1 2015-12-05T00:06:44  *** PaulCape_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  2 2015-12-05T00:09:31  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
  3 2015-12-05T00:11:27  *** ghtdak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  4 2015-12-05T00:15:35  *** ghtdak has quit IRC
  5 2015-12-05T00:16:06  *** ghtdak has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  6 2015-12-05T00:38:14  *** fkhan has quit IRC
  7 2015-12-05T00:49:48  *** MazrimTaim has quit IRC
  8 2015-12-05T00:52:27  *** fkhan has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  9 2015-12-05T01:07:39  *** raedah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 10 2015-12-05T01:22:21  *** tripleslash has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 11 2015-12-05T01:33:47  *** raedah has quit IRC
 12 2015-12-05T01:34:14  *** raedah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 13 2015-12-05T01:41:26  *** evoskuil has quit IRC
 14 2015-12-05T02:00:17  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
 15 2015-12-05T02:00:32  *** JackH has quit IRC
 16 2015-12-05T02:06:16  <randy-waterhouse> ETA on release candidate for core v0.12?
 17 2015-12-05T02:08:43  <randy-waterhouse> never mind looks I'm already testing with it :) thnx
 18 2015-12-05T02:22:53  *** raedah has quit IRC
 19 2015-12-05T02:33:57  *** evoskuil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 20 2015-12-05T02:48:36  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 21 2015-12-05T03:44:06  *** evoskuil has quit IRC
 22 2015-12-05T04:05:06  *** da2ce7_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 23 2015-12-05T04:15:30  *** da2ce7_ has quit IRC
 24 2015-12-05T04:15:53  *** da2ce7_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 25 2015-12-05T04:18:03  *** da2ce7_ has quit IRC
 26 2015-12-05T04:19:27  *** da2ce7_mobile has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 27 2015-12-05T04:54:54  <Luke-Jr> hmm, I setup the BitcoindComparisonTool and it works on master, but not 0.11? O.o
 28 2015-12-05T05:02:05  <gmaxwell> randy-waterhouse: 0.12 is a couple months out; so no RC s yet
 29 2015-12-05T05:20:55  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 30 2015-12-05T05:43:55  *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 31 2015-12-05T05:45:34  *** afk11 has quit IRC
 32 2015-12-05T06:08:54  *** PaulCape_ has quit IRC
 33 2015-12-05T06:09:23  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 34 2015-12-05T06:26:32  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
 35 2015-12-05T07:07:50  *** dcousens has quit IRC
 36 2015-12-05T07:19:04  *** Luke-Jr has quit IRC
 37 2015-12-05T08:24:31  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 38 2015-12-05T08:38:50  *** ParadoxSpiral_ has quit IRC
 39 2015-12-05T08:53:12  *** Luke-Jr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 40 2015-12-05T08:55:25  *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 41 2015-12-05T09:09:48  *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
 42 2015-12-05T09:10:34  *** randy-waterhouse has quit IRC
 43 2015-12-05T09:11:15  <GitHub189> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/792259278e4f...a2822b97cb83
 44 2015-12-05T09:11:15  <GitHub189> bitcoin/master 4c40ec0 Wladimir J. van der Laan: tests: Disable Tor interaction...
 45 2015-12-05T09:11:16  <GitHub189> bitcoin/master a2822b9 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge pull request #7170...
 46 2015-12-05T09:11:20  <GitHub105> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7170: tests: Disable Tor interaction (master...2015_12_tests_nolistentor) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7170
 47 2015-12-05T09:35:21  *** Alina-malina has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 48 2015-12-05T09:41:36  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 49 2015-12-05T09:41:55  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 50 2015-12-05T09:43:28  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 51 2015-12-05T09:43:28  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 52 2015-12-05T09:45:45  *** Alina-malina has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 53 2015-12-05T09:47:08  <GitHub43> [bitcoin] TheBlueMatt opened pull request #7174: Don't do mempool lookups for "mempool" command without a filter (master...2015-12-braindead-mempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7174
 54 2015-12-05T09:54:18  *** Thireus has quit IRC
 55 2015-12-05T09:54:38  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 56 2015-12-05T10:14:20  <wumpus> ETA for 0.12 RC1 is 2016-01-06
 57 2015-12-05T10:14:28  <wumpus> 0.12.0*
 58 2015-12-05T10:16:35  <btcdrak> wumpus: great.
 59 2015-12-05T10:19:35  <Luke-Jr> paveljanik: :/
 60 2015-12-05T10:26:59  <paveljanik> Luke-Jr, sorry, but this is clear for me now. No need to fight against "wind mills". No need to fight at all.
 61 2015-12-05T10:27:57  <Luke-Jr> paveljanik: but there is, I'm afraid.
 62 2015-12-05T10:30:27  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 63 2015-12-05T10:30:39  <paveljanik> The only remaining thing in this is why some devs are quite happy to make a decision that has economic effect on some users... In the past this was a huge obstacle...
 64 2015-12-05T10:31:15  <paveljanik> I can accept the fact that it makes their work a lot easier though...
 65 2015-12-05T10:33:39  <sipa> Luke-Jr: if priority is an effective measure against spam, it works (in the default configuration) only for 5% of the block space; miners certainly can change that size during an attack if that is deemed useful, but so can they reenable the priority space altogether
 66 2015-12-05T10:34:16  <sipa> and you're very welcome to work on an alternative that doesn't need special casing a predefined part of the block space
 67 2015-12-05T10:36:28  <Luke-Jr> paveljanik: it doesn't, because now I am forced to maintain it out-of-tree
 68 2015-12-05T10:37:50  *** sipa has left #bitcoin-core-dev
 69 2015-12-05T10:38:09  <Luke-Jr> paveljanik: and I'm the one who maintains this stuff in the first place
 70 2015-12-05T10:41:00  <paveljanik> technically speaking, from a pure economical view, I do not get it why miners do support priority space at all.
 71 2015-12-05T10:41:19  <paveljanik> and maybe this is the reasoning for other devs about it.
 72 2015-12-05T10:42:58  <Luke-Jr> believe it or not, most miners *do* care to some degree about Bitcoin's success
 73 2015-12-05T10:43:58  <paveljanik> then we have to draw a clear way from this to having prio space in blocks...
 74 2015-12-05T10:44:06  <paveljanik> I think most people do not get it.
 75 2015-12-05T10:47:03  <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: have you done anything to establish that priority is actually usful for a non-neglibile portion of transactions?
 76 2015-12-05T10:47:49  <gmaxwell> As I laid out the other day, I'd support brining it back if we could show that it was actually useful for users and if we could do so without the huge performance hit.
 77 2015-12-05T10:59:14  <Luke-Jr> because the onus of evidence lies with the one who *doesn't* want to make major changes that are obviously negative.. or we can just remove priority and see how bad the results are. I guess we should just remove the block size limit and see what happens too.
 78 2015-12-05T10:59:46  <Luke-Jr> (and no, I'm not yelling, just extremely frustrated)
 79 2015-12-05T11:01:40  <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, either fees become a significant portion of the total block reward and miners acting in their own self interest ignore priority, or we have massively misjudged the economic rational for mining and bitcoin will fail
 80 2015-12-05T11:01:57  <phantomcircuit> personally i like to be optimistic and believe priority is doomed
 81 2015-12-05T11:02:01  <gmaxwell> phantomcircuit: thats not a useful argument and I wish you wouldn't make it.
 82 2015-12-05T11:02:20  <gmaxwell> Because doing so is a distraction and debases the actually useful argument.
 83 2015-12-05T11:03:07  <gmaxwell> Which is that I have no objective reason to believe that it is of _any_ use today to the vast majority of the users of the system; because unlike us, most don't have years old immobile coins that cut straight through on priority.
 84 2015-12-05T11:03:39  <gmaxwell> Basically, to the extent that priority is doing anything at all; I think it's just acting like a free pass for a small number of oldtimer users; and I think thats wrong.
 85 2015-12-05T11:04:10  <Luke-Jr> do you really use your years-old coins in your hot wallet?
 86 2015-12-05T11:04:11  <gmaxwell> But if a fair number of non-spammy transactions would have priority high enough to matter; then I'm wrong.
 87 2015-12-05T11:04:44  <gmaxwell> A year? two years? yes.
 88 2015-12-05T11:04:45  <paveljanik> gmaxwell, using this argument, this calls for a lot of NEW users to bitcoin to call for "restart" of the network...
 89 2015-12-05T11:05:19  <paveljanik> beucase they do not have access to coins at all.
 90 2015-12-05T11:06:12  <gmaxwell> paveljanik: anyone can pay fees; which is a simple and equitible mechenism available to all commers.
 91 2015-12-05T11:06:44  <paveljanik> I agree with this.
 92 2015-12-05T11:07:02  <paveljanik> The only thing I do not agree is how it was done in the tree 8)
 93 2015-12-05T11:08:22  <gmaxwell> Luke-Jr: and beyond the age, self same wallet is full of coins worth multiple BTC each, which is not generally typical. many users end up with either lots of tiny txins or a few huge ones which lose their priority on their first spend.
 94 2015-12-05T11:08:57  <gmaxwell> AFAIK bitcoin core is the only wallet thats ever supported priority on the send side, and it's never even optimized for using priority wisely.
 95 2015-12-05T11:09:31  <Luke-Jr> looking at my hot wallet quickly..
 96 2015-12-05T11:09:47  <Luke-Jr> 0.046 BTC, aged under 2 weeks, is sufficient for priority mining
 97 2015-12-05T11:10:24  <Luke-Jr> or there's a 0.003 BTC aged 40 weeks
 98 2015-12-05T11:10:46  <Luke-Jr> 0.005 BTC aged 22 weeks
 99 2015-12-05T11:11:09  <Luke-Jr> 0.012 BTC aged 1 week
100 2015-12-05T11:11:24  <midnightmagic> whew, young coins.
101 2015-12-05T11:11:34  <Luke-Jr> actually, that last one might not be ready yet
102 2015-12-05T11:12:15  <Luke-Jr> the 1 week is 0.142 BTC
103 2015-12-05T11:12:25  <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, would you be opposed to simply making the "priority" adjust the effective fee rate?
104 2015-12-05T11:12:28  <Luke-Jr> these are all reasonably obtainable sizes
105 2015-12-05T11:12:46  <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit: it's too late for that in 0.12
106 2015-12-05T11:12:58  <phantomcircuit> and only calculating it when inserted into the mempool (remembering that things age out of the mempool every 72 hours by default)
107 2015-12-05T11:13:26  <phantomcircuit> Luke-Jr, we both know miners are all running with a bunch of crazy patches
108 2015-12-05T11:13:57  <Luke-Jr> phantomcircuit: some are. others are stupidly obstinate about using vanilla with defaults :/
109 2015-12-05T11:16:00  *** Thireus has quit IRC
110 2015-12-05T11:21:02  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
111 2015-12-05T11:24:31  *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112 2015-12-05T11:29:05  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
113 2015-12-05T11:35:39  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
114 2015-12-05T11:35:49  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
115 2015-12-05T11:41:34  *** CodeShark_ has quit IRC
116 2015-12-05T11:59:58  *** coco has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
117 2015-12-05T13:50:30  *** Guest40360 has quit IRC
118 2015-12-05T13:50:30  *** Guest40360 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
119 2015-12-05T13:50:36  *** Guest40360 is now known as s1w
120 2015-12-05T13:56:11  *** ParadoxSpiral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
121 2015-12-05T13:59:20  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
122 2015-12-05T14:11:32  *** Tera2342 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
123 2015-12-05T14:32:22  *** Luke-Jr has quit IRC
124 2015-12-05T14:32:40  *** Luke-Jr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
125 2015-12-05T15:04:34  *** tripleslash has quit IRC
126 2015-12-05T15:29:18  *** Tera2342 has quit IRC
127 2015-12-05T15:36:12  *** CodeShark_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
128 2015-12-05T16:14:41  *** JackH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
129 2015-12-05T16:15:38  *** evoskuil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
130 2015-12-05T16:29:44  *** Thireus has quit IRC
131 2015-12-05T16:32:52  *** Thireus has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
132 2015-12-05T17:47:47  *** ParadoxSpiral_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
133 2015-12-05T17:49:45  *** ParadoxSpiral has quit IRC
134 2015-12-05T17:56:04  *** jcorgan is now known as corgan
135 2015-12-05T17:57:55  *** corgan is now known as jcorgan
136 2015-12-05T17:58:46  *** evoskuil has quit IRC
137 2015-12-05T18:07:05  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
138 2015-12-05T18:13:05  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
139 2015-12-05T18:29:36  *** tulip has quit IRC
140 2015-12-05T18:31:16  *** tulip has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
141 2015-12-05T18:34:53  *** CodeShark_ has quit IRC
142 2015-12-05T18:39:57  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
143 2015-12-05T19:26:32  *** coco has quit IRC
144 2015-12-05T20:30:21  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
145 2015-12-05T21:46:53  *** paveljanik has quit IRC
146 2015-12-05T23:24:45  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
147 2015-12-05T23:29:34  <GitHub64> [bitcoin] gmaxwell pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a2822b97cb83...075faaebf2e5
148 2015-12-05T23:29:35  <GitHub64> bitcoin/master 96918a2 Matt Corallo: Don't do mempool lookups for "mempool" command without a filter
149 2015-12-05T23:29:35  <GitHub64> bitcoin/master 075faae Gregory Maxwell: Merge pull request #7174...
150 2015-12-05T23:29:40  <GitHub32> [bitcoin] gmaxwell closed pull request #7174: Don't do mempool lookups for "mempool" command without a filter (master...2015-12-braindead-mempool) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7174
151 2015-12-05T23:54:43  *** afk11 has quit IRC