19:06:25 <wumpus> #startmeeting
19:06:25 <lightningbot> Meeting started Thu Feb 21 19:06:25 2019 UTC.  The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:06:25 <lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
19:06:42 <wumpus> sorry
19:06:59 <wumpus> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 achow101 meshcollider jnewbery maaku fanquake promag provoostenator aj Chris_Stewart_5 dongcarl gwillen jamesob ken281221 ryanofsky gleb
19:07:03 <MarcoFalke> heh, I don't think there is much to discuss anyway?
19:07:24 <moneyball> no proposed topics during the week
19:07:24 <gmaxwell> HI
19:07:30 <MarcoFalke> Has anyone seen issues after the feature freeze that are not related to emojis?
19:07:48 <promag_> I'll submit a couple of fixes for 0.18, then help achow101 on create wallet, cheers
19:07:50 <moneyball> and congrats to everyone for completing feature freeze!
19:07:51 <promag_> emojis ^
19:07:52 <wumpus> the good news is, we're very well on schedule; there's two PRs left to be merged for 0.18 #15402 #15401
19:07:56 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15402 | Granular invalidateblock and RewindBlockIndex by sipa · Pull Request #15402 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:07:58 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15401 | rpc: Actually throw help when passed invalid number of params by MarcoFalke · Pull Request #15401 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:08:27 <achow101> MarcoFalke: #15453. promag_ and I figured out it's a signalling order problem with qt 5.7.1
19:08:29 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15453 | Starting bitcoin-qt with -nowallet and then opening a wallet does not show the wallet · Issue #15453 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:08:43 <MarcoFalke> oh, so not related to the filename?
19:08:49 <achow101> no
19:09:02 <achow101> well there's that too I think
19:09:17 <achow101> (different issue)
19:09:30 <wumpus> please let me know if anything needs tagging for 0.18
19:09:30 <kanzure> hi
19:12:27 <luke-jr> <.<
19:13:00 <wumpus> that's a short meeting I guess
19:13:19 <wumpus> no topics, nothing to discuss for 0.18 ?
19:13:29 <jnewbery> I imagine the same will be true for a wallet meeting tomorrow. Do we want to postpone that until next week?
19:13:32 <wumpus> please help reviewing the last PRs then
19:14:12 <moneyball> it gives developers time to do some extra reviews such as the PRs gmaxwell referred to earlier today
19:14:45 <wumpus> so the aim for the 0.18 branch split-off is 2019-03-01, I guess we're going to make it this time :)
19:15:10 <wumpus> yes, gmaxwell mentioned some secp256k1 PRs that need reviewing
19:15:37 <luke-jr> [12:21:31] <gmaxwell> If anyone is getting bored waiting for 0.18 to ship to get moving on other work…  libsecp256k1  has a couple PRs that could just use some C code review:
19:15:38 <luke-jr> [12:21:34] <gmaxwell> in particular: https://github.com/bitcoin-core/secp256k1/pull/578
19:16:34 <wumpus> #endmeeting