12019-08-01T00:00:03  *** Waithamai1 has quit IRC
  22019-08-01T00:03:55  *** Mark_Cockrell has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  32019-08-01T00:08:41  *** davterra has quit IRC
  42019-08-01T00:20:17  *** lightlike has quit IRC
  52019-08-01T00:21:12  <emilengler> WHere does bitcoin-qt deals with the config?
  62019-08-01T00:22:23  <emilengler> Nevermind, I think I've found it in src/qt/optionsmodel.cpp
  72019-08-01T00:31:56  *** promag has quit IRC
  82019-08-01T00:36:46  *** laptop500 has quit IRC
  92019-08-01T00:37:11  *** michaelfolkson has quit IRC
 102019-08-01T00:43:51  *** ptiyoyip has quit IRC
 112019-08-01T00:47:38  *** Krellan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 122019-08-01T00:58:47  *** DeanGuss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 132019-08-01T01:00:19  *** Zenton has quit IRC
 142019-08-01T01:35:48  *** DeanGuss has quit IRC
 152019-08-01T01:55:45  *** davterra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 162019-08-01T01:56:28  *** davterra has quit IRC
 172019-08-01T01:57:37  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 182019-08-01T02:00:47  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 192019-08-01T02:02:05  *** mzygar has quit IRC
 202019-08-01T02:03:42  *** cryptapus_ is now known as cryptapus
 212019-08-01T02:11:36  *** YonCole has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 222019-08-01T02:11:37  *** ercwl has quit IRC
 232019-08-01T02:18:19  <kallewoof> So, DrahtBot added a bunch of flags to #16440 (BIP322 PR). Not sure I agree with Build system flag, though.
 242019-08-01T02:18:25  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16440 | BIP-322: Generic signed message format by kallewoof · Pull Request #16440 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
 252019-08-01T02:18:50  <kallewoof> s/flags/labels/
 262019-08-01T02:19:56  *** ezegom has quit IRC
 272019-08-01T02:19:57  <fanquake> kallewoof: I'll sort that out. The bot isn't great at adding labels to large changes.
 282019-08-01T02:20:03  <sipa> kallewoof: i assume that's just because it's touching Makefile.am
 292019-08-01T02:20:30  <kallewoof> sipa: You're probably right!
 302019-08-01T02:20:44  <kallewoof> fanquake: Thanks :)
 312019-08-01T02:25:51  *** brianhoffman has quit IRC
 322019-08-01T02:26:55  *** brianhoffman has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 332019-08-01T02:33:04  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 342019-08-01T02:35:51  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
 352019-08-01T03:00:01  *** Mark_Cockrell has quit IRC
 362019-08-01T03:04:13  *** liberiga has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 372019-08-01T03:04:26  *** hack_bot has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 382019-08-01T03:06:43  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 392019-08-01T03:08:56  *** ezegom has quit IRC
 402019-08-01T03:09:09  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 412019-08-01T03:12:26  *** ezegom has quit IRC
 422019-08-01T03:13:04  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 432019-08-01T03:17:22  *** ezegom has quit IRC
 442019-08-01T03:18:11  *** hebasto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 452019-08-01T03:18:35  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 462019-08-01T03:41:52  *** Eagle[TM] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 472019-08-01T03:43:36  *** EagleTM has quit IRC
 482019-08-01T04:07:33  *** hebasto has quit IRC
 492019-08-01T04:08:50  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 502019-08-01T04:13:58  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 512019-08-01T04:13:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/25f0edd59fee...b7fbf74b980e
 522019-08-01T04:13:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0b1f4b3 João Barbosa: wallet: Drop unused OldKey
 532019-08-01T04:13:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b7fbf74 fanquake: Merge #16502: wallet: Drop unused OldKey
 542019-08-01T04:14:01  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 552019-08-01T04:15:03  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 562019-08-01T04:15:03  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16502: wallet: Drop unused OldKey (master...2019-07-drop-oldkey) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16502
 572019-08-01T04:15:04  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 582019-08-01T04:31:50  *** Victor_sueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 592019-08-01T04:34:22  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
 602019-08-01T04:46:07  *** davereikher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 612019-08-01T04:55:35  *** ezegom has quit IRC
 622019-08-01T04:56:11  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 632019-08-01T05:00:52  *** ezegom has quit IRC
 642019-08-01T05:16:23  *** YonCole has quit IRC
 652019-08-01T05:24:21  *** EF has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 662019-08-01T05:44:00  *** davereikher has quit IRC
 672019-08-01T05:49:33  *** Krellan has quit IRC
 682019-08-01T05:52:25  *** emilengler has quit IRC
 692019-08-01T05:56:13  *** liberiga has quit IRC
 702019-08-01T05:58:15  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 712019-08-01T06:00:02  *** hack_bot has quit IRC
 722019-08-01T06:02:33  *** mzygar has quit IRC
 732019-08-01T06:04:10  *** ao2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 742019-08-01T06:04:28  *** ao2 is now known as Guest64082
 752019-08-01T06:09:03  *** davereikher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 762019-08-01T06:15:59  *** davereikher has quit IRC
 772019-08-01T06:16:14  *** davereikher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 782019-08-01T06:16:47  <fanquake> Doing a binary comparison of a bitcoin-qt built from HEAD~1 and HEAD~2, building on Debian using depends. Currently seeing this diff: https://gist.github.com/fanquake/653bb42176d7772578db08a0f8e60f11 . Any suggestions as to what could be causing the difference? bitcoind matches.
 792019-08-01T06:17:05  <fanquake> The change in the src between the two is only in Python test code, so that should be it.
 802019-08-01T06:17:12  <fanquake> *shouldn't
 812019-08-01T06:18:50  *** davereikher has quit IRC
 822019-08-01T06:20:26  *** davereikher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 832019-08-01T06:20:47  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 842019-08-01T06:22:11  *** Eagle[TM] has quit IRC
 852019-08-01T06:31:23  *** davereikher has quit IRC
 862019-08-01T06:33:25  <wumpus> fanquake: do you happen to know what section this difference is in?
 872019-08-01T06:34:43  <wumpus> e.g. if it's in .text it might be useful to look at the disassembly
 882019-08-01T06:35:59  <fanquake> wumpus Ok. I'm just rebuilding, but assume the same diff will happen again, can check that for you shortly.
 892019-08-01T06:36:47  <wumpus> was about to ask that: if you get this difference without any C code changes, then, I wonder if you do get a stable output running it on the same commit again and again
 902019-08-01T06:38:07  <fanquake> Hopefully we'll know that shortly 🔍
 912019-08-01T06:40:54  <wumpus> if the difference is only in -qt it could suggest non-determinism in one of the qt tools
 922019-08-01T06:45:03  *** queip has quit IRC
 932019-08-01T06:45:57  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 942019-08-01T06:48:30  *** queip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 952019-08-01T06:48:32  <wumpus> i don't think i've ever used build-for-compare with bitcoin-qt, at all
 962019-08-01T06:50:10  *** promag has quit IRC
 972019-08-01T06:55:18  *** EF74 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 982019-08-01T06:55:47  *** EF has quit IRC
 992019-08-01T06:58:50  <wumpus> running the same compare now
1002019-08-01T06:59:10  <fanquake> wumpus: testing the new depends --prefix as well?
1012019-08-01T07:05:59  <fanquake> I've just done master (b7fbf74b980ebb122ae34b142f2cc49b44b92de3) and a dummy commit, still seeing the same difference in bitcoin-qt.
1022019-08-01T07:08:24  <fanquake> Looks like the difference is in libbitcoinqt_a-qrc_bitcoin_locale.o
1032019-08-01T07:08:26  <fanquake> .rodata._ZL18qt_resource_struct
1042019-08-01T07:10:00  <wumpus> no, not using --prefix at the moment, I see a diffrence too between the same commits though, in bitcoin-qt but not bitcoind
1052019-08-01T07:10:13  <wumpus> so i'm able to reproduce your issue
1062019-08-01T07:10:53  *** queip has quit IRC
1072019-08-01T07:12:01  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082019-08-01T07:12:01  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] meshcollider pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b7fbf74b980e...6841b013402d
1092019-08-01T07:12:02  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c5d3787 Andrew Chow: Allow createwallet to take empty passwords to make unencrypted wallets
1102019-08-01T07:12:03  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6841b01 MeshCollider: Merge #16394: Allow createwallet to take empty passwords to make unencrypt...
1112019-08-01T07:12:14  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1122019-08-01T07:13:01  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1132019-08-01T07:13:01  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] meshcollider merged pull request #16394: Allow createwallet to take empty passwords to make unencrypted wallets (master...fix-born-enc) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16394
1142019-08-01T07:13:10  <wumpus> fanquake: my guess would be: timestamp metadata in the compiled resource data
1152019-08-01T07:13:14  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1162019-08-01T07:13:48  <fanquake> meshcollider: If your merging, #15986 probably ready as well.
1172019-08-01T07:13:50  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15986 | Add unmodified-descriptor-with-checksum to getdescriptorinfo by sipa · Pull Request #15986 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1182019-08-01T07:14:11  <wumpus> fanquake: probably, this is an issue that was solved already for gitian deterministic building
1192019-08-01T07:14:23  <fanquake> wumpus: I know we have at least one RCC related patch
1202019-08-01T07:14:43  <fanquake> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/depends/patches/qt/fix_rcc_determinism.patch
1212019-08-01T07:15:16  <fanquake> However if I'm using Qt from depends then that should be included ?
1222019-08-01T07:16:16  <fanquake> eh right, QT_RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE wont have been set etc
1232019-08-01T07:16:38  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1242019-08-01T07:17:14  *** queip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252019-08-01T07:18:42  *** brianhoffman_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1262019-08-01T07:19:12  *** brianhoffman has quit IRC
1272019-08-01T07:19:12  *** brianhoffman_ is now known as brianhoffman
1282019-08-01T07:24:53  <wumpus> (i was not not using qt from the depends for my comparison, just ubuntu 18.04's system one)
1292019-08-01T07:25:06  *** coinmonks has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1302019-08-01T07:25:46  <coinmonks> Hey Guys, I am writing an article around Bitcoin codebase activity, anyone wanna look it and give me some  feedback..
1312019-08-01T07:26:47  <wumpus> fanquake: but yes, going to test the --prefix option next
1322019-08-01T07:27:09  <fanquake> wumpus: no worries. I'm going to rebuild while exporting that ENV var, and i assume it'll fix the Qt issue. If so I'll probably open a PR to change it to be exported by default in depends.
1332019-08-01T07:28:27  <wumpus> coinmonks: maybe link it here then people can look if they're interested
1342019-08-01T07:28:41  <coinmonks> https://medium.com/@gaurav.agrawal/bitcoin-codebase-deep-dive-127a7cb97fbf
1352019-08-01T07:29:24  <coinmonks> warning - English is my second language..
1362019-08-01T07:33:24  *** kljasdfvv has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1372019-08-01T07:36:19  *** kljasdfvv has quit IRC
1382019-08-01T07:37:52  *** kljasdfvv has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1392019-08-01T07:38:03  *** ossifrage has quit IRC
1402019-08-01T07:38:07  <coinmonks> I am online if anyone have any feedback,,or they can just leave private notes on the post itself.. thank you every one for contributing on Bitcoin.. :]
1412019-08-01T07:38:31  *** ossifrage has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1422019-08-01T07:42:54  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1432019-08-01T07:45:02  <fanquake> wumpus: yep QT_RCC_SOURCE_DATE_OVERRIDE fixed the issues with bitcoin-qt 🤦
1442019-08-01T07:47:18  *** davereikher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1452019-08-01T07:49:50  *** EF74 has quit IRC
1462019-08-01T07:58:28  <coinmonks> how practicalswift generates status reports every month (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16506) ..
1472019-08-01T07:59:33  <fanquake> coinmonks: your best way of finding out is contacting them directly.
1482019-08-01T08:00:27  <coinmonks> (y)
1492019-08-01T08:00:29  <kallewoof> I think practicalswift has a twitter account
1502019-08-01T08:01:19  <coinmonks> yes, tweeted him
1512019-08-01T08:02:04  <davereikher> quit
1522019-08-01T08:02:07  *** davereikher has quit IRC
1532019-08-01T08:02:37  *** jungly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1542019-08-01T08:08:10  *** setpill has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552019-08-01T08:23:34  <jonasschnelli> MarcoFalke: fee_
1562019-08-01T08:23:54  <jonasschnelli> MarcoFalke: fee_estimation test failed on master (random fail): https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?ansilog=44accd13-eea0-4aab-a6a4-f0694f12a68f.log#l7207 any idea?
1572019-08-01T08:24:35  <jonasschnelli> This is probably relevant: https://bitcoinbuilds.org/index.php?ansilog=44accd13-eea0-4aab-a6a4-f0694f12a68f.log#l7024
1582019-08-01T08:31:09  *** Zenton has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1592019-08-01T08:32:18  *** coinmonks has quit IRC
1602019-08-01T08:38:15  *** laptop500 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1612019-08-01T08:40:14  <wumpus> fanquake: cool, thanks for investigating, might make sense to set it by default in the compare-for-build
1622019-08-01T08:40:38  *** queip has quit IRC
1632019-08-01T08:41:10  <fanquake> wumpus: Sure, I can do that.
1642019-08-01T08:47:08  *** queip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652019-08-01T08:56:46  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1662019-08-01T09:00:01  *** Guest64082 has quit IRC
1672019-08-01T09:00:52  *** ezegom has quit IRC
1682019-08-01T09:00:53  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
1692019-08-01T09:16:00  *** tryphe has quit IRC
1702019-08-01T09:16:28  *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1712019-08-01T09:19:50  *** indolering has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1722019-08-01T09:20:28  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1732019-08-01T09:33:40  *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1742019-08-01T09:39:29  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1752019-08-01T09:54:30  *** jonatack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1762019-08-01T10:01:04  *** queip has quit IRC
1772019-08-01T10:01:09  *** jonatack has quit IRC
1782019-08-01T10:06:24  *** queip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1792019-08-01T10:11:46  *** mzygar has quit IRC
1802019-08-01T10:24:16  *** michaelfolkson has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1812019-08-01T10:31:16  *** michaelfolkson has quit IRC
1822019-08-01T10:32:15  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1832019-08-01T10:34:24  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1842019-08-01T10:38:59  *** mzygar has quit IRC
1852019-08-01T10:42:30  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1862019-08-01T10:42:30  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/6841b013402d...75656988ac8e
1872019-08-01T10:42:31  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b078067 João Barbosa: gui: Remove unused RPCConsole::tabFocus
1882019-08-01T10:42:31  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7565698 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16514: gui: Remove unused RPCConsole::tabFocus
1892019-08-01T10:42:43  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1902019-08-01T10:43:30  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1912019-08-01T10:43:30  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16514: gui: Remove unused RPCConsole::tabFocus (master...2019-07-remove-unused-tabfocus) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16514
1922019-08-01T10:43:43  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1932019-08-01T10:55:02  *** kcalvinalvin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1942019-08-01T10:57:27  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952019-08-01T11:01:17  *** rex4539 has quit IRC
1962019-08-01T11:01:29  *** ezegom has quit IRC
1972019-08-01T11:01:32  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1982019-08-01T11:18:16  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
1992019-08-01T11:22:06  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2002019-08-01T11:28:28  *** davec has quit IRC
2012019-08-01T11:28:50  *** davec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2022019-08-01T11:31:02  *** michaelfolkson has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2032019-08-01T11:34:33  *** mzygar has quit IRC
2042019-08-01T11:37:17  *** lightlike has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2052019-08-01T11:38:15  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2062019-08-01T11:39:04  *** michaelfolkson has quit IRC
2072019-08-01T11:39:28  *** ezegom has quit IRC
2082019-08-01T11:39:53  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2092019-08-01T11:41:18  *** ezegom_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2102019-08-01T11:41:18  *** ezegom has quit IRC
2112019-08-01T11:45:19  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2122019-08-01T11:45:36  *** ezegom_ has quit IRC
2132019-08-01T11:45:58  *** ezegom has quit IRC
2142019-08-01T11:46:20  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2152019-08-01T11:47:47  *** ezegom_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2162019-08-01T11:47:47  *** ezegom has quit IRC
2172019-08-01T11:52:07  *** ezegom_ has quit IRC
2182019-08-01T11:58:37  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2192019-08-01T12:00:02  *** indolering has quit IRC
2202019-08-01T12:03:30  *** shesek` has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2212019-08-01T12:05:20  *** shesek` has quit IRC
2222019-08-01T12:05:28  *** shesek` has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2232019-08-01T12:06:33  *** shesek`` has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242019-08-01T12:07:37  *** shesek has quit IRC
2252019-08-01T12:10:31  *** shesek` has quit IRC
2262019-08-01T12:17:07  *** kcalvinalvin has quit IRC
2272019-08-01T12:17:45  *** kcalvinalvin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282019-08-01T12:21:32  *** Linoleum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2292019-08-01T12:31:42  *** mzygar has quit IRC
2302019-08-01T12:44:28  *** kcalvinalvin has quit IRC
2312019-08-01T12:45:53  *** davterra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2322019-08-01T12:55:41  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2332019-08-01T13:12:29  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2342019-08-01T13:12:59  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2352019-08-01T13:14:18  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2362019-08-01T13:14:18  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/75656988ac8e...79816278e2fb
2372019-08-01T13:14:19  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fac2e6a MarcoFalke: test: Fail early on disconnect in mininode.wait_for_*
2382019-08-01T13:14:19  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7981627 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16470: test: Fail early on disconnect in mininode.wait_for_*
2392019-08-01T13:14:21  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2402019-08-01T13:15:18  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2412019-08-01T13:15:18  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16470: test: Fail early on disconnect in mininode.wait_for_* (master...1907-testMininodeNoWaitOnDisconnect) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16470
2422019-08-01T13:15:27  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2432019-08-01T13:17:42  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2442019-08-01T13:17:42  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/79816278e2fb...e653eeff7651
2452019-08-01T13:17:43  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7a0c224 Gert-Jaap Glasbergen: Suppress output in test_bitcoin for expected errors
2462019-08-01T13:17:43  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e653eef Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #16277: [Tests] Suppress output in test_bitcoin for expected errors
2472019-08-01T13:17:45  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2482019-08-01T13:18:38  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2492019-08-01T13:18:38  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj merged pull request #16277: [Tests] Suppress output in test_bitcoin for expected errors (master...issue-15944) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16277
2502019-08-01T13:18:39  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2512019-08-01T13:25:00  *** queip has quit IRC
2522019-08-01T13:25:31  *** kcalvinalvin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2532019-08-01T13:28:35  *** mzygar has quit IRC
2542019-08-01T13:29:56  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2552019-08-01T13:31:13  *** queip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562019-08-01T13:34:45  *** mzygar has quit IRC
2572019-08-01T13:39:16  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2582019-08-01T13:39:17  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2592019-08-01T13:41:23  *** kcalvinalvin has quit IRC
2602019-08-01T13:42:04  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2612019-08-01T13:43:43  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2622019-08-01T13:43:43  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] hebasto closed pull request #16476: Use ArgsManager::ALLOW_STRING flag explicitly in simple cases (master...20190727-pr16097-new-flags) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16476
2632019-08-01T13:43:46  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2642019-08-01T13:50:57  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2652019-08-01T13:58:05  *** jonatack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2662019-08-01T14:00:53  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2672019-08-01T14:01:03  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2682019-08-01T14:07:37  <wumpus> #proposedmeetingtopic 0.18.1 ready for final?
2692019-08-01T14:30:32  *** captjakk has quit IRC
2702019-08-01T14:30:52  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
2712019-08-01T14:31:06  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2722019-08-01T14:34:41  *** davterra has quit IRC
2732019-08-01T14:35:56  *** captjakk has quit IRC
2742019-08-01T14:36:11  *** davterra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2752019-08-01T14:37:06  *** kristapsk has quit IRC
2762019-08-01T14:37:38  *** davterra has quit IRC
2772019-08-01T14:38:11  *** davterra has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2782019-08-01T14:39:19  *** obsrver has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2792019-08-01T14:44:19  *** jonatack has quit IRC
2802019-08-01T14:46:39  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2812019-08-01T14:50:09  *** d_t has quit IRC
2822019-08-01T14:54:36  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
2832019-08-01T14:56:15  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2842019-08-01T14:57:10  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2852019-08-01T15:00:01  *** Linoleum has quit IRC
2862019-08-01T15:01:12  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
2872019-08-01T15:03:21  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2882019-08-01T15:04:02  *** hebasto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2892019-08-01T15:04:46  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
2902019-08-01T15:05:47  *** esotericnonsense has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2912019-08-01T15:14:33  *** victorSN has quit IRC
2922019-08-01T15:14:34  *** rockhouse has quit IRC
2932019-08-01T15:15:14  *** rockhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2942019-08-01T15:15:36  *** [RuCTFE]tswr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2952019-08-01T15:19:52  *** rockhouse has quit IRC
2962019-08-01T15:23:42  *** setpill has quit IRC
2972019-08-01T15:25:56  *** rockhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2982019-08-01T15:29:11  *** ezegom has quit IRC
2992019-08-01T15:29:50  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3002019-08-01T15:31:25  *** ezegom has quit IRC
3012019-08-01T15:31:38  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3022019-08-01T15:35:30  *** emilengler has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3032019-08-01T15:37:40  *** dgfhdfg has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3042019-08-01T15:40:33  *** mzygar has quit IRC
3052019-08-01T15:48:29  <emilengler> Is the path where the qt config file is being stored somewhere set in the code? Or is it the QSettings default?
3062019-08-01T15:51:51  *** jonatack has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3072019-08-01T16:01:11  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3082019-08-01T16:03:09  *** mdunnio_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3092019-08-01T16:03:44  *** davterra has quit IRC
3102019-08-01T16:05:28  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
3112019-08-01T16:09:00  <sipa> emilengler: i believe it's a platform dependent default
3122019-08-01T16:11:06  <emilengler> sipa: My question was if it is somewhere specified by code or by qt
3132019-08-01T16:13:12  <jonasschnelli> emilengler: by QT
3142019-08-01T16:13:17  <jonasschnelli> we use the default path
3152019-08-01T16:14:07  <jonasschnelli> https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qsettings.html
3162019-08-01T16:15:47  <emilengler> jonasschnelli: Thank you
3172019-08-01T16:16:17  <jonasschnelli> emilengler: I think if you pass "-resetguisettings" at startup you'll get a backup .ini file in your datadir...
3182019-08-01T16:16:24  <jonasschnelli> (that maybe helps if you want to inspect)
3192019-08-01T16:18:08  *** ezegom has quit IRC
3202019-08-01T16:18:31  <emilengler> And where is the config file initial be loaded? In src/qt/bitcoin.cpp or src/qt/intro.cpp
3212019-08-01T16:19:20  *** mdunnio_ has quit IRC
3222019-08-01T16:21:09  <jonasschnelli> emilengler: I think whenever it touches QSettings
3232019-08-01T16:21:28  <jonasschnelli> mainly qt/optionsmodel.cpp
3242019-08-01T16:21:53  <jonasschnelli> certainly when there is .setValue() or value()
3252019-08-01T16:23:12  <jonasschnelli> First "read" is probably in GetLangTerritory()
3262019-08-01T16:24:08  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3272019-08-01T16:29:18  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
3282019-08-01T16:33:34  *** darosior has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3292019-08-01T16:34:54  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3302019-08-01T16:35:22  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
3312019-08-01T16:35:37  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3322019-08-01T16:36:53  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
3332019-08-01T16:43:28  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3342019-08-01T16:49:38  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3352019-08-01T16:49:38  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] dongcarl opened pull request #16519: guix: Change manifest to use channels and inferiors (master...2019-06-guix-channels-and-inferiors) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16519
3362019-08-01T16:49:39  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
3372019-08-01T16:52:05  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
3382019-08-01T16:52:25  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3392019-08-01T16:55:05  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3402019-08-01T16:57:01  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
3412019-08-01T17:00:21  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3422019-08-01T17:00:38  <MarcoFalke> [04:23] <jonasschnelli> MarcoFalke: fee_
3432019-08-01T17:00:45  <MarcoFalke> This and others should be fixed in #16493
3442019-08-01T17:00:47  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16493 | test: Fix test failures by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #16493 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3452019-08-01T17:01:14  <jonasschnelli> nice!
3462019-08-01T17:02:40  <jonasschnelli> I can't attend at todays meeting (swiss national day and some fam. duties).
3472019-08-01T17:02:54  <jonasschnelli> If someone wants to pickup my. topic (bitcoin-dev mailing list moderation), feel free
3482019-08-01T17:03:54  *** ljlkjlger has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3492019-08-01T17:04:07  <jonasschnelli> I propose that we add more moderators to shorten the moderation lag which has been between >24h, thus makes debates cumbersome
3502019-08-01T17:04:19  <jonasschnelli> Eventually there are some volunteers for moderation, ideally neutral people
3512019-08-01T17:11:10  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3522019-08-01T17:15:25  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3532019-08-01T17:31:05  *** afk11 has quit IRC
3542019-08-01T17:31:30  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3552019-08-01T17:43:27  *** mzygar has quit IRC
3562019-08-01T17:44:02  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3572019-08-01T17:44:03  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Remagpie opened pull request #16521: wallet/rpc: Use the default maxfeerate value as BTC/kB (master...maxfeerate-as-rate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16521
3582019-08-01T17:44:04  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
3592019-08-01T17:55:04  *** jarthur has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3602019-08-01T18:00:01  *** [RuCTFE]tswr has quit IRC
3612019-08-01T18:05:25  *** nijak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3622019-08-01T18:05:52  *** nijak_ has quit IRC
3632019-08-01T18:10:56  *** gnomus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3642019-08-01T18:16:09  <dongcarl> Serialization question: in an `Unserialize`, is it possible to do something like this: `s >> static_cast<uint8_t>(m_network_id);`? Or do I have to split this up? `m_network_id` is an `enum class` backed by `uint8_t`
3652019-08-01T18:16:23  *** ercwl has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3662019-08-01T18:17:50  *** reallll has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3672019-08-01T18:18:19  <sipa> dongcarl: i belive static_cast<uint8_t&>(m_network_id) will work
3682019-08-01T18:18:39  * dongcarl trying
3692019-08-01T18:19:04  <sipa> seems not
3702019-08-01T18:19:34  <dongcarl> yeah... "invalid static_cast from type ‘NetworkID’ to type ‘uint8_t&’"
3712019-08-01T18:19:52  <sipa> though you can use `uint8_t x; s >> x; m_network_id = x;`
3722019-08-01T18:20:13  <dongcarl> sipa: Yeah I was using that before, just thought there might be something more elegant haha
3732019-08-01T18:21:13  <sipa> dongcarl: in my (long outdated) serialization rework #10785 i have a "READWRITEAS(type, value)"
3742019-08-01T18:21:17  *** belcher has quit IRC
3752019-08-01T18:21:17  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/10785 | Serialization improvements by sipa · Pull Request #10785 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3762019-08-01T18:21:55  <sipa> which would let you just write READWRITEAS(uint8_t, m_networkid) for both serialization and deserialization
3772019-08-01T18:21:55  <dongcarl> sipa: That can still be used if we're not using the `SerializationOp` magic?
3782019-08-01T18:23:37  <sipa> actually i suspect it won't work here; references need to be convertible for this
3792019-08-01T18:25:34  <dongcarl> `s >> *(uint8_t *)&m_network_id;` worked
3802019-08-01T18:25:52  <dongcarl> which is... cool i guess
3812019-08-01T18:26:04  *** reallll is now known as belcher
3822019-08-01T18:27:03  <sipa> dongcarl: i'm not sure that's legal
3832019-08-01T18:27:55  <sipa> s >> *static_cast<uint8_t*>(&m_network_id) does not work
3842019-08-01T18:28:40  <sipa> you can always access the byte representation of other objects, which means it's not UB to do this, but i'm not convinced it's guaranteed to have the desired effect
3852019-08-01T18:29:48  <dongcarl> sipa: Oh it's a reinterpret cast of some kind?
3862019-08-01T18:30:01  *** rh0nj has quit IRC
3872019-08-01T18:30:10  <sipa> yeah, it's a reinterpret cast
3882019-08-01T18:30:29  <sipa> i suspect that the representation of a class enum is defined to be equal to its underlying int type, which would make this correct
3892019-08-01T18:30:33  <sipa> but i'm not entirely sure
3902019-08-01T18:31:08  *** rh0nj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3912019-08-01T18:32:30  <dongcarl> Oh well, better to have multiple lines than to be unsure about safety :-) Will probably get optimized by the compiler anyway
3922019-08-01T18:32:36  <sipa> yes
3932019-08-01T18:49:27  <achow101> dongcarl: does `static_cast<uint8_t>(m_network_id)` not work?
3942019-08-01T18:49:43  <dongcarl> achow101: noop :-/
3952019-08-01T18:50:33  <achow101> you can have `uint8_t id; s >> id; static_cast<NetworkID>(id);
3962019-08-01T18:50:44  <achow101> just have a uint8_t temp variable
3972019-08-01T18:50:49  *** ezegom has quit IRC
3982019-08-01T18:51:11  <sipa> achow101: easier is `uint8_t id; s >> id; m_network_id = NetworkID(id);`
3992019-08-01T18:52:20  <dongcarl> yup, we're going the temp variable route, sipa didn't know you could do `NetworkID(id)`, neat!
4002019-08-01T18:55:58  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4012019-08-01T18:55:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #16522: travis: Run functional tests in GUI once (master...1908-testGuiFun) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16522
4022019-08-01T18:56:00  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
4032019-08-01T19:00:00  <moneyball> meeting?
4042019-08-01T19:00:04  <wumpus> #startmeeting
4052019-08-01T19:00:04  <lightningbot> Meeting started Thu Aug  1 19:00:04 2019 UTC.  The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
4062019-08-01T19:00:04  <lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
4072019-08-01T19:00:07  <moneyball> https://gist.github.com/moneyball/071d608fdae217c2a6d7c35955881d8a
4082019-08-01T19:00:07  <jnewbery> hi
4092019-08-01T19:00:21  <wumpus> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 achow101 meshcollider jnewbery maaku fanquake promag provoostenator aj Chris_Stewart_5 dongcarl gwillen jamesob ken281221 ryanofsky gleb moneyball kvaciral
4102019-08-01T19:00:27  <provoostenator> hi\
4112019-08-01T19:00:30  <sdaftuar> hello
4122019-08-01T19:00:33  <kanzure> hi
4132019-08-01T19:00:48  <meshcollider> Hi
4142019-08-01T19:01:08  <achow101> hi
4152019-08-01T19:01:11  * jonasschnelli not really here
4162019-08-01T19:01:19  <wumpus> four proposed topics today in https://gist.github.com/moneyball/071d608fdae217c2a6d7c35955881d8a, though jonasschnelli is not here
4172019-08-01T19:01:22  <wumpus> right
4182019-08-01T19:01:36  *** Kvaciral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4192019-08-01T19:01:36  <jamesob> hi
4202019-08-01T19:01:42  <sipa> hi
4212019-08-01T19:01:43  <wumpus> #topic High priority for review
4222019-08-01T19:01:50  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
4232019-08-01T19:02:11  <wumpus> 7 PRs (!) left in blockers, also 7 things chasing concept ACK
4242019-08-01T19:02:17  <wumpus> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8
4252019-08-01T19:02:33  <gleb> hi
4262019-08-01T19:02:53  <wumpus> anything to add/remove?
4272019-08-01T19:03:08  <wumpus> or more or less ready for merge?
4282019-08-01T19:03:12  <sdaftuar> i'll beg again for review on #15759
4292019-08-01T19:03:15  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15759 | [p2p] Add 2 outbound blocks-only connections by sdaftuar · Pull Request #15759 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4302019-08-01T19:03:41  <wumpus> we should probably refuse to add anything more to high prio until 15759 is merged :-)
4312019-08-01T19:03:51  <sdaftuar> no argument from me :)
4322019-08-01T19:03:59  <MarcoFalke> ok, then just merge it, no?
4332019-08-01T19:04:21  <jamesob> I said I'd review it again and I did. still A++++++ 10/10
4342019-08-01T19:04:24  <sdaftuar> it only has one ack, i believe, so probably premature
4352019-08-01T19:04:26  <wumpus> well it needs review first
4362019-08-01T19:04:48  <sdaftuar> jamesob: thank you!
4372019-08-01T19:04:57  <wumpus> maybe something for the review club, though, possibly too difficult
4382019-08-01T19:06:11  <ariard> will give it a try, at least on code changes, not on p2p implications
4392019-08-01T19:06:21  <wumpus> thanks!
4402019-08-01T19:06:24  <jonatack> same
4412019-08-01T19:07:07  <wumpus> anything to discuss about the issues needing concept ACK?
4422019-08-01T19:08:11  <aj> i think i'll close #16229 in favour of #16060
4432019-08-01T19:08:13  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16229 | Standardise deployment handling by ajtowns · Pull Request #16229 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4442019-08-01T19:08:17  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16060 | Bury bip9 deployments by jnewbery · Pull Request #16060 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4452019-08-01T19:08:52  <aj> doesn't #14895 already have conceptacks?
4462019-08-01T19:08:53  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14895 | Package relay design questions · Issue #14895 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4472019-08-01T19:09:03  <jnewbery> I've just pushed to 16060. It's ready for rereview
4482019-08-01T19:09:10  <jnewbery> (thanks for the review, aj!)
4492019-08-01T19:09:34  <wumpus> aj: yes, maybe for the best, having two competing PRs open is usually not very productive
4502019-08-01T19:09:42  <achow101> It seems like #16341 has Concept ACKs, so maybe move it to blockers? At least isn't labeled with "needs conceptual review" anymore
4512019-08-01T19:09:44  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16341 | Introduce ScriptPubKeyMan interface and use it for key and script management (aka wallet boxes) by achow101 · Pull Request #16341 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4522019-08-01T19:10:03  <wumpus> I think 7 blockers is enough :)
4532019-08-01T19:10:15  *** spaced0ut has quit IRC
4542019-08-01T19:10:33  <wumpus> otoh doesn't seem you have one yet there
4552019-08-01T19:10:45  <achow101> it got merged :)
4562019-08-01T19:11:27  <wumpus> ok moving it then
4572019-08-01T19:11:29  <provoostenator> I'd love to build on top of The Box, so not opposed to making it high prio.
4582019-08-01T19:12:06  <wumpus> at least #16363 is almost, or entirely ready for merge, I think
4592019-08-01T19:12:09  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16363 | test: Add test for BIP30 duplicate tx by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #16363 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4602019-08-01T19:13:20  <wumpus> #topic 0.18.1?
4612019-08-01T19:13:43  <wumpus> rc1 was uploaded almost a week ago, do we have any reports of issues?
4622019-08-01T19:13:45  <MarcoFalke> I haven't heard of any issues with 18.1rc1
4632019-08-01T19:13:49  <wumpus> me neither
4642019-08-01T19:14:05  <MarcoFalke> #action ship it
4652019-08-01T19:14:38  <wumpus> there's also no bugfixes that need to make it in hard enough to warrant another rc, AFAIK
4662019-08-01T19:14:45  <wumpus> yess
4672019-08-01T19:14:46  <achow101> haven't heard anything, but that may be a symptom of no one using it
4682019-08-01T19:14:56  <wumpus> you never know that...
4692019-08-01T19:15:34  *** nijak_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4702019-08-01T19:15:55  <wumpus> waiting longer will not likely get more people to test it
4712019-08-01T19:16:01  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
4722019-08-01T19:16:09  <achow101> ship it!
4732019-08-01T19:16:46  <wumpus> clear!
4742019-08-01T19:17:03  <wumpus> #topic is transaction.nVersion signed or unsigned? (BlueMatt)
4752019-08-01T19:17:08  *** nijak has quit IRC
4762019-08-01T19:17:13  <BlueMatt> #16513
4772019-08-01T19:17:15  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16513 | [RFC] Switch CTransaction::nVersion to an unsigned integer by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #16513 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4782019-08-01T19:17:19  <BlueMatt> this came up in rust-bitcoin discussion
4792019-08-01T19:17:27  <BlueMatt> consens-wise its unsigned, in our code its signed, people are confused
4802019-08-01T19:17:34  <BlueMatt> concept ack or nack, happy either way
4812019-08-01T19:17:36  <BlueMatt> just a discussion to have
4822019-08-01T19:17:39  <achow101> I thought consensus wise it isn't signed
4832019-08-01T19:17:48  <BlueMatt> indeed, it is unsigned in cnosensus
4842019-08-01T19:17:51  <BlueMatt> in the code its signed
4852019-08-01T19:18:08  <sdaftuar> how about we add a comment to think about it if it ever matters?
4862019-08-01T19:18:18  <wumpus> FWIW, I think it's fairly risky to change the consensus code for no functional change
4872019-08-01T19:18:19  <MarcoFalke> How can the change even be reviewed? Look at each call site?
4882019-08-01T19:18:37  <BlueMatt> MarcoFalke: the way I wrote it is to remove nVersion, see every place its accessed, and go read it
4892019-08-01T19:18:41  <BlueMatt> its....actually not that many
4902019-08-01T19:18:49  <sipa> one easy way to make sure you have all the call sites is to rename it
4912019-08-01T19:18:50  <achow101> if our code says it's signed, then doesn't that mean consensus-wise it is signed?
4922019-08-01T19:18:57  <BlueMatt> but, indeed, I'm happy to take a no, just also kinda wondering if people think libraries should make it signed or unsigned
4932019-08-01T19:19:11  <BlueMatt> achow101: its casted to unsigned in consensus checks
4942019-08-01T19:19:13  <sipa> achow101: as in: all call sites either don't care about signedness, or explicitly cast to unsigned before usage
4952019-08-01T19:19:25  <MarcoFalke> huh, nVersion is still here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16513/files#diff-5cb8d9decaa15620a8f98b0c6c44da9bR289
4962019-08-01T19:19:29  <BlueMatt> do people think this should be signed or unsigned in rust-bitcoin
4972019-08-01T19:19:29  <achow101> wth
4982019-08-01T19:19:36  <wumpus> well, other implementations could make it unsigned, if that makes the code easier
4992019-08-01T19:19:42  <BlueMatt> like, if its unsigned, people get confused reading crap from rpc
5002019-08-01T19:19:51  <BlueMatt> if its signed, people may misimplement CSV
5012019-08-01T19:20:32  <sipa> no strong opinion either way; if people want to change it, i think this is fairly easy to review for correctness
5022019-08-01T19:20:35  <wumpus> rust-bitcoin is not consensus critical, so the amount at stake for an implementation error is somewhat less their
5032019-08-01T19:20:53  <MarcoFalke> [15:18] <sipa> one easy way to make sure you have all the call sites is to rename it
5042019-08-01T19:20:54  <BlueMatt> right
5052019-08-01T19:20:54  <provoostenator> I can confirm nVersion is a source of confusion :-)
5062019-08-01T19:20:55  *** esotericnonsense has quit IRC
5072019-08-01T19:21:25  <BlueMatt> the background is someone got confused parsing rpc output or something similar, and wants to change the unsigned nVersion to signed
5082019-08-01T19:22:06  <provoostenator> 1 is the same signed and unsigned?
5092019-08-01T19:22:14  <wumpus> that only gets the direct usage sites though, it's somewhat harder to analyse where the value ends up indirectly
5102019-08-01T19:22:15  <BlueMatt> anyway, enough discussion, its somewhat minor...in 5 seconds everyone say their prefernce and we'll flip a weighted coin based on the response and close or not :p
5112019-08-01T19:22:32  <MarcoFalke> +0.001
5122019-08-01T19:23:01  <aj> MarcoFalke: you're voting for signed floating point? :)
5132019-08-01T19:23:17  <BlueMatt> aj: no, signed Decimal
5142019-08-01T19:23:42  <elichai2> BlueMatt: make it signed and cast when pass to libconsensus? lol
5152019-08-01T19:24:30  <sdaftuar> how about we cast to unsigned in the rpc handler
5162019-08-01T19:24:37  <wumpus> ^^
5172019-08-01T19:24:37  <sdaftuar> and then stop thinking about it for a long time
5182019-08-01T19:24:47  <BlueMatt> sounds fine to me too
5192019-08-01T19:24:54  <sipa> sgtm
5202019-08-01T19:24:56  <wumpus> exactly, if it confuses people in RPC, then report it differently in RPC :)
5212019-08-01T19:24:58  <BlueMatt> cool, next topi
5222019-08-01T19:25:00  <MarcoFalke> sdaftuar: Doeparsers decode 32bits to signed?
5232019-08-01T19:25:00  <BlueMatt> c
5242019-08-01T19:25:17  <MarcoFalke> Oh, json doesn't use bits
5252019-08-01T19:25:20  <wumpus> #topic any contributors affected by GH blocking access/functionality in certain countries? (fanquake)
5262019-08-01T19:25:52  <BlueMatt> well whats the eta until auzzies cant work on core cause their govt forces them ato add backdoors and gh kicks them out?
5272019-08-01T19:26:19  <BlueMatt> do we need to get fanquake a freedom visa?
5282019-08-01T19:26:27  <achow101> and aj
5292019-08-01T19:26:33  <BlueMatt> right
5302019-08-01T19:26:34  <moneyball> Nat tweeted saying it only affects private repos. I'm not sure if that matches reality or not.
5312019-08-01T19:26:35  <wumpus> from what I've heard, currently it shouldn't be a problem because Iran/Crimea/etc is only locked out of their private repos
5322019-08-01T19:26:38  <provoostenator> BlueMatt: Microsoft gladly added a backdoor to Skype for China, so I don't think they'll kick anyone out.
5332019-08-01T19:26:51  <wumpus> but in the longer run it's not clear what will happen
5342019-08-01T19:27:02  <provoostenator> Does Github allow Tor?
5352019-08-01T19:27:03  <achow101> https://help.github.com/en/articles/github-and-trade-controls
5362019-08-01T19:27:09  <sipa> yeah, it doesn't seem open projects are affected right now
5372019-08-01T19:27:11  <elichai2> I heard they're locked out of *their accounts* and becuase of that they can't see their private repos
5382019-08-01T19:27:12  <sipa> but it's a scary precedent
5392019-08-01T19:27:18  <sipa> elichai2: that was fixed, afaik
5402019-08-01T19:27:25  <moneyball> sipa: agree
5412019-08-01T19:27:40  <wumpus> it's definitely scary and it'd be absurd to have an international open source project be affected by one country's strange psychosis
5422019-08-01T19:27:46  <achow101> wumpus: I heard some reports that people were locked out of their accounts entirely
5432019-08-01T19:27:51  <BlueMatt> wumpus: BUT FREEDOMZ
5442019-08-01T19:28:06  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5452019-08-01T19:28:08  <emilengler> I have a VPN, I can look if I can connect to a Crimea server if there are one
5462019-08-01T19:28:19  <emilengler> Or any other servers/locations which are blocked by the US
5472019-08-01T19:28:24  <sipa> achow101: read this thread: https://twitter.com/Hamed/status/1154268514074660864
5482019-08-01T19:28:25  <emilengler> Is there a list or something
5492019-08-01T19:28:28  <wumpus> emilengler: DO NOT log into your account from there
5502019-08-01T19:28:44  <achow101> emilengler: I think it only effects accounts where they believe you a resident of a sanctioned country, not if you are connecting from one
5512019-08-01T19:28:53  <emzy> There is a git mirror for Bitcoin in the tor network.
5522019-08-01T19:29:03  <emilengler> wumpus: Sure, I wanted to create a trash account for it
5532019-08-01T19:29:09  <wumpus> emilengler: okay :)
5542019-08-01T19:29:14  <sipa> achow101: in particular, private repos can still be made public if their account is restricted
5552019-08-01T19:29:25  <jonatack> IIUC people can be blocked based on presumed citizenship e.g. the wrong passport living in London can be frozen out of their account
5562019-08-01T19:30:06  <sipa> everyone, please read this first to the end: https://twitter.com/Hamed/status/1154268514074660864
5572019-08-01T19:30:07  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5582019-08-01T19:30:26  <emilengler> Has someone a list of the countries who are blocked?
5592019-08-01T19:30:30  <emilengler> Or regions
5602019-08-01T19:30:37  <wumpus> emzy: right, getting the source code isn't hard, but losing access to PRs/issues etc to be able to contribute back would be bad
5612019-08-01T19:30:42  <achow101> emilengler: it's in the help.github article I linked earlier
5622019-08-01T19:30:52  <achow101> emilengler: Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, and Syria.
5632019-08-01T19:30:56  <sipa> afaict, the only thing we should be discussing here now is whether we should prioritize figuring out in what ways our processes are dependent on github
5642019-08-01T19:31:15  <wumpus> yes
5652019-08-01T19:31:42  <emzy> right
5662019-08-01T19:32:16  <dongcarl> I know that a few of the depends packages depend on other GitHub repos
5672019-08-01T19:32:29  <wumpus> I think our process is already kind of detached from github in a way: we dont use it for merging, a lot of us prefer reviewing locally, the ACK system could work everywhere, etc
5682019-08-01T19:32:42  *** esotericnonsense has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5692019-08-01T19:32:47  <sipa> yeah, i think if worst comes to worst, we can spin up something else
5702019-08-01T19:32:56  <sipa> it'd be annoying, but not devastating
5712019-08-01T19:33:12  <achow101> the annoying part is losing the issues and PRs
5722019-08-01T19:33:23  <wumpus> the good part you mean
5732019-08-01T19:33:25  <wumpus> *ducks*
5742019-08-01T19:33:27  <sdaftuar> lol
5752019-08-01T19:33:30  <moneyball> ha
5762019-08-01T19:33:30  <meshcollider> Lol
5772019-08-01T19:33:34  <wumpus> just file the ones that matter again :p
5782019-08-01T19:33:55  <elichai2> unless we think of this ahead of time and start slowly duplicating all of github into a private gitlab (we could "fake" the PRs and issues to be the same as in github if it's an open source platform)
5792019-08-01T19:33:59  <moneyball> can't we just export issues/PR data on a regular basis as backup?
5802019-08-01T19:34:03  <wumpus> seriously though, maybe there's some way to import gh metadata
5812019-08-01T19:34:06  <BlueMatt> I presume as long as we (a) have very good backups of the entire pr/issue/everything context and (b) are willing to switch upon seeing any actual real-world issues for people, then I think we dont need to do anything today, no?
5822019-08-01T19:34:08  <wumpus> moneyball: we do!
5832019-08-01T19:34:17  <moneyball> oh nice!
5842019-08-01T19:34:34  *** ezegom has quit IRC
5852019-08-01T19:34:35  <MarcoFalke> So people from those countries can create pull requests and issues, right?
5862019-08-01T19:34:43  <wumpus> moneyball: it's backed up to a github repo though, so be sure to pull it regularly :) https://github.com/zw/bitcoin-gh-meta
5872019-08-01T19:34:51  <dongcarl> Is there a GitHub<->GitLab mirroring tool that keeps them in sync?
5882019-08-01T19:34:54  <sipa> MarcoFalke: afaict, the only thing is access to their private repos
5892019-08-01T19:35:27  <achow101> MarcoFalke: seems like it
5902019-08-01T19:35:33  <phantomcircuit> BlueMatt, visa doesn't change an australian citizens obligation to backdoor stuff for their government
5912019-08-01T19:35:36  <emilengler> GitLab can import github issues/pr as well
5922019-08-01T19:35:42  <phantomcircuit> just cant trust those convicts anymore
5932019-08-01T19:36:14  <wumpus> hehe
5942019-08-01T19:36:23  <wumpus> phantomcircuit: discrimination!
5952019-08-01T19:36:57  <wumpus> anyhow, not much to say on this topic I think, no one from those countries spoke up at least
5962019-08-01T19:37:12  <BlueMatt> ehh, if openbsd can discriminate against us citizens for the same reason, I think we're allowed to discriminate based on a convict colony
5972019-08-01T19:37:13  <wumpus> (if you are from those countries feel free to PM me)
5982019-08-01T19:37:49  <sipa> BlueMatt: you know the difference between a cup of yoghurt and australia?
5992019-08-01T19:37:57  <achow101> oh no
6002019-08-01T19:38:10  <dongcarl> something something culture?
6012019-08-01T19:38:48  <wumpus> that leaves one topic "bitcoin-dev mailing list moderation", which I'm kind of scared of and jonasschnelli isn't here anyway
6022019-08-01T19:39:02  <sipa> is warren or kanzure here?
6032019-08-01T19:39:02  <phantomcircuit> wumpus, in all seriousness the first part is actually true, the obligation is of citizens and residents, not merely of people in australia
6042019-08-01T19:39:12  <achow101> I think it was just a question about whether we had enough mailing list moderators
6052019-08-01T19:39:16  <emilengler> How does the list moderation works? It is slow that's the only thing I know..
6062019-08-01T19:39:30  <wumpus> "I propose that we add more moderators to shorten the moderation lag which has been between >24h, thus makes debates cumbersome"
6072019-08-01T19:39:44  <sipa> arguably the ML isn't really on topic here, as it's not a bitcoin core thing
6082019-08-01T19:39:47  <wumpus> "Eventually there are some volunteers for moderation, ideally neutral people"
6092019-08-01T19:39:48  *** mzygar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6102019-08-01T19:39:57  <wumpus> yea exactly...
6112019-08-01T19:40:04  <sipa> plus it doesn't seem that any of the list operators are here now
6122019-08-01T19:40:13  <MarcoFalke> Could the mailing list be used for this discussion?
6132019-08-01T19:40:20  <sipa> yes
6142019-08-01T19:40:32  <MarcoFalke> ok, endmeeting :)
6152019-08-01T19:40:36  <wumpus> #endmeeting
6162019-08-01T19:40:36  <lightningbot> Meeting ended Thu Aug  1 19:40:36 2019 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
6172019-08-01T19:40:36  <lightningbot> Minutes:        http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-08-01-19.00.html
6182019-08-01T19:40:36  <lightningbot> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-08-01-19.00.txt
6192019-08-01T19:40:36  <lightningbot> Log:            http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-08-01-19.00.log.html
6202019-08-01T19:40:45  <sipa> if you'd leave a cup of yoghurt alone for 200 years, it'd develop a culture
6212019-08-01T19:40:50  <wumpus> lol
6222019-08-01T19:41:01  <achow101> lmao
6232019-08-01T19:41:05  <sdaftuar> that missed the meeting minutes
6242019-08-01T19:41:06  <elichai2> loool
6252019-08-01T19:41:07  <aj> didn't want that in the minutes, eh?
6262019-08-01T19:41:10  <jamesob> someone call HR
6272019-08-01T19:41:23  <emilengler> sipa: Something similar was covered in a Simpsons Episode
6282019-08-01T19:41:46  <emzy> hehe
6292019-08-01T19:42:43  *** PaulTroon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6302019-08-01T19:44:23  *** mzygar has quit IRC
6312019-08-01T19:46:40  *** ljlkjlger has quit IRC
6322019-08-01T19:46:47  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6332019-08-01T19:53:51  *** Emilstud has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6342019-08-01T19:56:17  *** emilengler has quit IRC
6352019-08-01T19:57:25  *** Emilstud has quit IRC
6362019-08-01T20:00:16  *** emilengler has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6372019-08-01T20:05:11  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6382019-08-01T20:05:12  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #16522: travis: Run functional tests in GUI once (master...1908-testGuiFun) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16522
6392019-08-01T20:05:16  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
6402019-08-01T20:05:24  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
6412019-08-01T20:06:13  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6422019-08-01T20:07:44  *** ercwl has quit IRC
6432019-08-01T20:19:44  *** timothy has quit IRC
6442019-08-01T20:22:37  *** belcher has quit IRC
6452019-08-01T20:24:04  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
6462019-08-01T20:31:26  *** DeanGuss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6472019-08-01T20:33:45  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6482019-08-01T20:33:45  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] metalicjames opened pull request #16523: Add removemempoolentry RPC to evict transactions from the mempool (master...removemempoolentry) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16523
6492019-08-01T20:33:47  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
6502019-08-01T20:40:51  <fanquake> I’m almost glad I didn’t turn up for that meeting
6512019-08-01T20:42:22  <fanquake> Sounds like I should cancel my Aussie citizenship ASAP heh
6522019-08-01T20:43:04  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6532019-08-01T20:45:23  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
6542019-08-01T20:48:51  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6552019-08-01T20:54:11  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6562019-08-01T20:54:11  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #16524: Truly decouple wallet from chainparams for -fallbackfee (master...b19-true-wallet-no-chainparams) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16524
6572019-08-01T20:54:19  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
6582019-08-01T20:56:42  *** esotericnonsense has quit IRC
6592019-08-01T21:00:04  *** gnomus has quit IRC
6602019-08-01T21:02:14  *** ptiyoyip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6612019-08-01T21:03:20  *** esotericnonsense has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6622019-08-01T21:04:30  *** dgfhdfg has quit IRC
6632019-08-01T21:09:28  *** DeanGuss has quit IRC
6642019-08-01T21:12:33  *** queip has quit IRC
6652019-08-01T21:18:07  *** jamesl22 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6662019-08-01T21:20:53  *** afb has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6672019-08-01T21:29:45  *** queip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6682019-08-01T21:31:06  *** PaulTroon has quit IRC
6692019-08-01T21:31:49  *** PaulTroon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6702019-08-01T21:35:58  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6712019-08-01T21:35:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt closed pull request #16513: [RFC] Switch CTransaction::nVersion to an unsigned integer (master...2019-07-unsigned-tx-ver) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16513
6722019-08-01T21:36:11  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
6732019-08-01T21:49:58  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
6742019-08-01T21:54:50  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
6752019-08-01T21:55:47  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
6762019-08-01T21:56:09  *** kristapsk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6772019-08-01T21:57:41  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
6782019-08-01T21:59:27  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6792019-08-01T22:05:50  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6802019-08-01T22:05:51  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #16525: Dump transaction version as an unsigned integer in RPC/TxToUniv (master...2019-07-unsigned-tx-ver) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16525
6812019-08-01T22:05:52  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
6822019-08-01T22:06:56  *** obsrver has quit IRC
6832019-08-01T22:08:42  *** liberiga has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6842019-08-01T22:11:16  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6852019-08-01T22:14:51  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
6862019-08-01T22:16:45  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6872019-08-01T22:17:20  *** Zenton has quit IRC
6882019-08-01T22:19:55  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6892019-08-01T22:19:55  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #16526: Refactor: Chainparams: readability (master...b19-chainparams-no-istestchain) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16526
6902019-08-01T22:19:56  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
6912019-08-01T22:20:28  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6922019-08-01T22:26:56  *** laptop500 has quit IRC
6932019-08-01T22:29:49  *** jamesob_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6942019-08-01T22:30:23  *** ahmed___ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6952019-08-01T22:31:47  *** emzy_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
6962019-08-01T22:36:59  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
6972019-08-01T22:37:18  *** ahmed_ has quit IRC
6982019-08-01T22:37:19  *** jamesob has quit IRC
6992019-08-01T22:37:19  *** emzy has quit IRC
7002019-08-01T22:37:22  *** jamesob_ is now known as jamesob
7012019-08-01T22:37:22  *** ahmed___ is now known as ahmed_
7022019-08-01T22:43:37  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7032019-08-01T22:45:00  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7042019-08-01T22:53:37  *** jarthur has quit IRC
7052019-08-01T22:54:27  *** ezegom has quit IRC
7062019-08-01T22:58:04  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
7072019-08-01T23:09:46  *** laptop500 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7082019-08-01T23:15:07  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7092019-08-01T23:15:07  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jtimon opened pull request #16527: Get rid of Params().RequireStandard() (master...b19-chainparams-no-requirestd) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16527
7102019-08-01T23:15:10  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
7112019-08-01T23:32:09  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7122019-08-01T23:41:26  *** ezegom has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7132019-08-01T23:45:39  *** ezegom has quit IRC
7142019-08-01T23:46:18  *** jnewbery has quit IRC
7152019-08-01T23:46:30  *** whydb has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7162019-08-01T23:46:44  *** sdaftuar has quit IRC
7172019-08-01T23:50:10  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
7182019-08-01T23:51:37  *** sdaftuar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7192019-08-01T23:51:49  *** captjakk has quit IRC
7202019-08-01T23:52:10  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
7212019-08-01T23:52:24  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7222019-08-01T23:53:41  *** jnewbery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
7232019-08-01T23:56:29  *** captjakk has quit IRC