:33 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
107 2017-01-31T17:15:22 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
108 2017-01-31T17:24:17 *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
109 2017-01-31T17:38:49 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
110 2017-01-31T17:39:26 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
111 2017-01-31T17:44:59 *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112 2017-01-31T17:44:59 *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
113 2017-01-31T17:47:30 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
114 2017-01-31T17:50:24 *** Giszmo1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
115 2017-01-31T17:50:25 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
116 2017-01-31T17:51:39 *** Giszmo1 has quit IRC
117 2017-01-31T17:51:52 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
118 2017-01-31T17:52:27 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
119 2017-01-31T17:57:08 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
120 2017-01-31T18:16:24 *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
121 2017-01-31T18:17:49 *** dstadulis has quit IRC
122 2017-01-31T18:18:46 *** echonaut has quit IRC
123 2017-01-31T18:19:00 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
124 2017-01-31T18:31:53 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
125 2017-01-31T18:52:33 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
126 2017-01-31T18:55:26 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
127 2017-01-31T19:06:07 *** reginaldo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
128 2017-01-31T19:06:13 *** reginaldo_ has quit IRC
129 2017-01-31T19:06:13 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
130 2017-01-31T19:06:35 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
131 2017-01-31T19:23:46 *** lclc has quit IRC
132 2017-01-31T19:32:07 *** jannes has quit IRC
133 2017-01-31T19:43:46 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
134 2017-01-31T20:10:36 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #9581: [pep-8] Prefer "foo is None" to "foo == None". Prefer "foo not in bar" to "not foo in bar". (master...test-for-membership) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9581
135 2017-01-31T20:21:26 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
136 2017-01-31T20:55:59 <BlueMatt> wtf travis
137 2017-01-31T20:56:00 <BlueMatt> https://travis-ci.org/TheBlueMatt/bitcoin/jobs/197083388#L5456
138 2017-01-31T20:56:06 <BlueMatt> "The command "if [ "$RUN_TESTS" = "true" -a "$TRAVIS_REPO_SLUG" = "TheBlueMatt/bitcoin" -a "$TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST" = "false" ]; then contrib/verify-commits/verify-commits.sh; fi" exited with 127."
139 2017-01-31T20:56:10 <BlueMatt> but it keps turnning......
140 2017-01-31T20:56:28 <BlueMatt> oh, it did mark failure, ok
141 2017-01-31T20:59:50 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9656: Add Marko's Key to verify-commits and check verify-commits on pushes to master (master...2017-01-fix-verify-commits) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9656
142 2017-01-31T21:00:23 *** Sosumi has quit IRC
143 2017-01-31T21:00:30 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #9657: Improve rpc-tests.py (master...improvepytests2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9657
144 2017-01-31T21:07:00 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
145 2017-01-31T21:11:32 *** windsok has quit IRC
146 2017-01-31T21:21:36 *** windsok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
147 2017-01-31T21:26:30 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
148 2017-01-31T21:26:36 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
149 2017-01-31T21:45:40 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
150 2017-01-31T22:01:52 *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
151 2017-01-31T22:02:20 *** dermoth has quit IRC
152 2017-01-31T22:02:22 *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
153 2017-01-31T22:04:31 *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
154 2017-01-31T22:05:19 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
155 2017-01-31T22:05:37 *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
156 2017-01-31T22:10:11 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] isle2983 opened pull request #9658: Add clang_format.py to help automate code style analysis (master...PR-clang-format) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9658
157 2017-01-31T22:11:46 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
158 2017-01-31T22:11:47 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
159 2017-01-31T22:50:09 *** luke-jr has quit IRC
160 2017-01-31T22:51:14 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9659: Net: Turn some methods and params/variables const (master...0.14-net-more-const) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9659
161 2017-01-31T22:54:22 *** aguycalled has quit IRC
162 2017-01-31T22:59:58 *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
163 2017-01-31T23:00:20 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
164 2017-01-31T23:00:24 *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
165 2017-01-31T23:11:32 *** reginaldo has quit IRC
166 2017-01-31T23:22:42 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
167 2017-01-31T23:27:04 *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
168 2017-01-31T23:27:15 <dgenr8> to conduct a poll by coins you can make a hard-forking client with limited ways to "spend" coins to vote (none of which create txes valid on mainnet). has similar drawbacks as bitcoinocracy
169 2017-01-31T23:39:49 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
170 2017-01-31T23:51:15 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev