12019-08-15T00:00:01  *** dhart has quit IRC
  22019-08-15T00:01:02  *** hanhua has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  32019-08-15T00:04:18  *** profmac has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  42019-08-15T00:04:40  <fanquake> I think this is one of the most explicit "help me create an altcoin" issues we've ever had: #16616
  52019-08-15T00:04:42  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16616 | Technical Issue : rename command ..It is recognized as a file. · Issue #16616 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
  62019-08-15T00:04:51  *** manuel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  72019-08-15T00:09:24  *** Deacyde has quit IRC
  82019-08-15T00:24:26  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  92019-08-15T00:24:27  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/f418c3379cba...8516285d2ea4
 102019-08-15T00:24:27  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 36f7697 Chuf: doc: Fix typos in COPYRIGHT
 112019-08-15T00:24:28  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8516285 fanquake: Merge #16615: doc: Fix typos in COPYRIGHT
 122019-08-15T00:24:32  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 132019-08-15T00:25:31  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 142019-08-15T00:25:31  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16615: doc: Fix typos in COPYRIGHT (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16615
 152019-08-15T00:25:32  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 162019-08-15T00:25:45  <promag> fanquake: github could do that when someone forks the project -> it could ask for altcoin name and then it would rename everything
 172019-08-15T00:39:25  *** nosss2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 182019-08-15T00:39:47  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
 192019-08-15T00:41:38  <sipa> promag: coingen :)
 202019-08-15T00:43:48  *** nosss2 has quit IRC
 212019-08-15T00:45:43  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 222019-08-15T00:47:43  <promag> sipa: ah that's a thing already
 232019-08-15T00:48:11  <promag> err, fucking libevent
 242019-08-15T00:48:49  <sipa> i think it died in 2014
 252019-08-15T00:49:14  <promag> `nc localhost 18443` doesn't trigger any callback
 262019-08-15T00:49:43  <promag> only if a http request goes through
 272019-08-15T00:50:03  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 282019-08-15T00:50:12  *** bralyclow has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 292019-08-15T00:50:34  <sipa> promag: there's also forkgen
 302019-08-15T00:50:50  <sipa> oh, that died too
 312019-08-15T00:51:59  <promag> lol "and the world is kind of sort of back to normal."
 322019-08-15T01:02:00  <promag> quoting satoshilite from bitcoincore slack:@fanquake you should point him to https://build-a-co.in/ :)
 332019-08-15T01:07:20  <sipa> based on litecoin 0.8.5.1, lol
 342019-08-15T01:09:02  <esotericnonsense> lol, that's great (16616). could only be improved slightly if it were an s/bit/something-else. wonder how many important instances of 'bit' are in the code. :P
 352019-08-15T01:12:29  *** hanhua has quit IRC
 362019-08-15T01:12:38  *** nosss2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 372019-08-15T01:16:33  *** joe_land1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 382019-08-15T01:17:39  <phantomcircuit> promag, i assume you're using the libevent http stuff and not the socket handling stuff?
 392019-08-15T01:18:00  <promag> phantomcircuit: right
 402019-08-15T01:19:29  <promag> phantomcircuit: are you suggesting to create a read event on evhttp_bound_socket_get_fd?
 412019-08-15T01:21:32  *** tryphe has quit IRC
 422019-08-15T01:21:39  *** joe_land1 has quit IRC
 432019-08-15T01:21:57  *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 442019-08-15T01:26:19  *** joe_land1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 452019-08-15T01:28:14  *** elichai2 has quit IRC
 462019-08-15T01:29:00  *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
 472019-08-15T01:30:10  *** promag has quit IRC
 482019-08-15T01:34:34  *** lightlike has quit IRC
 492019-08-15T01:49:09  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 502019-08-15T02:03:37  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 512019-08-15T02:03:38  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #16617: [0.18.2] Backports (0.18...0_18_2_backports) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16617
 522019-08-15T02:03:39  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 532019-08-15T02:08:02  *** rh0nj has quit IRC
 542019-08-15T02:09:07  *** rh0nj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 552019-08-15T02:11:55  *** mdunnio has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 562019-08-15T02:30:39  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 572019-08-15T02:43:37  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 582019-08-15T02:43:38  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #16541: qt: Add better icon for Open URI (master...2019-08-qt-update-open-uri-icon) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16541
 592019-08-15T02:43:39  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 602019-08-15T02:44:58  *** millerti has quit IRC
 612019-08-15T02:47:50  *** mdunnio has quit IRC
 622019-08-15T02:57:12  *** Eagle[TM] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 632019-08-15T02:57:32  *** EagleTM has quit IRC
 642019-08-15T02:57:53  *** Dean_Guss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 652019-08-15T03:00:02  *** manuel has quit IRC
 662019-08-15T03:02:52  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 672019-08-15T03:03:57  *** clintbellanger has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 682019-08-15T03:21:59  *** CubicEarth has quit IRC
 692019-08-15T03:23:12  *** CubicEarth has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 702019-08-15T03:33:08  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 712019-08-15T03:40:05  *** EagleTM has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 722019-08-15T03:41:10  *** Eagle[TM] has quit IRC
 732019-08-15T03:45:40  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 742019-08-15T03:47:46  *** bralyclow01 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 752019-08-15T03:48:30  *** bralyclo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 762019-08-15T03:50:45  *** bralyclo_ has quit IRC
 772019-08-15T03:51:06  *** bralyclo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 782019-08-15T03:51:17  *** bralyclow has quit IRC
 792019-08-15T03:52:01  *** bralyclow01 has quit IRC
 802019-08-15T04:14:51  *** hebasto has quit IRC
 812019-08-15T04:24:37  *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 822019-08-15T04:37:01  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
 832019-08-15T04:40:58  *** peleion has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 842019-08-15T04:42:07  *** bralyclo_ has quit IRC
 852019-08-15T04:46:04  *** bralyclow has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 862019-08-15T04:46:24  *** bralyclow has quit IRC
 872019-08-15T04:48:43  *** davex_ has quit IRC
 882019-08-15T04:48:58  *** davex_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 892019-08-15T04:49:12  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 902019-08-15T04:54:26  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 912019-08-15T05:08:46  *** jeremyrubin has quit IRC
 922019-08-15T05:08:51  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
 932019-08-15T05:09:06  *** jeremyrubin has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 942019-08-15T05:28:48  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 952019-08-15T06:00:01  *** clintbellanger has quit IRC
 962019-08-15T06:19:00  *** pleia21 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 972019-08-15T06:19:31  *** fox2p_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 982019-08-15T06:19:41  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
 992019-08-15T06:20:19  *** fox2p has quit IRC
1002019-08-15T06:22:52  *** EagleTM has quit IRC
1012019-08-15T06:39:03  *** Dean_Guss has quit IRC
1022019-08-15T06:39:17  *** Dean_Guss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1032019-08-15T06:41:20  <kallewoof> luke-jr: splitting out sounds sensible to me
1042019-08-15T06:46:21  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052019-08-15T06:55:59  *** Dean_Guss has quit IRC
1062019-08-15T06:56:26  *** Dean_Guss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1072019-08-15T06:57:22  <fanquake> Apparently I cannot get the GUI to run at more than 10 FPS.
1082019-08-15T06:59:35  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1092019-08-15T07:03:59  <wumpus> fanquake: have you tried enabling hardware acceleration :-)
1102019-08-15T07:09:58  *** TheRec has quit IRC
1112019-08-15T07:11:48  <fanquake> wumpus: heh, probably have a better chance of ramping up the FPS by disabling sync.
1122019-08-15T07:14:41  <wumpus> qt can render using opengl and even vulkan, a smooth 1000fps should be piece of cake with a decent GPU!
1132019-08-15T07:16:23  <wumpus> yes, disabling sync definitely a good start :)
1142019-08-15T07:19:38  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1152019-08-15T07:20:06  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162019-08-15T07:20:06  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8516285d2ea4...8fc7f0cba9b1
1172019-08-15T07:20:07  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master a2714a5 Andrew Chow: Give QApplication dummy arguments
1182019-08-15T07:20:08  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8fc7f0c fanquake: Merge #16578: Do not pass in command line arguments to QApplication
1192019-08-15T07:20:10  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1202019-08-15T07:21:08  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212019-08-15T07:21:09  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #16578: Do not pass in command line arguments to QApplication (master...no-qapp-args) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16578
1222019-08-15T07:21:21  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1232019-08-15T07:25:13  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
1242019-08-15T07:25:35  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252019-08-15T07:26:26  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
1262019-08-15T07:26:45  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272019-08-15T07:30:20  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1282019-08-15T07:30:21  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake closed pull request #15954: refactor: remove old bootstrap relevant code (master...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15954
1292019-08-15T07:30:22  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1302019-08-15T07:32:39  *** TheRec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1312019-08-15T07:37:48  *** joe_land1 has quit IRC
1322019-08-15T07:37:51  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1332019-08-15T07:37:51  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] NicolasDorier opened pull request #16618: [Fix] Allow connection of a noban banned peer (master...fix/noban-banned) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16618
1342019-08-15T07:37:54  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1352019-08-15T08:22:08  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
1362019-08-15T08:22:24  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1372019-08-15T08:34:42  *** setpill has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1382019-08-15T08:35:47  *** harding has quit IRC
1392019-08-15T08:36:04  *** harding has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1402019-08-15T08:44:54  <fanquake> Is Travis just having a bad day? Seeing a lot of timeouts like https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/572183150
1412019-08-15T08:45:36  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
1422019-08-15T08:48:41  <wumpus> oh those dependency fetching timeouts, saw a few yesterday too
1432019-08-15T08:49:31  <wumpus> maybe archive.ubuntu.com is getting sick of being continuously hammered by them, i'm really surprised travis don't have their own apt mirror
1442019-08-15T09:00:01  *** pleia21 has quit IRC
1452019-08-15T09:02:17  <fanquake> Has anyone here ever used distcc when building core / depends  etc ?
1462019-08-15T09:02:23  <fanquake> https://distcc.github.io/
1472019-08-15T09:03:58  *** mathepauker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1482019-08-15T09:06:28  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492019-08-15T09:16:13  <wumpus> not me
1502019-08-15T09:16:58  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1512019-08-15T09:21:02  <fanquake> wumpus #16400 now has 3 ACKs. I'm going to add it to the HPFR list. Maybe we could save merging anything into validation while this gets some final review over today and tomorrow?
1522019-08-15T09:21:06  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16400 | [refactor] Rewrite AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker() using smaller parts by sdaftuar · Pull Request #16400 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1532019-08-15T09:22:32  *** tryphe has quit IRC
1542019-08-15T09:22:57  *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1552019-08-15T09:25:09  <wumpus> fanquake: SGTM
1562019-08-15T09:27:33  <fanquake> I've asked meshcollider for a final look over #15986, he should be able to merge that if he's happy.
1572019-08-15T09:27:35  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15986 | Add checksum to getdescriptorinfo by sipa · Pull Request #15986 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1582019-08-15T09:32:51  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1592019-08-15T09:33:06  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1602019-08-15T09:35:27  *** alko has quit IRC
1612019-08-15T09:49:49  *** seeder has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1622019-08-15T09:57:06  *** alko has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1632019-08-15T10:14:59  *** harrigan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642019-08-15T10:28:16  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1652019-08-15T10:32:36  *** promag has quit IRC
1662019-08-15T10:50:32  *** harrigan has quit IRC
1672019-08-15T10:50:59  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1682019-08-15T11:03:12  *** harrigan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1692019-08-15T11:33:30  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1702019-08-15T11:33:30  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #16612: qt: Remove menu icons (master...2019_08_remove_menuicons) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16612
1712019-08-15T11:33:33  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1722019-08-15T11:37:05  <wumpus> gah
1732019-08-15T11:37:22  <wumpus> I'm increasingly unable to contribute to opens ource software, I just don't have the energy anymore
1742019-08-15T11:38:10  <wumpus> always so many things everyone wants differently, sometimes reasonable, sometimes not, but it's just too busy for me
1752019-08-15T11:44:58  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1762019-08-15T11:44:58  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8fc7f0cba9b1...e00501e00ccd
1772019-08-15T11:44:58  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 37f2784 practicalswift: tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard outpu...
1782019-08-15T11:44:59  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e00501e MarcoFalke: Merge #16561: tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if ...
1792019-08-15T11:45:00  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1802019-08-15T11:45:13  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
1812019-08-15T11:46:03  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1822019-08-15T11:46:03  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16561: tests: Use colors and dots in test_runner.py output only if standard output is a terminal (master...parsable) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16561
1832019-08-15T11:46:04  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1842019-08-15T11:47:56  *** harrigan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1852019-08-15T11:48:22  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
1862019-08-15T11:53:14  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872019-08-15T11:55:17  <fanquake> wumpus: I know exactly how you're feeling at the moment.
1882019-08-15T11:55:32  <wumpus> fanquake: thank you
1892019-08-15T11:59:32  *** seeder has quit IRC
1902019-08-15T12:00:02  *** mathepauker has quit IRC
1912019-08-15T12:00:57  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1922019-08-15T12:04:19  *** supaplex1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1932019-08-15T12:37:22  *** elichai2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1942019-08-15T12:46:04  *** lightlike has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952019-08-15T13:13:13  *** harrigan has quit IRC
1962019-08-15T13:19:28  *** emilengler has quit IRC
1972019-08-15T13:20:55  *** emilengler has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1982019-08-15T13:21:26  *** harrigan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1992019-08-15T13:23:15  <jonasschnelli> ariard: can you explain that comment further: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16562#discussion_r314112055
2002019-08-15T13:23:18  <jonasschnelli> I can't follow
2012019-08-15T13:35:37  *** davex_ has quit IRC
2022019-08-15T13:36:44  *** davex__ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2032019-08-15T14:09:13  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2042019-08-15T14:09:14  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #16620: util: Move ResolveErrMsg to util/error (master...1908-utilErrorResolveErrMsg) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16620
2052019-08-15T14:09:27  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2062019-08-15T14:10:34  *** davex__ has quit IRC
2072019-08-15T14:24:03  <elichai2> achow101: is there a way for me to sign a psbt using a descriptor with private key instead of the wallet? (I'm doing `utxoupdatepsbt` with it and now i want to do `walletprocesspsbt`, or should I use `importmulti` instead?)
2082019-08-15T14:31:21  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2092019-08-15T14:31:22  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 5 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e00501e00ccd...8bd5e0af9983
2102019-08-15T14:31:23  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fac3dcf MarcoFalke: test: Generate one block for each send in wallet_import_rescan
2112019-08-15T14:31:24  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa79af2 MarcoFalke: test: Replace fragile "rng" with call to random()
2122019-08-15T14:31:25  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa25668 MarcoFalke: test: Test p2sh-witness and bech32 in wallet_import_rescan
2132019-08-15T14:31:34  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2142019-08-15T14:32:18  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2152019-08-15T14:32:19  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16465: test: Test p2sh-witness and bech32 in wallet_import_rescan (master...1907-testAllAddressTypesImport) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16465
2162019-08-15T14:32:31  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2172019-08-15T14:34:57  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2182019-08-15T14:34:57  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] gapeman opened pull request #16621: doc: add default bitcoin.conf locations (master...patch-2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16621
2192019-08-15T14:34:58  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2202019-08-15T14:39:02  <ariard> jonasschnelli: destructor is currently unused for V1, do you plan to use it for V2 serializer?
2212019-08-15T14:41:56  *** jarthur has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2222019-08-15T14:49:50  *** harrigan has quit IRC
2232019-08-15T14:51:31  <achow101> elichai2: there is not
2242019-08-15T14:54:05  <sipa> ariard: i think tha5 whenever you have subclasses stored as pointers to superclass objects, the superclass must have a virtual destructor
2252019-08-15T14:54:26  <sipa> even if the subclass types don't define their own destructors
2262019-08-15T14:54:51  <jonasschnelli> yes. what sipa said
2272019-08-15T14:55:13  *** hebasto has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282019-08-15T15:00:01  *** supaplex1 has quit IRC
2292019-08-15T15:03:51  *** mryandao has quit IRC
2302019-08-15T15:04:08  *** mryandao has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2312019-08-15T15:05:51  <ariard> good to know, thanks
2322019-08-15T15:18:53  *** tryphe has quit IRC
2332019-08-15T15:19:51  *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2342019-08-15T15:22:26  *** tryphe has quit IRC
2352019-08-15T15:22:28  *** setpill has quit IRC
2362019-08-15T15:26:44  *** PaulTroon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2372019-08-15T15:36:36  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2382019-08-15T15:36:36  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] emilengler closed pull request #16590: init: systemd directory fix (master...2019-08-systemd-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16590
2392019-08-15T15:36:41  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2402019-08-15T15:38:47  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2412019-08-15T15:38:47  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonatack opened pull request #16622: autoconf: property tests status and options (master...property-tests-autoconf-improvements) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16622
2422019-08-15T15:38:48  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2432019-08-15T15:42:28  <elichai2> I wish people would've used more switch/case for enums instead of if/else that way the compiler will warn you on all the uses of that enum if you modify it
2442019-08-15T15:42:58  *** secdragon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2452019-08-15T15:53:36  <jonatack> fanquake, Chris_Stewart_5: rapidcheck seems to be coming back to life a bit https://github.com/emil-e/rapidcheck/commits/master
2462019-08-15T15:55:24  *** Dean_Guss has quit IRC
2472019-08-15T16:01:50  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2482019-08-15T16:07:02  *** rh0nj has quit IRC
2492019-08-15T16:08:07  *** rh0nj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2502019-08-15T16:38:01  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
2512019-08-15T16:44:15  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2522019-08-15T16:44:47  <provoostenator> I know everyone wants to review the create wallet GUI PR #15450...
2532019-08-15T16:44:51  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15450 | [GUI] Create wallet menu option by achow101 · Pull Request #15450 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2542019-08-15T16:49:07  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
2552019-08-15T16:49:13  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562019-08-15T16:49:14  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 4 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/8bd5e0af9983...85883a9f8ea0
2572019-08-15T16:49:15  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fae6ab6 James O'Beirne: refactor: pcoinsTip -> CChainState::CoinsTip()
2582019-08-15T16:49:16  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5693530 James O'Beirne: refactor: have CCoins* data managed under CChainState
2592019-08-15T16:49:16  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 582d2cd James O'Beirne: Cover UTXO set access with lock annotations
2602019-08-15T16:49:18  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2612019-08-15T16:49:49  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2622019-08-15T16:49:49  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke reopened pull request #16612: qt: Remove menu icons (master...2019_08_remove_menuicons) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16612
2632019-08-15T16:49:51  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2642019-08-15T16:50:13  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2652019-08-15T16:50:13  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16443: refactor: have CCoins* data managed under CChainState (master...2019-07-au-coins-under-chainstate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16443
2662019-08-15T16:50:14  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2672019-08-15T16:51:28  *** E__ has quit IRC
2682019-08-15T16:53:30  <provoostenator> ^^ *wumpus calls Github CEO: please allow PR owner transfer*
2692019-08-15T16:57:53  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2702019-08-15T16:57:54  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 6 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/85883a9f8ea0...367b023ae444
2712019-08-15T16:57:54  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fafe78f MarcoFalke: ci: Rename .travis/ to ./ci/
2722019-08-15T16:57:55  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa0aac0 MarcoFalke: ci: Add retry
2732019-08-15T16:57:56  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa31bc3 MarcoFalke: ci: Remove dependence on travis, use it as fallback env
2742019-08-15T16:58:06  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2752019-08-15T16:58:48  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2762019-08-15T16:58:48  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16582: test: Rework ci (Use travis only as fallback env) (master...1908-ciRework) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16582
2772019-08-15T16:59:02  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
2782019-08-15T16:59:48  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
2792019-08-15T17:08:17  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2802019-08-15T17:12:25  *** Krellan_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2812019-08-15T17:12:49  *** pinheadmz has quit IRC
2822019-08-15T17:15:25  *** Krellan has quit IRC
2832019-08-15T17:18:33  *** pinheadmz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2842019-08-15T17:27:08  <emilengler> Can someone restart this? https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/builds/572354962?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification
2852019-08-15T17:28:08  <sipa> emilengler: done
2862019-08-15T17:28:20  <emilengler> sipa: thank you
2872019-08-15T17:42:17  <gleb> wumpus: I just figured out something, and I feel like we can remove #16599 from "seeking conceptual review" for now to not distract people until I implement something.
2882019-08-15T17:42:19  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16599 | ASN-based bucketing of the network nodes · Issue #16599 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2892019-08-15T17:42:34  <gleb> Sorry for bothering :)
2902019-08-15T17:49:51  <provoostenator> gleb: that's not a bad idea. I'll probably have a stronger opinion (as opposed to no opinion) if I can see the implemations for both options.
2912019-08-15T17:50:15  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2922019-08-15T17:51:52  <wumpus> gleb: ok, will remove it
2932019-08-15T17:54:46  *** Dean_Guss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2942019-08-15T18:00:02  *** secdragon has quit IRC
2952019-08-15T18:06:41  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2962019-08-15T18:11:53  *** owowo has quit IRC
2972019-08-15T18:14:38  *** PaulTroon has quit IRC
2982019-08-15T18:16:48  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2992019-08-15T18:22:07  *** Evel-Knievel has quit IRC
3002019-08-15T18:22:26  *** Evel-Knievel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3012019-08-15T18:34:22  *** PaulTroon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3022019-08-15T18:35:42  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3032019-08-15T18:39:05  *** PaulTroon has quit IRC
3042019-08-15T18:42:02  *** MichealH-iPod has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3052019-08-15T18:51:00  *** PaulTroon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3062019-08-15T18:59:14  <MarcoFalke> Short update on the ci stuff:
3072019-08-15T18:59:33  <MarcoFalke> * GitHub ci is in early beta and there is not much I can evaluate
3082019-08-15T18:59:50  <MarcoFalke> They don't have caching, nor can own hardware be attached
3092019-08-15T19:00:18  <MarcoFalke> * Travis timeout was bumped to 90 minutes, so we shouldn't see any timeout anymore
3102019-08-15T19:00:21  <wumpus> #startmeeting
3112019-08-15T19:00:21  <lightningbot> Meeting started Thu Aug 15 19:00:21 2019 UTC.  The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
3122019-08-15T19:00:21  <lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
3132019-08-15T19:00:34  <provoostenator> hi
3142019-08-15T19:00:41  <jonasschnelli> hi
3152019-08-15T19:00:44  <MarcoFalke> (In theory, in practice `apt update` times out ...)
3162019-08-15T19:00:46  <MarcoFalke> hi
3172019-08-15T19:01:05  <wumpus> yes, that's nice, hopefully the theory starts working out :)
3182019-08-15T19:01:06  <real_or_random> hi
3192019-08-15T19:01:22  <wumpus> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 achow101 meshcollider jnewbery maaku fanquake promag provoostenator aj Chris_Stewart_5 dongcarl gwillen jamesob ken281221 ryanofsky gleb moneyball kvaciral
3202019-08-15T19:01:37  <wumpus> no proposed topics on the weekly meeting list
3212019-08-15T19:01:41  <cfields> MarcoFalke: I wasn't here last week to post, but here was my feedback for Github: https://pastebin.com/raw/3PS5rtdN
3222019-08-15T19:01:42  <sipa> hi
3232019-08-15T19:01:46  <MarcoFalke> But the good news is that the ci can be run locally (or anywhere now). See ./ci/ subfolder
3242019-08-15T19:01:52  *** greypw has quit IRC
3252019-08-15T19:01:56  <jonasschnelli> nice
3262019-08-15T19:02:00  <gleb> hi
3272019-08-15T19:02:05  <Chris_Stewart_5>   hi
3282019-08-15T19:02:11  <sipa> MarcoFalke: nice
3292019-08-15T19:02:12  <cfields> Glad to see you're trying it out, though :)
3302019-08-15T19:02:42  <jonasschnelli> Though I still not fully buying into the concept that a CI configuration should be part of the main repository
3312019-08-15T19:02:42  <wumpus> right, at least we know its limitations now, thanks!
3322019-08-15T19:02:46  <MarcoFalke> cfields: Yeah, I guess in the end we'll go with jonasschnelli's ci
3332019-08-15T19:03:04  <jonasschnelli> (once it's mature enough)
3342019-08-15T19:03:05  <ryanofsky> fun fact: the ci folder contains 4 mentions of the word "poop"
3352019-08-15T19:03:08  <MarcoFalke> jonasschnelli: Why not? travis.yml is part of the main repo
3362019-08-15T19:03:22  <achow101> hi
3372019-08-15T19:03:32  <jonasschnelli> Just conceptually I don't understand why the CI configuration needs to be part of the project sources
3382019-08-15T19:03:40  <jonasschnelli> Could be another repo, config-file, whatever
3392019-08-15T19:03:45  <jnewbery> hi
3402019-08-15T19:04:01  <MarcoFalke> jonasschnelli: Because the config needs to be updated atomically with the source code
3412019-08-15T19:04:09  <jonasschnelli> why?
3422019-08-15T19:04:23  <MarcoFalke> Let's say I add a new dependency boost-process, the ci runner needs to install it
3432019-08-15T19:04:32  *** iamtimmarchant has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3442019-08-15T19:04:54  <jonasschnelli> Yes. But it could be update in that secondary config file / repository then
3452019-08-15T19:05:13  *** iamtimmarchant has quit IRC
3462019-08-15T19:05:19  <MarcoFalke> And in the meantime the ci couldn't run?
3472019-08-15T19:05:26  <MarcoFalke> Also you couldn't run it on older branches
3482019-08-15T19:05:34  <jonasschnelli> Maybe...
3492019-08-15T19:05:53  *** captjakk has quit IRC
3502019-08-15T19:05:55  <jonasschnelli> It just feels this would not scale with multiple build systems / CI
3512019-08-15T19:06:09  <jonasschnelli> With the Appvayor, it's already a problem IMO
3522019-08-15T19:06:20  <jonasschnelli> but I'm probably complicating things...
3532019-08-15T19:06:26  <MarcoFalke> My plan was to only have one place to put the config and have all build systems use that config
3542019-08-15T19:06:44  <MarcoFalke> I tested it with GitHub CI, Cirrus CI, Travis CI. They all use the same config and it works
3552019-08-15T19:06:57  <jonasschnelli> Wouldn't that lead to a monotonic CI/test system?
3562019-08-15T19:07:25  <MarcoFalke> It includes the whole build matrix. But I agree
3572019-08-15T19:07:28  <kanzure> hi
3582019-08-15T19:07:33  <ryanofsky> i think it's convenient for things like ci and lint to be in the main repository, it would be a headache to have a change like #16367 that requires a ci update and have to stage it in multiple prs
3592019-08-15T19:07:36  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16367 | Multiprocess build support by ryanofsky · Pull Request #16367 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3602019-08-15T19:07:51  <jonasschnelli> My understanding would be, that there are a bunch of test-systems (call it CIs), running aside of our repo...
3612019-08-15T19:07:53  *** elisheets has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3622019-08-15T19:07:56  * dongcarl enjoyed ryanofsky's fun fact
3632019-08-15T19:08:13  <jonasschnelli> They have all their custom setup to test various configurations
3642019-08-15T19:08:21  <provoostenator> I'd like to be able to run CI without Docker at some point...
3652019-08-15T19:08:27  <jonasschnelli> If we run the same matrix on all CIs,.. seems a bit pointless
3662019-08-15T19:08:40  <MarcoFalke> jonasschnelli: Right. Agree on that
3672019-08-15T19:08:40  <jonasschnelli> provoostenator: bitcoinbuilds at least runs without docker...
3682019-08-15T19:08:55  <MarcoFalke> It is more a plan to not be married to one CI supplier
3692019-08-15T19:08:57  <wumpus> dongcarl: same :)
3702019-08-15T19:09:04  <jonasschnelli> which is a good point. If we have one CI script that always runs in docker...
3712019-08-15T19:09:31  <MarcoFalke> provoostenator: jonasschnelli: You can also run ./ci/ without docker
3722019-08-15T19:09:38  <MarcoFalke> Though that messes up the host (obviously)
3732019-08-15T19:10:10  <jonasschnelli> Okay. Let me continue to think about this... but I see the point of convenience
3742019-08-15T19:10:25  <provoostenator> Right, it would be happy to run just one specifiic host
3752019-08-15T19:10:53  <provoostenator> E.g. I have a Bionic x86 machine here, or an ARM machine elsewhere.
3762019-08-15T19:11:05  <MarcoFalke> jonasschnelli: Yeah let's continue in #bitcoin-builds or in one of my follow up pull requests that I plan to open soon :)
3772019-08-15T19:11:09  <jonasschnelli> ack
3782019-08-15T19:11:18  <sipa> proposed topic: libsecp256k1 maintenance
3792019-08-15T19:11:33  <MarcoFalke> #topic libsecp256k1 maintenance (sipa)
3802019-08-15T19:12:12  <sipa> so, lately i haven't had too much time to deal with maintaining libsecp256k1
3812019-08-15T19:12:29  <sipa> and also the other existing maintainers haven't been active
3822019-08-15T19:13:28  <sipa> real_or_random has been pretty active, and i'd like to transition to giving him maintainer rights
3832019-08-15T19:13:29  * jonasschnelli looks at real_or_random 
3842019-08-15T19:13:47  <sipa> but i wanted to bring this up here, as the secp256k1 repo is under the bitcoin-core org
3852019-08-15T19:13:48  <MarcoFalke> I was about to suggest the first one to say a word will become the next maintainer
3862019-08-15T19:14:02  <real_or_random> glad I haven't said a word
3872019-08-15T19:14:04  <instagibbs> congrats... jonasschnelli ;P
3882019-08-15T19:14:12  <MarcoFalke> good to hear that real_or_random is volunteering for that position
3892019-08-15T19:14:15  <jonasschnelli> ack on real_or_random
3902019-08-15T19:14:33  <jonasschnelli> instagibbs: that was just an irc-action.. :P
3912019-08-15T19:14:59  <wumpus> I'd like to volunteer but currently, I'm just not able to
3922019-08-15T19:15:28  *** owowo has quit IRC
3932019-08-15T19:15:30  *** greypw has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3942019-08-15T19:15:51  <MarcoFalke> wumpus: We should make a rule that Bitcoin Core maintainers are not allowed to maintain other projects :)
3952019-08-15T19:15:56  <nickler> ack real_or_random
3962019-08-15T19:16:03  <real_or_random> I think nickler was volunteering too :)
3972019-08-15T19:16:05  <wumpus> MarcoFalke: that's okay with me too :)
3982019-08-15T19:16:09  <provoostenator> also ack real_or_random
3992019-08-15T19:16:20  <MarcoFalke> ack nickler and real_or_random
4002019-08-15T19:16:26  <wumpus> *leaves bitcoin core for secp256k1* hehe
4012019-08-15T19:16:26  <sipa> also ack nickler from me, obviously :)
4022019-08-15T19:16:30  <jonasschnelli> also ack nickler
4032019-08-15T19:16:52  <sipa> that was easy.
4042019-08-15T19:16:53  <nickler> I'd be happy to help
4052019-08-15T19:16:56  <instagibbs> should people be removed?
4062019-08-15T19:17:05  <instagibbs> or is it just too small a number
4072019-08-15T19:17:21  <jonasschnelli> I guess greg and sipa?
4082019-08-15T19:17:28  <provoostenator> nickler what's your Github name?
4092019-08-15T19:17:34  <jonasschnelli> Fine for me to keep it for now
4102019-08-15T19:17:37  <sipa> it's andytoshi and me
4112019-08-15T19:17:37  <nickler> provoostenator: jonasnick
4122019-08-15T19:17:40  <sipa> currently
4132019-08-15T19:17:49  <provoostenator> Ah ok, ACK
4142019-08-15T19:17:56  <instagibbs> ok ACK
4152019-08-15T19:18:03  <wumpus> are you going to add them sipa or should I?
4162019-08-15T19:18:20  <sipa> i will.
4172019-08-15T19:18:22  <MarcoFalke> Is it that repo: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1 ?
4182019-08-15T19:18:26  <sipa> correct
4192019-08-15T19:18:30  <wumpus> yes
4202019-08-15T19:18:37  <jonasschnelli> I think removing is something that could be done after 1y of inactivity or if someone explicitly wants to be removed
4212019-08-15T19:18:39  <MarcoFalke> why is the latest merge not signed and done with GitHub?
4222019-08-15T19:18:55  <MarcoFalke> (ot)
4232019-08-15T19:19:28  <jonasschnelli> valid point... some merge policy would probably be wise
4242019-08-15T19:19:30  <sipa> we should probably add merge checks in CI just like in bitcoin core itself
4252019-08-15T19:19:31  <real_or_random> MarcoFalke: yeah I think there are a few related issues to  discuss
4262019-08-15T19:19:34  <provoostenator> Could reuse some of the Bitcoin Core tools over?
4272019-08-15T19:19:38  <sipa> yeah.
4282019-08-15T19:19:53  <real_or_random> also e.g., I have an open issue about a security.md file
4292019-08-15T19:20:34  <real_or_random> which raises the question who should be in there. secp256k1 maintainers or bitcoin-core maintainers?
4302019-08-15T19:20:50  * MarcoFalke has set a bash alias `ghm` for "github-merge.py" that works on any repo
4312019-08-15T19:21:08  <real_or_random> and we also don't have super clear guidelines for what should be in the repo and what not (e.g., we have the JNI bindings that we may want to remove)
4322019-08-15T19:21:08  <wumpus> we should probably move github-merge.py to maintainer-tools
4332019-08-15T19:21:17  <wumpus> instead of having it in the bitcoin core repository
4342019-08-15T19:21:20  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4352019-08-15T19:21:46  <wumpus> that way it's much easier to use it for different projects
4362019-08-15T19:21:56  <sipa> i think that libsecp256k1 issues which don't directly affect bitcoin core can be kept inside the secp256k1 project (bitcoin core has no need for JNI... :p)
4372019-08-15T19:22:22  <sipa> and discussed on the #secp256k1 channel
4382019-08-15T19:22:24  <wumpus> secp256k1 issues should probably be reported to secp256k1 maintainers, in general
4392019-08-15T19:22:49  *** Dean_Guss has quit IRC
4402019-08-15T19:22:51  <sipa> agree; though very serious issues that impact bitcoin could of course also be reported to bitcoin core
4412019-08-15T19:23:09  <real_or_random> wumpus: yes this seems sensible they can escalate to core if necessary
4422019-08-15T19:23:30  <sipa> wumpus: agree on moving over github-merge to maintainer-tools
4432019-08-15T19:23:40  <sipa> i use it for unrelated projects too :)
4442019-08-15T19:23:44  <wumpus> yes, if it affects use in bitcoin, or is even an issue that threatens bitcoin, that seems an exception
4452019-08-15T19:23:54  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4462019-08-15T19:23:57  *** reallll has quit IRC
4472019-08-15T19:24:21  <wumpus> sipa: ok!
4482019-08-15T19:24:41  <real_or_random> ack on a using github-merge and/or related tools
4492019-08-15T19:25:12  <real_or_random> core vendors secp256k1, so the changes need to be accepted there too
4502019-08-15T19:25:30  <wumpus> #action move github-merge.py to bitcoin-maintainer-tools repo
4512019-08-15T19:25:55  <sipa> real_or_random: occasionally we open a PR to core that updates the subtree, summarizing the changes
4522019-08-15T19:25:58  <real_or_random> but tbh, if we open a large +500/-500 PR from time to time, it's too late to spot weirdnesses
4532019-08-15T19:26:32  <sipa> yeah perhaps that's a question whether people here prefer more regular updates of the subtree
4542019-08-15T19:26:50  <real_or_random> yes, indeed. I think my point is that these tend to get ACKed with the idea in mind that they're fine because they were merged in secp256k1
4552019-08-15T19:26:59  <wumpus> it's another opportunity for review, though yes, if it groups too many different things it'll likely not get more than cursory glances
4562019-08-15T19:27:27  <real_or_random> so it makes sense to have the same careful committing/merging process for secp too
4572019-08-15T19:27:30  <wumpus> also a lot of bitcoin core reviewers don't have much knowledge of the details of the cryptography and implementation
4582019-08-15T19:27:37  <wumpus> yes
4592019-08-15T19:27:40  *** MasterdonX has quit IRC
4602019-08-15T19:27:40  <real_or_random> right
4612019-08-15T19:27:55  <real_or_random> sipa: this question is also related to possible releases
4622019-08-15T19:28:17  <real_or_random> AFAIK it was always planned to have releases, we may reconsider that
4632019-08-15T19:28:29  <sipa> yeah
4642019-08-15T19:28:45  <sipa> i guess not everything needs to be resolved in this meeting
4652019-08-15T19:28:50  <real_or_random> sure
4662019-08-15T19:28:50  <sipa> but it's good to have some communication
4672019-08-15T19:30:04  *** EagleTM has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4682019-08-15T19:30:27  <wumpus> yes, it's fine, it's not like there's other proposed topics for this meeting :) and I don't think sharing a meeting with secp256k1 stuff is that bad so people are aware what is happening there
4692019-08-15T19:30:48  <sipa> high priority for review?
4702019-08-15T19:30:57  <wumpus> oh yes, we could do that
4712019-08-15T19:31:04  <wumpus> #topic High priority for review
4722019-08-15T19:31:11  <BlueMatt> an I add #16421 to the list?
4732019-08-15T19:31:14  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16421 | Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #16421 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4742019-08-15T19:31:49  <wumpus> sure we can always add more, I'm most interested in whether some things are getting ready for merge though :)
4752019-08-15T19:32:39  <aj> BlueMatt: fanquake did that already i thought?
4762019-08-15T19:32:58  <jeremyrubin> correct
4772019-08-15T19:33:02  <BlueMatt> oh, maybe
4782019-08-15T19:33:14  <BlueMatt> I just want to get it in for .19, and its gotten very little review
4792019-08-15T19:33:19  <BlueMatt> despite being an incredibly simple pr
4802019-08-15T19:33:21  <instagibbs> BlueMatt, will review
4812019-08-15T19:33:37  <MarcoFalke> I think we got three high-prio things merged this week
4822019-08-15T19:33:42  <MarcoFalke> maybe even more
4832019-08-15T19:33:56  <wumpus> 8 things on the list is a lot though
4842019-08-15T19:34:07  <wumpus> oh one is merged, good
4852019-08-15T19:34:13  <aj> oh fanquake added 16400
4862019-08-15T19:35:07  <MarcoFalke> #16400 should get removed
4872019-08-15T19:35:10  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16400 | [refactor] Rewrite AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker() using smaller parts by sdaftuar · Pull Request #16400 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4882019-08-15T19:35:17  <wumpus> so yes, the soft translation string freeze for 0.19 is already in two weeks, the feature freeze in a month
4892019-08-15T19:35:33  <MarcoFalke> It needs rebase and I think #15759 was in first
4902019-08-15T19:35:36  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15759 | [p2p] Add 2 outbound blocks-only connections by sdaftuar · Pull Request #15759 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
4912019-08-15T19:36:22  <wumpus> ok
4922019-08-15T19:37:14  <wumpus> 16400 removed from now, let's re-add it after 15759 merged
4932019-08-15T19:38:25  <wumpus> anything else to discuss?
4942019-08-15T19:39:57  <wumpus> #endmeeting
4952019-08-15T19:39:57  <lightningbot> Meeting ended Thu Aug 15 19:39:57 2019 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
4962019-08-15T19:39:57  <lightningbot> Minutes:        http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-08-15-19.00.html
4972019-08-15T19:39:57  <lightningbot> Minutes (text): http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-08-15-19.00.txt
4982019-08-15T19:39:57  <lightningbot> Log:            http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2019/bitcoin-core-dev.2019-08-15-19.00.log.html
4992019-08-15T19:40:56  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5002019-08-15T19:45:11  <wumpus> FWIW https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-maintainer-tools/pull/28
5012019-08-15T19:50:59  *** Dean_Guss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5022019-08-15T19:59:58  *** hebasto has quit IRC
5032019-08-15T20:04:14  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5042019-08-15T20:04:16  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 6 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/367b023ae444...1bf2ff2bf8e8
5052019-08-15T20:04:16  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 3862e47 John Newbery: [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks
5062019-08-15T20:04:17  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1c93b9b John Newbery: [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height
5072019-08-15T20:04:18  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 0328dcd John Newbery: [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment
5082019-08-15T20:04:20  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
5092019-08-15T20:04:59  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5102019-08-15T20:05:00  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke merged pull request #16060: Bury bip9 deployments (master...bury_bip9_deployments) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16060
5112019-08-15T20:05:13  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
5122019-08-15T20:16:31  *** greypw has quit IRC
5132019-08-15T20:17:58  *** EagleTM has quit IRC
5142019-08-15T20:20:57  *** greypw has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5152019-08-15T20:30:36  *** MasterdonX has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5162019-08-15T20:32:49  *** EagleTM has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5172019-08-15T20:39:58  *** Evel-Knievel has quit IRC
5182019-08-15T20:40:39  *** Evel-Knievel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5192019-08-15T20:49:08  *** captjakk has quit IRC
5202019-08-15T20:49:27  *** captjakk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5212019-08-15T20:50:52  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
5222019-08-15T20:53:02  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5232019-08-15T20:53:03  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #16623: ci: Add environment files for all settings (master...1908-ciEnv) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16623
5242019-08-15T20:53:04  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
5252019-08-15T20:55:21  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
5262019-08-15T20:56:20  *** hanhua has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5272019-08-15T20:58:39  *** elisheets has quit IRC
5282019-08-15T21:00:01  *** MichealH-iPod has quit IRC
5292019-08-15T21:05:09  *** sankarshan1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5302019-08-15T21:16:55  *** bitcoin-git has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5312019-08-15T21:16:55  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] ariard opened pull request #16624: wallet : encapsulate trransactions state (master...2019-08-encapsulate-tx-state) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16624
5322019-08-15T21:16:56  *** bitcoin-git has left #bitcoin-core-dev
5332019-08-15T21:19:40  *** Dean_Guss has quit IRC
5342019-08-15T21:19:54  *** Dean_Guss has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5352019-08-15T21:45:36  *** EagleTM has quit IRC
5362019-08-15T21:48:48  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5372019-08-15T21:51:44  <fanquake> I put 16400 in there because it had 3 ACKs and was much closer to being merged than 15799 at the time (also didn’t need a rebase). Guess someone merged into validation and broke it.
5382019-08-15T21:53:11  <fanquake> I don’t think it should necessarily matter which PR was in there “first”. As there are things that have lingered in HP for weeks. It should also matter what has had recent/active review.
5392019-08-15T21:54:55  *** dviola has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5402019-08-15T22:04:42  *** kristapsk_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5412019-08-15T22:07:20  *** kristapsk has quit IRC
5422019-08-15T22:08:26  *** kristapsk_ is now known as kristapsk
5432019-08-15T22:14:02  *** spinza has quit IRC
5442019-08-15T22:21:04  *** roconnor has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5452019-08-15T22:22:04  *** kristapsk has quit IRC
5462019-08-15T22:22:08  *** kristapsk_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5472019-08-15T22:26:59  *** spinza has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5482019-08-15T22:28:57  *** jarthur has quit IRC
5492019-08-15T22:32:21  *** PaulTroon has quit IRC
5502019-08-15T22:32:35  *** kristapsk_ has quit IRC
5512019-08-15T22:33:03  *** profmac has quit IRC
5522019-08-15T22:33:23  *** kristapsk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5532019-08-15T22:33:58  <roconnor> Hi all.  After building bitcoin-0.18.0 and bitcoin-0.18.1 when I run the test_bitcoin program it lists a large number of "Error: Specified -walletdir "wallets" is a relative path ... followed by "*** No errors detected".  I didn't have this issue with bitcoin-0.17.1.  Have I made some sort of configuration error here?
5542019-08-15T22:39:20  *** promag_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5552019-08-15T22:39:21  *** promag has quit IRC
5562019-08-15T22:50:07  *** profmac has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
5572019-08-15T22:57:51  <lightlike> roconnor: that was described in #15944 and recently fixed (#16277): as a side effect of a negative test these messages are written to stderr. so it's no problem.
5582019-08-15T22:57:52  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15944 | Path error messages while executing test_bitcoin · Issue #15944 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
5592019-08-15T22:57:54  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16277 | [Tests] Suppress output in test_bitcoin for expected errors by gertjaap · Pull Request #16277 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
5602019-08-15T23:01:43  <roconnor> Great thanks.  I won't sweat about it then.
5612019-08-15T23:12:12  *** Dean_Guss has quit IRC
5622019-08-15T23:21:42  *** davterra has quit IRC