1 2017-01-31T00:21:51  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  2 2017-01-31T00:31:40  *** NicolasDorier has quit IRC
  3 2017-01-31T00:32:01  *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  4 2017-01-31T00:40:24  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9654: Add jtimon pgp keys for commit sigs and future gitian builds (master...jtimon-key-gpg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9654
  5 2017-01-31T00:47:40  *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  6 2017-01-31T00:57:47  *** abpa has quit IRC
  7 2017-01-31T01:37:31  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  8 2017-01-31T02:05:27  *** justan0theruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  9 2017-01-31T02:08:10  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 10 2017-01-31T02:54:40  *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 11 2017-01-31T02:55:08  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 12 2017-01-31T02:55:10  *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
 13 2017-01-31T03:17:08  *** dstadulis has quit IRC
 14 2017-01-31T03:42:36  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
 15 2017-01-31T04:46:51  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
 16 2017-01-31T04:50:54  *** waxwing has quit IRC
 17 2017-01-31T04:55:19  *** chris2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 18 2017-01-31T04:58:08  *** chris200_ has quit IRC
 19 2017-01-31T05:35:01  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 20 2017-01-31T05:45:04  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
 21 2017-01-31T05:48:12  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 22 2017-01-31T05:55:09  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
 23 2017-01-31T06:03:48  *** guest23190302109 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 24 2017-01-31T06:04:26  *** guest23190302109 has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 25 2017-01-31T06:15:25  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 26 2017-01-31T06:33:17  <luke-jr> what would others think of a feature where you can sign a message using the UTXO set to show you probably run a full node?
 27 2017-01-31T06:46:24  *** jtimon has quit IRC
 28 2017-01-31T06:56:35  <jl2012> you could outsource this, I suppose
 29 2017-01-31T06:57:07  *** jouke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 30 2017-01-31T07:00:29  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 31 2017-01-31T07:12:38  *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 32 2017-01-31T07:13:20  <sipa> if you do it as a challenge-response, and require a response within not-much-more-than-ping-time, you'd at least prove you're close to a full node
 33 2017-01-31T07:15:58  <luke-jr> jl2012: yes, it won't be 100% reliable, but it might be handy
 34 2017-01-31T07:16:23  <luke-jr> sipa: that sounds much more complicated (can't really integrate with a browser) :/
 35 2017-01-31T07:16:51  <luke-jr> it would also exclude those who have remote full nodes under their own control
 36 2017-01-31T07:17:05  <luke-jr> depending on implementation I guess
 37 2017-01-31T07:17:37  <luke-jr> I suppose the node can contact the webpage directly, but that seems like not the best idea for security
 38 2017-01-31T07:21:57  <sipa> webpage?
 39 2017-01-31T07:22:34  <sipa> maybe you have a very different use case in mind than me
 40 2017-01-31T07:31:05  *** cjamthagen has quit IRC
 41 2017-01-31T07:45:47  *** cjamthagen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 42 2017-01-31T08:01:18  <luke-jr> sipa: I was thinking for polling users
 43 2017-01-31T08:07:23  <TD-Linux> that makes no sense if you're trying to make 1 vote per user
 44 2017-01-31T08:37:50  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 45 2017-01-31T08:40:45  <CubicEarth> luke-jr: you are interested in poll results, 1 vote per-full node?
 46 2017-01-31T08:41:05  <luke-jr> CubicEarth: that's up to the polling website to figure out weights
 47 2017-01-31T08:41:40  <luke-jr> eg, one might use a combination of full-node-signature plus coin-control-signature to weigh by coins controlled
 48 2017-01-31T08:42:40  <CubicEarth> luke-jr: Nice! Anything with coin-weights is near and dear to my heart
 49 2017-01-31T08:44:58  <CubicEarth> luke-jr: any what are you trying to limit by wanting the full-node signature in addition to coin control proof?
 50 2017-01-31T08:46:06  <luke-jr> gauging interest and possible consent in protocol change ideas
 51 2017-01-31T08:47:12  <CubicEarth> I guessed that part.... but my question stands
 52 2017-01-31T08:50:20  *** echonaut3 has quit IRC
 53 2017-01-31T08:50:37  *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 54 2017-01-31T08:53:55  <CubicEarth> I could see the benefit in giving coins more weight if someone can prove a node as well, but I can't see a point to giving the same amount of coins more weight if two nodes were proved
 55 2017-01-31T08:57:37  <luke-jr> I'm not even sure what you're asking about there
 56 2017-01-31T08:59:05  <CubicEarth> If you are interested in proof-of-full-node as a voting concept, and if so, curious as to why sybil wouldn't be an issue
 57 2017-01-31T09:00:01  <CubicEarth> So, that's why I said I could see it being binary: do the coins that are voting also have a node.... that wouldn't have sybil issues
 58 2017-01-31T09:00:40  <CubicEarth> maybe I missed something about the discussion
 59 2017-01-31T09:02:58  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 60 2017-01-31T09:03:13  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
 61 2017-01-31T09:17:11  *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 62 2017-01-31T09:20:08  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
 63 2017-01-31T09:23:56  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 64 2017-01-31T09:26:42  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 65 2017-01-31T09:26:43  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 66 2017-01-31T10:43:23  *** lclc has quit IRC
 67 2017-01-31T11:01:41  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 68 2017-01-31T11:05:01  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
 69 2017-01-31T11:35:54  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 70 2017-01-31T11:51:41  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
 71 2017-01-31T12:27:35  *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 72 2017-01-31T12:47:06  <jl2012> luke-jr: wouldn't it be very cheap to run one full node, and pretend to be 100 using 100 ip addresses?
 73 2017-01-31T13:18:55  <jl2012> if proof of full node is remotely possible, we don't need pow
 74 2017-01-31T13:20:13  <jl2012> finally, people will just invest on resources (e.g. ip addresses), that do not have anything to do with the security of bitcoin
 75 2017-01-31T13:24:37  <CubicEarth> I could see a small use case: If someone has a bunch of coins they want to vote with, they could also need to prove they have a full node. There would be no limit to the coins that one node could enable to vote.
 76 2017-01-31T13:24:47  <CubicEarth> What would that show?
 77 2017-01-31T13:25:05  <CubicEarth> That someone who wanted to vote was able to create a full node
 78 2017-01-31T13:25:28  <CubicEarth> I don't know if that would be important to anyone....
 79 2017-01-31T13:30:28  *** chjj has quit IRC
 80 2017-01-31T14:00:02  *** BCBot has quit IRC
 81 2017-01-31T14:00:26  *** BCBot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 82 2017-01-31T14:04:55  <gmaxwell> sipa: no you don't, I can artifically increase my ping time.
 83 2017-01-31T14:15:13  *** groot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 84 2017-01-31T14:25:25  <Eliel_> jl2012: isn't it reasonably easy to construct a challenge you can use to verify a full node? There have been ideas for mining algorithms that'd make mining impossible if you don't have the full blockchain available.
 85 2017-01-31T14:26:21  <Eliel_> although, the only way to verify that two different looking nodes aren't the same one would be to challenge them both at the same time.
 86 2017-01-31T14:26:23  <jl2012> yes, but luke-jr is suggesting a voting system based on that
 87 2017-01-31T14:26:51  <jl2012> and that's outsourceable
 88 2017-01-31T14:26:55  <Eliel_> I guess I'd better read the backlog
 89 2017-01-31T14:27:18  <jl2012> even for the purpose of mining, that's outsourceable
 90 2017-01-31T14:30:25  <jonasschnelli> If I create a bloom filter (block filter) of all the COutPoints and inputs scriptSigs of a recent block, it will get pretty big,... It often hits around 15'000 elememts, so, roughly 15kb per block = 2.1MB of filters per day... Any idea how to improve that?
 91 2017-01-31T14:46:16  *** rafalcpp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 92 2017-01-31T15:15:07  *** Sosumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 93 2017-01-31T15:16:02  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 94 2017-01-31T15:25:38  <sipa> gmaxwell: sure, but then you have a higher ping time
 95 2017-01-31T15:32:47  *** lclc has quit IRC
 96 2017-01-31T15:38:06  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 97 2017-01-31T15:53:52  *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 98 2017-01-31T15:54:58  *** groot has quit IRC
 99 2017-01-31T15:55:07  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
100 2017-01-31T16:09:50  *** dstadulis has quit IRC
101 2017-01-31T16:22:30  *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102 2017-01-31T16:45:00  *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
103 2017-01-31T16:45:46  *** ratoder has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
104 2017-01-31T16:51:29  *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
105 2017-01-31T16:54:22  *** lclc has quit IRC
106 2017-01-31T17:04:33  *** dstadulis has quit IRC
107 2017-01-31T17:15:22  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
108 2017-01-31T17:24:17  *** dstadulis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
109 2017-01-31T17:38:49  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
110 2017-01-31T17:39:26  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
111 2017-01-31T17:44:59  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112 2017-01-31T17:44:59  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
113 2017-01-31T17:47:30  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
114 2017-01-31T17:50:24  *** Giszmo1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
115 2017-01-31T17:50:25  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
116 2017-01-31T17:51:39  *** Giszmo1 has quit IRC
117 2017-01-31T17:51:52  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
118 2017-01-31T17:52:27  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
119 2017-01-31T17:57:08  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
120 2017-01-31T18:16:24  *** lclc has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
121 2017-01-31T18:17:49  *** dstadulis has quit IRC
122 2017-01-31T18:18:46  *** echonaut has quit IRC
123 2017-01-31T18:19:00  *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
124 2017-01-31T18:31:53  *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
125 2017-01-31T18:52:33  *** reginaldo has quit IRC
126 2017-01-31T18:55:26  *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
127 2017-01-31T19:06:07  *** reginaldo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
128 2017-01-31T19:06:13  *** reginaldo_ has quit IRC
129 2017-01-31T19:06:13  *** reginaldo has quit IRC
130 2017-01-31T19:06:35  *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
131 2017-01-31T19:23:46  *** lclc has quit IRC
132 2017-01-31T19:32:07  *** jannes has quit IRC
133 2017-01-31T19:43:46  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
134 2017-01-31T20:10:36  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift closed pull request #9581: [pep-8] Prefer "foo is None" to "foo == None". Prefer "foo not in bar" to "not foo in bar". (master...test-for-membership) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9581
135 2017-01-31T20:21:26  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
136 2017-01-31T20:55:59  <BlueMatt> wtf travis
137 2017-01-31T20:56:00  <BlueMatt> https://travis-ci.org/TheBlueMatt/bitcoin/jobs/197083388#L5456
138 2017-01-31T20:56:06  <BlueMatt> "The command "if [ "$RUN_TESTS" = "true" -a "$TRAVIS_REPO_SLUG" = "TheBlueMatt/bitcoin" -a "$TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST" = "false" ]; then contrib/verify-commits/verify-commits.sh; fi" exited with 127."
139 2017-01-31T20:56:10  <BlueMatt> but it keps turnning......
140 2017-01-31T20:56:28  <BlueMatt> oh, it did mark failure, ok
141 2017-01-31T20:59:50  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #9656: Add Marko's Key to verify-commits and check verify-commits on pushes to master (master...2017-01-fix-verify-commits) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9656
142 2017-01-31T21:00:23  *** Sosumi has quit IRC
143 2017-01-31T21:00:30  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #9657: Improve rpc-tests.py (master...improvepytests2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9657
144 2017-01-31T21:07:00  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
145 2017-01-31T21:11:32  *** windsok has quit IRC
146 2017-01-31T21:21:36  *** windsok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
147 2017-01-31T21:26:30  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
148 2017-01-31T21:26:36  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
149 2017-01-31T21:45:40  *** reginaldo has quit IRC
150 2017-01-31T22:01:52  *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
151 2017-01-31T22:02:20  *** dermoth has quit IRC
152 2017-01-31T22:02:22  *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
153 2017-01-31T22:04:31  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
154 2017-01-31T22:05:19  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
155 2017-01-31T22:05:37  *** reginaldo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
156 2017-01-31T22:10:11  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] isle2983 opened pull request #9658: Add clang_format.py to help automate code style analysis (master...PR-clang-format) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9658
157 2017-01-31T22:11:46  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
158 2017-01-31T22:11:47  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
159 2017-01-31T22:50:09  *** luke-jr has quit IRC
160 2017-01-31T22:51:14  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #9659: Net: Turn some methods and params/variables const (master...0.14-net-more-const) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9659
161 2017-01-31T22:54:22  *** aguycalled has quit IRC
162 2017-01-31T22:59:58  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
163 2017-01-31T23:00:20  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
164 2017-01-31T23:00:24  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
165 2017-01-31T23:11:32  *** reginaldo has quit IRC
166 2017-01-31T23:22:42  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
167 2017-01-31T23:27:04  *** aguycalled has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
168 2017-01-31T23:27:15  <dgenr8> to conduct a poll by coins you can make a hard-forking client with limited ways to "spend" coins to vote (none of which create txes valid on mainnet). has similar drawbacks as bitcoinocracy
169 2017-01-31T23:39:49  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
170 2017-01-31T23:51:15  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev