1 2017-05-03T00:03:22  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  2 2017-05-03T00:29:40  *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
  3 2017-05-03T00:30:20  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  4 2017-05-03T00:37:57  *** harrymm has quit IRC
  5 2017-05-03T00:39:20  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  6 2017-05-03T00:43:42  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  7 2017-05-03T00:44:53  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
  8 2017-05-03T00:48:01  <Chris_Stewart_5> Has anyone had to deal with using bitcoind as a dependency with travis ci? Is there a way to get them to whitelist it's use in -regtest mode?
  9 2017-05-03T00:50:32  <sipa> ?
 10 2017-05-03T00:50:52  <sipa> why would it need a whitelist?
 11 2017-05-03T00:52:21  <Chris_Stewart_5> It looks like travis-ci bans people that use bitcoin as a dependency in .travis.yml
 12 2017-05-03T00:52:29  <Chris_Stewart_5> https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin-s/bitcoin-s-rpc-client/requests
 13 2017-05-03T00:52:40  <Chris_Stewart_5> claiming I am mining
 14 2017-05-03T00:52:56  <sipa> ah, i see
 15 2017-05-03T00:53:10  <sipa> perhaps if you built bitcoind inside the VM?
 16 2017-05-03T00:53:13  <Chris_Stewart_5> and now I am a repeat offender :o. I emailed the travis ci people to hopefully get off of the list
 17 2017-05-03T00:53:22  <sipa> rather than using it as a dependency
 18 2017-05-03T00:53:27  <sipa> yeah, contact them to explain first
 19 2017-05-03T00:53:29  <Chris_Stewart_5> I asked if they could whitelist 'bitcoind -regtest'
 20 2017-05-03T00:53:43  <Chris_Stewart_5> We will see what the response is :/
 21 2017-05-03T00:55:01  <sipa> bitcoind doesn't even contain a miner anymore
 22 2017-05-03T00:55:12  <luke-jr> sipa: they banned us too
 23 2017-05-03T00:55:31  <luke-jr> had to get whitelisted :/
 24 2017-05-03T00:55:41  <Chris_Stewart_5> luke-jr: How long ago was that?
 25 2017-05-03T00:55:52  <luke-jr> not sure, a Looooooong time ago
 26 2017-05-03T00:57:19  <gmaxwell> great so even we're using a service that bans people for running our software. :(
 27 2017-05-03T00:58:52  <Chris_Stewart_5> yeah, I didn't even just get banned on that repo, it looks like I am banned on all repos :S
 28 2017-05-03T01:22:15  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #10322: Use hardware timestamps in RNG seeding (master...rdtsc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10322
 29 2017-05-03T01:43:58  <sipa> gmaxwell: std::random_device in libstdc++ from modern G++ uses rdrand when available, so we could just include that into the seeding
 30 2017-05-03T01:44:28  <sipa> and /dev/urandom otherwise
 31 2017-05-03T01:44:57  <sipa> ... however, the mingw-64 version just uses a mersenne twister with a constant(!) seed
 32 2017-05-03T01:49:56  *** molz_ has quit IRC
 33 2017-05-03T01:57:26  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
 34 2017-05-03T01:59:46  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 35 2017-05-03T02:00:07  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 36 2017-05-03T02:00:09  *** moli_ has quit IRC
 37 2017-05-03T02:00:37  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 38 2017-05-03T02:01:01  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 39 2017-05-03T02:18:00  *** fao2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 40 2017-05-03T02:21:04  *** fao1 has quit IRC
 41 2017-05-03T02:21:26  *** arowser has quit IRC
 42 2017-05-03T02:27:02  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #10323: Update to latest libsecp256k1 master (master...secp_up) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10323
 43 2017-05-03T02:27:17  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 44 2017-05-03T02:57:02  *** arowser_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 45 2017-05-03T02:57:21  *** fao3 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 46 2017-05-03T02:59:24  *** arowser has quit IRC
 47 2017-05-03T03:00:05  *** fao2 has quit IRC
 48 2017-05-03T03:00:22  *** wasi has quit IRC
 49 2017-05-03T03:00:53  *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 50 2017-05-03T03:09:38  *** logsys has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 51 2017-05-03T03:10:13  *** _anthony_ has quit IRC
 52 2017-05-03T03:29:55  <sipa> TIL: C++ template parameters can be (uninstantiated) templates themselves
 53 2017-05-03T03:42:43  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/75171f099e82...431a548faaf5
 54 2017-05-03T03:42:43  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master db994b2 Pieter Wuille: Simplify DisconnectBlock arguments/return value...
 55 2017-05-03T03:42:44  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 431a548 Pieter Wuille: Merge #10297: Simplify DisconnectBlock arguments/return value...
 56 2017-05-03T03:43:02  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa closed pull request #10297: Simplify DisconnectBlock arguments/return value (master...disconnect_enum) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10297
 57 2017-05-03T03:53:25  *** NewLiberty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 58 2017-05-03T04:12:20  *** moli_ has quit IRC
 59 2017-05-03T04:13:36  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 60 2017-05-03T04:34:34  *** arowser_ has quit IRC
 61 2017-05-03T04:34:56  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 62 2017-05-03T05:07:02  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
 63 2017-05-03T05:12:13  *** NewLiberty has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 64 2017-05-03T05:55:40  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
 65 2017-05-03T06:00:03  *** dermoth has quit IRC
 66 2017-05-03T06:00:54  *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 67 2017-05-03T06:11:20  *** logsys has quit IRC
 68 2017-05-03T06:11:32  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 69 2017-05-03T06:15:54  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/431a548faaf5...d4732f3232c3
 70 2017-05-03T06:15:54  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master bd1f138 Pieter Wuille: Add getchaintxstats RPC
 71 2017-05-03T06:15:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d4732f3 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9733: Add getchaintxstats RPC...
 72 2017-05-03T06:17:42  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9733: Add getchaintxstats RPC (master...chaintxstats) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9733
 73 2017-05-03T06:26:19  *** mryandao has quit IRC
 74 2017-05-03T06:47:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d4732f3232c3...83073de4bdd8
 75 2017-05-03T06:47:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b8251f6 John Newbery: [tests] allow zmq test to be run in out-of-tree builds
 76 2017-05-03T06:47:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 83073de Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10307: [tests] allow zmq test to be run in out-of-tree builds...
 77 2017-05-03T06:48:25  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10307: [tests] allow zmq test to be run in out-of-tree builds (master...fix_zmq_test_out_of_tree) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10307
 78 2017-05-03T06:52:14  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 79 2017-05-03T07:11:53  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 80 2017-05-03T07:12:05  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/83073de4bdd8...d3dce0eb67e8
 81 2017-05-03T07:12:05  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 185c7f0 Matt Corallo: Avoid reading the old hd master key during wallet encryption...
 82 2017-05-03T07:12:06  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master d3dce0e Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10115: Avoid reading the old hd master key during wallet encryption...
 83 2017-05-03T07:12:25  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10115: Avoid reading the old hd master key during wallet encryption (master...2017-03-cleanup-sethdmasterkey) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10115
 84 2017-05-03T07:23:00  *** arowser has quit IRC
 85 2017-05-03T07:24:09  *** arowser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 86 2017-05-03T08:04:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] spencerlievens opened pull request #10324: Add OSX keystroke to clear RPCConsole (master...patch-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10324
 87 2017-05-03T08:22:24  *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 88 2017-05-03T08:25:14  *** movrcx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 89 2017-05-03T08:37:43  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 90 2017-05-03T08:38:32  *** BashCo has quit IRC
 91 2017-05-03T08:40:23  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 92 2017-05-03T08:44:17  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 93 2017-05-03T09:04:14  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/d3dce0eb67e8...2a183de0ecb5
 94 2017-05-03T09:04:15  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 91c91e1 John Newbery: Control mempool persistence using a command line parameter....
 95 2017-05-03T09:04:15  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a750d77 John Newbery: Add tests for mempool persistence...
 96 2017-05-03T09:04:16  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 2a183de Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9966: Control mempool persistence using a command line parameter...
 97 2017-05-03T09:04:35  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9966: Control mempool persistence using a command line parameter (master...mempoolpersistenceoption) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9966
 98 2017-05-03T09:05:21  *** elkalamar has quit IRC
 99 2017-05-03T09:14:30  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
100 2017-05-03T09:26:39  *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
101 2017-05-03T09:40:54  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/2a183de0ecb5...0912620888e8
102 2017-05-03T09:40:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 56f09df Spencer Lievens: [Makefile] Alphabetically Reorder addrdb.cpp...
103 2017-05-03T09:40:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0912620 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10302: [Makefile] Alphabetically Reorder addrdb.cpp...
104 2017-05-03T09:41:19  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10302: [Makefile] Alphabetically Reorder addrdb.cpp (master...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10302
105 2017-05-03T09:42:28  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
106 2017-05-03T09:48:04  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/0912620888e8...22d870016eb6
107 2017-05-03T09:48:05  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1ff2bb4 BtcDrak: Remove unused args from GetFetchhFlags()
108 2017-05-03T09:48:05  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 22d8700 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10311: Remove unused args from GetFetchFlags()...
109 2017-05-03T09:48:29  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10311: Remove unused args from GetFetchFlags() (master...getflags) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10311
110 2017-05-03T10:02:35  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
111 2017-05-03T10:04:17  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
112 2017-05-03T10:38:18  *** shesek has quit IRC
113 2017-05-03T10:40:43  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #10325: 0.15.0 Depends Updates (master...depends-0-15-0) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10325
114 2017-05-03T10:52:01  *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
115 2017-05-03T10:52:01  *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
116 2017-05-03T11:00:32  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
117 2017-05-03T11:04:02  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
118 2017-05-03T11:04:52  *** swoup has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
119 2017-05-03T11:31:36  *** swoup has left #bitcoin-core-dev
120 2017-05-03T11:31:45  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
121 2017-05-03T11:45:14  *** Guyver2_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
122 2017-05-03T11:48:08  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
123 2017-05-03T11:48:16  *** Guyver2_ is now known as Guyver2
124 2017-05-03T11:51:04  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
125 2017-05-03T11:51:14  *** harrymm has quit IRC
126 2017-05-03T12:15:50  *** Guyver2_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
127 2017-05-03T12:18:28  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
128 2017-05-03T12:18:29  *** Guyver2_ is now known as Guyver2
129 2017-05-03T12:21:36  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
130 2017-05-03T12:43:14  *** NewLiberty has quit IRC
131 2017-05-03T12:57:38  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
132 2017-05-03T12:57:38  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
133 2017-05-03T12:57:39  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
134 2017-05-03T13:01:51  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
135 2017-05-03T13:03:08  <jtimon> more begging for review on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9494
136 2017-05-03T13:06:25  <jnewbery> wumpus did you see my comment on #10225? It's causing test runs to fail intermittently for me. Can we revert it until it's had some review?
137 2017-05-03T13:06:27  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10225 | [test] Add aborttrescan tests by kallewoof · Pull Request #10225 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
138 2017-05-03T13:07:10  <wumpus> jnewbery: sure
139 2017-05-03T13:08:09  <wumpus> just commenting out the test so it doesn't run automatically would be enough I guess
140 2017-05-03T13:10:16  <jnewbery> yes, that would solve the immediate problem, but I'd also like to make sure that the test gets some review. I had a bunch of review comments for the PR which I didn't add because it wasn't even running reliably for me
141 2017-05-03T13:11:03  <wumpus> no matter waht, comments must be addressed in a new PR
142 2017-05-03T13:11:09  <wumpus> it's not possible to unmerge and reopen a PR
143 2017-05-03T13:12:13  <jnewbery> can we do something like: new PR or commit to remove the test entirely, and then PR it again
144 2017-05-03T13:12:22  <wumpus> I guess if no one fixes it, we can remove the test again at some point
145 2017-05-03T13:13:18  <wumpus> I don't really see how that is better than just disabling the test (so it can still be run manually) then fixing its problems while it's not blocking travis, but okay...
146 2017-05-03T13:14:11  <jnewbery> because the test is unreviewed and untested. I think we *should* have the test, I'd just like it to go through a review process before it gets merged :)
147 2017-05-03T13:18:28  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10327: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py (master...remove_abort_rescan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10327
148 2017-05-03T13:40:05  *** questioner2 has quit IRC
149 2017-05-03T13:44:52  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/22d870016eb6...35da2aeed7d4
150 2017-05-03T13:44:53  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 981e586 John Newbery: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py...
151 2017-05-03T13:44:53  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 35da2ae Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10327: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py...
152 2017-05-03T13:45:19  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10327: [tests] remove import-abort-rescan.py (master...remove_abort_rescan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10327
153 2017-05-03T13:50:36  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
154 2017-05-03T13:55:24  *** d_t has quit IRC
155 2017-05-03T14:01:55  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #10328: Update contrib/debian to latest Ubuntu PPA upload. (master...2017-05-update-debian) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10328
156 2017-05-03T14:14:41  <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: re: qt4: I think we need to just remove our tray icon anyway, at this point?
157 2017-05-03T14:14:53  <BlueMatt> then the issues with qt4 should be resolved, I believe?
158 2017-05-03T14:14:54  <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: I think there is an option
159 2017-05-03T14:15:05  <jonasschnelli> let me check
160 2017-05-03T14:15:34  <jonasschnelli> setTrayIconVisible(optionsModel->getHideTrayIcon());
161 2017-05-03T14:16:11  <BlueMatt> can someone close #10326 as "follow up with antpool, we are not antpool support there is nothing we can do"
162 2017-05-03T14:16:15  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10326 | block accepted in solo mining in Antpool and never rewards in the dashboard · Issue #10326 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
163 2017-05-03T14:17:05  <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: i believe there was previously discussion of just always not having tray icons
164 2017-05-03T14:17:50  <jonasschnelli> Yes. Removing the tray makes sense... though, to prevent distraction, we shouldn't hurry. The option was a good start IMO
165 2017-05-03T14:19:18  <jonasschnelli> I mean "removing the tray icon".
166 2017-05-03T14:19:55  <jonasschnelli> OSX has already deprecated those "global menu icons" since years. Because it looks like that every new application wants to place a icon there and mostly the space is limited to just a handfull.
167 2017-05-03T14:20:02  <jonasschnelli> I guess it's similar on Ubuntu/Windows.
168 2017-05-03T14:20:17  <jonasschnelli> But all new application ignore these deprecations. :)
169 2017-05-03T14:20:27  <jonasschnelli> Dropbox / Adobe / VMWare, etc.
170 2017-05-03T14:20:42  <wumpus> ubuntu is going to drop unity anyhow
171 2017-05-03T14:20:46  <wumpus> so the problem will go way
172 2017-05-03T14:21:25  <jonasschnelli> wumpus: There are no such thing like Tray icons in GNOME?
173 2017-05-03T14:21:26  <wumpus> but yes completely removing tray icon functionality would be a possible future thing too
174 2017-05-03T14:21:35  <wumpus> jonasschnelli: there are, but that problem shouldn't exist there
175 2017-05-03T14:21:55  <wumpus> it's a problem specific to how unity intercepts the tray menu
176 2017-05-03T14:22:01  <wumpus> as I understand, at least
177 2017-05-03T14:22:10  <jonasschnelli> Okay. Yes. I think as long as users like apps that inject tray icons, we should not hurry with removing the option.
178 2017-05-03T14:22:17  <jonasschnelli> We could first set the option to false by default
179 2017-05-03T14:22:31  <wumpus> right
180 2017-05-03T14:23:43  <wumpus> but as I understand it this problem is specific to unity: it doesn't exist on GNOME, nor KDE
181 2017-05-03T14:24:03  <wumpus> haven't tested, though.
182 2017-05-03T14:24:16  <jonasschnelli> Yes. I think so.
183 2017-05-03T14:24:29  <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: the current PPA is built with Qt4? Right?
184 2017-05-03T14:24:36  <BlueMatt> yes
185 2017-05-03T14:24:47  <jonasschnelli> Hmm... what speaks against Qt5?
186 2017-05-03T14:25:11  <BlueMatt> wumpus: luke-jr was also complaining about qt5 not working with kde4 folks (do people still use kde4...or kde?)
187 2017-05-03T14:26:04  <jonasschnelli> Yes. But that orthogonal to the PPA.
188 2017-05-03T14:26:36  <BlueMatt> true, but it is further reason why we need to support Qt4
189 2017-05-03T14:26:52  <BlueMatt> (is there even a reason to migrate to qt5)
190 2017-05-03T14:26:56  <BlueMatt> or, quickly migrate, that is
191 2017-05-03T14:28:11  <wumpus> well, most software moved away from qt4 by now, so requiring qt4 for the ppa pulls that in, and makes the software look different from other things
192 2017-05-03T14:28:35  <wumpus> this is a different decision than stopping qt4 support anyhow
193 2017-05-03T14:28:44  <BlueMatt> how do other projects support qt5 on ubuntu? just no tray icons?
194 2017-05-03T14:29:02  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
195 2017-05-03T14:29:19  <wumpus> I think so, yes
196 2017-05-03T14:29:31  <jonasschnelli> I expect much less maintenance on the qt4 branch. Things like HiDPI, etc. which nowadays is also common on Ubuntu is only possible with Qt5.
197 2017-05-03T14:29:38  <wumpus> software on linux that adds tray icons is kind of rare
198 2017-05-03T14:29:43  <BlueMatt> lol, why is all software terrible
199 2017-05-03T14:31:04  <wumpus> the "correct way" to do tray functionality on ubuntu is to register beneath one of the existing (vendor-provided) tray icons in the tray menu. They have an API for this. Of course, given that it's going to disappear it's not worth spending time on that.
200 2017-05-03T14:31:08  <wumpus> (if it ever was)
201 2017-05-03T14:31:34  <wumpus> but e.g. some instant messenger and email clients etc do that
202 2017-05-03T14:31:46  <BlueMatt> ah
203 2017-05-03T14:32:00  <wumpus> (probably, ubuntu maintains their own patches for that)
204 2017-05-03T14:32:43  <BlueMatt> <BlueMatt> lol, why is all software terrible
205 2017-05-03T14:33:46  <wumpus> why is all terrible
206 2017-05-03T14:34:03  <BlueMatt> fair point
207 2017-05-03T14:37:10  *** kexkey has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
208 2017-05-03T14:49:30  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: Qt5 doesn't adapt to Qt4, *and vice versa*. KDE 4 is rapidly becoming Windows XP. I think we're okay to drop Qt4 entirely as soon as it becomes a burden, but changing builds to use Qt5 ASAP is a good idea.
209 2017-05-03T14:50:32  <wumpus> the bitcoin.org builds have been using qt5 for considerable time, it's just the PPA using qt4
210 2017-05-03T14:52:01  <luke-jr> Ubuntu is no longer Unity; I'm guessing we still support an older Unity-based version though?
211 2017-05-03T14:52:29  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
212 2017-05-03T14:52:59  <wumpus> there's no Ubuntu no-Unity release yet afaik? I just meant that starting from there we can switch it to qt5
213 2017-05-03T14:53:21  <luke-jr> is there a way to make debs use a different version based on their target?
214 2017-05-03T14:53:40  <luke-jr> (parazyd - the guy who opened that PR - 's target is Knots on Devuan FWIW)
215 2017-05-03T14:53:47  <wumpus> "On 5 April 2017 Mark Shuttleworth announced that Canonical's work on Unity will end and that Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, a year away from release at the time, will abandon the Unity desktop and employ the GNOME 3 desktop instead"
216 2017-05-03T14:55:16  <wumpus> yes he's using KDE5, which doesn't work with qt4 all too well, so I understand his concern
217 2017-05-03T15:04:33  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: all debian builds have the release hardcoded
218 2017-05-03T15:04:45  <BlueMatt> well, for uploads to ppa/debian builds/ubuntu builds
219 2017-05-03T15:04:50  <BlueMatt> manual builds ignore that
220 2017-05-03T15:07:15  <luke-jr> I thought for PPAs you upload once and it built for everything? :o
221 2017-05-03T15:07:32  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
222 2017-05-03T15:07:43  <BlueMatt> nope, it gets uploaded like 5 times
223 2017-05-03T15:08:15  <luke-jr> ew
224 2017-05-03T15:08:41  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: it would be nice if there was a gitian descriptor that produced the files to upload btw ;)
225 2017-05-03T15:10:39  <BlueMatt> the files to upload is pretty much just the debian/ folder from contrib/debian and a copy of the git archive, all signed by my pgp key
226 2017-05-03T15:10:45  <BlueMatt> not sure how useful it would be, then, unsigned :p
227 2017-05-03T15:12:13  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
228 2017-05-03T15:12:51  <luke-jr> there isn't something that requires a Debian-based OS to generate?
229 2017-05-03T15:13:14  <BlueMatt> I dunno, I use the debian tools to upload, but used to use the debain tools on arch, even
230 2017-05-03T15:13:18  <BlueMatt> now its in a vm
231 2017-05-03T15:14:06  <sipa> i thought PPA was ubuntu-spdcific
232 2017-05-03T15:14:28  <luke-jr> it is
233 2017-05-03T15:14:33  <BlueMatt> PPAs are, but the tools to upload to them are debian-generic
234 2017-05-03T15:15:56  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: well, it'd be nice to have that VM turned into a gitian descriptor simply for convenience IMO; gitian as an automating tool rather that determinism tool ;)O
235 2017-05-03T15:16:22  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: yes, but there'd be no point in anyone but me using it?
236 2017-05-03T15:16:24  <BlueMatt> so why bother?
237 2017-05-03T15:16:30  <BlueMatt> its already dead-simple to do
238 2017-05-03T15:16:35  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: well, you don't want to maintain a PPA for Knots I assume?
239 2017-05-03T15:16:39  <BlueMatt> just copy contrib/debian into debian and run dpkg-buildpackage
240 2017-05-03T15:17:21  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
241 2017-05-03T15:17:22  <BlueMatt> iirc dpkg-buildpackage -S -sa -d && dput ppaname *.changes
242 2017-05-03T15:17:47  <luke-jr> k, will try that
243 2017-05-03T15:18:06  <BlueMatt> you need to add ppaname to some config file
244 2017-05-03T15:18:25  <BlueMatt> but ofc thats the part that is me-specific
245 2017-05-03T15:18:29  <BlueMatt> not gitian-able
246 2017-05-03T15:19:04  <BlueMatt> also your pgp key name has to match the top entry in debian/changelog for dpkg-buildpackage to sign it right
247 2017-05-03T15:20:12  <luke-jr> your daily and RC PPAs seem dead since 2011 btw
248 2017-05-03T15:20:18  <BlueMatt> im aware
249 2017-05-03T15:20:30  <BlueMatt> they need to be deleted, probably
250 2017-05-03T15:25:08  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
251 2017-05-03T15:25:23  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
252 2017-05-03T15:25:35  <Lauda> Is 'walletpassphrase' supposed to return 'null' now on correct entry of pass?
253 2017-05-03T15:27:47  <wumpus> it always did AFAIK
254 2017-05-03T15:28:42  <wumpus> on failure it throws an error, on success it returns NullUniValue
255 2017-05-03T15:33:19  <Lauda> It may just be me, but I haven't noticed 'null' up until today on 0.14.1
256 2017-05-03T15:33:27  <Lauda> Thanks for clarifying though!
257 2017-05-03T15:33:32  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: i cant add people to the "bitcoin" team on launchpad because adding people means they get instant upload rights....so adding people needs to be a public process of "this person is gonna get PPA upload rights"
258 2017-05-03T15:33:48  <wumpus> Lauda: might be that the GUI now displays it differently?
259 2017-05-03T15:35:07  <Lauda> wumpus IIRC the GUI never returned 'null', that's why it surprised me (it had an empty line or something). Again, might be me :l
260 2017-05-03T15:37:23  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: hmm, no way to add me with just a second PPA for knots?
261 2017-05-03T15:37:35  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: I dont believe so, but may be wrong
262 2017-05-03T15:38:12  <luke-jr> weird
263 2017-05-03T15:40:22  *** EagleTM has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
264 2017-05-03T15:40:23  <wumpus> Lauda: ah I think I remember now, IIRC that was changed because an empty line was confusing people
265 2017-05-03T15:41:04  <Lauda> maybe in 0.14.0 (just tested that one, as it also has null). Thanks :D
266 2017-05-03T15:44:41  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)': no upstream tarball found at ../bitcoin_0.11.0.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz}
267 2017-05-03T15:45:39  <BlueMatt> luke-jr: you need to create a git archive with the listed name :p
268 2017-05-03T15:47:15  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
269 2017-05-03T15:48:32  <luke-jr> dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are: bitcoin/source/clientversion.cpp
270 2017-05-03T15:49:03  <BlueMatt> yes, and the source has to match the git archive exactly, so the git archive magic in clientversion.cpp needs to be updated accordingly
271 2017-05-03T15:49:22  <BlueMatt> really you're supposed to just untar the release source (which for us is git archive)
272 2017-05-03T15:49:36  <luke-jr> not the gitian-generated tarball?
273 2017-05-03T15:50:09  <BlueMatt> i suppose it doesnt matter?
274 2017-05-03T15:50:27  <BlueMatt> i mean you can upload any source you want, i use git archives
275 2017-05-03T15:50:30  <luke-jr> the latter has clientversion correct and configure generated :D
276 2017-05-03T15:51:11  <BlueMatt> ehh, I'll stick with autogen on launchpad, doesnt matter
277 2017-05-03T15:53:50  *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
278 2017-05-03T16:03:42  <jtimon> mhmm, travis wasn't launched for #9494 on last rebase... wumpus can you or someone else make it happen or should I just push with a different commit id or something?
279 2017-05-03T16:03:45  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9494 | Introduce an ArgsManager class encapsulating cs_args, mapArgs and mapMultiArgs by jtimon · Pull Request #9494 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
280 2017-05-03T16:05:40  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] RHavar closed pull request #10100: Make ApproximateBestSubset optimize for amount of inputs (master...coinselection) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10100
281 2017-05-03T16:18:04  *** BashCo has quit IRC
282 2017-05-03T16:18:54  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
283 2017-05-03T16:23:28  *** xiangfu has quit IRC
284 2017-05-03T16:24:05  *** xiangfu has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
285 2017-05-03T16:30:38  *** timothy has quit IRC
286 2017-05-03T16:38:07  <sipa> anyone know what could be happening here? https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/228201960
287 2017-05-03T16:38:24  <sipa> no output for 10 minutes while/after running bitcoin-util-test.py
288 2017-05-03T16:38:48  <sipa> this is the second PR where I see this problem
289 2017-05-03T16:40:00  <wumpus> no, no idea. This was after the revert of #10225?
290 2017-05-03T16:40:01  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10225 | [test] Add aborttrescan tests by kallewoof · Pull Request #10225 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
291 2017-05-03T16:43:23  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
292 2017-05-03T16:43:37  <sipa> let me rebase on top of that revert
293 2017-05-03T16:45:11  *** EagleTM has left #bitcoin-core-dev
294 2017-05-03T16:45:43  <sipa> reindex-chainstate on my laptop with pertxoutcache: 1h27m to block 453354 (default assumevalid)
295 2017-05-03T16:46:17  <sipa> (and infinite dbcache, which is larger now)
296 2017-05-03T16:46:56  <sipa> i'll benchmark master as well
297 2017-05-03T16:58:06  *** heath_ is now known as heath
298 2017-05-03T16:59:43  *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
299 2017-05-03T17:01:46  <luke-jr> BlueMatt: how to get db4.8 built? :p
300 2017-05-03T17:03:38  <luke-jr> (maybe it should be a separate PPA that can just be used as a dep?)
301 2017-05-03T17:04:51  <TD-Linux> which reminds me, a recent beautiful locking bug with latest glibc and libdb breaks rpm on Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394862
302 2017-05-03T17:05:09  <TD-Linux> I don't think this affects db4.8 or wallet btw
303 2017-05-03T17:07:28  *** sambhu has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
304 2017-05-03T17:13:10  <BlueMatt> sipa: context? what is non-per-utxo?
305 2017-05-03T17:13:16  <BlueMatt> wait, what is pertxoutcache?
306 2017-05-03T17:13:40  <sipa> BlueMatt: pertxoutcache = #10195
307 2017-05-03T17:13:41  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10195 | Switch chainstate db and cache to per-txout model by sipa · Pull Request #10195 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
308 2017-05-03T17:13:56  <sipa> sorry, i think in my own branch names rather than PRs
309 2017-05-03T17:14:11  <BlueMatt> ah, k
310 2017-05-03T17:14:53  <sipa> dbcache was 6.3G at that point though, and 2.7G on disk after flushing
311 2017-05-03T17:22:20  <BlueMatt> sipa: still missing lots of context...how do those numbers compare to previously :p
312 2017-05-03T17:22:47  <BlueMatt> (esp cache size)
313 2017-05-03T17:23:13  *** sambhu has quit IRC
314 2017-05-03T17:23:53  <sipa> BlueMatt: yeah, i haven't done a rigorous benchmark on this system recently, so i can't tell
315 2017-05-03T17:24:01  <sipa> i was just surprised by a reindex of 1.5h
316 2017-05-03T17:24:20  <sipa> maybe that's due to improvements in master i'm not aware of, or maybe my memory is faulty :)
317 2017-05-03T17:29:20  <BlueMatt> or assumevalid
318 2017-05-03T17:30:02  *** mol has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
319 2017-05-03T17:33:27  *** moli_ has quit IRC
320 2017-05-03T17:41:33  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
321 2017-05-03T17:45:28  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10330: fix zapwallettxes interaction with persistent mempool (master...zapwallettxes) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10330
322 2017-05-03T17:53:56  *** vicenteH has quit IRC
323 2017-05-03T17:55:59  <jnewbery> sipa: I may be wrong, but I think that your travis issue is with the unit tests rather than bitcoin-util-test.py. Compare: https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/228344728 . I think the final line in your output:
324 2017-05-03T17:55:59  <jnewbery> make[4]: Entering directory `/home/travis/build/bitcoin/bitcoin/build/bitcoin-i686-w64-mingw32/src'
325 2017-05-03T17:55:59  <jnewbery> indicates that bitcoin-util-test.py has returned and you're now running the unit tests
326 2017-05-03T17:58:55  <sipa> jnewbery: sounds plausible
327 2017-05-03T18:00:12  <sipa> any idea on how to find out which test is the cause?
328 2017-05-03T18:01:34  <luke-jr> I'm not sure the UAWITNESS service bit in BIP 149 is sufficient. At the very least, relying on service bits is a bad idea.
329 2017-05-03T18:03:22  <luke-jr> what happens if a malicious node sends 0.14.1 a segwit block when BIP9 didn't activate? will it permanently flag it as invalid and never reconsider a stripped version?
330 2017-05-03T18:04:53  <abpa> Don't you have the same issue if SegWit 2 is proposed with BIP9 over again?
331 2017-05-03T18:05:12  <luke-jr> abpa: possibly. changing the dummy byte may workaround this.
332 2017-05-03T18:06:38  <jnewbery> how reproducible is this on travis? Perhaps you could update the travis/make config to run the unit tests with verbose output?
333 2017-05-03T18:15:05  *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
334 2017-05-03T18:16:44  <sipa> jnewbery: i have 2 PRs which reproducibly failed in 1 or 2 builds, both windows builds
335 2017-05-03T18:16:55  <sipa> how do i run the tests verbose?
336 2017-05-03T18:18:10  *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
337 2017-05-03T18:26:02  <jnewbery> sipa: test_bitcoin --log_level=all if you're running them manually, but that produces a lot of output. I haven't looked at how you'd update makefiles/travis config to do this
338 2017-05-03T18:37:29  *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
339 2017-05-03T18:37:55  *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
340 2017-05-03T18:43:00  *** molz_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
341 2017-05-03T18:43:16  <sipa> jnewbery: i cannot reproduce it locally
342 2017-05-03T18:43:19  <sipa> ok
343 2017-05-03T18:46:35  *** mol has quit IRC
344 2017-05-03T18:52:36  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jnewbery opened pull request #10331: Share config between util and functional tests (master...shared_util_function_test_config) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10331
345 2017-05-03T18:59:01  <luke-jr> woo success https://launchpad.net/~luke-jr/+archive/ubuntu/db48
346 2017-05-03T19:09:55  *** molz_ has quit IRC
347 2017-05-03T19:11:26  *** moli_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
348 2017-05-03T19:29:56  <luke-jr> FYI: release tarballs are missing contrib/debian entirely
349 2017-05-03T19:55:00  *** mol has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
350 2017-05-03T19:56:47  *** moli_ has quit IRC
351 2017-05-03T20:05:28  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] parazyd closed pull request #10316: fix contrib/debian builds; prefer qt5 (master...debian-packaging) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10316
352 2017-05-03T20:17:58  *** harrymm has quit IRC
353 2017-05-03T20:36:07  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
354 2017-05-03T20:37:50  *** protomar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
355 2017-05-03T20:38:55  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
356 2017-05-03T20:53:46  *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
357 2017-05-03T20:54:22  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
358 2017-05-03T20:55:16  *** goksinen has quit IRC
359 2017-05-03T20:58:13  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
360 2017-05-03T20:58:14  *** cryptapus_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
361 2017-05-03T20:58:14  *** cryptapus_ is now known as cryptapus_afk
362 2017-05-03T20:58:48  *** cryptapus has quit IRC
363 2017-05-03T20:59:19  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
364 2017-05-03T20:59:21  *** emucode has quit IRC
365 2017-05-03T21:01:43  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
366 2017-05-03T21:01:56  *** vicenteH has quit IRC
367 2017-05-03T21:02:51  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
368 2017-05-03T21:04:11  *** goksinen has quit IRC
369 2017-05-03T21:05:27  *** emucode has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
370 2017-05-03T21:06:42  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
371 2017-05-03T21:06:42  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
372 2017-05-03T21:08:43  *** molz_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
373 2017-05-03T21:11:07  *** str4d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
374 2017-05-03T21:11:30  *** afk11 has quit IRC
375 2017-05-03T21:11:32  *** cryptapus_afk has quit IRC
376 2017-05-03T21:11:46  *** mol has quit IRC
377 2017-05-03T21:12:08  *** cryptapus_afk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
378 2017-05-03T21:12:20  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
379 2017-05-03T21:14:03  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] instagibbs opened pull request #10333: CreateTransction fee fixes: always create change, adjust value, and p… (master...fixfeefinal) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10333
380 2017-05-03T21:24:54  <sipa> cfields: how do i go about having a #define available for the presence of clock_gettime?
381 2017-05-03T21:25:08  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
382 2017-05-03T21:25:12  <sipa> cfields: it seems configure.ac already tests for it, but there is no macro
383 2017-05-03T21:27:27  <cfields> sipa: looks like we assume it's always there?
384 2017-05-03T21:27:28  *** protomar has quit IRC
385 2017-05-03T21:28:40  <sipa> cfields: the interwebs tell me that OSX doesn't have it
386 2017-05-03T21:28:55  <cfields> sipa: ergh, I remember something about it changing in 10.12
387 2017-05-03T21:29:10  *** kexkey has quit IRC
388 2017-05-03T21:29:47  <cfields> sipa: ah right, maybe it was added and we'll have to deal with it like getentropy
389 2017-05-03T21:29:48  <cfields> checking
390 2017-05-03T21:30:10  <cfields> sipa: wait. What do you need it for?
391 2017-05-03T21:30:46  <sipa> cfields: #10322
392 2017-05-03T21:30:47  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10322 | Use hardware timestamps in RNG seeding by sipa · Pull Request #10322 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
393 2017-05-03T21:31:15  <sipa> ARM does not have an rdtsc instruction, and clock_gettime has much higher precision than gettimeofday
394 2017-05-03T21:32:05  <sipa> i guess it does not matter that much... because on OSX we'll always be on a platform that does have rdtsc
395 2017-05-03T21:32:19  <cfields> sipa: opposed to using std::chrono::high_resolution_clock ?
396 2017-05-03T21:33:03  <sipa> ah!
397 2017-05-03T21:33:43  <cfields> (i assume it's just an abstraction around clock_gettime for *nix)
398 2017-05-03T21:34:30  *** goksinen has quit IRC
399 2017-05-03T21:34:35  <sipa> checking how it is implemented; thanks for the suggestion
400 2017-05-03T21:34:48  <cfields> np
401 2017-05-03T21:35:05  * sipa is slightly scared about these things, after seeing how useless the std::random_device implementations can be...
402 2017-05-03T21:35:38  *** afk11 has quit IRC
403 2017-05-03T21:36:19  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
404 2017-05-03T21:37:43  <cfields> to answer your question, in case this doesn't work out, in the "AC_SEARCH_LIBS([clock_gettime]", just add a third argument. Do the AC_DEFINE there.
405 2017-05-03T21:38:49  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
406 2017-05-03T21:44:17  <cfields> libc++ uses:  clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &tp)
407 2017-05-03T21:44:26  *** elkalamar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
408 2017-05-03T21:44:49  *** goksinen has quit IRC
409 2017-05-03T21:45:38  <cfields> but seems to round it to msecs :(
410 2017-05-03T21:45:57  <sipa> "uses" ?
411 2017-05-03T21:46:00  <sipa> for what?
412 2017-05-03T21:46:24  <sipa> oh, for high_resolution_clock?
413 2017-05-03T21:46:27  <sipa> rly?
414 2017-05-03T21:47:27  <cfields> ah wait, that's only if there's no monotick source
415 2017-05-03T21:47:47  <cfields> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/src/chrono.cpp#L137
416 2017-05-03T21:48:22  *** Squidicuz has quit IRC
417 2017-05-03T21:48:41  *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
418 2017-05-03T21:48:54  <cfields> and https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/src/chrono.cpp#L224
419 2017-05-03T21:50:09  <sipa> cfields: can you try compiling and running https://zerobin.net/?f8af7a8040549857#9JGDEBZvv+MQzzGCfLGyvIC5C8plMb7L/Jxg34DuCYM= ?
420 2017-05-03T21:50:11  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9 | Fix for GUI on Macs and latest wxWidgets by gavinandresen · Pull Request #9 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
421 2017-05-03T21:50:35  <sipa> on linux it gives me nanosecond precision, in mingw-w64 + wine microsecond
422 2017-05-03T21:50:39  <cfields> mmm, i'm about ready to take back that suggestion. probably not worth the risk.
423 2017-05-03T21:50:52  <cfields> sec
424 2017-05-03T21:52:19  <cfields> yea, I get nano
425 2017-05-03T21:52:44  <sipa> cool
426 2017-05-03T21:54:26  <sipa> i like c++:
427 2017-05-03T21:54:27  <sipa>     return std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::nanoseconds>(std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::now().time_since_epoch()).count();
428 2017-05-03T21:54:30  <sipa> ...
429 2017-05-03T21:57:34  <cfields> heh
430 2017-05-03T21:57:41  <sipa> translates to a single instruction
431 2017-05-03T21:57:58  <sipa> (a library call, to be clear... but no conversion anywhere)
432 2017-05-03T21:58:01  <cfields> oh, nice :)
433 2017-05-03T21:58:08  <cfields> sipa: static_assert(std::ratio_greater_equal<std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::period, std::nano>::value == true, "no nanosecond precision");
434 2017-05-03T21:58:13  <cfields> zero instructions for that one :)
435 2017-05-03T21:59:16  <sipa> cfields: that compiles fine on mingw, even though the result only has microsecond precision
436 2017-05-03T22:00:08  <sipa> (it always returns numbers that are multiples of 1000)
437 2017-05-03T22:00:13  <cfields> hmm
438 2017-05-03T22:00:54  <sipa> what output do you get on osx from my snippet?
439 2017-05-03T22:02:39  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
440 2017-05-03T22:03:03  <cfields> nano
441 2017-05-03T22:03:15  <cfields> 1033378907044228
442 2017-05-03T22:03:15  <cfields> 1033378907124163
443 2017-05-03T22:03:19  <cfields> ...
444 2017-05-03T22:07:01  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
445 2017-05-03T22:07:07  <cfields> oh sorry, got that static_assert backwards. That should be ratio_less_equal
446 2017-05-03T22:07:15  <cfields> with that change, mingw fails to compile for me.
447 2017-05-03T22:07:55  <sipa> still compiles fine here
448 2017-05-03T22:08:00  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
449 2017-05-03T22:12:16  *** goksinen has quit IRC
450 2017-05-03T22:19:04  <cfields> sipa: to avoid multiples of 1000 with microsecond precision, you can use: "auto value = std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::high_resolution_clock::duration>(epoch);"
451 2017-05-03T22:19:52  <cfields> (though it sounds like your mingw is lying to you about precision at compile-time, so that may not help)
452 2017-05-03T22:19:58  <cfields> works here
453 2017-05-03T22:20:06  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
454 2017-05-03T22:21:43  *** altoz_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
455 2017-05-03T22:23:25  *** pindarhk_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
456 2017-05-03T22:23:29  *** eragmus_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
457 2017-05-03T22:23:32  *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
458 2017-05-03T22:25:56  *** comboy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
459 2017-05-03T22:26:09  *** xhire_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
460 2017-05-03T22:27:20  *** comboy_ has quit IRC
461 2017-05-03T22:27:30  *** Apocalyptic_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
462 2017-05-03T22:27:57  *** comboy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
463 2017-05-03T22:28:41  *** CodeShark has quit IRC
464 2017-05-03T22:28:41  *** pindarhk has quit IRC
465 2017-05-03T22:28:41  *** Apocalyptic has quit IRC
466 2017-05-03T22:28:42  *** btcdrak has quit IRC
467 2017-05-03T22:28:42  *** eragmus has quit IRC
468 2017-05-03T22:28:43  *** comboy has quit IRC
469 2017-05-03T22:28:43  *** xHire has quit IRC
470 2017-05-03T22:28:43  *** altoz has quit IRC
471 2017-05-03T22:28:44  *** kadoban has quit IRC
472 2017-05-03T22:28:45  *** CodeShark_ is now known as CodeShark
473 2017-05-03T22:28:45  *** Apocalyptic_ is now known as Apocalyptic
474 2017-05-03T22:29:14  *** pindarhk_ is now known as pindarhk
475 2017-05-03T22:29:25  *** eragmus_ is now known as eragmus
476 2017-05-03T22:29:42  *** goksinen has quit IRC
477 2017-05-03T22:30:50  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
478 2017-05-03T22:36:03  *** altoz_ is now known as altoz
479 2017-05-03T22:57:03  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
480 2017-05-03T23:01:31  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
481 2017-05-03T23:03:37  *** tw2006 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
482 2017-05-03T23:08:24  *** tw2006 has quit IRC
483 2017-05-03T23:08:52  *** goksinen has quit IRC
484 2017-05-03T23:20:41  *** comboy_ is now known as comboy
485 2017-05-03T23:21:56  *** goksinen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
486 2017-05-03T23:26:50  *** goksinen has quit IRC
487 2017-05-03T23:47:33  *** jannes has quit IRC
488 2017-05-03T23:50:26  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
489 2017-05-03T23:52:57  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
490 2017-05-03T23:59:56  *** abpa has quit IRC