19:00:46 <wumpus> #startmeeting
19:00:46 <lightningbot> Meeting started Thu Jul 16 19:00:46 2020 UTC.  The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
19:00:46 <lightningbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.
19:00:49 <achow101> hi
19:00:56 <meshcollider> hi
19:01:13 <instagibbs> hi
19:01:20 <hebasto> hi
19:01:22 <amiti> hi
19:01:48 <sipa> hi
19:01:50 <luke-jr> hi
19:01:55 <troygiorshev> hi
19:01:57 <wumpus> one proposed topic: 0.20.1rc1 (fanquake)
19:02:02 <wumpus> any last minute topic suggestions?
19:03:05 <wumpus> #topic High priority for review
19:03:12 <jnewbery> hi
19:03:34 <achow101> #19334 for hi prio
19:03:36 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19334 | wallet: Introduce WalletDatabase abstract class by achow101 · Pull Request #19334 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:03:56 <wumpus> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8  11 blockers, 1 bugfix, 3 chasing concept ACK
19:04:11 <jonatack> hi
19:04:14 <hebasto> may I ask for #18710 to hi prio?
19:04:17 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18710 | Add local thread pool to CCheckQueue by hebasto · Pull Request #18710 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:04:50 <wumpus> achow101: added
19:05:30 <kanzure> hi
19:05:48 <wumpus> hebasto: added
19:05:57 <hebasto> wumpus: thanks!
19:06:52 <wumpus> another one was already merged, so we're at 12 blockers now
19:06:59 <wumpus> enough to review for everyone I'd hope
19:07:12 <luke-jr> haven't seen it help tbh
19:07:13 <wumpus> oh 11 even
19:08:15 <luke-jr> wumpus: please add #11082
19:08:20 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11082 | Add new bitcoin_rw.conf file that is used for settings modified by this software itself by luke-jr · Pull Request #11082 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:08:59 <wumpus> luke-jr: added
19:09:14 <luke-jr> it also has a "Waiting for author" label that should be removed AFAICT
19:09:36 <wumpus> ok
19:09:59 <wumpus> #topic 0.20.1rc1 (fanquake)
19:10:11 <luke-jr> I guess technically #18818 needs to be dropped from the high-prio list. Nobody seems to care to review it, and it's not like the tarball has ever really worked anyway :/
19:10:14 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/18818 | Fix release tarball generated by gitian by luke-jr · Pull Request #18818 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:11:12 <wumpus> "I won't be at the meeting. However my input for my topic is that I think #19524 should be merged, and a 0.20.1rc1 tagged today/tomorrow. We've dragged our heels on this, and there is a publicly know issue affecting at-least the two most recent releases."
19:11:14 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19524 | [0.20] Backport #19517 - Increment input value sum only once per UTXO in decodepsbt by fanquake · Pull Request #19524 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:11:55 <wumpus> I agree with fanquake there; that PR has been merged now, so I intend to start the release process for 0.20.0rc1 soon
19:12:03 <achow101> ack
19:12:09 <jnewbery> ack
19:12:18 <luke-jr> sgtm
19:12:21 <sipa> sgtm
19:12:33 <luke-jr> unless we want to merge Taproot with flagday activation on Dec 1st :P j/k
19:12:50 <wumpus> hehe
19:13:12 <wumpus> let's leave that for .2 :)
19:13:18 <hebasto> could a one line fix of https://github.com/bitcoin-core/gui/issues/32 bug could be included in 0.20.1 ?
19:13:53 <wumpus> how bad is it?
19:14:32 <hebasto> a user has problems while onboarding and choosing custom datadir
19:15:07 <hebasto> Fix is very simple #19536
19:15:08 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/19536 | qt, build: Fix QFileDialog for static builds by hebasto · Pull Request #19536 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
19:15:28 <wumpus> I'm not sure that's critical enough to hold the release up further tbh
19:15:37 <hebasto> ok
19:15:45 <wumpus> but ok, it's a one line change
19:15:48 <wumpus> in bulid system
19:15:51 <jnewbery> #proposedtopic p2p irc meeting
19:16:22 <luke-jr> it means rebuilding Qt, but IMO should be fixed anyway
19:16:24 <wumpus> I'm sure we can get that merged and backported tomorrow if the build system people people review it
19:17:10 <wumpus> yes, it requires a rebuild of qt so would make the build somewhat longer
19:18:03 <wumpus> #topic p2p irc meeting (jnewbery)
19:18:16 <jnewbery> thanks wumpus
19:18:32 <jnewbery> I'd like to start a fortnightly (that's every two weeks) meeting in this channel for p2p PRs.
19:18:45 <jnewbery> It seems like there are enough people doing interesting things in p2p that a short check-in to share what everyone’s focus is would be helpful
19:18:59 <jnewbery> I’m aware of the following people actively working on p2p projects:
19:19:04 <jnewbery> vasild (addrv2), carl (addrv2 and parallel validation protocol), aj (various), suhas (wtxid relay and various), gleb (addr relay and various), amiti (refactor peer types, testing, tx relay), sipa (tx relay and various), troy (logging), me (net/net_processing split)
19:19:17 <jnewbery> ... and there are probably a bunch more that I’m temporarily not remembering.
19:19:24 <jonatack> Yup, I am, but I don't talk about it.
19:19:43 <wumpus> sounds good to me, though, don't those topics fit in the normal meeting? we generally have enough time for more topics in the main meeting
19:19:43 <gzhao408> +1 i wanna lurk
19:20:04 <jnewbery> jonatack: yes, I've seen you've been reviewing a bunch of PRs. There are quite a few other regular reviewers too
19:20:12 <jnewbery> it might end up just being a five minute check in on what everyone's focus is that week. I don't like having long meetings for meetings' sake.
19:20:48 <gzhao408> are there other code area-specific meetings?
19:20:54 <wumpus> the wallet meeting
19:21:02 <sipa> jnewbery: it seems the biggest hurdle may be getting all those people on irc at the same time :)
19:21:05 <hebasto> build meeting
19:21:10 <troygiorshev> ack
19:21:19 <jnewbery> gzhao408: there's a fortnightly wallet meeting, which I think was very successful at focusing attention (at least initially)
19:21:30 <wumpus> bitcoin-builds even has its own IRC channel, but no planned time afaik?
19:21:31 <cfields> we've informally been doing meetings for buildsystem discussion too lately
19:21:36 <vasild> imhere now, a bit sleepy though ;)
19:21:38 <wumpus> ohh
19:21:39 <cfields> ^^ what hebasto said.
19:21:42 <jonatack> sipa: agree. this hour is too late for me tbh.
19:22:02 <jnewbery> yes, with apologies to our antipodean friends I'm going to suggest that we do the same time on a different day
19:22:03 <sipa> aj is also in a timezone far away from most others
19:22:47 <sipa> jnewbery: i think it may make sense to first see people's availability and preferences; if this time of day would be a good meeting time, those people would already be here in this meeting right now, i'd expect
19:22:52 <cfields> jnewbery: 1 min while everyone googles antipodean.
19:22:53 <jnewbery> or we could do an hour or two earlier and still get america and europe. Again, sorry to Asia and Australia :(
19:23:17 <cfields> TIL :)
19:23:23 <jnewbery> ok, I don't think we need to figure out a time now. Was more looking for concept ACKs/NACKs
19:23:37 <wumpus> concept ACK
19:23:48 <vasild> concept ACK
19:23:54 <gzhao408> concept ACK
19:23:57 <jonatack> these hours are pretty US-centric, would be nice to alternate a bit if possible, ACK if earlier
19:23:58 <amiti> concept ACK! I'm a fan of the idea of a p2p focused meeting. even if we can't get everyone at the same time, encouraging convo between our work tracks seems great!
19:23:59 <jnewbery> like I said, I'd prefer to keep the meeting short. I think there's always value in hearing what other people's focus is
19:24:25 <sipa> concept ACK, but conditional on finding a good time and buy-in :)
19:24:53 <jnewbery> I defintely want to avoid adding an hour of unproductive time to people's calendars
19:24:57 <sipa> my reasoning: if it'll just end up being the people who are here today now, we can also do it regular weekly meetings, especially if it's short
19:25:32 <wumpus> yes, that was also my only remark
19:25:37 <cfields> maybe meetings could be called for by a sponsor when there's something concrete to discuss?
19:26:30 <jnewbery> cfields jonatack: I think these things have much more chance of succeeding if they have a regular reliable time/day
19:26:38 <sipa> i agree with that
19:26:48 <cfields> fair enough.
19:27:22 <jnewbery> cfields: antipodean:feet on the wrong end
19:27:57 <jnewbery> ok, I'll try to figure out a process for choosing a time
19:28:01 <sipa> antipodism (uncountable)
19:28:02 <sipa> A form of foot juggling where the juggler lies on his or her back, usually on a sort of chair.
19:28:38 <wumpus> hehe
19:28:39 <meshcollider> Ah yes, regular occurrence down here
19:28:41 <cfields> clearly I was confused as that's the only usage I know ;)
19:28:54 <wumpus> I think there's no further topics for today then
19:29:11 <wumpus> #endmeeting