12016-03-25T00:02:56  *** d_t has quit IRC
  22016-03-25T00:04:04  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  32016-03-25T00:08:30  *** mrkent_ has quit IRC
  42016-03-25T00:09:19  *** molly has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  52016-03-25T00:12:49  *** molz has quit IRC
  62016-03-25T00:28:47  *** supasonic has quit IRC
  72016-03-25T00:33:39  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
  82016-03-25T00:35:25  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  92016-03-25T00:39:39  *** frankenmint has quit IRC
 102016-03-25T00:44:26  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 112016-03-25T00:50:34  *** murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 122016-03-25T01:03:31  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 132016-03-25T01:05:01  *** murch has quit IRC
 142016-03-25T01:36:10  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 152016-03-25T01:40:25  *** frankenmint has quit IRC
 162016-03-25T01:41:14  *** kangx has quit IRC
 172016-03-25T01:47:04  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 182016-03-25T01:51:40  *** Tasoshi has quit IRC
 192016-03-25T01:52:09  *** Tasoshi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 202016-03-25T02:06:12  *** wangchun_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 212016-03-25T02:06:47  *** ChillazZ has quit IRC
 222016-03-25T02:06:48  *** wangchun has quit IRC
 232016-03-25T02:06:48  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 242016-03-25T02:07:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 252016-03-25T02:07:37  *** shesek has quit IRC
 262016-03-25T02:08:02  *** shesek has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 272016-03-25T02:08:16  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 282016-03-25T02:11:01  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
 292016-03-25T02:14:38  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 302016-03-25T02:20:33  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 312016-03-25T02:28:30  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 322016-03-25T02:31:08  *** PRab has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 332016-03-25T02:33:33  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 342016-03-25T02:41:42  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
 352016-03-25T02:43:29  *** belcher has quit IRC
 362016-03-25T02:56:36  *** fengling has quit IRC
 372016-03-25T02:59:42  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 382016-03-25T03:00:11  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 392016-03-25T03:06:10  *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 402016-03-25T03:11:13  *** anttea has quit IRC
 412016-03-25T03:11:19  *** anttea has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 422016-03-25T03:13:43  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 432016-03-25T03:23:17  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 442016-03-25T03:40:46  *** achow101 has quit IRC
 452016-03-25T03:40:49  *** wallet42 has quit IRC
 462016-03-25T03:42:03  *** wallet42 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 472016-03-25T04:07:30  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 482016-03-25T04:11:08  *** randy-waterhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 492016-03-25T04:13:20  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 502016-03-25T04:14:08  *** mrkent has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 512016-03-25T04:22:07  *** zooko has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 522016-03-25T04:23:24  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 532016-03-25T04:28:07  *** frankenmint has quit IRC
 542016-03-25T04:31:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 552016-03-25T04:32:07  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 562016-03-25T05:05:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 572016-03-25T05:05:46  <cfields> sipa / jonasschnelli: i pushed a quick hack to libbtcnet that adds an option for chunked reads as opposed to header+message. It's clunky, but should be enough to test with
 582016-03-25T05:06:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 592016-03-25T05:08:38  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 602016-03-25T05:11:59  *** zooko has quit IRC
 612016-03-25T05:18:34  *** molly has quit IRC
 622016-03-25T05:19:16  *** moli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 632016-03-25T05:25:34  *** d_t has quit IRC
 642016-03-25T05:26:02  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 652016-03-25T05:32:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 662016-03-25T05:33:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 672016-03-25T05:40:49  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 682016-03-25T06:05:13  *** lysobit has quit IRC
 692016-03-25T06:05:21  *** lysobit has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 702016-03-25T06:13:30  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 712016-03-25T06:18:28  *** frankenmint has quit IRC
 722016-03-25T06:23:17  *** d_t has quit IRC
 732016-03-25T06:24:16  *** fengling has quit IRC
 742016-03-25T06:26:20  *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 752016-03-25T06:30:05  *** Don_John has quit IRC
 762016-03-25T06:32:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 772016-03-25T06:33:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 782016-03-25T06:34:59  *** mrkent has quit IRC
 792016-03-25T06:35:10  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
 802016-03-25T06:39:19  <gmaxwell> yippie. mutation testing proves the existing tests are inadequate.
 812016-03-25T06:39:24  <gmaxwell> (for ct aes)
 822016-03-25T06:50:13  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 832016-03-25T06:56:56  *** fengling has quit IRC
 842016-03-25T07:08:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 852016-03-25T07:09:07  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 862016-03-25T07:23:09  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 872016-03-25T07:27:29  *** frankenmint has quit IRC
 882016-03-25T07:38:28  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: what do you mean with inadequate? IIRC, the tests included a subset of the NIST test vectors.
 892016-03-25T07:39:02  <jonasschnelli> Or do you aim in particular for something to test the CT?
 902016-03-25T07:42:04  <gmaxwell> I mean I can add plausable bugs to the implementation which pass the vectors.
 912016-03-25T07:42:47  <gmaxwell> I'll create more vectors to resolve this, of course.
 922016-03-25T07:46:13  <jonasschnelli> Okay. Yes. That would be good.
 932016-03-25T07:46:46  <jonasschnelli> Is the CT behavior somehow testable in a test script that should be portable enought?
 942016-03-25T07:49:12  *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 952016-03-25T07:53:56  *** fengling has quit IRC
 962016-03-25T07:57:12  <gmaxwell> No, and not much reason to 'test' generally.. all the promises that can be given from C on that front are statically decidable.
 972016-03-25T08:04:14  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 982016-03-25T08:08:02  *** Alopex has quit IRC
 992016-03-25T08:09:07  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1002016-03-25T08:15:18  <jonasschnelli> For ChaCha20-poly1305, would this require two keys? One for the chacha cipher and one for the poly1305 AED?
1012016-03-25T08:15:34  <jonasschnelli> *AEAD
1022016-03-25T08:34:52  *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1032016-03-25T08:44:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
1042016-03-25T08:45:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052016-03-25T09:12:48  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1062016-03-25T09:39:52  *** slackircbridge has quit IRC
1072016-03-25T09:40:22  *** slackircbridge has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082016-03-25T09:48:39  *** ChillazZ has quit IRC
1092016-03-25T09:48:40  *** anttea has quit IRC
1102016-03-25T09:48:40  *** anttea has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112016-03-25T09:51:53  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1122016-03-25T09:51:53  *** anttea has quit IRC
1132016-03-25T09:53:32  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142016-03-25T09:59:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
1152016-03-25T10:00:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162016-03-25T10:04:33  *** demaged has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1172016-03-25T10:04:58  *** ChillazZ has quit IRC
1182016-03-25T10:05:35  <demaged> hi, have you guys seen this? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812275
1192016-03-25T10:06:27  <demaged> besideds, what's the reason bitcoin isn't migrating to testing, stuck in ustable for years now :/
1202016-03-25T10:09:29  *** anttea has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212016-03-25T10:12:28  *** anttea has quit IRC
1222016-03-25T10:17:54  <wumpus> I'm quite happy that bitcoin isn't packaged by distributions - we had some bad experiences in the past with ubuntu's bitcoin package being stuck at 0.3.x, for example.
1232016-03-25T10:18:34  <wumpus> distributions have their own pecularities in versioning, releases, etc. I think it'd be better to release our own packages for various distros, like we do with the ppa.
1242016-03-25T10:22:25  <GitHub14> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 3 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b88e0b0c610a...0b98dd793967
1252016-03-25T10:22:26  <GitHub14> bitcoin/master 4856f1d Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] Debug window: replace "Build date" with "Datadir"...
1262016-03-25T10:22:26  <GitHub14> bitcoin/master fc737d1 Jonas Schnelli: [Qt] remove unused formatBuildDate method
1272016-03-25T10:22:27  <GitHub14> bitcoin/master 0b98dd7 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #7732: [Qt] Debug window: replace "Build date" with "Datadir"...
1282016-03-25T10:22:35  <GitHub39> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #7732: [Qt] Debug window: replace "Build date" with "Datadir" (master...2016/03/qt_datadir) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7732
1292016-03-25T10:23:25  *** fengling has quit IRC
1302016-03-25T10:23:35  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
1312016-03-25T10:29:16  *** shesek has quit IRC
1322016-03-25T10:30:21  *** anttea has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1332016-03-25T10:30:21  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1342016-03-25T10:35:22  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1352016-03-25T10:35:30  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1362016-03-25T10:35:47  *** ChillazZ has quit IRC
1372016-03-25T10:38:09  <demaged> wumpus, maybe though I think for the convenience of users, free auditing done by the maintaners, extra exposure and bug reporting, etc. is worth the cooperation
1382016-03-25T10:38:28  <wumpus> well, feel free to do so
1392016-03-25T10:38:38  <wumpus> I can say a lot of people have tried and failed :)
1402016-03-25T10:39:31  <wumpus> and for example it doesn't help bug reporting *at all* if some distribution, in its stable release, keeps shipping bitcoin 10.2 forever. We'd get tons of reports against old versions, for bugs that have probably been solved ages ago.
1412016-03-25T10:40:00  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1422016-03-25T10:40:01  *** anttea has quit IRC
1432016-03-25T10:40:41  <wumpus> also philosophically, upgrading bitcoin core should be a conscioius decision. You may or may not agree with any consensus changes.
1442016-03-25T10:41:02  *** ChillazZ has quit IRC
1452016-03-25T10:41:05  <wumpus> that's why there are no auto-upgraders nor even new version notification in the client
1462016-03-25T10:47:45  <demaged> wumpus, regarding your comment on bug reporting I disagree, imo it helps with the diversification of the ecosystem as it would be a disaster if all the nodes were on v0.12 for example
1472016-03-25T10:49:13  <demaged> just wondering, debian has what 50k+ packages  in its main repo, surely there's a way to cooperate otherewise the number wouldn't be so high
1482016-03-25T10:51:21  *** anttea has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492016-03-25T10:52:26  <demaged> i agree with you on the point of forced upgrades but I don't see distro updates as such
1502016-03-25T10:53:35  <demaged> anyway, I only wanted to point out that bug report in case it's interesting for devs as I don't have github account to report
1512016-03-25T10:56:52  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522016-03-25T10:58:25  *** ChillazZ has quit IRC
1532016-03-25T11:01:06  <demaged> from personal experience, I'm a sys-admin and have been running non-wallet full nodes on multiple servers I maintaining for many years now to help the network and having bitcoind package in Debian was always my biggest wish... for convenience... one day.
1542016-03-25T11:01:08  <demaged> thanks
1552016-03-25T11:01:38  *** demaged has quit IRC
1562016-03-25T11:03:44  <wumpus> no, it wouldn't be a disaster if all nodes were 0.12
1572016-03-25T11:04:17  <wumpus> a group like debian indescriminately deciding what version a large part of the network runs is much more disastrous
1582016-03-25T11:04:51  *** anttea has quit IRC
1592016-03-25T11:11:14  *** anttea has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1602016-03-25T11:14:42  *** ChillazZ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1612016-03-25T11:23:58  *** murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1622016-03-25T11:24:00  *** demaged has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1632016-03-25T11:27:08  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642016-03-25T11:27:10  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1652016-03-25T11:27:44  *** randy-waterhouse has quit IRC
1662016-03-25T11:27:57  <demaged> wumpus, I'm sorry but you're wrong. With no safe fallback to nodes running v0.10 or v0.11 one critical security bug could bring the whole network down or worse.
1672016-03-25T11:28:13  <demaged> Also, Debian is far from indiscriminate in their choices nor it would make up large part of the network. This would add to diversity and decentralisation of, for example, update channels, etc.
1682016-03-25T11:28:19  <wumpus> what makes you think v0.10 or v0.11 is any safer?
1692016-03-25T11:28:33  <wumpus> if anything, many security bugs get solved every release
1702016-03-25T11:28:43  <demaged> wumpus, it may not contain bu that was introduced in v0.12
1712016-03-25T11:29:40  <demaged> s/bu/bug
1722016-03-25T11:29:55  <demaged> What if your infrastructure is compromised? What you're proposing is very dangerous.
1732016-03-25T11:30:07  <wumpus> that's true, that is a reason why one would run multiple versions of bitcoin core, some people indeed do that
1742016-03-25T11:30:14  <wumpus> consciouisly, not because a distro forces them to
1752016-03-25T11:30:37  <wumpus> I'm not proposing anything but keeping the status quo, you are the one proposing something
1762016-03-25T11:30:56  <demaged> in practical terms distro dosn't force me to do anything, it makes things more convenient
1772016-03-25T11:31:18  <demaged> Decentralisation in terms of whether software can run on RasPi is  important but so is decentralisation of update channels, development, ideas. Just m y 2c.
1782016-03-25T11:32:24  <wumpus> the point is that distros are used by a lot of newbies, and for newbies the best choice is generally to use the latest and greatest version. Advanced users may indeed chose to run older versions for verious reasons, that's fine.
1792016-03-25T11:33:49  <wumpus> in any case, I'm done discussing this
1802016-03-25T11:34:03  <demaged> true, that's why different distros target different audience for example ubuntu and debian; diversification of bitoind for free :)
1812016-03-25T11:34:19  <demaged> I didn't mean to sound pushy
1822016-03-25T11:46:08  *** demaged has quit IRC
1832016-03-25T11:57:54  *** davec has quit IRC
1842016-03-25T12:03:12  *** davec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1852016-03-25T12:15:53  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1862016-03-25T12:28:23  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872016-03-25T12:55:48  <wumpus> hm re: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7463, it seems that if bitcoind never spins up RPC (for example, if init failures) the successive bitcoin-cli -rpcwait getblockcount will wait forever
1882016-03-25T12:56:48  <wumpus> that's something of a race condition, I think I'm going to implement the getblockcount loop myself, each time checking if bitcoind is still alive, instead of relying on -rpcwait
1892016-03-25T12:57:00  *** achow101 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1902016-03-25T13:25:08  <GitHub25> [bitcoin] laanwj opened pull request #7744: test_framework: detect failure of bitcoind startup (master...2016_03_detect_startup_failure) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7744
1912016-03-25T13:33:59  <wumpus> voila
1922016-03-25T13:44:00  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1932016-03-25T13:50:35  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1942016-03-25T13:55:10  *** d_t has quit IRC
1952016-03-25T14:11:39  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1962016-03-25T14:11:43  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1972016-03-25T14:14:03  <wumpus> heh "In fact one of the reasons given for OpenSSH's adoption of the chacha20-poly1305 crypto mechanisms (alongside Curve25519 and others) was that it finally allowed them to remove the last vestiges of OpenSSL from their code."
1982016-03-25T14:22:11  *** achow101 has quit IRC
1992016-03-25T14:31:01  *** Alopex has quit IRC
2002016-03-25T14:32:06  *** Alopex has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2012016-03-25T14:34:04  *** treehug88 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2022016-03-25T14:41:01  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2032016-03-25T14:50:00  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
2042016-03-25T14:56:24  *** lejitz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2052016-03-25T15:00:04  *** lejitz has quit IRC
2062016-03-25T15:02:28  *** lejitz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2072016-03-25T15:06:33  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2082016-03-25T15:08:59  *** lejitz has quit IRC
2092016-03-25T15:12:21  *** tucenaber has quit IRC
2102016-03-25T15:18:46  *** murch has quit IRC
2112016-03-25T15:59:43  <instagibbs> does an empty vector being serialized using READWRITE end up being read correctly? I'm running tests and have read the code to the best of my ability, but want to check.
2122016-03-25T16:04:27  <sipa> it should
2132016-03-25T16:04:47  *** hybridsole has quit IRC
2142016-03-25T16:06:22  *** belcher has quit IRC
2152016-03-25T16:09:27  *** hybridsole has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2162016-03-25T16:10:03  <instagibbs> ok thanks
2172016-03-25T16:10:41  <instagibbs> It appears you attach a size message of 0, then nothing else, which should be enough.
2182016-03-25T16:12:52  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2192016-03-25T16:14:50  *** da2ce7 has quit IRC
2202016-03-25T16:14:51  *** da2ce7_mobile has quit IRC
2212016-03-25T16:21:23  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2222016-03-25T16:42:16  *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
2232016-03-25T16:43:54  *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242016-03-25T16:45:05  *** da2ce7_mobile has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2252016-03-25T16:47:50  *** bsm117532 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2262016-03-25T16:48:05  *** da2ce7 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2272016-03-25T16:48:24  *** moli has quit IRC
2282016-03-25T17:00:18  *** hybridsole has quit IRC
2292016-03-25T17:02:57  *** hybridsole has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2302016-03-25T17:30:32  *** achow101 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2312016-03-25T18:00:33  *** tucenaber has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2322016-03-25T18:30:25  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2332016-03-25T18:31:02  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2342016-03-25T18:31:49  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2352016-03-25T18:32:31  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2362016-03-25T18:33:13  *** d_t has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2372016-03-25T18:58:53  *** p15x has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2382016-03-25T19:08:07  <gmaxwell> jonasschnelli: I see your updated encryption draft. It doesn't appear to specify a KDF. The output of ECDH should not be used directly. (also, you're going to need a 256 bit session ID for later auth, and two 512 bit keys for the authenticated encryption); so that will be needed.   I'm not sure if that ciphersuite negoiation procedure is sufficient to achieve the goal that if X is faster for bot
2392016-03-25T19:08:13  <gmaxwell> h peers, they'll pick it... but regardless, both of their ciphersuite sets also need to be included in the KDF.  Otherwise a MITM could force ciphersuite selection (say to a weaker cipher) without disrupting changing the session ID.  Personally I'd just suggest dropping the negoation; having it and avoiding introducing downgrading attacks is hard... also supporting many ciphers pushes people to
2402016-03-25T19:08:19  <gmaxwell> using kitchen soup crypto libraries, which is bad for attack surface.
2412016-03-25T19:10:48  <gmaxwell> the input to the KDF should probably be the ECDH value, one of the public keys (doesn't matter which of the two-- assuming the pubkeys are all valid), and the offered paramters of each side.
2422016-03-25T19:40:45  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
2432016-03-25T19:51:01  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
2442016-03-25T19:52:58  *** moli has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2452016-03-25T19:53:32  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2462016-03-25T19:56:09  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
2472016-03-25T20:18:51  *** Don_John has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2482016-03-25T20:42:12  *** murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2492016-03-25T20:56:39  *** johnwhitton has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2502016-03-25T21:14:29  <jonasschnelli> gmaxwell: I'm kind of afk but will check you feedback and update the BIP. Thanks!
2512016-03-25T21:24:47  *** jgarzik has quit IRC
2522016-03-25T21:26:26  <sipa> jonasschnelli: typically what you'll do is take the ECDH result (an EC point), and use that to seed some PRNG, from which you then draw the session key, encryption keys, ...
2532016-03-25T21:27:03  *** davec has quit IRC
2542016-03-25T21:27:13  <sipa> jonasschnelli: note that libsecp256k1 at this point does not return the ECDH result point directly, but it returns a SHA256 of it (which guarantees all its entropy is used)
2552016-03-25T21:28:55  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562016-03-25T21:47:28  *** davec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2572016-03-25T21:53:53  *** murch has quit IRC
2582016-03-25T22:14:53  *** treehug88 has quit IRC
2592016-03-25T22:16:05  *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
2602016-03-25T22:22:13  *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2612016-03-25T22:32:53  *** randy-waterhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2622016-03-25T22:33:23  *** zooko has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2632016-03-25T22:36:14  *** frankenmint has quit IRC
2642016-03-25T22:37:21  *** supasonic has quit IRC
2652016-03-25T22:37:47  *** supasonic has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2662016-03-25T22:38:31  *** frankenmint has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2672016-03-25T22:46:08  *** JeromeLegoupil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2682016-03-25T23:07:38  *** achow101 has quit IRC
2692016-03-25T23:12:24  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
2702016-03-25T23:22:59  *** JeromeLegoupil has quit IRC
2712016-03-25T23:27:44  *** JeromeLegoupil has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2722016-03-25T23:51:01  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
2732016-03-25T23:56:13  *** jyap has quit IRC