12017-12-07T00:02:08 *** griswaalt[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
22017-12-07T00:04:53 *** str4d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32017-12-07T00:08:52 *** rhavar_ has quit IRC
42017-12-07T00:10:29 *** herzmeister[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
52017-12-07T00:10:30 *** kewde[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62017-12-07T00:10:30 *** Masaomi[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
72017-12-07T00:10:36 *** ajtowns[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
82017-12-07T00:10:57 *** Randolf has quit IRC
92017-12-07T00:14:25 *** vh has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102017-12-07T00:21:20 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
112017-12-07T00:22:14 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
122017-12-07T00:22:14 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
132017-12-07T00:22:14 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
142017-12-07T00:23:32 *** Sentineo has quit IRC
152017-12-07T00:27:37 *** Soligor has quit IRC
162017-12-07T00:29:22 *** Soligor has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
172017-12-07T00:34:13 *** jack_ is now known as j_
182017-12-07T00:34:23 *** microapple has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
192017-12-07T00:43:53 *** microapple has quit IRC
202017-12-07T00:46:46 *** vh has quit IRC
212017-12-07T00:49:49 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
222017-12-07T00:53:08 *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
232017-12-07T00:54:44 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
242017-12-07T00:54:55 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
252017-12-07T00:55:56 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
262017-12-07T00:58:26 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
272017-12-07T01:00:49 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
282017-12-07T01:00:52 *** dabura667 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
292017-12-07T01:06:16 *** promag has quit IRC
302017-12-07T01:10:21 *** jb55 has quit IRC
312017-12-07T01:16:46 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
322017-12-07T01:17:07 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
332017-12-07T01:20:53 *** trippysalmon has quit IRC
342017-12-07T01:21:31 *** btcdrak has quit IRC
352017-12-07T01:29:35 *** trippysalmon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
362017-12-07T01:34:44 *** DrFeelGood has quit IRC
372017-12-07T01:48:19 *** meshcollider_ has quit IRC
382017-12-07T01:48:41 *** meshcollider_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
392017-12-07T01:49:54 *** meshcollider is now known as mesh_
402017-12-07T01:57:41 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
412017-12-07T01:58:21 *** meshcollider_ has quit IRC
422017-12-07T01:58:41 *** meshcollider has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
432017-12-07T02:05:13 *** microapple has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
442017-12-07T02:16:52 *** dqx has quit IRC
452017-12-07T02:20:32 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
462017-12-07T02:21:25 *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
472017-12-07T02:22:24 *** fengling is now known as qinfengling
482017-12-07T02:23:44 *** qinfengling has quit IRC
492017-12-07T02:24:03 *** Murch has quit IRC
502017-12-07T02:24:09 *** Randolf has quit IRC
512017-12-07T02:24:25 *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
522017-12-07T02:24:47 *** fengling has left #bitcoin-core-dev
532017-12-07T02:25:37 *** dqx has quit IRC
542017-12-07T02:26:53 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
552017-12-07T02:28:33 *** j_ has quit IRC
562017-12-07T02:31:27 *** qinfengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
572017-12-07T02:32:21 *** qinfengling has quit IRC
582017-12-07T02:43:03 *** qinfengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
592017-12-07T02:43:28 *** Usman_Mutawakil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
602017-12-07T02:45:06 <Usman_Mutawakil> Is their any documentation that expands on the details of the source code? I'm having difficulty finding the entry points.
612017-12-07T02:45:13 <Usman_Mutawakil> there*
622017-12-07T02:46:31 *** jack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
632017-12-07T02:46:55 *** jack is now known as __J
642017-12-07T02:46:57 *** jamesob has quit IRC
652017-12-07T02:55:27 *** qinfengling has quit IRC
662017-12-07T02:57:12 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
672017-12-07T02:58:09 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
682017-12-07T02:58:49 *** qinfengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
692017-12-07T02:59:14 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
702017-12-07T02:59:15 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
712017-12-07T02:59:15 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
722017-12-07T03:00:12 <meshcollider> Usman_Mutawakil: The entry points of the programs, or the entry point to understanding it?
732017-12-07T03:01:00 <Usman_Mutawakil> Both, initially the former
742017-12-07T03:03:29 *** __J is now known as j_
752017-12-07T03:10:41 *** Randolf has quit IRC
762017-12-07T03:13:54 *** Usman_Mutawakil has quit IRC
772017-12-07T03:31:31 <meshcollider> Usman_Mutawakil: the main() function for bitcoind is in bitcoind.cpp, for bitcoin-qt it is in qt/bitcoin.cpp and there is one in bitcoin-tx.cpp and bitcoin-cli.cpp for their respective binaries too
782017-12-07T03:40:11 *** mr_burdell has quit IRC
792017-12-07T03:40:45 *** mr_burdell has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
802017-12-07T03:43:07 *** intcat has quit IRC
812017-12-07T03:43:07 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
822017-12-07T03:43:07 *** arubi has quit IRC
832017-12-07T03:43:32 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
842017-12-07T03:44:29 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
852017-12-07T03:44:53 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
862017-12-07T03:46:57 *** dqx has quit IRC
872017-12-07T03:54:42 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
882017-12-07T03:59:05 *** goatpig has quit IRC
892017-12-07T04:03:11 *** intcat has quit IRC
902017-12-07T04:04:05 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
912017-12-07T04:05:03 *** dqx has quit IRC
922017-12-07T04:06:11 *** intcat has quit IRC
932017-12-07T04:07:09 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
942017-12-07T04:22:13 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
952017-12-07T04:22:47 *** mr_burdell has quit IRC
962017-12-07T04:23:27 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
972017-12-07T04:24:18 *** mr_burdell has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
982017-12-07T04:30:37 *** qinfengling has quit IRC
992017-12-07T04:42:14 *** microapple has quit IRC
1002017-12-07T04:46:15 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1012017-12-07T04:46:15 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1022017-12-07T05:10:57 *** intcat has quit IRC
1032017-12-07T05:11:04 *** jimJackson has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1042017-12-07T05:11:47 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052017-12-07T05:13:27 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
1062017-12-07T05:14:06 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1072017-12-07T05:14:06 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
1082017-12-07T05:14:06 *** StopAndDecrypt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1092017-12-07T05:14:22 <BGL> can anyone help me with instructions on storing the blockchain &/or the wallet seperately on windows, via symbolic link, drive/mount or anything that works?
1102017-12-07T05:21:00 *** intcat has quit IRC
1112017-12-07T05:22:10 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1122017-12-07T05:39:36 *** j_ has quit IRC
1132017-12-07T05:45:45 *** j_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142017-12-07T05:49:09 <meshcollider> BGL: are you using 0.15.1 or build of master?
1152017-12-07T05:49:24 <BGL> yeah newest copy
1162017-12-07T05:49:36 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1172017-12-07T05:50:01 <BGL> 0.15.1
1182017-12-07T05:52:03 *** Randolf has quit IRC
1192017-12-07T05:52:36 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1202017-12-07T05:58:29 <jonasschnelli> cfields: ping (in case you are still awake)
1212017-12-07T06:00:56 *** indistylo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1222017-12-07T06:03:45 *** Randolf has quit IRC
1232017-12-07T06:03:47 <cfields> jonasschnelli: pong, hi
1242017-12-07T06:04:03 <jonasschnelli> hi
1252017-12-07T06:05:21 <cfields> jonasschnelli: any chance you can get ahold of a dummy certificate signing request?
1262017-12-07T06:05:33 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272017-12-07T06:05:36 <jonasschnelli> cfields: I have one here... one sec
1282017-12-07T06:05:44 <cfields> oh, that was easy :)
1292017-12-07T06:07:18 <jonasschnelli> cfields: there is now also the option to request ECC (up to 521 bits... though not sure if they will be accepted
1302017-12-07T06:07:35 <cfields> ah, nice
1312017-12-07T06:07:43 <cfields> we'd need to check back-compat too, though
1322017-12-07T06:07:50 <cfields> oh, i guess that's what you meant :)
1332017-12-07T06:07:55 *** intcat has quit IRC
1342017-12-07T06:08:48 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1352017-12-07T06:09:40 *** Sentineo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1362017-12-07T06:09:41 <jonasschnelli> cfields: Yes. Not sure if its accepted and backward compat... so better to go for RSA
1372017-12-07T06:10:09 *** dqx has quit IRC
1382017-12-07T06:10:47 <cfields> got the dummies, thanks a bunch. It's late now, but I'll have a look in the morning.
1392017-12-07T06:11:13 <jonasschnelli> cfields: Sure. Just tell me if you want access to the apple developer programm interface
1402017-12-07T06:12:51 *** esotericnonsense has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1412017-12-07T06:13:08 <cfields> jonasschnelli: hmm, we probably need to keep that locked down. assuming that access would allow me to revoke the current or request a new cert.
1422017-12-07T06:13:08 *** j_ has quit IRC
1432017-12-07T06:13:15 *** Cory has quit IRC
1442017-12-07T06:13:48 <jonasschnelli> cfields: I don't know how to best deal with that...
1452017-12-07T06:15:37 *** QuangNA has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462017-12-07T06:19:56 <cfields> jonasschnelli: i wonder if it's possible to cancel your account without revoking the certs. a quick search turned up an email address to use for revoking without an account, so maybe that's possible?
1472017-12-07T06:20:20 <cfields> then a new account could be created for each renewal. Or would that require re-certification?
1482017-12-07T06:21:09 <jonasschnelli> cfields: the account setup is somehow cumbersome. I had to verify the account (by phone) because it's an organisation. You need a DUNS number, and need to pay 99USD.
1492017-12-07T06:22:11 <cfields> ah damn, ok. I was thinking the dev account and corp id might not be 100% tied together.
1502017-12-07T06:22:16 <jonasschnelli> cfields: and finally, it's social hackable. If we lock ourselfs out,.. apple probably has a solution to lock in again if the right person from the organisation authorizes himself
1512017-12-07T06:22:20 *** intcat has quit IRC
1522017-12-07T06:22:55 <jonasschnelli> cfields: I can setup an new "team member". Maybe I can even revoke my own admin user (after have setup a new one)... but not sure how this would allow to improve things
1532017-12-07T06:23:09 *** Cory has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1542017-12-07T06:23:09 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552017-12-07T06:24:29 <cfields> yea, maybe not
1562017-12-07T06:25:13 <cfields> well, i guess the same threshold scheme would work for revocation as well. if ever necessary.
1572017-12-07T06:25:58 <cfields> ah nm, it'd be a different key
1582017-12-07T06:26:39 <cfields> (assuming someone got control of the account and created a new key)
1592017-12-07T06:27:09 <cfields> blah, I'll dive in tomorrow. thanks again :)
1602017-12-07T06:33:41 *** Apocalyptic has quit IRC
1612017-12-07T06:35:41 *** musalbas has quit IRC
1622017-12-07T06:47:17 *** booyah_ is now known as booyah
1632017-12-07T06:58:36 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642017-12-07T07:09:40 *** musalbas has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652017-12-07T07:09:49 *** DvdKhl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1662017-12-07T07:10:09 *** intcat has quit IRC
1672017-12-07T07:10:59 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1682017-12-07T07:11:03 <jonasschnelli> cfields: Yeah. Have some rest. I think it's not solvable in a secure way. On top, apple has control over everything. It's just code signing and does not ensure the binary has built properly. It's far less valuable then the gitian signatures...
1692017-12-07T07:14:35 *** Apocalyptic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1702017-12-07T07:18:56 *** intcat has quit IRC
1712017-12-07T07:20:11 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1722017-12-07T07:27:18 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
1732017-12-07T07:28:26 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1742017-12-07T07:29:02 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1752017-12-07T07:29:02 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1762017-12-07T07:39:40 *** QuangNA has quit IRC
1772017-12-07T07:40:59 *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1782017-12-07T07:45:40 <warren> A while ago checkpoints were there in part to allow IBD to go a lot faster. The checkpoints are still in there now. After headersfirst, are those checkpoints in there still serving any IBD performance purpose?
1792017-12-07T07:47:45 <sipa> warren: no, we have assumevalid for that now
1802017-12-07T07:47:58 <sipa> the checkpoints are just there to prevent a low-work headers spam attack
1812017-12-07T07:49:33 <warren> thx.
1822017-12-07T07:50:31 <sipa> assumevalid was introduced in 0.13 or 0.14 iirc
1832017-12-07T07:50:54 <sipa> https://bitcoin.org/en/release/v0.14.0#introduction-of-assumed-valid-blocks
1842017-12-07T07:56:07 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1852017-12-07T07:56:26 *** shesek has quit IRC
1862017-12-07T08:04:18 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872017-12-07T08:06:56 *** intcat has quit IRC
1882017-12-07T08:08:12 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1892017-12-07T08:09:02 *** dqx has quit IRC
1902017-12-07T08:09:23 *** promag has quit IRC
1912017-12-07T08:16:44 *** arubi has quit IRC
1922017-12-07T08:17:10 *** JackH has quit IRC
1932017-12-07T08:21:55 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1942017-12-07T08:24:00 *** intcat has quit IRC
1952017-12-07T08:24:47 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1962017-12-07T08:29:10 *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1972017-12-07T08:50:10 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
1982017-12-07T08:50:35 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1992017-12-07T08:57:34 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2002017-12-07T08:59:12 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2012017-12-07T09:02:42 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2022017-12-07T09:02:43 *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2032017-12-07T09:02:55 *** DvdKhl has quit IRC
2042017-12-07T09:03:17 *** intcat has quit IRC
2052017-12-07T09:04:02 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2062017-12-07T09:09:49 *** dermoth has quit IRC
2072017-12-07T09:10:12 *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2082017-12-07T09:13:05 *** ula has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2092017-12-07T09:25:23 *** intcat has quit IRC
2102017-12-07T09:25:55 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2112017-12-07T09:27:24 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
2122017-12-07T09:27:41 *** arubi has quit IRC
2132017-12-07T09:27:42 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2142017-12-07T09:28:37 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2152017-12-07T09:31:30 *** shesek has quit IRC
2162017-12-07T09:31:41 *** rafalcpp has quit IRC
2172017-12-07T09:38:27 *** LeMiner has quit IRC
2182017-12-07T09:38:33 *** cheese_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2192017-12-07T09:38:40 *** Cheeseo has quit IRC
2202017-12-07T09:39:43 *** musalbas has quit IRC
2212017-12-07T09:39:44 *** nullptr| has quit IRC
2222017-12-07T09:39:57 *** LeMiner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2232017-12-07T09:40:26 <GAit> wumpus: is the ARM assembly optimization the one enabled by --enable-experimental-asm or there's something ARM specific that I missed?
2242017-12-07T09:40:50 <sipa> GAit: the libsecp256k1 ARM assembly? i don't think so
2252017-12-07T09:41:19 *** BashCo has quit IRC
2262017-12-07T09:41:54 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2272017-12-07T09:41:55 <GAit> I was just going on about a comment from wumpus above about considering enabling by default the ARM assembly opt and I was wondering which flag would do that manually today
2282017-12-07T09:42:13 *** nullptr| has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2292017-12-07T09:42:29 *** musalbas has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2302017-12-07T09:47:36 <Sentineo> GAit: ./configure --with-asm=arm --enable-experimental
2312017-12-07T09:47:56 <GAit> Sentineo: thanks
2322017-12-07T09:48:02 <Sentineo> yw
2332017-12-07T09:49:48 <GAit> maybe it's just me but i find having both --enable-experimental-asm and having --with-asm=arm --enable-experimetal is a tiny bit confusing
2342017-12-07T09:55:05 *** intcat has quit IRC
2352017-12-07T09:55:54 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2362017-12-07T10:00:15 <meshcollider> Yeah GAit wumpus mentioned earlier today that some documentation is probably needed but he's not sure where the best place to put it is
2372017-12-07T10:04:39 <sipa> GAit: "--with-asm=arm --enable-experimental" are libsecp256k1 configure options; the " --enable-experimental-asm" is a bitcoin core configure option
2382017-12-07T10:04:50 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
2392017-12-07T10:04:52 *** arubi has quit IRC
2402017-12-07T10:05:15 <sipa> together it does look confusing, i agree
2412017-12-07T10:05:16 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2422017-12-07T10:08:00 *** intcat has quit IRC
2432017-12-07T10:09:03 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2442017-12-07T10:24:47 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2452017-12-07T10:25:01 *** intcat has quit IRC
2462017-12-07T10:25:54 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2472017-12-07T10:26:36 *** kabaum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2482017-12-07T10:28:59 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2492017-12-07T10:33:35 *** dqx has quit IRC
2502017-12-07T10:52:27 <wumpus> --with-asm=arm enables the secp256k1 arm assembly, --enable-experimental-asm does nothing for ARM afaik
2512017-12-07T10:53:12 <wumpus> (it might in the future if someone adds support for the ARM crypto intrinsics to bitcoin)
2522017-12-07T10:54:49 <wumpus> it'd be nice to be able to run gitian on non-x86 platforms, doing at least one such build would add reassurance against intel ME antics
2532017-12-07T10:56:56 <sipa> syncing on my kdroid was painfully slow as it flushed every few blocks in order to prune
2542017-12-07T10:57:18 <sipa> by making it only prune whwn kver 2x the prune target i made it an order of magnitude faster, i think
2552017-12-07T10:57:22 <sipa> *odroid
2562017-12-07T10:59:16 *** roadcrap has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2572017-12-07T11:01:19 *** monako has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2582017-12-07T11:02:24 <Sentineo> I run an odroid as well, the arm optimisation did help it a lot
2592017-12-07T11:02:32 <Sentineo> but my node is not pruned
2602017-12-07T11:06:15 *** monako has quit IRC
2612017-12-07T11:08:50 *** rafalcpp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2622017-12-07T11:10:41 *** ryan-c has quit IRC
2632017-12-07T11:11:26 <Provoostenator> sipa: I'll keep my Xiaomi A1 around in case someone want to get some measurements for more efficient pruning during IDB...
2642017-12-07T11:11:58 *** intcat has quit IRC
2652017-12-07T11:12:16 <Provoostenator> It took a little under 2 weeks
2662017-12-07T11:12:42 <Provoostenator> Using ABCore; I don't know if that uses any optimization.
2672017-12-07T11:13:10 *** ryan-c has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2682017-12-07T11:13:21 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2692017-12-07T11:14:05 <esotericnonsense> pimping https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11658 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11359
2702017-12-07T11:15:04 <Provoostenator> I also put a small bounty on #11720, as I'd love to try and run a full node on my iPhone X. I don't even have to prune it :-)
2712017-12-07T11:15:06 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11720 | iOS Deployment Target for RPC · Issue #11720 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2722017-12-07T11:15:08 *** LeMiner has quit IRC
2732017-12-07T11:15:31 <wumpus> Provoostenator: their source is here: https://github.com/greenaddress/abcore couldn't find the configure/compile flags there so quickly
2742017-12-07T11:15:41 <esotericnonsense> on pruning there's the seemingly longer-term thing of having writeback not flush (i haven't been paying attention to this for a while)
2752017-12-07T11:16:03 <wumpus> I don't think they're using our ARM builds, at least they didn't use to
2762017-12-07T11:16:38 *** LeMiner has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2772017-12-07T11:18:27 <Provoostenator> esotericnonsense: 11658 is wonderfully small
2782017-12-07T11:19:40 <esotericnonsense> i've only just seen it, i'm ill at the moment and trying to reason through the code isn't working. if it actually does what it says on the tin i like it and agree with promag that 10% is too little.
2792017-12-07T11:21:13 <esotericnonsense> wondering if there's some weird interaction with minimum prune size like if you are at 550MiB and use 50% can you end up with very few blocks.
2802017-12-07T11:22:21 *** intcat has quit IRC
2812017-12-07T11:23:18 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2822017-12-07T11:24:23 <Provoostenator> wumpus: I just nagged the author on Twitter, we'll see
2832017-12-07T11:25:22 <wumpus> might make sense to make their ndk build part of the standard gitian targets at some point
2842017-12-07T11:25:50 <Provoostenator> Maybe it should never go below 550, but any prune size above that will use some intelligent percentage.
2852017-12-07T11:26:00 <wumpus> anyhow if they reply please let me know what they use now
2862017-12-07T11:28:00 *** intcat has quit IRC
2872017-12-07T11:29:18 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2882017-12-07T11:29:18 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2892017-12-07T11:34:20 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: Provoostenator: I also wonder if abcore added android ndk to the depends system (but never upstreamed it) or they're building their own dependencies somehow
2902017-12-07T11:35:01 <sipa> GAit is the author of abcore
2912017-12-07T11:35:11 <wumpus> oh lol
2922017-12-07T11:36:31 <Provoostenator> No, we should reach him through a screenshot of Twitter posted on Reddit with a link to this IRC log...
2932017-12-07T11:36:41 *** blackbaba has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2942017-12-07T11:36:43 <wumpus> hahahahah
2952017-12-07T11:38:14 <sipa> Provoostenator: excuse me, but i'm sure you meant a screenshot of a slack with a bridge of this IRC channel :p
2962017-12-07T11:39:32 <Provoostenator> That too. How hard would it be to make that bridge two-way, somehow mapping and authenticating Slack names to IRC names for those who use both?
2972017-12-07T11:41:33 <wumpus> I'm would be surprised if there's not already software for that and you just have to stash it somewhere and configure it. But to be honest I'd prefer no bridges *to* this channel, in the interest of managing signal-to-noise.
2982017-12-07T11:42:28 <Provoostenator> I suppose most people who can compile from source can figure out IRC.
2992017-12-07T11:42:32 <GAit> lol
3002017-12-07T11:43:17 <GAit> so abcore used to use debian/archlinux build until core provided arm binaries. Now it uses ndk native builds, using github.com/greenaddress/bitcoin_ndk for the building part
3012017-12-07T11:43:52 <GAit> would love some feedback, it's very hacked up together (though I'm not too worried as abcore is experimental and in alpha)
3022017-12-07T11:44:13 *** dabura667 has quit IRC
3032017-12-07T11:44:49 <GAit> to enable the arm optimization i will need to enable armv-7a (for Thumb-2)
3042017-12-07T11:45:09 <wumpus> Provoostenator: there you go: https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge (#monero-dev seems to have this, not sure what they're bridging from)
3052017-12-07T11:45:23 <wumpus> GAit: thanks
3062017-12-07T11:46:03 *** blackbaba has quit IRC
3072017-12-07T11:46:26 <GAit> I'm using clang as android ndk deprecated gcc and they are going to remove it
3082017-12-07T11:47:17 <GAit> however i had to use an older ndk than the latest because the latest has some issues/bad headers
3092017-12-07T11:47:48 <wumpus> GAit: one suggestion would be to benchmark whether thumb or arm instructions gives the best performance. I vaguely remember that for me, simple ARM32 instructions gave the best performance at some point at least on the secp256k1 benches, on i.mx6.
3102017-12-07T11:48:25 <Provoostenator> wumpus: nice. I suppose you don't really need individual user authentication for this, just as long as all messages end up on both services (without feedback loops).
3112017-12-07T11:48:52 <GAit> wumpus: you mean things like field_10x26_arm.s
3122017-12-07T11:49:21 <wumpus> GAit: I mean the code generation of the compiler, what kind of instructions it generates, whether it uses the processor in ARM or THUMB mode (or interwork)
3132017-12-07T11:50:18 <GAit> indeed to make sure one would need to benchmark. but before you can benchmark you need to get it to work, and i will have to enable v7a/thumb-2 otherwise i get rc/asm/field_10x26_arm.s:109:2: error: instruction requires: thumb2
3142017-12-07T11:50:32 <wumpus> THUMB usually results in more compact code, but ARM instructions allow more flexibility, so doing more in less instructions. Then again this was relevant for ARM32, probably not for AARCH64.
3152017-12-07T11:52:20 <wumpus> GAit: just looked at the bitcoin_ndk build a bit and doesn't seem like it needs huge patches, I guess the introduction of src/ifaddrs.c is the biggest change
3162017-12-07T11:53:39 <GAit> wumpus: yes, it doesn't need much patching. Not with this ndk version anyway. Had to do a lot more with later and still didn't manage so i gave up.
3172017-12-07T11:53:51 <wumpus> I vaguely remember needing to do the "i686_linux_CC=$(default_host_CC) -m32" change in linux.mk as well. This was for building depends on ARM64, for ARM64. Depends is really rooted in 'we build from x86 linux' right now.
3182017-12-07T11:54:09 <wumpus> hmm okay
3192017-12-07T11:54:58 <GAit> I'm terrible at make/build otherwise i'd see if i could make a PR or more out of it
3202017-12-07T11:55:09 <wumpus> so building bitcoin core on most recent ndk is an open issue?
3212017-12-07T11:55:15 <GAit> (assuming there was interest)
3222017-12-07T11:55:22 <wumpus> there's certainly interest
3232017-12-07T11:55:31 <GAit> yes, i can do that on a branch so that you can see the travis log
3242017-12-07T11:56:26 <wumpus> going to open an issue for that
3252017-12-07T11:59:10 *** noglar_ has quit IRC
3262017-12-07T12:02:41 <wumpus> GAit: just opened #11844 feel free to post that there so people have an idea what the open problems are
3272017-12-07T12:02:42 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11844 | Bitcoin core build on Android NDK · Issue #11844 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3282017-12-07T12:07:01 <wumpus> FYI some people have also been building bitcoin core natively on android using termux (#11388), but that uses a debian derivative not NDK
3292017-12-07T12:07:03 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11388 | Building within termux fails with incomplete type CBlock · Issue #11388 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3302017-12-07T12:07:45 <wumpus> oh that was esotericnonsense :)
3312017-12-07T12:07:50 <GAit> great, thanks wumpus . Oh I didn't know about termux having core builds, i searched in their repos. I was going to try that after failing on NDK but eventually trying different things got it to work
3322017-12-07T12:08:43 <esotericnonsense> GAit: it doesn't, i built it on termux
3332017-12-07T12:09:00 <esotericnonsense> i don't have the time to maintain it so didn't submit to packages
3342017-12-07T12:10:16 <wumpus> agree, distro packages for bitcoin are a bad idea if they're not maintained
3352017-12-07T12:10:42 <wumpus> tends to keep a share of the users permanently stuck in the past
3362017-12-07T12:12:07 *** noglar_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3372017-12-07T12:13:01 <Sentineo> bitcoins build system is awasome anyway, do not feel the lack of an official distro package per distribution
3382017-12-07T12:14:31 *** intcat has quit IRC
3392017-12-07T12:15:29 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3402017-12-07T12:16:06 <wumpus> yes it's pretty neat, quite uncommon for open source projects to ship with scripts to easily build dependencies
3412017-12-07T12:16:18 *** ula has quit IRC
3422017-12-07T12:16:56 <Sentineo> the only thing I could not manage is the gitian build
3432017-12-07T12:17:05 <Sentineo> but I did not try hard enough :)
3442017-12-07T12:17:37 <GAit> wumpus: indeed I would have never managed without the build system being 'generic' and being battle tested against arm
3452017-12-07T12:17:46 <wumpus> yeah gitian could definitely be easier
3462017-12-07T12:18:32 <Provoostenator> I still have some notes for a future Gitian documentation improvement PR, but I'd like to do a few more builds to wrap my head around it.
3472017-12-07T12:19:30 <Sentineo> Provoostenator: if you have a draft I would be happe to at least give you feedback :)
3482017-12-07T12:19:34 <Provoostenator> I'd like to get it to a point where anyone with OSX (others can do Linux / Windows) and very little sysadmin skills can sign a build.
3492017-12-07T12:19:45 *** esotericnonsense has quit IRC
3502017-12-07T12:20:44 <Provoostenator> Sentineo: my scribbled notes are worse than the actual documentation :-)
3512017-12-07T12:21:09 <Sentineo> :) ok, just in case ... let me know
3522017-12-07T12:21:18 <wumpus> but better than nothing at all probably
3532017-12-07T12:22:01 <Provoostenator> I also wonder if it's possible to verify an OSX signed binary without gitian signers having to sign off on the signed binary.
3542017-12-07T12:22:39 <Provoostenator> I.e. isn't it possible to unpack a signed binary, strip the signature and then check that against the unsigned gitian build?
3552017-12-07T12:23:14 <Provoostenator> I'd need to study how OSX code signing actually works.
3562017-12-07T12:24:30 <wumpus> it's possible, but if gitian signers don't sign off on the signed binary that makes verification of hashes a lot harder. No longer can you just use sha256, but need a script, which might have been tampered with itself!
3572017-12-07T12:25:23 <Provoostenator> Right, so that would only make sense if the script is trivial enough that it fits on a T-shirt.
3582017-12-07T12:25:25 <wumpus> we looked at the inverse approach that you describe back in the day that we introduced signed executables, but decided not to because of drawbacks like that
3592017-12-07T12:25:48 <wumpus> right, and it takes some serious binary surgery so that's likely not the case and will have dependencies of itself
3602017-12-07T12:26:21 <Provoostenator> "Binary surgery" - lol
3612017-12-07T12:26:58 <Provoostenator> It's weird though; these executables work, so you'd think everything is already in the system...
3622017-12-07T12:30:47 *** microapple has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3632017-12-07T12:35:32 *** instagibbs has quit IRC
3642017-12-07T12:43:16 *** SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3652017-12-07T12:53:30 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11602: utils: removed deprecated check and function for OpenSSL compatiblity (master...old_openssl_names) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11602
3662017-12-07T12:56:32 *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3672017-12-07T12:59:01 <GAit> wumpus: so for arm/thumb i can't just set global CFLAGS because otherwise native_ccaache will pick them up and break, suggest hacking linux.mk or is there an easy way maybe to disable native_ccache
3682017-12-07T12:59:50 *** Emcy has quit IRC
3692017-12-07T12:59:55 <wumpus> could add a NO_CCACHE that works similar to NO_WALLET NO_QT etc, but no currently that doesn't exist
3702017-12-07T13:00:36 <wumpus> but I agree that is inconvenient, maybe cfields has a simpler sugggestion
3712017-12-07T13:01:23 <GAit> well disabling it would be a hack, if itn's not there i think is better that i patch directly linux.mk to add my cflags there. Or, I could set them maybe just for the core build and not for the dependencies.
3722017-12-07T13:01:31 <wumpus> "passing global cflags for the target" would be nice as a supported option for depends, no matter ccache
3732017-12-07T13:01:45 <GAit> yes indeed it would
3742017-12-07T13:02:10 <wumpus> I've run into similar issues in experimentation but also ended up patching makefiles
3752017-12-07T13:02:30 <GAit> i feel terrible/funny because i assumed it was possible and felt too embarassed to ask how so i've been looking and patching when i didn't find a better way
3762017-12-07T13:04:00 <GAit> anyway for now i'll try to set the flags just for the core build and not for the deps, unless that's stupid for some reason
3772017-12-07T13:06:39 <GAit> by the way, I think it's curious how ccache picks up my cflags but not my cc or cxx env vars
3782017-12-07T13:07:47 <wumpus> none of the dependencies that are not built into bitcoin's source tree are performance critical (maybe with the exception of boost, but that's mostly header only?)
3792017-12-07T13:08:24 <wumpus> so if you're experimenting with build flags setting them just for the core build is probably fine
3802017-12-07T13:09:46 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/497d0e014cc7...7630a1fe9a4c
3812017-12-07T13:09:46 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 529b866 MeshCollider: Test datadir in conf file exists
3822017-12-07T13:09:47 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7630a1f Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11829: Test datadir specified in conf file exists...
3832017-12-07T13:11:19 *** wxss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3842017-12-07T13:12:18 *** meshcollider has quit IRC
3852017-12-07T13:15:25 <GAit> wumpus: cool, ta
3862017-12-07T13:16:15 *** jimJackson has quit IRC
3872017-12-07T13:17:03 <wumpus> (there's a similar consideration on whether to do flto on just bitcoin core or all the dependencies as well. Though that experiment was put on hold when it turned out flto somehow negatively affected performance, at least in a specific case)
3882017-12-07T13:21:42 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3892017-12-07T13:22:34 <GAit> wumpus: i've updated the issue you raised with the specific failure, has to do with NDK doing something stupid and the woraround would be to not set FILE_OFFSET_BITS
3902017-12-07T13:22:43 <GAit> only breaks on 32 bit, on 64 bit it works
3912017-12-07T13:22:55 <wumpus> okay at least easy to work around then, good
3922017-12-07T13:23:56 <GAit> well it wasn't that easy for me, i tried to unset it in a couple of places but probably i just misunderstood how it worked
3932017-12-07T13:24:15 <GAit> or what was setting it. I think core sets it
3942017-12-07T13:24:21 <GAit> but maybe some of the deps too?
3952017-12-07T13:25:07 <GAit> anyway after a long intensive and unfruitful discussion with the ndk that's when i just went to an earlier version
3962017-12-07T13:25:21 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
3972017-12-07T13:27:00 *** intcat has quit IRC
3982017-12-07T13:28:47 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] wjcloud opened pull request #11845: Add gitian PGP key: wjcloud (master...p) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11845
3992017-12-07T13:29:01 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4002017-12-07T13:29:26 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
4012017-12-07T13:39:10 <wumpus> yes, core sets it in configure.ac
4022017-12-07T13:39:55 <GAit> yes so i tried to unset it there but i think it still failed, i.e. something else was setting it too, or at least that's what i recall
4032017-12-07T13:41:49 <wumpus> indeed,if that was all then we could just stop setting it when ndk build detected
4042017-12-07T13:42:24 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4052017-12-07T13:45:03 <GAit> the asm flags passed to core only break the configure, doesn't find boost sleep, i assume both (or neither) need them can't do it half and half
4062017-12-07T13:47:04 <wumpus> can you pastebin configure.log part where the boost sleep test fails? it has the detailed error message
4072017-12-07T13:47:19 <wumpus> the "cannot find boost sleep" error is completely useless in that regard it can mean so many things
4082017-12-07T13:48:47 <wumpus> would make sense to structure the boost detection differently, so that it first tries if it can compile/link anything against boost and only then try to find the sleep function to use
4092017-12-07T13:49:33 *** gonzazoid has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4102017-12-07T13:49:51 <GAit> sure one sec
4112017-12-07T13:51:55 *** j_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4122017-12-07T13:52:54 <GAit> wumpus: https://pastebin.com/vUVcQSV9
4132017-12-07T13:53:38 <GAit> chokes on choke me
4142017-12-07T13:54:03 <wumpus> errors like /build/bitcoin-0.15.1/depends/arm-linux-androideabi/share/../lib/libboost_system-mt.a(error_code.o)(.ARM.extab+0xc): error: undefined reference to '__gxx_personality_v0' look scarier
4152017-12-07T13:54:25 <wumpus> looks like it can't even link the c++ standard libary
4162017-12-07T13:54:37 <wumpus> so yes, apparently that doesn't work
4172017-12-07T13:55:33 <GAit> for what is worth this is master of bitcoin_ndk with extra "-march=armv7-a -mthumb" cflags for the core part (not the deps) of arm (not arm64)
4182017-12-07T13:55:46 <GAit> cflags and cxxflags to be precise
4192017-12-07T14:00:25 <wumpus> strange
4202017-12-07T14:00:57 *** goatpig has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4212017-12-07T14:06:27 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4222017-12-07T14:06:42 <wumpus> I wonder which of those two is the culprit
4232017-12-07T14:07:35 <wumpus> my guess would be at changing the arch
4242017-12-07T14:08:56 <wumpus> there are some compiler settings that effectively need a new build root but I've never noticed thumb/arm to be one of those
4252017-12-07T14:10:26 <wumpus> oh I remember it depends on the setting of interwork, ift that's not enabled you can't mix thumb and ARM. But it's pretyt much the default for a long time for linux distros at least.
4262017-12-07T14:11:05 *** dqx has quit IRC
4272017-12-07T14:11:36 <GAit> maybe because i'm using clang the toolchain is not assuming linux? not sure
4282017-12-07T14:12:07 <wumpus> it could all be different for ndk which is not really linux
4292017-12-07T14:12:21 <GAit> kernel is linux, but no gnuland
4302017-12-07T14:12:53 <wumpus> kernel is a specially patched kernel to add bind etc, or are the android patches upstream now?
4312017-12-07T14:13:24 <wumpus> binder*
4322017-12-07T14:14:01 <wumpus> but yes that part is compatible in one direction, you can run debian rootfs' on android, but not android rootfs on debian
4332017-12-07T14:15:12 *** microapple has quit IRC
4342017-12-07T14:17:25 *** instagibbs has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4352017-12-07T14:18:08 *** promag has quit IRC
4362017-12-07T14:20:03 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4372017-12-07T14:25:11 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
4382017-12-07T14:25:49 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4392017-12-07T14:26:59 *** intcat has quit IRC
4402017-12-07T14:28:17 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4412017-12-07T14:30:08 *** intcat has quit IRC
4422017-12-07T14:31:28 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4432017-12-07T14:48:26 *** promag has quit IRC
4442017-12-07T14:48:27 *** gonzazoid has quit IRC
4452017-12-07T14:48:27 *** BashCo has quit IRC
4462017-12-07T14:48:27 *** trippysalmon has quit IRC
4472017-12-07T14:48:27 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
4482017-12-07T14:48:27 *** so has quit IRC
4492017-12-07T14:48:27 *** BGL has quit IRC
4502017-12-07T14:48:27 *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
4512017-12-07T14:48:27 *** chjj has quit IRC
4522017-12-07T14:48:27 *** murchandamus has quit IRC
4532017-12-07T14:48:27 *** merehap has quit IRC
4542017-12-07T14:48:27 *** Deadhand has quit IRC
4552017-12-07T14:48:27 *** belcher has quit IRC
4562017-12-07T14:48:28 *** griswaalt[m] has quit IRC
4572017-12-07T14:48:28 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
4582017-12-07T14:48:28 *** earlz has quit IRC
4592017-12-07T14:48:28 *** ossifrage has quit IRC
4602017-12-07T14:48:28 *** _flow_ has quit IRC
4612017-12-07T14:48:28 *** helo has quit IRC
4622017-12-07T14:48:29 *** hsmiths has quit IRC
4632017-12-07T14:48:29 *** andytoshi has quit IRC
4642017-12-07T14:48:29 *** PatBoy has quit IRC
4652017-12-07T14:48:29 *** harding_ has quit IRC
4662017-12-07T14:48:29 *** pigeons has quit IRC
4672017-12-07T14:48:29 *** musalbas has quit IRC
4682017-12-07T14:48:30 *** windsok has quit IRC
4692017-12-07T14:48:30 *** twistedline has quit IRC
4702017-12-07T14:48:30 *** go1111111 has quit IRC
4712017-12-07T14:48:30 *** Arokh has quit IRC
4722017-12-07T14:48:30 *** intcat has quit IRC
4732017-12-07T14:48:30 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
4742017-12-07T14:48:30 *** arubi has quit IRC
4752017-12-07T14:48:30 *** dermoth has quit IRC
4762017-12-07T14:48:30 *** instagibbs has quit IRC
4772017-12-07T14:48:30 *** Emcy_ has quit IRC
4782017-12-07T14:48:30 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has quit IRC
4792017-12-07T14:48:30 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
4802017-12-07T14:48:30 *** indistylo has quit IRC
4812017-12-07T14:48:31 *** roasbeef has quit IRC
4822017-12-07T14:48:31 *** Anduck has quit IRC
4832017-12-07T14:48:31 *** puff has quit IRC
4842017-12-07T14:48:31 *** newbie-- has quit IRC
4852017-12-07T14:48:31 *** gmaxwell has quit IRC
4862017-12-07T14:48:31 *** CryptAxe has quit IRC
4872017-12-07T14:48:31 *** newbold_ has quit IRC
4882017-12-07T14:48:31 *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
4892017-12-07T14:48:31 *** waxwing has quit IRC
4902017-12-07T14:48:31 *** chainhead has quit IRC
4912017-12-07T14:48:31 *** nanotube has quit IRC
4922017-12-07T14:48:31 *** kanzure has quit IRC
4932017-12-07T14:48:31 *** nullptr| has quit IRC
4942017-12-07T14:48:32 *** str4d has quit IRC
4952017-12-07T14:48:32 *** booyah has quit IRC
4962017-12-07T14:48:32 *** roadcrap has quit IRC
4972017-12-07T14:48:32 *** ensign has quit IRC
4982017-12-07T14:48:32 *** Taek has quit IRC
4992017-12-07T14:48:32 *** nsh has quit IRC
5002017-12-07T14:48:32 *** Dyaheon has quit IRC
5012017-12-07T14:48:32 *** luke-jr has quit IRC
5022017-12-07T14:48:32 *** berndj has quit IRC
5032017-12-07T14:48:32 *** Dummbatz has quit IRC
5042017-12-07T14:48:32 *** cysm has quit IRC
5052017-12-07T14:48:32 *** jl2012 has quit IRC
5062017-12-07T14:48:32 *** aspect_ has quit IRC
5072017-12-07T14:48:32 *** jcorgan has quit IRC
5082017-12-07T14:48:32 *** gribble has quit IRC
5092017-12-07T14:48:32 *** adiabat has quit IRC
5102017-12-07T14:48:33 *** Masaomi[m] has quit IRC
5112017-12-07T14:48:33 *** photonclock_ has quit IRC
5122017-12-07T14:48:33 *** echonaut2 has quit IRC
5132017-12-07T14:48:33 *** spinza has quit IRC
5142017-12-07T14:48:33 *** lio17 has quit IRC
5152017-12-07T14:48:33 *** Deacydal has quit IRC
5162017-12-07T14:48:33 *** owowo has quit IRC
5172017-12-07T14:48:33 *** lari has quit IRC
5182017-12-07T14:48:33 *** atroxes has quit IRC
5192017-12-07T14:48:33 *** sjums has quit IRC
5202017-12-07T14:48:33 *** rubensayshi has quit IRC
5212017-12-07T14:48:33 *** pindarhk_ has quit IRC
5222017-12-07T14:48:33 *** eragmus has quit IRC
5232017-12-07T14:48:33 *** derbumi has quit IRC
5242017-12-07T14:48:33 *** jimpo has quit IRC
5252017-12-07T14:48:33 *** bitbee has quit IRC
5262017-12-07T14:48:33 *** newbold has quit IRC
5272017-12-07T14:48:34 *** adam3us has quit IRC
5282017-12-07T14:48:34 *** jonasschnelli has quit IRC
5292017-12-07T14:48:34 *** robby938 has quit IRC
5302017-12-07T14:48:34 *** wbnns has quit IRC
5312017-12-07T14:48:34 *** CodeShark has quit IRC
5322017-12-07T14:48:34 *** niska has quit IRC
5332017-12-07T14:48:34 *** Muis has quit IRC
5342017-12-07T14:48:34 *** emzy has quit IRC
5352017-12-07T14:48:34 *** phantomcircuit has quit IRC
5362017-12-07T14:48:34 *** klow has quit IRC
5372017-12-07T14:48:35 *** warren has quit IRC
5382017-12-07T14:48:35 *** jrayhawk has quit IRC
5392017-12-07T14:48:35 *** wolfspraul has quit IRC
5402017-12-07T14:48:35 *** lrvick has quit IRC
5412017-12-07T14:48:35 *** wallet42 has quit IRC
5422017-12-07T14:48:35 *** Vortiago has quit IRC
5432017-12-07T14:48:35 *** thrasher` has quit IRC
5442017-12-07T14:48:35 *** Sentineo has quit IRC
5452017-12-07T14:48:35 *** rabidus has quit IRC
5462017-12-07T14:48:35 *** gwillen has quit IRC
5472017-12-07T14:48:35 *** marsadm has quit IRC
5482017-12-07T14:48:35 *** da2ce7_ has quit IRC
5492017-12-07T14:48:35 *** baldur_ has quit IRC
5502017-12-07T14:48:35 *** isis has quit IRC
5512017-12-07T14:48:35 *** cryptapus has quit IRC
5522017-12-07T14:48:35 *** shtirlic has quit IRC
5532017-12-07T14:48:36 *** alephzero has quit IRC
5542017-12-07T14:48:36 *** j_ has quit IRC
5552017-12-07T14:48:36 *** JackH has quit IRC
5562017-12-07T14:48:36 *** michagogo has quit IRC
5572017-12-07T14:48:36 *** lifeofguenter_ has quit IRC
5582017-12-07T14:48:36 *** commavir has quit IRC
5592017-12-07T14:48:36 *** sugarpuff has quit IRC
5602017-12-07T14:48:36 *** xHire has quit IRC
5612017-12-07T14:48:36 *** crazyprodigy has quit IRC
5622017-12-07T14:48:36 *** stevenroose has quit IRC
5632017-12-07T14:48:36 *** BlueMatt has quit IRC
5642017-12-07T14:48:36 *** schnerchi has quit IRC
5652017-12-07T14:48:36 *** gijensen has quit IRC
5662017-12-07T14:48:36 *** zxzzt has quit IRC
5672017-12-07T14:48:36 *** sdaftuar has quit IRC
5682017-12-07T14:48:36 *** asoltys has quit IRC
5692017-12-07T14:48:36 *** mariorz has quit IRC
5702017-12-07T14:48:36 *** AndyS2 has quit IRC
5712017-12-07T14:48:37 *** dlb76 has quit IRC
5722017-12-07T14:48:37 *** comboy has quit IRC
5732017-12-07T14:48:37 *** ibrightly has quit IRC
5742017-12-07T14:48:37 *** TheV01d has quit IRC
5752017-12-07T14:48:37 *** goatpig has quit IRC
5762017-12-07T14:48:37 *** JustAGuy_ has quit IRC
5772017-12-07T14:48:37 *** Varunram has quit IRC
5782017-12-07T14:48:37 *** sipa has quit IRC
5792017-12-07T14:48:37 *** kinlo has quit IRC
5802017-12-07T14:48:37 *** wxss has quit IRC
5812017-12-07T14:48:38 *** rafalcpp has quit IRC
5822017-12-07T14:48:38 *** Apocalyptic has quit IRC
5832017-12-07T14:48:38 *** whphhg has quit IRC
5842017-12-07T14:48:38 *** harrymm has quit IRC
5852017-12-07T14:48:38 *** Squidicuz has quit IRC
5862017-12-07T14:48:38 *** BCBot has quit IRC
5872017-12-07T14:48:38 *** aj has quit IRC
5882017-12-07T14:48:38 *** rockhouse has quit IRC
5892017-12-07T14:48:38 *** sturles has quit IRC
5902017-12-07T14:48:38 *** ybit has quit IRC
5912017-12-07T14:48:38 *** Eliel has quit IRC
5922017-12-07T14:48:38 *** petertodd has quit IRC
5932017-12-07T14:48:38 *** Randolf has quit IRC
5942017-12-07T14:48:38 *** ajtowns[m] has quit IRC
5952017-12-07T14:48:38 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
5962017-12-07T14:48:38 *** unholymachine has quit IRC
5972017-12-07T14:48:38 *** jouke has quit IRC
5982017-12-07T14:48:39 *** jnewbery has quit IRC
5992017-12-07T14:48:39 *** davec_ has quit IRC
6002017-12-07T14:48:39 *** lesderid has quit IRC
6012017-12-07T14:48:39 *** jouke_ has quit IRC
6022017-12-07T14:48:39 *** cfields has quit IRC
6032017-12-07T14:48:39 *** nOgAnOo has quit IRC
6042017-12-07T14:48:39 *** trotski2000 has quit IRC
6052017-12-07T14:48:39 *** profall has quit IRC
6062017-12-07T14:48:39 *** exit70 has quit IRC
6072017-12-07T14:48:39 *** lejitz has quit IRC
6082017-12-07T14:48:39 *** brg444 has quit IRC
6092017-12-07T14:51:41 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6102017-12-07T14:52:05 *** kewde[m] has quit IRC
6112017-12-07T14:52:06 *** herzmeister[m] has quit IRC
6122017-12-07T14:52:17 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6132017-12-07T14:52:17 *** gonzazoid has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6142017-12-07T14:52:17 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6152017-12-07T14:52:17 *** trippysalmon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6162017-12-07T14:52:17 *** BGL has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6172017-12-07T14:52:17 *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6182017-12-07T14:52:17 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6192017-12-07T14:52:17 *** murchandamus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6202017-12-07T14:52:17 *** merehap has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6212017-12-07T14:52:17 *** Deadhand has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6222017-12-07T14:52:47 *** dcousens has quit IRC
6232017-12-07T14:53:25 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6242017-12-07T14:54:39 *** brg444 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6252017-12-07T14:54:39 *** lejitz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6262017-12-07T14:54:39 *** profall has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6272017-12-07T14:54:39 *** trotski2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6282017-12-07T14:54:39 *** nOgAnOo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6292017-12-07T14:54:39 *** cfields has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6302017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jouke_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6312017-12-07T14:54:39 *** lesderid has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6322017-12-07T14:54:39 *** exit70 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6332017-12-07T14:54:39 *** davec_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6342017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jnewbery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6352017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jouke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6362017-12-07T14:54:39 *** unholymachine has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6372017-12-07T14:54:39 *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6382017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6392017-12-07T14:54:39 *** dermoth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6402017-12-07T14:54:39 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6412017-12-07T14:54:39 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6422017-12-07T14:54:39 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6432017-12-07T14:54:39 *** TheV01d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6442017-12-07T14:54:39 *** ibrightly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6452017-12-07T14:54:39 *** comboy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6462017-12-07T14:54:39 *** dlb76 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6472017-12-07T14:54:39 *** mariorz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6482017-12-07T14:54:39 *** asoltys has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6492017-12-07T14:54:39 *** sdaftuar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6502017-12-07T14:54:39 *** zxzzt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6512017-12-07T14:54:39 *** gijensen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6522017-12-07T14:54:39 *** BlueMatt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6532017-12-07T14:54:39 *** schnerchi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6542017-12-07T14:54:39 *** stevenroose has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6552017-12-07T14:54:39 *** crazyprodigy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6562017-12-07T14:54:39 *** xHire has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6572017-12-07T14:54:39 *** sugarpuff has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6582017-12-07T14:54:39 *** AndyS2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6592017-12-07T14:54:39 *** commavir has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6602017-12-07T14:54:39 *** lifeofguenter_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6612017-12-07T14:54:39 *** michagogo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6622017-12-07T14:54:39 *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6632017-12-07T14:54:39 *** j_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6642017-12-07T14:54:39 *** instagibbs has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6652017-12-07T14:54:39 *** wxss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6662017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6672017-12-07T14:54:39 *** rafalcpp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6682017-12-07T14:54:39 *** roadcrap has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6692017-12-07T14:54:39 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6702017-12-07T14:54:39 *** musalbas has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6712017-12-07T14:54:39 *** nullptr| has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6722017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6732017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6742017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Sentineo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6752017-12-07T14:54:39 *** indistylo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6762017-12-07T14:54:39 *** str4d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6772017-12-07T14:54:39 *** booyah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6782017-12-07T14:54:39 *** photonclock_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6792017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6802017-12-07T14:54:39 *** echonaut2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6812017-12-07T14:54:39 *** earlz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6822017-12-07T14:54:39 *** spinza has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6832017-12-07T14:54:39 *** lio17 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6842017-12-07T14:54:39 *** pigeons has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6852017-12-07T14:54:39 *** harding_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6862017-12-07T14:54:39 *** PatBoy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6872017-12-07T14:54:39 *** andytoshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6882017-12-07T14:54:39 *** hsmiths has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6892017-12-07T14:54:39 *** helo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6902017-12-07T14:54:39 *** _flow_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6912017-12-07T14:54:39 *** ossifrage has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6922017-12-07T14:54:39 *** windsok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6932017-12-07T14:54:39 *** whphhg has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6942017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Deacydal has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6952017-12-07T14:54:39 *** roasbeef has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6962017-12-07T14:54:39 *** rabidus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6972017-12-07T14:54:39 *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6982017-12-07T14:54:39 *** twistedline has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6992017-12-07T14:54:39 *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7002017-12-07T14:54:39 *** ensign has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7012017-12-07T14:54:39 *** gwillen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7022017-12-07T14:54:39 *** go1111111 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7032017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Taek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7042017-12-07T14:54:39 *** nsh has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7052017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Dyaheon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7062017-12-07T14:54:39 *** marsadm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7072017-12-07T14:54:39 *** luke-jr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7082017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7092017-12-07T14:54:39 *** lari has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7102017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Anduck has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7112017-12-07T14:54:39 *** da2ce7_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7122017-12-07T14:54:39 *** baldur_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7132017-12-07T14:54:39 *** niska has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7142017-12-07T14:54:39 *** berndj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7152017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Dummbatz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7162017-12-07T14:54:39 *** cysm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7172017-12-07T14:54:39 *** isis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7182017-12-07T14:54:39 *** cryptapus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7192017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jl2012 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7202017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Muis has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7212017-12-07T14:54:39 *** aspect_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7222017-12-07T14:54:39 *** atroxes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7232017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jcorgan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7242017-12-07T14:54:39 *** gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7252017-12-07T14:54:39 *** adiabat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7262017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Arokh has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7272017-12-07T14:54:39 *** BCBot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7282017-12-07T14:54:39 *** emzy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7292017-12-07T14:54:39 *** shtirlic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7302017-12-07T14:54:39 *** kanzure has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7312017-12-07T14:54:39 *** nanotube has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7322017-12-07T14:54:39 *** chainhead has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7332017-12-07T14:54:39 *** waxwing has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7342017-12-07T14:54:39 *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7352017-12-07T14:54:39 *** newbold_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7362017-12-07T14:54:39 *** CryptAxe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7372017-12-07T14:54:39 *** gmaxwell has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7382017-12-07T14:54:39 *** newbie-- has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7392017-12-07T14:54:39 *** puff has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7402017-12-07T14:54:39 *** klow has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7412017-12-07T14:54:39 *** sjums has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7422017-12-07T14:54:39 *** alephzero has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7432017-12-07T14:54:39 *** aj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7442017-12-07T14:54:39 *** phantomcircuit has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7452017-12-07T14:54:39 *** CodeShark has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7462017-12-07T14:54:39 *** robby938 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7472017-12-07T14:54:39 *** wbnns has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7482017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jonasschnelli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7492017-12-07T14:54:39 *** adam3us has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7502017-12-07T14:54:39 *** newbold has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7512017-12-07T14:54:39 *** bitbee has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7522017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jimpo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7532017-12-07T14:54:39 *** derbumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7542017-12-07T14:54:39 *** eragmus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7552017-12-07T14:54:39 *** pindarhk_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7562017-12-07T14:54:39 *** rubensayshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7572017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Varunram has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7582017-12-07T14:54:39 *** warren has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7592017-12-07T14:54:39 *** jrayhawk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7602017-12-07T14:54:39 *** wolfspraul has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7612017-12-07T14:54:39 *** rockhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7622017-12-07T14:54:39 *** sipa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7632017-12-07T14:54:39 *** kinlo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7642017-12-07T14:54:39 *** sturles has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7652017-12-07T14:54:39 *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7662017-12-07T14:54:39 *** ybit has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7672017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Vortiago has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7682017-12-07T14:54:39 *** thrasher` has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7692017-12-07T14:54:39 *** Eliel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7702017-12-07T14:54:39 *** petertodd has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7712017-12-07T14:54:41 *** profall has quit IRC
7722017-12-07T14:54:53 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
7732017-12-07T14:55:09 *** gribble has quit IRC
7742017-12-07T14:57:12 <promag> wumpus: if you feel like merging something 11838 :P
7752017-12-07T14:58:04 *** profall has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7762017-12-07T14:58:25 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7772017-12-07T15:07:31 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #11847: Make boost::multi_index comparators const (master...2017-12-fix-const-comparator) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11847
7782017-12-07T15:09:11 *** str4d has quit IRC
7792017-12-07T15:16:16 *** goatpig has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7802017-12-07T15:16:16 *** JustAGuy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7812017-12-07T15:20:09 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has quit IRC
7822017-12-07T15:20:52 *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7832017-12-07T15:20:53 *** Apocalyptic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7842017-12-07T15:21:01 *** so has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7852017-12-07T15:22:34 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7862017-12-07T15:22:55 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
7872017-12-07T15:23:04 *** intcat has quit IRC
7882017-12-07T15:24:12 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7892017-12-07T15:24:42 <promag> jnewbery: rebasing #10160?
7902017-12-07T15:25:04 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7912017-12-07T15:25:20 *** pkx2_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7922017-12-07T15:27:45 *** pkx2_ has quit IRC
7932017-12-07T15:28:31 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
7942017-12-07T15:29:08 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7952017-12-07T15:30:02 *** gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7962017-12-07T15:31:56 *** lrvick has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7972017-12-07T15:32:05 *** indistylo has quit IRC
7982017-12-07T15:32:34 *** herzmeister[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7992017-12-07T15:36:51 *** microapple has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8002017-12-07T15:37:31 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
8012017-12-07T15:38:38 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8022017-12-07T15:38:45 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
8032017-12-07T15:39:36 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8042017-12-07T15:40:54 *** griswaalt[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8052017-12-07T15:40:56 *** Masaomi[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8062017-12-07T15:40:56 *** kewde[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8072017-12-07T15:40:58 *** ajtowns[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8082017-12-07T15:42:55 *** gonzazoid has quit IRC
8092017-12-07T15:45:45 *** promag has quit IRC
8102017-12-07T15:50:01 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8112017-12-07T15:54:49 *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8122017-12-07T15:59:45 *** dqx has quit IRC
8132017-12-07T16:02:27 *** Murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8142017-12-07T16:14:11 *** JackH has quit IRC
8152017-12-07T16:18:59 *** intcat has quit IRC
8162017-12-07T16:20:21 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8172017-12-07T16:25:04 *** sanada has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8182017-12-07T16:26:35 *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8192017-12-07T16:30:02 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
8202017-12-07T16:31:11 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8212017-12-07T16:37:47 <wumpus> promag: thanks
8222017-12-07T16:38:07 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/7630a1fe9a4c...3e5002412002
8232017-12-07T16:38:07 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa4c16d MarcoFalke: qa: Add getrawtransaction in_active_chain=False test
8242017-12-07T16:38:08 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 3e50024 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11838: qa: Add getrawtransaction in_active_chain=False test...
8252017-12-07T16:39:12 *** Masaomi[m] has quit IRC
8262017-12-07T16:39:18 *** herzmeister[m] has quit IRC
8272017-12-07T16:39:33 *** griswaalt[m] has quit IRC
8282017-12-07T16:39:47 *** ajtowns[m] has quit IRC
8292017-12-07T16:39:47 *** kewde[m] has quit IRC
8302017-12-07T16:40:11 *** ghost43 has quit IRC
8312017-12-07T16:40:56 *** StopAndDecrypt_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8322017-12-07T16:41:05 *** StopAndDecrypt has quit IRC
8332017-12-07T16:41:07 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11809: gui: Fix proxy setting options dialog crash (master...2017_12_gui_proxy_robustness) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11809
8342017-12-07T16:43:14 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8352017-12-07T16:44:20 *** darklegacy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8362017-12-07T16:44:54 <darklegacy> hii
8372017-12-07T16:45:17 <darklegacy> any one there
8382017-12-07T16:45:21 *** cheese_ has quit IRC
8392017-12-07T16:45:22 *** Randolf has quit IRC
8402017-12-07T16:45:53 *** DrFeelGood has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8412017-12-07T16:45:53 <darklegacy> hyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
8422017-12-07T16:46:00 <instagibbs> no
8432017-12-07T16:46:00 <darklegacy> helooo
8442017-12-07T16:46:05 *** cheese_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8452017-12-07T16:46:10 *** promag has quit IRC
8462017-12-07T16:46:16 *** promag_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8472017-12-07T16:46:20 <instagibbs> more seriously: this channel is for Core development discussion, please no chatter
8482017-12-07T16:46:24 <instagibbs> #bitcoin for chatter
8492017-12-07T16:46:39 <darklegacy> can some one teach me how to mine bitcoin
8502017-12-07T16:47:12 <darklegacy> where to start???
8512017-12-07T16:48:39 *** darklegacy has quit IRC
8522017-12-07T16:49:53 *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8532017-12-07T16:50:46 *** DrFeelGood has quit IRC
8542017-12-07T16:50:50 <promag_> wumpus: meeting in about 2 hours right?
8552017-12-07T16:51:05 *** microapple has quit IRC
8562017-12-07T16:51:06 <wumpus> promag_: yes
8572017-12-07T16:51:06 *** promag_ is now known as promag
8582017-12-07T16:51:34 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8592017-12-07T16:51:35 <promag> thank, probably I'll be late, have to get kids..
8602017-12-07T16:52:09 *** DvdKhl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8612017-12-07T16:52:51 <wumpus> date -u -> 19:00 UTC
8622017-12-07T16:52:57 <promag> ok
8632017-12-07T16:53:00 *** x41 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8642017-12-07T16:53:02 <wumpus> ok well feel free to drop in later
8652017-12-07T16:53:59 <promag> I would like to discuss #11826 as it interacts with other PR's
8662017-12-07T16:54:01 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11826 | RFC: Activity feature · Issue #11826 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
8672017-12-07T16:54:16 <promag> end of queue thou
8682017-12-07T16:59:08 *** microapple has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8692017-12-07T16:59:47 *** DrFeelGood has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8702017-12-07T17:07:09 *** x41 has quit IRC
8712017-12-07T17:07:26 *** promag has quit IRC
8722017-12-07T17:07:37 *** intcat has quit IRC
8732017-12-07T17:08:22 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8742017-12-07T17:09:26 *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
8752017-12-07T17:09:57 *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8762017-12-07T17:11:35 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
8772017-12-07T17:13:02 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8782017-12-07T17:18:37 *** meshcollider has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8792017-12-07T17:19:23 *** echonaut2 has quit IRC
8802017-12-07T17:19:52 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8812017-12-07T17:23:16 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
8822017-12-07T17:24:12 *** echonaut has quit IRC
8832017-12-07T17:24:36 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8842017-12-07T17:25:09 *** JackH has quit IRC
8852017-12-07T17:25:37 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8862017-12-07T17:27:46 *** echonaut has quit IRC
8872017-12-07T17:28:03 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8882017-12-07T17:29:49 *** Randolf has quit IRC
8892017-12-07T17:38:09 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/80f9dad0b799...4ef4dfebbc07
8902017-12-07T17:38:09 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1ec0c0a Suhas Daftuar: Make boost::multi_index comparators const...
8912017-12-07T17:38:10 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 4ef4dfe Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #11847: Make boost::multi_index comparators const...
8922017-12-07T17:38:44 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #11847: Make boost::multi_index comparators const (master...2017-12-fix-const-comparator) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11847
8932017-12-07T17:41:57 *** jb55 has quit IRC
8942017-12-07T17:42:15 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8952017-12-07T17:48:45 *** PaulCape_ has quit IRC
8962017-12-07T17:50:52 *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8972017-12-07T17:51:43 *** herzmeister[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
8982017-12-07T17:58:59 *** j_ has quit IRC
8992017-12-07T18:02:12 *** kewde[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9002017-12-07T18:02:13 *** griswaalt[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9012017-12-07T18:02:13 *** ajtowns[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9022017-12-07T18:02:13 *** Masaomi[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9032017-12-07T18:03:03 *** jack__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9042017-12-07T18:05:10 *** Masaomi[m] has quit IRC
9052017-12-07T18:05:10 *** kewde[m] has quit IRC
9062017-12-07T18:05:10 *** ajtowns[m] has quit IRC
9072017-12-07T18:05:10 *** herzmeister[m] has quit IRC
9082017-12-07T18:05:11 *** griswaalt[m] has quit IRC
9092017-12-07T18:06:41 *** ivan__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9102017-12-07T18:07:38 *** satoshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9112017-12-07T18:08:09 *** intcat has quit IRC
9122017-12-07T18:10:49 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9132017-12-07T18:10:50 *** satoshi has quit IRC
9142017-12-07T18:12:09 *** CappyD has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9152017-12-07T18:12:20 *** Mg has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9162017-12-07T18:12:28 <Mg> Join
9172017-12-07T18:12:29 *** CappyD has quit IRC
9182017-12-07T18:12:42 *** Mg is now known as Guest82059
9192017-12-07T18:13:35 <Guest82059> CSbreakdown
9202017-12-07T18:14:49 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9212017-12-07T18:15:41 *** ivko999 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9222017-12-07T18:15:46 <Guest82059> How can i do mining of bitcoin
9232017-12-07T18:15:59 <belcher> wrong channel, try #bitcoin
9242017-12-07T18:16:00 <sipa> #bitcoin
9252017-12-07T18:16:26 <Guest82059> Mining of #bitcoin
9262017-12-07T18:16:41 <sipa> please, not here. go to #bitcoin
9272017-12-07T18:17:14 *** Guest82059 has quit IRC
9282017-12-07T18:17:51 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9292017-12-07T18:18:23 *** Krellan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9302017-12-07T18:19:31 *** intcat has quit IRC
9312017-12-07T18:20:45 *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
9322017-12-07T18:21:56 *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9332017-12-07T18:22:07 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9342017-12-07T18:22:15 *** indistylo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9352017-12-07T18:30:17 *** ivko999 has quit IRC
9362017-12-07T18:31:43 *** jair has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9372017-12-07T18:32:25 *** jair has quit IRC
9382017-12-07T18:34:53 *** herzmeister[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9392017-12-07T18:37:00 *** arubi has quit IRC
9402017-12-07T18:43:04 *** arubi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9412017-12-07T18:44:46 *** griswaalt[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9422017-12-07T18:44:46 *** ajtowns[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9432017-12-07T18:44:47 *** kewde[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9442017-12-07T18:44:47 *** Masaomi[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9452017-12-07T18:46:55 *** jamesob has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9462017-12-07T18:47:16 *** bule has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9472017-12-07T18:48:21 *** CASEgezadthfr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9482017-12-07T18:55:32 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
9492017-12-07T18:56:28 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9502017-12-07T18:56:42 <jonasschnelli> re BTC message signing: what is the "vchSig[0] = 27 + rec + (fCompressed ? 4 : 0);". Is that packing the recid together with the compress-flag into a single byte?
9512017-12-07T18:56:54 <jonasschnelli> Why 27?
9522017-12-07T18:58:28 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9532017-12-07T19:00:46 <achow101> meeting?
9542017-12-07T19:00:51 <wumpus> #startmeeting
9552017-12-07T19:00:51 <lightningbot> Meeting started Thu Dec 7 19:00:51 2017 UTC. The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
9562017-12-07T19:00:51 <lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
9572017-12-07T19:00:52 <instagibbs> yes
9582017-12-07T19:01:04 <meshcollider> hi
9592017-12-07T19:01:05 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
9602017-12-07T19:01:21 <wumpus> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr btcdrak sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 achow101 meshcollider jnewbery maaku fanquake promag
9612017-12-07T19:01:26 <jonasschnelli> hi
9622017-12-07T19:01:38 <cfields> hi
9632017-12-07T19:01:38 <Provoostenator> hi
9642017-12-07T19:01:46 <wumpus> #topic high priority for review
9652017-12-07T19:01:49 <achow101> hi
9662017-12-07T19:01:55 <wumpus> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8
9672017-12-07T19:02:52 <wumpus> there was lots of review on #11403 this week
9682017-12-07T19:02:57 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11403 | SegWit wallet support by sipa · Pull Request #11403 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
9692017-12-07T19:02:59 <wumpus> but nothing ready for merge yet AFAIK
9702017-12-07T19:03:13 <kanzure> hi.
9712017-12-07T19:03:22 <jnewbery> hello
9722017-12-07T19:03:28 * BlueMatt is working on reviewing it now...lots of "ehh, you should clean this up instead of hacking around it" type things which may get pushed to a new pr, but nothing broken yet
9732017-12-07T19:03:35 <sipa> hi, only half here
9742017-12-07T19:03:46 <BlueMatt> re: high prio #11383 should probably be taken off
9752017-12-07T19:03:49 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11383 | Basic Multiwallet GUI support by luke-jr · Pull Request #11383 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
9762017-12-07T19:03:52 <BlueMatt> cause luke-jr hasnt kept up with it
9772017-12-07T19:04:08 <wumpus> sipa: which half?
9782017-12-07T19:04:10 <BlueMatt> jnewbery: promised me he'd rebase #10740
9792017-12-07T19:04:13 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10740 | [wallet] dynamic loading/unloading of wallets by jnewbery · Pull Request #10740 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
9802017-12-07T19:04:19 <wumpus> BlueMatt: ok
9812017-12-07T19:04:24 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
9822017-12-07T19:04:30 *** goatpig has quit IRC
9832017-12-07T19:04:47 <instagibbs> will retest segwit wallet/qt pr on top of #11839
9842017-12-07T19:04:49 <jonasschnelli> I'll try to take over 11383 (we should have this in 0.16)
9852017-12-07T19:04:49 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11839 | dont attempt mempool entry for wallet transactions on startup if alr⦠by instagibbs · Pull Request #11839 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
9862017-12-07T19:04:49 <promag> hi
9872017-12-07T19:05:07 <BlueMatt> oh, yea, 11839 should be tagged 0.16
9882017-12-07T19:05:09 *** SopaXorzTaker has quit IRC
9892017-12-07T19:05:10 <BlueMatt> its a trivial fix, I think
9902017-12-07T19:05:44 <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: no need to take it over if instagibbs is active on it?
9912017-12-07T19:05:51 <wumpus> if it's a trival fix it should probably be merged instead of tagged?
9922017-12-07T19:06:00 <instagibbs> BlueMatt, wrong PR, just looks like he mentioned it i think?
9932017-12-07T19:06:11 <jonasschnelli> I'm doing the Multiwalltet GUI PR
9942017-12-07T19:06:13 <instagibbs> that's multiwallet
9952017-12-07T19:06:20 <BlueMatt> ohoh, yea, wrong #
9962017-12-07T19:06:27 * BlueMatt suggested an alternative fix for 11839, so thats just pending disucssion of "the right fix"
9972017-12-07T19:06:32 <BlueMatt> all options are relatively trivial
9982017-12-07T19:07:02 *** intcat has quit IRC
9992017-12-07T19:07:11 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
10002017-12-07T19:07:13 <BlueMatt> #11824 may be mergeable with another review to fix reindex on master, jamesob indicated his issue was the result of "running wrong build"
10012017-12-07T19:07:13 *** SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10022017-12-07T19:07:15 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11824 | Block ActivateBestChain to empty validationinterface queue by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11824 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10032017-12-07T19:08:10 <achow101> I think #11824 can be merged.
10042017-12-07T19:08:12 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11824 | Block ActivateBestChain to empty validationinterface queue by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11824 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10052017-12-07T19:08:37 <wumpus> #action merge #11824
10062017-12-07T19:08:39 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11824 | Block ActivateBestChain to empty validationinterface queue by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #11824 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10072017-12-07T19:08:46 <achow101> I did notice another OOM issue I think, but it looked like to be hard to reproduce and required significant uptime
10082017-12-07T19:09:23 <BlueMatt> achow101: I failed to find any hidden memory in massif, but I'm still doing runs in it so will look further
10092017-12-07T19:09:50 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10102017-12-07T19:10:22 <wumpus> do we have a memory leak?
10112017-12-07T19:11:00 <BlueMatt> I dont (currently) believe so...master will OOM during reindex cause validation runs ahead of validationinterface and memory grows huge, but its not technically a leak cause it will catch up eventually if you have enough memory to do it
10122017-12-07T19:11:03 <wumpus> I haven't had any OOM crashes FWIW
10132017-12-07T19:11:04 <BlueMatt> 11824 fixes that
10142017-12-07T19:11:09 <jonasschnelli> Did also a quick run with my leak tool and some stuff popped up. leveldb, bdb ansd some other things
10152017-12-07T19:11:10 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10162017-12-07T19:11:31 <jonasschnelli> Will have a closer look soon
10172017-12-07T19:11:41 <wumpus> oh, only during reindex, I haven't done that recently
10182017-12-07T19:11:43 <BlueMatt> topics?
10192017-12-07T19:12:01 <BlueMatt> wumpus: could also happen directly after restart if you've been offline for a month or whatever
10202017-12-07T19:12:18 <achow101> or during IBD
10212017-12-07T19:12:25 <wumpus> I think an OOM issue is a pretty serious topic? but other suggestions are welcome of course
10222017-12-07T19:12:44 <morcos> if anyone objects to my "won't fix" of #11800, speak up now. will update code comments per ryanofsky suggestion
10232017-12-07T19:12:46 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11800 | Bitcoin is returning higher fees for 36 block window than 2 block window (on testnet) · Issue #11800 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10242017-12-07T19:12:50 <BlueMatt> well I think we've at least gotten 97% of it down, several folks looking into the last 3 and it may be a false positive
10252017-12-07T19:12:51 <Provoostenator> OOM?
10262017-12-07T19:12:59 <michagogo> Out Of Memory
10272017-12-07T19:13:13 <achow101> wumpus: the only known OOM right now is fixed by 11824
10282017-12-07T19:13:18 <BlueMatt> achow101: ibd seems less likely cause time spent downloading blocks is time for wallet to catch up...
10292017-12-07T19:13:19 <wumpus> achow101: ok
10302017-12-07T19:13:42 <wumpus> on to morcos' topic
10312017-12-07T19:13:45 * BlueMatt makes a quick note that, of the high-priority-to-review items, #11363 is very easy to review and has been sitting for a while
10322017-12-07T19:13:46 <wumpus> #topic Bitcoin is returning higher fees for 36 block window than 2 block window (on testnet)
10332017-12-07T19:13:47 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11363 | net: Split socket create/connect by theuni · Pull Request #11363 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10342017-12-07T19:14:11 <wumpus> #action review #11363
10352017-12-07T19:14:14 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11363 | net: Split socket create/connect by theuni · Pull Request #11363 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10362017-12-07T19:14:26 <wumpus> anyone opposing 'wontfix' there?
10372017-12-07T19:14:43 <jonasschnelli> we should at least know why
10382017-12-07T19:14:53 <BlueMatt> jonasschnelli: morcos had a writeup on the issue
10392017-12-07T19:15:00 <jonasschnelli> #?
10402017-12-07T19:15:00 <cfields> BlueMatt: thanks :)
10412017-12-07T19:15:06 <BlueMatt> #11800
10422017-12-07T19:15:06 <morcos> 11800
10432017-12-07T19:15:07 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11800 | Bitcoin is returning higher fees for 36 block window than 2 block window (on testnet) · Issue #11800 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10442017-12-07T19:15:07 <wumpus> morcos posted that
10452017-12-07T19:15:09 <wumpus> right
10462017-12-07T19:16:09 <wumpus> so the situation is pretty much unique to testnet and extremely unlikley on mainnet
10472017-12-07T19:16:13 <jonasschnelli> IMO low prio or even "won't fix"
10482017-12-07T19:16:52 <BlueMatt> yea, I mean I think I'd prefer to not call it "wont fix", but certainly not anything worth spending time on compared to other priorities
10492017-12-07T19:16:53 <wumpus> I tend to agree, very low priority if it only affects testnet's wildness
10502017-12-07T19:17:24 <jonasschnelli> what BlueMatt said
10512017-12-07T19:17:35 <wumpus> we kind of know that the current testnet isn't realistic
10522017-12-07T19:17:44 <wumpus> a frequent request is a more realistic testnet FWIW
10532017-12-07T19:18:46 <BlueMatt> suggested topic: testnet4
10542017-12-07T19:19:00 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10552017-12-07T19:19:01 <midnightmagic> the data in tn3 is fairly valuable on its own. if any tn reset is being considered for a pullreq it would be really nice to effect a high-quality preservation of tn3. like an option or something to put it into archive-mode.
10562017-12-07T19:19:20 <BlueMatt> you mean as test-cases?
10572017-12-07T19:19:27 <promag> next topic? btw I would like to have more NACK/ACK on #11826
10582017-12-07T19:19:28 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11826 | RFC: Activity feature · Issue #11826 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10592017-12-07T19:19:29 <midnightmagic> as test-cases and historical reference.
10602017-12-07T19:19:33 <Provoostenator> What about cherry-picking interesting testnet3 transactions?
10612017-12-07T19:19:56 <wumpus> no tn reset is being considered
10622017-12-07T19:20:07 <jonasschnelli> That's more regression testing?
10632017-12-07T19:20:18 <BlueMatt> wumpus: please add comma, or do you mean we're not considering it?
10642017-12-07T19:20:19 <wumpus> keeping tn3 support is fine
10652017-12-07T19:20:22 <midnightmagic> okay. sorry, carry on. :)
10662017-12-07T19:20:51 <wumpus> BlueMatt: huh? yes I mean we're not considering it. Any new testnet would be an addition, I think.
10672017-12-07T19:21:20 <BlueMatt> I meannn...I guess thats fine? I think I was considering just moving to testnet4
10682017-12-07T19:21:28 <wumpus> (still not sure where to add the comma)
10692017-12-07T19:21:48 <BlueMatt> if nothing else testnet3 with a mindiff higher than 1, and to not have a million blocks
10702017-12-07T19:22:09 <BlueMatt> lots of complaints about even spv sync time in testnet3 cause of so many blocks
10712017-12-07T19:22:12 <morcos> i vote we do segwit wallet support first
10722017-12-07T19:22:17 <wumpus> there was some talk of doing a testnet with signed blocks which simulates behavior of the mainnet
10732017-12-07T19:22:26 <wumpus> morcos: yes, absolutely
10742017-12-07T19:22:27 <BlueMatt> i mean thats also of interest, yea
10752017-12-07T19:22:36 <phantomcircuit> huh what im here
10762017-12-07T19:22:39 *** goatpig has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10772017-12-07T19:22:45 <meshcollider> topic suggestion: the various config file PRs
10782017-12-07T19:22:55 <adiabat> testnet having lots of headers needed for SPV may motivate more efficient header transmission
10792017-12-07T19:22:59 <meshcollider> e.g. #10996 and #10267
10802017-12-07T19:23:01 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10996 | Add per-network config file network.conf by ajtowns · Pull Request #10996 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10812017-12-07T19:23:03 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10267 | New -includeconf argument for including external configuration files by kallewoof · Pull Request #10267 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
10822017-12-07T19:23:08 <wumpus> #topic config file handling
10832017-12-07T19:23:41 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10842017-12-07T19:24:11 <meshcollider> We have to work out what configurations we should support, e.g. whether -conf should be repeatable, whether we have -includeconf, -netconf and -conf, etc.
10852017-12-07T19:24:17 *** noglar_ has quit IRC
10862017-12-07T19:24:18 <wumpus> so the question is pretty much whether to do per-network config file
10872017-12-07T19:24:22 <jonasschnelli> IMO the config layers are already complex... not sure if we want to add more
10882017-12-07T19:24:23 <meshcollider> its getting a bit messy
10892017-12-07T19:24:25 <wumpus> or -testnet-X and -regtest-X
10902017-12-07T19:24:38 <jonasschnelli> There are serval levels and multiple files
10912017-12-07T19:24:49 <wumpus> where X are options like port, walletdir, logfile, which are only useful per network
10922017-12-07T19:25:21 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
10932017-12-07T19:25:37 <wumpus> currently if you define e.g. port or bind in bitcoin.conf you will get collisions when you run both testnet and mainnet on the same machine
10942017-12-07T19:25:50 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
10952017-12-07T19:25:53 <meshcollider> one idea I had was suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10996#issuecomment-346189099, basically we default to using root-level bitcoin.conf and network specific network.conf if they exist, but if -conf is specified then we just use that and not the network specific one too
10962017-12-07T19:26:02 <wumpus> so one potential solution for that was to do per-network config files, but as said that makes things reallly complex
10972017-12-07T19:26:08 <meshcollider> and then allow -conf to be repeatable?
10982017-12-07T19:26:09 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
10992017-12-07T19:26:11 <wumpus> so an alternative proposal was just to do -regtest-port -testnet-port etc
11002017-12-07T19:26:26 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: +1
11012017-12-07T19:26:31 <aj> from 10267, having conf repeatable or includeconf recursive seems hard to implement well; currently it only handles a single additional config file aiui
11022017-12-07T19:26:32 <wumpus> and I think I like that
11032017-12-07T19:26:39 <meshcollider> wumpus what about unique addnode's for each network
11042017-12-07T19:26:47 <wumpus> so bare -port will be only for mainnet
11052017-12-07T19:26:57 <wumpus> meshcollider: -regtest-addnode -testnet-addnode
11062017-12-07T19:27:19 <meshcollider> so just allow -regtest or -testnet to be prefixed to any existing arg?
11072017-12-07T19:27:23 <promag> yes, I think that is pretty simple and clear
11082017-12-07T19:27:33 <promag> if not set, defaults to?
11092017-12-07T19:27:43 <wumpus> these can be specified in any config file or on the command line, no difference, no *context sensitivity* like per-network config files
11102017-12-07T19:27:43 <jonasschnelli> promag: the default :)
11112017-12-07T19:27:48 <wumpus> yes,the default
11122017-12-07T19:28:06 <meshcollider> and then still support #10267 ?
11132017-12-07T19:28:07 <wumpus> meshcollider: yes
11142017-12-07T19:28:09 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10267 | New -includeconf argument for including external configuration files by kallewoof · Pull Request #10267 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
11152017-12-07T19:28:18 <wumpus> includeconf is orthogonal
11162017-12-07T19:28:18 *** Randolf has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11172017-12-07T19:28:22 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11182017-12-07T19:28:33 <wumpus> I see no reason why not
11192017-12-07T19:28:37 <meshcollider> yeah but it would allow -regtest-includeconf=whatever
11202017-12-07T19:28:39 <promag> jonasschnelli: default of the network right?
11212017-12-07T19:28:43 <meshcollider> so it could be good :)
11222017-12-07T19:28:46 <jonasschnelli> promag: yes
11232017-12-07T19:28:47 <wumpus> it's pretty standard these days to allow including config files from config files for daemons
11242017-12-07T19:28:55 <morcos> wait, just so i understand, if you run ./bitcoind -regtest , then do you also have to add -regtest- to each of your command line options
11252017-12-07T19:28:59 <morcos> that would be super annoying
11262017-12-07T19:29:02 <cfields> an alternative to that would be sections in a config file. and on the cmdline they'd look like namespaces. so, [testnet] port=5. or -testnet::port=5.
11272017-12-07T19:29:08 <wumpus> almost any program supporting config files supports that in any way
11282017-12-07T19:29:12 <promag> wumpus: yes, like inherit other config
11292017-12-07T19:29:14 <morcos> cfields: that soudns way better
11302017-12-07T19:29:21 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
11312017-12-07T19:29:32 <wumpus> cfields: fine with me too
11322017-12-07T19:29:45 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11332017-12-07T19:29:57 <wumpus> it's just that per-network config files make things too complex, so I'd like to avoid that
11342017-12-07T19:30:11 <meshcollider> morcos: I guess anything without a prefix would be used no matter what network was chosen
11352017-12-07T19:30:12 <wumpus> which kind of namespacing whether it's [net]option or -net-option I don't mind much
11362017-12-07T19:30:14 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
11372017-12-07T19:30:16 <cfields> and in time the sections could potentially be broken out an included/inerited. but the simple change seems like a simple enough first step to me.
11382017-12-07T19:30:37 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11392017-12-07T19:30:45 <wumpus> meshcollider: yeah...
11402017-12-07T19:30:46 <jonasschnelli> but morcos point is valid. What if you just start use CLI params and switch between networks...
11412017-12-07T19:30:46 <cfields> simple == simple. nice.
11422017-12-07T19:30:48 <morcos> seems like it would make a lot of sense to have a single conf file, that has sections : [default] [mainnet] [testnet] [regtest] and you always end up reading default and one of the others
11432017-12-07T19:30:58 <jonasschnelli> do you need to add/switch the namespace all the times?
11442017-12-07T19:31:10 <wumpus> morcos: yes
11452017-12-07T19:31:23 <aj> morcos: +1
11462017-12-07T19:31:51 <sipa> ok, back
11472017-12-07T19:31:52 *** intcat has quit IRC
11482017-12-07T19:31:57 *** zshlyk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11492017-12-07T19:32:01 <meshcollider> cool, next topic then :)
11502017-12-07T19:32:07 <wumpus> yes seems we agree
11512017-12-07T19:32:12 <promag> #11826
11522017-12-07T19:32:13 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11826 | RFC: Activity feature · Issue #11826 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
11532017-12-07T19:32:24 <meshcollider> jonasschnelli: what do you mean
11542017-12-07T19:32:40 <jonasschnelli> meshcollider: solves with the namespaces described by morcos.
11552017-12-07T19:32:42 <jonasschnelli> *solved
11562017-12-07T19:32:49 *** zshlyk is now known as intcat
11572017-12-07T19:33:01 <meshcollider> promag: I like 11826
11582017-12-07T19:33:01 <wumpus> #topic activity feature
11592017-12-07T19:33:05 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
11602017-12-07T19:33:08 <meshcollider> concept ACK from me
11612017-12-07T19:33:08 <jnewbery> seems like the namespace model gives you separate conf files for free: just add a -includeconf in your relevant network namespace
11622017-12-07T19:33:09 <jonasschnelli> Yes. We should have that
11632017-12-07T19:33:13 <wumpus> I think everyone likes 11826
11642017-12-07T19:33:27 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11652017-12-07T19:33:28 <jonasschnelli> Bitcoin Core does a lot of things under the hood... and there is no way to see/control that
11662017-12-07T19:33:29 <promag> I have one problem there
11672017-12-07T19:33:33 *** Masaomi[m] has quit IRC
11682017-12-07T19:33:38 * BlueMatt isnt sure about the use-cases for 11826
11692017-12-07T19:33:39 <jonasschnelli> An activity window is something should have IMO
11702017-12-07T19:33:43 <promag> should the activity have a boost::variant<> source?
11712017-12-07T19:33:45 <BlueMatt> seems like putting the cart before the horse, as it were
11722017-12-07T19:33:45 *** griswaalt[m] has quit IRC
11732017-12-07T19:33:46 *** kewde[m] has quit IRC
11742017-12-07T19:33:59 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
11752017-12-07T19:34:00 <BlueMatt> like, the only things that can go *into* the activity window are things you do from rpc debug window
11762017-12-07T19:34:00 <promag> or should we have class WalletActivity : Activity ?
11772017-12-07T19:34:09 <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: most stuff in there should be read-only...
11782017-12-07T19:34:15 <promag> BlueMatt: why?
11792017-12-07T19:34:20 <sipa> promag: seems like an implementation details
11802017-12-07T19:34:23 <BlueMatt> in that case, building an activity window should probably come after making rescan, etc things that users have access to
11812017-12-07T19:34:23 *** ajtowns[m] has quit IRC
11822017-12-07T19:34:23 *** herzmeister[m] has quit IRC
11832017-12-07T19:34:34 <sipa> BlueMatt: reindex-chainstate too
11842017-12-07T19:34:58 <BlueMatt> isnt reindex-chainstate handled like ibd?
11852017-12-07T19:35:01 <BlueMatt> (as it should be)/
11862017-12-07T19:35:05 <sipa> yes, it is
11872017-12-07T19:35:10 *** esotericnonsense has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11882017-12-07T19:35:12 <BlueMatt> (cause we cant get a progress indicator for reindex-chainstate)
11892017-12-07T19:35:22 <sipa> ?
11902017-12-07T19:35:50 <BlueMatt> I mean the only progress indicator you can do is the same as ibd
11912017-12-07T19:36:05 <promag> BlueMatt: in those cases it's an indeterminate progress bar
11922017-12-07T19:36:16 <jonasschnelli> Maybe we should first fix the rescan GUI "abortness", then continue with the activity window (will take a while)
11932017-12-07T19:36:40 <jonasschnelli> A single progress bar does certainly limit use cases.
11942017-12-07T19:36:48 <wumpus> yes
11952017-12-07T19:36:51 * BlueMatt is just saying, if someone wants to build an activity window, ok, have fun, but I'm not sure where it actually makes all that much sense, cause we dont have many activities that users almost ever do)
11962017-12-07T19:37:14 <jonasschnelli> BlueMatt: not only the user triggered ones...
11972017-12-07T19:37:18 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
11982017-12-07T19:37:42 <promag> BlueMatt: also, activities could stays on the window even after finished, like a log, or your download history
11992017-12-07T19:37:53 <BlueMatt> download history?
12002017-12-07T19:37:59 <sipa> i do agree there are relatively few use cases now, but the concept is useful... and i think eventually we want to be able to do things more concurrently anyway
12012017-12-07T19:37:59 <BlueMatt> you mean rescan history
12022017-12-07T19:38:04 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
12032017-12-07T19:38:08 <promag> no, I mean browser download history
12042017-12-07T19:38:08 <jonasschnelli> Yeah.. a mix between Activity and short term log would be possible
12052017-12-07T19:38:09 <jonasschnelli> but hard to make it right
12062017-12-07T19:38:16 <promag> it's more friendly than a raw log
12072017-12-07T19:38:28 <phantomcircuit> BlueMatt, lots of users complain about ibd apparently stalling, something that indicated what was happening would be good
12082017-12-07T19:38:41 <jonasschnelli> [disappearing message] new block validated \n [disappearing message] new peer 1.1.1.1 connected
12092017-12-07T19:38:44 *** Madars has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12102017-12-07T19:38:51 <BlueMatt> I mean if I'm a user, I dont really want to see a progress history thing, tbh....either I have all the transactions in my wallet or I dont...
12112017-12-07T19:39:03 *** imabinarydigit01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12122017-12-07T19:39:17 <wumpus> for that, a debug log view would be more useful
12132017-12-07T19:39:22 <wumpus> let's not conflate ongoing activities with a log
12142017-12-07T19:39:25 <cfields> :q
12152017-12-07T19:39:32 <cfields> er, heh
12162017-12-07T19:39:42 <jonasschnelli> heh... Yes.
12172017-12-07T19:40:12 <jonasschnelli> previous attempts that are more or less a log where kinda accepted #5896
12182017-12-07T19:40:14 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5896 | [Qt][PoC] introduce "core-pulse" by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #5896 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
12192017-12-07T19:40:18 <promag> ok, I'll try to keep it simple
12202017-12-07T19:40:24 <BlueMatt> but, ongoing activities are like....rescan, just rescan, and thats not something you should do all that often...ibd/reindex/sync is a rather separate thing
12212017-12-07T19:40:46 <BlueMatt> but, anyway, it sounds like I'm the only one who disagrees, so I'm happy to shut up :p
12222017-12-07T19:40:57 <wumpus> sending a transaction is also an ongoing activity
12232017-12-07T19:41:13 <wumpus> ideally the GUI would move to do all those things asynchronously instead of in the GUI thread
12242017-12-07T19:41:17 <BlueMatt> I mean it sounds like y'all want to restructure our entire gui around an activity log...
12252017-12-07T19:41:18 <achow101> I also don't really see the utility of an activity window. but I don't really care either way
12262017-12-07T19:41:25 <promag> un/loading wallets too
12272017-12-07T19:41:34 <wumpus> no, I want to structure the GUI asynchronously
12282017-12-07T19:41:46 <wumpus> an activity thing would be a nice thing that comes with it
12292017-12-07T19:41:51 <BlueMatt> sending txn is rather async already, no? I mean you send and then you wait on confirms, maybe with a feebump
12302017-12-07T19:42:27 <BlueMatt> (at a user level, that is)
12312017-12-07T19:42:48 *** imjustatech has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
12322017-12-07T19:43:07 <jonasschnelli> Lets promag work on that concept and see where it leads to. It's certenly good to have it around in case we can do more stuff in parallel and have other cases where we want to show progress
12332017-12-07T19:43:11 <wumpus> the point is that comments are executed in the GUI thread, with the various locks held
12342017-12-07T19:43:14 <wumpus> commands*
12352017-12-07T19:43:37 <jonasschnelli> Also it would be useful for IPC (GUI / node detatch)
12362017-12-07T19:43:40 <instagibbs> probably makes more sense if the wallet is more goal-driven, for now I don't mind the feature
12372017-12-07T19:43:48 <instagibbs> (re: wallet comments)
12382017-12-07T19:44:08 <wumpus> which is not a nice user experience
12392017-12-07T19:44:11 <promag> ok guys, I'll file the PR soon
12402017-12-07T19:44:54 <wumpus> e.g. what I've noticed is that when it's catching up to the chain, getting the information for coin control hangs the entire GUI for half a minute sometimes
12412017-12-07T19:45:12 <wumpus> which would be fine if it showed a progress indicator but not if everything just blocks
12422017-12-07T19:45:28 <Randolf> That would likely cause many users to think it crashed.
12432017-12-07T19:45:40 <wumpus> well the window manager starts to think that too
12442017-12-07T19:45:43 <wumpus> and wants to kill it
12452017-12-07T19:46:10 <jonasschnelli> The GUI synchronousness does sometimes lead to terrible UX.
12462017-12-07T19:46:12 <Randolf> Yes. And under the Windows OS, the user sees a message along the lines of "Task not responding" with an option to kill the task.
12472017-12-07T19:46:52 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: it was always my intent to change that but I just don't get around to it
12482017-12-07T19:47:05 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: it's also pretty complex
12492017-12-07T19:47:12 <wumpus> nah, not really complex, just work
12502017-12-07T19:47:17 <Randolf> So, if the GUI is on a separate thread, then it can always respond to the OS and the user's operations (e.g., open the Help menu, load/save wallets, print reports, etc.) while waiting for updates from the other threads.
12512017-12-07T19:47:17 <BlueMatt> yea, cs_main-y-ness of gui sucks atm :(
12522017-12-07T19:47:41 <jonasschnelli> Randolf: we are trying that (ask ryanofsky) :)
12532017-12-07T19:47:42 <wumpus> Randolf: right
12542017-12-07T19:47:51 <Randolf> jonasschnelli: Cool!
12552017-12-07T19:48:30 <BlueMatt> anyway, more topics in 10 minutes?
12562017-12-07T19:48:43 <sipa> i have one
12572017-12-07T19:48:54 <sipa> would a libgmp dependency by acceptable?
12582017-12-07T19:49:19 <BlueMatt> for....secp? or your muhash stuff?
12592017-12-07T19:49:32 <Randolf> jonasschnelli: I've done a lot of Java development, and this is how JFC/Swing and the newer JavaFX handle things. The use of atomic variables and thread-safe queues becomes pretty important. Maybe the original GUI for Bitcoin was designed with more development convenience in mind just so that the
12602017-12-07T19:49:32 <Randolf> project could get completed faster? I don't consider this to be a bad thing, necessarily, but I'm glad to know that there's an interest in improving this.
12612017-12-07T19:49:32 <BlueMatt> I mean doesnt secp optionally use it already?
12622017-12-07T19:49:46 <wumpus> #topic libgmp dependency
12632017-12-07T19:49:53 <wumpus> libgmp is GPL right?
12642017-12-07T19:50:03 <sipa> BlueMatt: it does, and there is a small performanc benefit from using it for validation itself
12652017-12-07T19:50:08 <wumpus> if it's MIT/BSD licensed it's ok with me
12662017-12-07T19:50:10 <meshcollider> wumpus: yep I think so
12672017-12-07T19:50:17 <wumpus> but if it's GPL, we have to say no
12682017-12-07T19:50:18 <sipa> but for UTXO hashes it would be a huge difference
12692017-12-07T19:50:22 <sipa> i see
12702017-12-07T19:50:22 <cfields> sipa: i assume you mean a non-optional dep?
12712017-12-07T19:50:34 <sipa> it's LGPLv3
12722017-12-07T19:50:44 <sipa> cfields: right
12732017-12-07T19:50:50 <ryanofsky> Randolf maybe see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10244 which separates bitcoin gui code from wallet/node code
12742017-12-07T19:51:23 <meshcollider> sipa: also uses GPLv2 I think
12752017-12-07T19:51:27 <wumpus> there's really no other library implementing that?
12762017-12-07T19:51:30 <Randolf> Thanks ryanofsky.
12772017-12-07T19:51:40 <wumpus> (which could have a more suitable license)
12782017-12-07T19:51:49 <sipa> wumpus: specifically, it's for jacobi symbol computation
12792017-12-07T19:51:50 * BlueMatt personally thinks its fine to ship lgpl stuff, but others likely disagree
12802017-12-07T19:51:55 <aj> meshcollider: it's user's discretion as to GPLv2+ or LGPLv3+
12812017-12-07T19:52:05 <cfields> sipa: license aside, it would feel a little backwards to introduce a new dep which may at some point be consensus critical :(
12822017-12-07T19:52:06 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
12832017-12-07T19:52:09 <sipa> which is not impossible to implement ourselves, and probably faster if we do, but it's very nontrivial
12842017-12-07T19:52:12 <sipa> cfields: it wouldn't be
12852017-12-07T19:52:39 <sipa> cfields: everything we'd use would be verified
12862017-12-07T19:52:47 <wumpus> cfields: also agree with that
12872017-12-07T19:53:01 <wumpus> so apart from using libgmp and implementing it ourselves there are no options?
12882017-12-07T19:53:14 <sipa> or take the performance hit
12892017-12-07T19:53:21 <aj> sipa: context is #10434 ?
12902017-12-07T19:53:23 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10434 | [WIP] 3072-bit MuHash based hash_serialized by sipa · Pull Request #10434 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
12912017-12-07T19:53:45 <sipa> 10434 uses the modular multiplication group approach, which doesn't need this - it's faster but much harder to cache
12922017-12-07T19:54:37 <sipa> the alternative approach is using EC based rolling hashes, for which using jacobi symbols would be a 2x speedup or so
12932017-12-07T19:54:49 <sipa> wumpus: so a 3rd option is not implementing EC-based rolling hashes
12942017-12-07T19:54:50 <promag> out-of-battery o/
12952017-12-07T19:54:52 *** promag has quit IRC
12962017-12-07T19:55:33 *** SopaXorzTaker has quit IRC
12972017-12-07T19:55:44 <wumpus> also after all the work that was done to lose dependency on openssl for bignums, to introduce dependency on a new arbitrary precision library seems also a reversal to me
12982017-12-07T19:55:47 <sipa> so i just wanted to bring it up to see what the option were
12992017-12-07T19:55:48 <BlueMatt> so if we use lgpl gmp as a dep, and then someone wants to ship a bitcoincore-modified binary with all deps static-linked, they'd be screwed?
13002017-12-07T19:56:11 <sipa> wumpus: to be clear, nothing would be consensus critical (even if rolling hashes were somehow made a consensus rule)
13012017-12-07T19:56:21 <aj> BlueMatt: lgpl means they'd have to release sources or their .o/.a files
13022017-12-07T19:57:01 <BlueMatt> yea, ok, i meannnn, probably fine, but that is a real change in effective license of bitcoin core
13032017-12-07T19:57:10 <morcos> sipa: 2x speedup in what exactly
13042017-12-07T19:57:29 <morcos> when would those computations happen and what is the base latency
13052017-12-07T19:57:40 <cfields> sipa: at the risk of going too far off-topic, aren't there curves with potentially quicker and guaranteed O(1) map operations?
13062017-12-07T19:58:13 <morcos> piont being, perhaps we can punt on the question of libgmp until it becomes clear that optimizing the speed is an important tradeoff to make
13072017-12-07T19:58:13 *** echonaut has quit IRC
13082017-12-07T19:58:17 <wumpus> good point morcos
13092017-12-07T19:58:19 <instagibbs> morcos, +1
13102017-12-07T19:58:27 <sipa> cfields: let's discuss outside of the meeting
13112017-12-07T19:58:28 <sipa> morcos: updating a rolling hash given a set of UTXOs created and spent
13122017-12-07T19:58:39 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13132017-12-07T19:58:40 <cfields> ok
13142017-12-07T19:58:50 <BlueMatt> well meeting over anyway
13152017-12-07T19:58:57 <gmaxwell> ugh was missing meeting.
13162017-12-07T19:59:04 <instagibbs> gmaxwell, 2 minutes
13172017-12-07T19:59:06 <instagibbs> 1 minute
13182017-12-07T19:59:06 <morcos> right, so how often are we envisioning doing that, does it happen async to everything else, and how long does it take without libgmp
13192017-12-07T19:59:10 <gmaxwell> why did we start talking about libgmp? :(
13202017-12-07T19:59:12 <sipa> in an absolutely first implementation, i would expect that that would just affect gettxoutsetinfo or its equivalent that just computes the hash from the UTXO set from scratch
13212017-12-07T19:59:18 <BlueMatt> gmaxwell: blame sipa
13222017-12-07T19:59:41 <gmaxwell> sipa: we do not want gmp as part of bitcoin's consensus critical paths, totally independently of using it as a dependency.
13232017-12-07T19:59:46 <sipa> $ git blame sipa
13242017-12-07T19:59:46 <sipa> fatal: cannot stat path 'sipa': No such file or directory
13252017-12-07T19:59:50 <BlueMatt> yes, that point was made
13262017-12-07T19:59:53 *** clarkmoody has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13272017-12-07T19:59:56 <sipa> gmaxwell: absolutely
13282017-12-07T20:00:01 <sipa> no intention of changing that
13292017-12-07T20:00:26 <wumpus> #endmeeting
13302017-12-07T20:00:26 <lightningbot> Meeting ended Thu Dec 7 20:00:26 2017 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
13312017-12-07T20:00:26 <lightningbot> Minutes: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-12-07-19.00.html
13322017-12-07T20:00:26 <lightningbot> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-12-07-19.00.txt
13332017-12-07T20:00:26 <lightningbot> Log: http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-12-07-19.00.log.html
13342017-12-07T20:00:39 <gmaxwell> ah, you were talking about it for the jacobi symbol for aggregate validation?
13352017-12-07T20:01:04 <aj> libzmq is lgpl isn't it?
13362017-12-07T20:01:04 <wumpus> yes
13372017-12-07T20:01:08 <wumpus> aj: no
13382017-12-07T20:01:28 *** echonaut has quit IRC
13392017-12-07T20:01:30 <sipa> more in the context of rolling hashes
13402017-12-07T20:01:31 <wumpus> aj: oh, you're actually right
13412017-12-07T20:01:38 <wumpus> aj: wtf, I never knew
13422017-12-07T20:01:54 <wumpus> aj: however zmq is optional
13432017-12-07T20:02:10 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13442017-12-07T20:02:38 <BlueMatt> that sucks...our release binaries have lgpl crap in them and we dont have an easy way to get a bitcoind that is linked to everything but zmq?
13452017-12-07T20:02:51 <aj> the release binaries have zmq now?
13462017-12-07T20:02:54 * BlueMatt wonders if some altcoins are violating that license
13472017-12-07T20:02:56 <BlueMatt> almost certainly are
13482017-12-07T20:03:08 <achow101> releases have zmq and have had them for a while now
13492017-12-07T20:03:43 *** imjustatech has left #bitcoin-core-dev
13502017-12-07T20:05:06 *** echonaut has quit IRC
13512017-12-07T20:05:18 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13522017-12-07T20:05:34 <wumpus> --disable-zmq
13532017-12-07T20:05:47 *** ossifrage has quit IRC
13542017-12-07T20:05:48 *** clarkmoody has quit IRC
13552017-12-07T20:06:06 *** ossifrage has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13562017-12-07T20:06:08 *** clarkmoody has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13572017-12-07T20:06:13 <wumpus> (or was it --without-zmq, I don't remember)
13582017-12-07T20:07:20 <wumpus> my preferred way for not linking against something is just to not have it installed on the VM
13592017-12-07T20:08:08 *** strogos has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13602017-12-07T20:08:33 *** strogos has quit IRC
13612017-12-07T20:08:55 *** jack__ has quit IRC
13622017-12-07T20:09:17 *** jack__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13632017-12-07T20:10:12 *** cl0uding has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13642017-12-07T20:10:23 <aj> wumpus: btw, i got a manually runnable script that gives some approximate pr status's that might be worth a look; script and (edited) output are at https://gist.github.com/ajtowns/bdc91590471559b5c73682fdfa712b15
13652017-12-07T20:11:45 *** echonaut has quit IRC
13662017-12-07T20:11:52 *** echonaut3 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13672017-12-07T20:12:45 *** sc__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13682017-12-07T20:12:45 <jonasschnelli> aj: nice!
13692017-12-07T20:12:59 <aj> #10520 and #10149 could probably be closed
13702017-12-07T20:13:01 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10520 | 0.14 by gentlejack · Pull Request #10520 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
13712017-12-07T20:13:02 <sc__> hi!
13722017-12-07T20:13:04 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10149 | gentlejack by gentlejack · Pull Request #10149 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
13732017-12-07T20:13:15 <wumpus> aj: cool
13742017-12-07T20:13:46 <jonasschnelli> aj: What I really would like to have is something like this in a web-base script (CGI)
13752017-12-07T20:13:49 <sc__> does anybody know by chance, why bitcoind regtest is missing witness data in p2p messages?
13762017-12-07T20:14:17 <sc__> and how to get witness data via p2p?
13772017-12-07T20:14:20 <instagibbs> sc__, make sure you actually activated segwit by making a few hundred blocks...
13782017-12-07T20:14:30 <jonasschnelli> aj: That web-site/app could be an interactive mode of that script you wrote with some cookie based local editing... one could flag the PRs he wants to review (locally stored)
13792017-12-07T20:14:32 <wumpus> for me a console-based tool is better
13802017-12-07T20:14:52 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: nerd! :)
13812017-12-07T20:14:54 <sc__> instagibbs: I really did this (the block count is over 11000 now)
13822017-12-07T20:14:55 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: Yeah.. consol based would even make more sense...
13832017-12-07T20:15:06 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: just extremely paranoid :)
13842017-12-07T20:15:06 <jonasschnelli> not sure if ncurses is more complex then HTML
13852017-12-07T20:15:12 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13862017-12-07T20:15:37 *** echonaut3 has quit IRC
13872017-12-07T20:15:47 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: But I guess at some point, you have to link to the github issue to read more about it... or do you use lynx or some sort of console browsing?
13882017-12-07T20:16:30 <instagibbs> aj, very cool
13892017-12-07T20:16:36 *** intcat has quit IRC
13902017-12-07T20:16:48 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: sometimes, but lynx doesn't work very well/at all on github
13912017-12-07T20:17:04 <instagibbs> aj, maybe the submitter shouldn't be able to advance their own PR's labels, heh
13922017-12-07T20:17:20 <jonasschnelli> aj's tool should also include the discussion,.. ideally it would be a full fletched github console client... :)
13932017-12-07T20:17:58 * jonasschnelli stops dreaming now
13942017-12-07T20:18:12 *** echonaut has quit IRC
13952017-12-07T20:18:19 <wumpus> jonasschnelli: I think it's a good argument for the tool to be low-level, just print the data in some format - anything like a UI can be added on top
13962017-12-07T20:18:36 <aj> instagibbs: oh, did someone ack their own PR? i didn't put a check in for that in the python version
13972017-12-07T20:18:38 <jonasschnelli> sure. However, well done aj
13982017-12-07T20:18:49 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
13992017-12-07T20:18:56 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14002017-12-07T20:19:03 <instagibbs> aj you did in your PR testing it :P, unless I missed something
14012017-12-07T20:19:15 <jonasschnelli> kallewoof: re your BIP174,... I guess this also works perfectly fine for pure unsigned transaction...
14022017-12-07T20:19:31 <aj> instagibbs: oh, yeah, in that i specifically disabled the check so i could test it :)
14032017-12-07T20:19:35 <wumpus> and aj wrote it in python instead of (s)hellscript, I like that
14042017-12-07T20:20:05 <aj> wumpus: oh, i have some curl|jshon for loops i was using earlier if you prefer :)
14052017-12-07T20:20:08 <jonasschnelli> kallewoof: the "partially signed" tag makes it look that is "partially" unusable for pure softwallet<->hardware wallet interaction
14062017-12-07T20:20:13 <wumpus> aj: nooooooo :)
14072017-12-07T20:20:47 <aj> wumpus: curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bitcoin/pulls?"page=$a;per_page=100" | jshon -a -e number -u -p -e updated_at -u -p -e head -e sha -u -p -p -e base -e ref -u; done | paste -s -d ' \n'
14082017-12-07T20:21:28 <instagibbs> jonasschnelli, link? haven't seen recent work on it
14092017-12-07T20:21:46 <jonasschnelli> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0174.mediawiki
14102017-12-07T20:21:47 <instagibbs> I have an ugly hww integration working, but am looking for a more generic signraw API
14112017-12-07T20:21:48 *** echonaut4 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14122017-12-07T20:21:56 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14132017-12-07T20:21:58 <instagibbs> jonasschnelli, I mean why kallewoof ? achow101 is the author of the bip?
14142017-12-07T20:22:00 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14152017-12-07T20:22:17 <jonasschnelli> instagibbs: argh! Right... meant achow101
14162017-12-07T20:22:34 <instagibbs> aw darn :) thinking of writing that interface anyways...
14172017-12-07T20:22:47 *** Krellan has quit IRC
14182017-12-07T20:23:49 *** echonaut4 has quit IRC
14192017-12-07T20:24:01 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14202017-12-07T20:24:18 *** Krellan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14212017-12-07T20:24:32 <achow101> jonasschnelli: hmm?
14222017-12-07T20:24:44 <jonasschnelli> achow101: re your BIP174...
14232017-12-07T20:25:03 <instagibbs> jonasschnelli, yes the idea is that createraw, or something, would create a thing that is potentially signable
14242017-12-07T20:25:04 <jonasschnelli> I'm looking for a standard how software watch-only wallets (assume Core) can talk to a hardware wallet
14252017-12-07T20:25:25 <jonasschnelli> Need to read more into the BIP... but seems 174 does cover that case pretty well
14262017-12-07T20:25:33 <wumpus> seems there is suddenly lots of interest in signing messages
14272017-12-07T20:25:35 <aj> jonasschnelli: anyhoo, i could turn that RESULTS.txt into some html with links and nicer formatting, updated by cron once an hour or something without too much trouble; making it properly dynamic/current would take some effort though. worthwhile?
14282017-12-07T20:25:50 <achow101> jonasschnelli: how would it be unusable?
14292017-12-07T20:26:08 <jonasschnelli> wumpus: yeah! I'm feeling like I'm missing a party... don't know what people do sign now all the times
14302017-12-07T20:26:49 <instagibbs> wumpus, this time it's transactions, we swear!
14312017-12-07T20:26:55 <jonasschnelli> achow101: Assume I have a Core in watch only mode and did a fundrawtransaction with watch only inputs... then I'd like to hand "it" over to the hardware wallet.
14322017-12-07T20:27:01 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14332017-12-07T20:27:02 <jonasschnelli> achow101: What data and what schemantics do I use
14342017-12-07T20:27:04 *** echonaut5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14352017-12-07T20:27:09 <jonasschnelli> BIP174 would be a way? woudln't it?
14362017-12-07T20:27:17 <achow101> yes, bip174 would
14372017-12-07T20:27:39 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
14382017-12-07T20:27:45 <jonasschnelli> because there is no other standard how to serialize a data-blob including the inputs and other elements required for signing
14392017-12-07T20:27:56 <instagibbs> that was the reason for the bip, ye
14402017-12-07T20:28:04 <achow101> the hardware wallet interaction was one of the motivators for making the bip
14412017-12-07T20:28:13 <jonasschnelli> achow101: would a mime type make sense?
14422017-12-07T20:28:31 <jonasschnelli> instagibbs: or what channels to transmit your data-package have you considered?
14432017-12-07T20:28:37 <jonasschnelli> mean achow101
14442017-12-07T20:28:37 <wumpus> aj: gives me a TypeError: https://0bin.net/paste/wG-O21gNtVhwBDA3#Y0XyZu5-tENRZZZSy14gX41LNcF9okNM2sTlIvnsvhK
14452017-12-07T20:28:55 <achow101> jonasschnelli: I haven't considered any channel for transmitting the data itself.
14462017-12-07T20:29:01 <achow101> I considered that to be out of scope
14472017-12-07T20:29:08 <aj> wumpus: you probably hit the rate limit
14482017-12-07T20:29:36 <achow101> jonasschnelli: I think that such a protocol would be a separate bip entirely as you could transmit the data any number of ways
14492017-12-07T20:29:43 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14502017-12-07T20:29:47 <wumpus> aj: oh I should buy more github tokens? :p
14512017-12-07T20:30:17 *** echonaut5 has quit IRC
14522017-12-07T20:30:17 <aj> wumpus: get a token from https://github.com/settings/tokens and set GITHUB_LOGIN=laanw and GITHUB_PASSWORD= your token.
14532017-12-07T20:30:20 <wumpus> ok, thanks
14542017-12-07T20:30:24 <jonasschnelli> achow101: yes... hard to figure out what ways could be standartized
14552017-12-07T20:30:39 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14562017-12-07T20:32:45 *** echonaut6 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14572017-12-07T20:32:47 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14582017-12-07T20:33:22 <wumpus> aj: oh wowthis is pretty neat, even allows setting permissions per token
14592017-12-07T20:33:56 <aj> wumpus: yeah, doesn't suck.
14602017-12-07T20:33:57 <wumpus> I guess it needs no permissions at all as it's read-only?
14612017-12-07T20:34:03 <aj> wumpus: yup
14622017-12-07T20:34:31 *** clarkmoody has quit IRC
14632017-12-07T20:35:02 <wumpus> I wish github ssh keys could be configured in the same way, e.g. a certain key can be set to only allow to push to a certain project
14642017-12-07T20:35:45 *** echonaut6 has quit IRC
14652017-12-07T20:36:00 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14662017-12-07T20:36:46 *** promag has quit IRC
14672017-12-07T20:37:43 <aj> wumpus: guess they want you do do that by protecting branchs and pull request statuses (like "can't merge if travis doesn't give the ok")
14682017-12-07T20:38:20 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14692017-12-07T20:38:32 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14702017-12-07T20:38:59 <wumpus> aj: yes that can only allow certain users to push to certain branches, which is extremely useful
14712017-12-07T20:39:43 *** photonclock_ has quit IRC
14722017-12-07T20:39:44 <wumpus> aj: but in my case it'd be useful to have a certain VM/user only have keys to push to a certain repo and not all repos my account has access to. I could create multiple accounts but meh.
14732017-12-07T20:40:23 *** Sentineo has quit IRC
14742017-12-07T20:40:35 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14752017-12-07T20:40:39 *** CASEgezadthfr has quit IRC
14762017-12-07T20:41:14 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14772017-12-07T20:41:28 <wumpus> aj: anyhow github has improved a lot with regard to more granular access control in the last few years which is very good
14782017-12-07T20:41:44 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14792017-12-07T20:42:26 <aj> wumpus: i think you could make a "github app" which you could then assign to a repo and which could maybe then push to non-protected branches...
14802017-12-07T20:43:20 <wumpus> aj: yep non-protected branches would be fine; allow it to push to laanwj/bitcoin but not bitcoin/bitcoin master for example
14812017-12-07T20:44:02 *** strmci has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14822017-12-07T20:44:25 <aj> wumpus: hmm, i might see if that works actually. i was thinking about having lightningbot update a repo of its meeting logs automatically (and use an Attendees file there to pick people to highlight), but got stuck on how to push... https://github.com/ajtowns/bitcoin-core-meetings
14832017-12-07T20:44:47 *** echonaut7 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14842017-12-07T20:44:49 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14852017-12-07T20:45:48 *** echonaut7 has quit IRC
14862017-12-07T20:46:28 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14872017-12-07T20:46:30 <wumpus> aj: I've enabled the token and with that, check_acks ran to completion without error, thanks
14882017-12-07T20:47:00 *** Giszmo has quit IRC
14892017-12-07T20:48:27 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14902017-12-07T20:48:39 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14912017-12-07T20:52:29 *** Sentineo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14922017-12-07T20:54:42 *** echonaut has quit IRC
14932017-12-07T20:54:43 *** jack__ is now known as mrfrasha
14942017-12-07T20:54:46 *** echonaut1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14952017-12-07T20:56:15 *** echonaut1 has quit IRC
14962017-12-07T20:56:25 <promag> wumpus: considering the current lockunspent help description, #5584 can be closed right?
14972017-12-07T20:56:30 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
14982017-12-07T20:56:33 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/5584 | Ability to examine, save locked-UTXO state · Issue #5584 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
14992017-12-07T20:58:27 <wumpus> promag: I'm not sure; what does the help description change about a feature request?
15002017-12-07T20:59:00 <promag> ah right, feature request
15012017-12-07T20:59:33 <promag> not really something important to implement right?
15022017-12-07T21:00:08 <wumpus> no
15032017-12-07T21:01:34 <wumpus> well there are certainly use-cases for persistently locking UTXOs in the wallet
15042017-12-07T21:03:06 <wumpus> less if 'abandontransaction' always worked
15052017-12-07T21:03:53 *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15062017-12-07T21:04:17 <wumpus> the most common use case of locking UTXOs persistently would be a transaction, I think where the use case for explicit locking comes from is to be able to unlock them easily again, which isn't possible with the current wallet code
15072017-12-07T21:06:41 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
15082017-12-07T21:07:27 *** intcat has quit IRC
15092017-12-07T21:07:39 <wumpus> how long does it take for github to forgive you for rate limit exceeding? I can't use github-merge.py either anymore from this IP :-)
15102017-12-07T21:09:54 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15112017-12-07T21:09:58 <promag> wumpus: I know a use case where there is explicit locking, and because of the lack of lock persistence, the locks are saved outside and verified/repeated
15122017-12-07T21:10:25 <wumpus> promag: yeah...
15132017-12-07T21:13:29 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15142017-12-07T21:13:29 <aj> wumpus: curl -s -i https://api.github.com/repos/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects | grep ^X-RateLimit
15152017-12-07T21:13:46 <aj> wumpus: the RateLimit-Reset should give you a timestamp under an hour away
15162017-12-07T21:13:50 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15172017-12-07T21:14:44 <wumpus> aj: X-RateLimit-Reset: 1512681788 -> date --date='@1512681788' -> Thu Dec 7 22:23:08 CET 2017
15182017-12-07T21:15:03 <wumpus> aj: ok, I'll probably not manage to add authentication support to gh-merge.py before then
15192017-12-07T21:15:37 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15202017-12-07T21:16:01 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15212017-12-07T21:17:03 *** echonaut2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15222017-12-07T21:17:07 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15232017-12-07T21:19:26 *** echonaut2 has quit IRC
15242017-12-07T21:19:34 *** Emcy_ has quit IRC
15252017-12-07T21:19:52 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15262017-12-07T21:20:23 *** Emcy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15272017-12-07T21:20:52 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15282017-12-07T21:20:54 *** promag has quit IRC
15292017-12-07T21:21:03 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15302017-12-07T21:22:03 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15312017-12-07T21:22:18 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15322017-12-07T21:24:56 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15332017-12-07T21:25:07 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15342017-12-07T21:26:49 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15352017-12-07T21:26:57 *** echonaut3 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15362017-12-07T21:27:06 *** saint_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15372017-12-07T21:27:42 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
15382017-12-07T21:29:31 *** echonaut3 has quit IRC
15392017-12-07T21:29:56 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15402017-12-07T21:31:00 *** echonaut4 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15412017-12-07T21:31:06 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15422017-12-07T21:32:05 *** echonaut4 has quit IRC
15432017-12-07T21:32:17 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15442017-12-07T21:33:31 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15452017-12-07T21:33:42 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15462017-12-07T21:36:13 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15472017-12-07T21:36:53 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15482017-12-07T21:38:10 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15492017-12-07T21:38:26 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15502017-12-07T21:39:06 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15512017-12-07T21:40:08 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15522017-12-07T21:43:01 *** ossifrage has quit IRC
15532017-12-07T21:43:02 *** indistylo has quit IRC
15542017-12-07T21:43:02 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
15552017-12-07T21:43:02 *** jb55 has quit IRC
15562017-12-07T21:43:02 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
15572017-12-07T21:43:02 *** unholymachine has quit IRC
15582017-12-07T21:43:02 *** jouke has quit IRC
15592017-12-07T21:43:02 *** jnewbery has quit IRC
15602017-12-07T21:43:02 *** davec_ has quit IRC
15612017-12-07T21:43:02 *** lesderid has quit IRC
15622017-12-07T21:43:02 *** jouke_ has quit IRC
15632017-12-07T21:43:02 *** cfields has quit IRC
15642017-12-07T21:43:02 *** trotski2000 has quit IRC
15652017-12-07T21:43:02 *** nOgAnOo has quit IRC
15662017-12-07T21:43:02 *** exit70 has quit IRC
15672017-12-07T21:43:02 *** lejitz has quit IRC
15682017-12-07T21:43:02 *** brg444 has quit IRC
15692017-12-07T21:43:43 *** exit70 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15702017-12-07T21:45:29 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15712017-12-07T21:45:38 *** echonaut5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15722017-12-07T21:48:02 *** echonaut5 has quit IRC
15732017-12-07T21:48:14 *** lesderid has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15742017-12-07T21:48:14 *** ossifrage has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15752017-12-07T21:48:14 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15762017-12-07T21:48:14 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15772017-12-07T21:48:14 *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15782017-12-07T21:48:14 *** unholymachine has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15792017-12-07T21:48:14 *** jouke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15802017-12-07T21:48:14 *** jnewbery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15812017-12-07T21:48:14 *** davec_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15822017-12-07T21:48:14 *** jouke_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15832017-12-07T21:48:15 *** cfields has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15842017-12-07T21:48:15 *** nOgAnOo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15852017-12-07T21:48:15 *** trotski2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15862017-12-07T21:48:15 *** lejitz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15872017-12-07T21:48:15 *** brg444 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15882017-12-07T21:48:22 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15892017-12-07T21:48:22 *** Cogito_Ergo_Sum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15902017-12-07T21:48:47 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15912017-12-07T21:51:22 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15922017-12-07T21:51:39 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15932017-12-07T21:52:29 *** echonaut has quit IRC
15942017-12-07T21:52:41 *** echonaut6 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15952017-12-07T21:56:05 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
15962017-12-07T21:59:25 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
15972017-12-07T22:06:55 *** imabinarydigit01 has quit IRC
15982017-12-07T22:13:27 *** intcat has quit IRC
15992017-12-07T22:14:18 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16002017-12-07T22:15:47 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16012017-12-07T22:16:19 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
16022017-12-07T22:16:45 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16032017-12-07T22:26:19 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
16042017-12-07T22:26:34 *** strmci has quit IRC
16052017-12-07T22:26:38 *** ekrok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16062017-12-07T22:26:54 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16072017-12-07T22:30:21 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
16082017-12-07T22:30:32 *** pkx2_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16092017-12-07T22:33:38 *** pkx2_ has quit IRC
16102017-12-07T22:33:50 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16112017-12-07T22:34:29 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16122017-12-07T22:34:34 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
16132017-12-07T22:34:34 *** Krellan has quit IRC
16142017-12-07T22:35:32 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
16152017-12-07T22:35:43 *** Krellan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16162017-12-07T22:36:58 *** lesderid has quit IRC
16172017-12-07T22:36:58 *** ossifrage has quit IRC
16182017-12-07T22:36:58 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
16192017-12-07T22:36:58 *** jb55 has quit IRC
16202017-12-07T22:36:58 *** tripleslash has quit IRC
16212017-12-07T22:36:58 *** unholymachine has quit IRC
16222017-12-07T22:36:58 *** jouke has quit IRC
16232017-12-07T22:36:58 *** jnewbery has quit IRC
16242017-12-07T22:36:58 *** davec_ has quit IRC
16252017-12-07T22:36:58 *** jouke_ has quit IRC
16262017-12-07T22:36:58 *** cfields has quit IRC
16272017-12-07T22:36:58 *** trotski2000 has quit IRC
16282017-12-07T22:36:58 *** nOgAnOo has quit IRC
16292017-12-07T22:36:59 *** lejitz has quit IRC
16302017-12-07T22:36:59 *** brg444 has quit IRC
16312017-12-07T22:37:43 *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16322017-12-07T22:39:25 *** Aaronvan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16332017-12-07T22:41:10 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16342017-12-07T22:42:06 *** lesderid has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16352017-12-07T22:42:06 *** ossifrage has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16362017-12-07T22:42:06 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16372017-12-07T22:42:06 *** jb55 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16382017-12-07T22:42:06 *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16392017-12-07T22:42:06 *** unholymachine has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16402017-12-07T22:42:06 *** jouke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16412017-12-07T22:42:06 *** jnewbery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16422017-12-07T22:42:06 *** davec_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16432017-12-07T22:42:06 *** jouke_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16442017-12-07T22:42:06 *** cfields has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16452017-12-07T22:42:06 *** nOgAnOo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16462017-12-07T22:42:06 *** trotski2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16472017-12-07T22:42:06 *** lejitz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16482017-12-07T22:42:06 *** brg444 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16492017-12-07T22:42:37 *** gribble has quit IRC
16502017-12-07T22:42:47 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
16512017-12-07T22:47:01 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
16522017-12-07T22:50:54 *** promag has quit IRC
16532017-12-07T22:51:22 *** mrfrasha has quit IRC
16542017-12-07T22:53:09 *** gribble has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16552017-12-07T22:57:10 *** roidster has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16562017-12-07T22:57:31 *** roidster is now known as Guest64007
16572017-12-07T23:04:52 *** BashCo has quit IRC
16582017-12-07T23:05:29 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16592017-12-07T23:09:25 *** pkx2 has quit IRC
16602017-12-07T23:09:59 *** Krellan has quit IRC
16612017-12-07T23:11:58 *** warxhead has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16622017-12-07T23:12:44 *** Krellan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16632017-12-07T23:14:58 *** Aaronvan_ has quit IRC
16642017-12-07T23:15:38 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16652017-12-07T23:18:09 *** intcat has quit IRC
16662017-12-07T23:18:50 *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16672017-12-07T23:19:59 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
16682017-12-07T23:20:05 *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16692017-12-07T23:36:00 *** wxss has quit IRC
16702017-12-07T23:40:21 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16712017-12-07T23:42:01 *** pkx2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16722017-12-07T23:43:59 *** acutulus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
16732017-12-07T23:46:39 *** acutulus has left #bitcoin-core-dev
16742017-12-07T23:52:40 *** cheese_ has quit IRC