12017-01-10T00:03:01 *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
22017-01-10T00:04:08 *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32017-01-10T00:28:51 *** chjj has quit IRC
42017-01-10T00:38:05 *** blkdb has quit IRC
52017-01-10T00:38:25 *** blkdb has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62017-01-10T00:43:04 *** Saucery has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
72017-01-10T00:43:31 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
82017-01-10T00:47:51 *** chjj has quit IRC
92017-01-10T00:59:32 *** LeMiner2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
102017-01-10T01:01:16 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
112017-01-10T01:01:46 *** LeMiner has quit IRC
122017-01-10T01:01:46 *** LeMiner2 is now known as LeMiner
132017-01-10T01:01:53 *** abpa has quit IRC
142017-01-10T01:37:28 *** Ylbam has quit IRC
152017-01-10T01:37:48 *** Saucery has quit IRC
162017-01-10T01:40:11 *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
172017-01-10T02:03:14 *** abpa has quit IRC
182017-01-10T02:25:18 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #9500: [Qt][RPC] Autocomplete commands for 'help' command in debug console (master...help-rpc-autocomplete) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9500
192017-01-10T03:14:50 *** wasi has quit IRC
202017-01-10T03:34:49 *** jtimon has quit IRC
212017-01-10T04:20:21 *** chris2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
222017-01-10T04:23:40 *** chris200_ has quit IRC
232017-01-10T05:11:52 <Lightsword> what conditions would cause me to hit this inconclusive for submitblock? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/0.13/src/rpc/mining.cpp#L776
242017-01-10T05:21:24 <luke-jr> Lightsword: block submitted is not on the longest chain, and therefore was not fully verified
252017-01-10T05:21:39 <luke-jr> eg, stale block
262017-01-10T05:24:49 <Lightsword> luke-jr, so itâs possible to hit that when doing a duplicate submit right?
272017-01-10T05:25:20 <luke-jr> shouldn't be. duplicate is explicitly detected
282017-01-10T05:25:44 <Lightsword> luke-jr, thatâs what I thoughtâ¦but seems you can get that from a duplicateâ¦probably timing dependent
292017-01-10T05:26:02 <luke-jr> oh, maybe if the duplicate is of an inconclusive block?
302017-01-10T05:26:08 <luke-jr> eg, the first submit was inconclusive
312017-01-10T05:26:41 <Lightsword> actually in this case the block first came in over p2p and was then submitted over the RPC at almost the exact same time
322017-01-10T05:27:28 <luke-jr> that doesn't change much
332017-01-10T05:27:54 <Lightsword> hmm, looks like the block came in over p2p in the middle of submitblock actually
342017-01-10T05:29:26 <phantomcircuit> Lightsword, duplicate-inconclusive is a thing
352017-01-10T05:30:12 <Lightsword> phantomcircuit, well duplicate-inconclusive was not what submit block returned, it returned a plain âinconclusiveâ
362017-01-10T05:31:31 <phantomcircuit> that means the block wasn't already seen was accepted but is not in the main chain
372017-01-10T05:34:01 <Lightsword> phantomcircuit, so that response is given after being accepted but before updatetip?
382017-01-10T05:36:32 <phantomcircuit> Lightsword, a block can be accepted even if it doesn't update the tip iirc
392017-01-10T05:37:24 <profall> I have an issue where my bitcoin core daemon goes out of sync for no reason at all. Plenty of peers and in a proper datacenter. It's a server with an E3 processor and 16GB of Ram, not a resource isssue.
402017-01-10T05:38:23 <profall> It'll run for 24 or 36 hours on the correct block if you compare it in real-time to blockchain.info or wherever, then randomly it'll just stop syncing.
412017-01-10T05:39:52 <phantomcircuit> profall, what version?
422017-01-10T05:40:25 <profall> bitcoin-0.13.2-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz right off the website.
432017-01-10T05:40:59 <profall> (obviously extracted it...)
442017-01-10T05:41:46 <phantomcircuit> bitcoin-cli getinfo how many peers?
452017-01-10T05:42:12 <profall> 69
462017-01-10T05:47:09 <phantomcircuit> profall, how far behind?
472017-01-10T05:47:40 <profall> It'll go 50 blocks behind sometimes until I manually intervene. I simply stop bitcoind and start it again.
482017-01-10T05:47:48 <profall> It'll resync right away.
492017-01-10T05:48:25 <phantomcircuit> hmm
502017-01-10T05:48:51 <profall> I mean, maybe the datacenter is having connection issues? It's like the only thing I can think of I guess ill put in a ticket.
512017-01-10T05:49:22 <profall> Everything else works fine though on that server, so I feel like it's not related to the internet connection.
522017-01-10T05:52:02 <phantomcircuit> uh
532017-01-10T05:52:07 <phantomcircuit> is this by chance in the bay area
542017-01-10T05:52:12 <profall> No
552017-01-10T05:54:59 <phantomcircuit> BlueMatt, ^
562017-01-10T05:56:28 <phantomcircuit> profall, if you run getpeerinfo is there one peer with a bunch of blocks in flight?
572017-01-10T06:12:36 <Lightsword> phantomcircuit, so I guess when parsing submitblock responses inconclusive can potentially mean duplicate and that the tip just hasnât updated yet?
582017-01-10T06:15:15 *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
592017-01-10T06:18:51 *** dgenr8 has quit IRC
602017-01-10T06:19:06 *** dgenr8 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
612017-01-10T06:22:23 <gmaxwell> profall: that is very interesting and unusual. Can you check the time on that host (including timezone)? Do you have a debug log covering one of these events?
622017-01-10T06:51:05 *** windsok has quit IRC
632017-01-10T06:52:31 *** tunafizz has quit IRC
642017-01-10T07:02:30 *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
652017-01-10T07:10:04 *** tunafizz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
662017-01-10T07:29:28 *** kadoban has quit IRC
672017-01-10T07:29:37 *** windsok has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
682017-01-10T07:29:55 *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
692017-01-10T08:02:59 *** kadoban has quit IRC
702017-01-10T08:03:24 *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
712017-01-10T08:07:01 *** BashCo has quit IRC
722017-01-10T08:07:38 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
732017-01-10T08:12:02 *** BashCo has quit IRC
742017-01-10T08:28:43 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
752017-01-10T08:47:24 *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
762017-01-10T08:49:06 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
772017-01-10T08:58:27 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
782017-01-10T08:59:47 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
792017-01-10T09:04:19 *** jannes has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
802017-01-10T09:08:25 *** paveljanik has quit IRC
812017-01-10T09:15:44 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/07fd147b9f12...98c80e374b84
822017-01-10T09:15:45 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 7df5e38 Pavel JanÃk: Rename lambda argument name to prevent shadowing.
832017-01-10T09:15:45 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 98c80e3 MarcoFalke: Merge #9496: Rename lambda argument name to prevent shadowing...
842017-01-10T09:16:00 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #9496: Rename lambda argument name to prevent shadowing (master...20170109_Wshadow_rpcconsole_lambda) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9496
852017-01-10T09:35:19 *** petertodd has quit IRC
862017-01-10T09:37:17 *** eenoch has quit IRC
872017-01-10T09:37:18 *** kallewoof has quit IRC
882017-01-10T09:37:18 *** warren has quit IRC
892017-01-10T09:37:19 *** lesderid has quit IRC
902017-01-10T09:37:19 *** thestringpuller has quit IRC
912017-01-10T09:37:26 *** lesderid has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
922017-01-10T09:37:30 *** eenoch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
932017-01-10T09:37:31 *** thestringpuller has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
942017-01-10T09:37:34 *** kallewoof has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
952017-01-10T09:37:54 *** thestringpuller is now known as Guest94281
962017-01-10T09:38:25 *** warren has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
972017-01-10T09:38:47 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
982017-01-10T09:38:47 *** Squidicuz has quit IRC
992017-01-10T09:38:48 *** morcos has quit IRC
1002017-01-10T09:38:49 *** amiller has quit IRC
1012017-01-10T09:38:50 *** mr_burdell has quit IRC
1022017-01-10T09:38:56 *** mr_burdell has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1032017-01-10T09:39:07 *** echonaut has quit IRC
1042017-01-10T09:39:07 *** thermoman has quit IRC
1052017-01-10T09:39:08 *** jeremyrubin has quit IRC
1062017-01-10T09:39:11 *** niska` has quit IRC
1072017-01-10T09:39:14 *** jeremyru1in has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082017-01-10T09:39:16 *** thermoman has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1092017-01-10T09:39:17 *** niska has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1102017-01-10T09:39:23 *** echonaut has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1112017-01-10T09:39:49 *** Guest5911 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1122017-01-10T09:41:32 *** profall has quit IRC
1132017-01-10T09:42:27 *** LeMiner2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142017-01-10T09:43:35 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
1152017-01-10T09:44:00 *** morcos has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162017-01-10T09:44:03 *** profall has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1172017-01-10T09:44:54 *** LeMiner has quit IRC
1182017-01-10T09:44:54 *** LeMiner2 is now known as LeMiner
1192017-01-10T09:55:00 *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1202017-01-10T10:06:32 *** BashCo_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212017-01-10T10:09:52 *** BashCo has quit IRC
1222017-01-10T10:20:07 *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1232017-01-10T10:49:04 *** petertodd has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1242017-01-10T11:09:15 *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1252017-01-10T11:10:08 *** laurentmt has quit IRC
1262017-01-10T11:30:22 *** emmmork has quit IRC
1272017-01-10T11:58:36 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1282017-01-10T12:01:35 *** BashCo_ has quit IRC
1292017-01-10T12:08:37 *** emmmork has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1302017-01-10T12:35:10 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 1 new commit to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/68eb56203be17066af4e37837703490af4d4f40c
1312017-01-10T12:35:10 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 68eb562 Wladimir J. van der Laan: qt: periodic translations update
1322017-01-10T12:37:24 *** LeMiner2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1332017-01-10T12:39:54 *** LeMiner has quit IRC
1342017-01-10T12:39:54 *** LeMiner2 is now known as LeMiner
1352017-01-10T12:45:16 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1362017-01-10T12:45:17 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1372017-01-10T12:45:17 *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1382017-01-10T13:14:29 *** wump is now known as wumpus
1392017-01-10T13:15:15 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 14 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/68eb56203be1...5754e0341b7c
1402017-01-10T13:15:16 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5865d41 Wladimir J. van der Laan: authproxy: Add support for RPC named arguments
1412017-01-10T13:15:16 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6f1c76a Wladimir J. van der Laan: rpc: Support named arguments...
1422017-01-10T13:15:17 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 495eb44 Wladimir J. van der Laan: rpc: Named arguments for blockchain calls
1432017-01-10T13:24:32 *** chjj has quit IRC
1442017-01-10T13:26:32 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
1452017-01-10T13:41:02 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462017-01-10T13:41:20 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1472017-01-10T13:49:56 *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1482017-01-10T13:55:39 *** Sosumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492017-01-10T13:57:56 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1502017-01-10T14:11:29 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
1512017-01-10T14:27:25 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522017-01-10T14:29:35 *** wasi has quit IRC
1532017-01-10T14:30:00 *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1542017-01-10T14:31:38 *** wasi has quit IRC
1552017-01-10T14:32:01 *** wasi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1562017-01-10T14:48:06 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
1572017-01-10T15:00:46 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1582017-01-10T15:13:53 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
1592017-01-10T15:27:18 *** BashCo has quit IRC
1602017-01-10T15:28:04 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1612017-01-10T15:28:07 *** Squidicuz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1622017-01-10T15:29:51 *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1632017-01-10T15:32:17 *** BashCo has quit IRC
1642017-01-10T15:33:32 <jonasschnelli> instagibbs: can you help me parsing your comment... :)
1652017-01-10T15:33:32 <jonasschnelli> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9294/files#r95169601
1662017-01-10T15:33:35 <jonasschnelli> (or anyone)
1672017-01-10T15:33:43 <jonasschnelli> I don't understand it
1682017-01-10T15:35:08 <instagibbs> jonasschnelli, in one commit you go from 0 internal to 50/50 external/internal, to 100/20
1692017-01-10T15:35:13 <instagibbs> in the next
1702017-01-10T15:35:21 <instagibbs> I just find that a bit odd
1712017-01-10T15:35:30 <jonasschnelli> Ah. The commit order...
1722017-01-10T15:35:46 <jonasschnelli> Yes. I force pushed it in a confusing way.
1732017-01-10T15:35:46 <instagibbs> yeah, not blocking, I just got confused when reviewing commit by commit
1742017-01-10T15:36:06 <instagibbs> I think logically it's not broken at any point
1752017-01-10T15:39:23 <jonasschnelli> I think I squash the commits.
1762017-01-10T15:39:32 <jonasschnelli> It's one single change
1772017-01-10T15:51:03 <instagibbs> is #9400 reasonable for 0.14? It's gotten decent amount of review, and is a pretty small change
1782017-01-10T15:51:06 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9400 | Set peers as HB peers upon full block validation by instagibbs · Pull Request #9400 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1792017-01-10T15:54:05 * jonasschnelli invites instagibbs to re-review #9294 (thanks!)
1802017-01-10T15:54:07 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9294 | Use internal HD chain for change outputs (hd split) by jonasschnelli · Pull Request #9294 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1812017-01-10T16:00:22 <instagibbs> well since you asked nicely
1822017-01-10T16:05:47 *** Guest5911 has quit IRC
1832017-01-10T16:05:47 *** Guest5911 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1842017-01-10T16:05:47 *** Guest5911 is now known as amiller
1852017-01-10T16:08:44 <jonasschnelli> Thanks for the review instagibbs: I owe you a review now!
1862017-01-10T16:09:21 *** BashCo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872017-01-10T16:09:22 *** xiangfu has quit IRC
1882017-01-10T16:09:51 *** fengling has quit IRC
1892017-01-10T16:19:26 *** fengling has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1902017-01-10T16:21:53 *** xiangfu has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1912017-01-10T16:27:34 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1922017-01-10T16:27:56 <xinxi> cfields: ping. I have a question about codesigning binaries using gitian.
1932017-01-10T16:28:49 <cfields> xinxi: hi, shoot
1942017-01-10T16:29:50 <xinxi> ./bin/gbuild -i --commit signature=master ../litecoin/contrib/gitian-descriptors/gitian-win-signer.yml
1952017-01-10T16:29:50 <xinxi> --- Building for trusty amd64 ---
1962017-01-10T16:29:51 <xinxi> Stopping target if it is up
1972017-01-10T16:29:52 <xinxi> Starting target
1982017-01-10T16:29:54 <xinxi> Checking if target is up..............................
1992017-01-10T16:29:56 <xinxi> sudo: unknown user: ubuntu
2002017-01-10T16:29:58 <xinxi> sudo: unable to initialize policy plugin
2012017-01-10T16:30:00 <xinxi> ./bin/gbuild:21:in `system!': failed to run on-target true (RuntimeError)
2022017-01-10T16:30:02 <xinxi> from ./bin/gbuild:73:in `build_one_configuration'
2032017-01-10T16:30:04 <xinxi> from ./bin/gbuild:285:in `block (2 levels) in <main>'
2042017-01-10T16:30:06 <xinxi> from ./bin/gbuild:280:in `each'
2052017-01-10T16:30:08 <xinxi> from ./bin/gbuild:280:in `block in <main>'
2062017-01-10T16:30:10 <xinxi> from ./bin/gbuild:278:in `each'
2072017-01-10T16:30:12 <xinxi> from ./bin/gbuild:278:in `<main>'
2082017-01-10T16:30:14 <xinxi> [11:43]
2092017-01-10T16:30:16 <xinxi> I changed ubuntu -> debian
2102017-01-10T16:30:19 <xinxi> I got the above error when I was compiling Litecoin.
2112017-01-10T16:30:20 <cfields> xinxi: ahh, paste somewhere please!
2122017-01-10T16:30:29 <xinxi> oops
2132017-01-10T16:31:03 <cfields> xinxi: need to look at the log, the above doesn't tell much
2142017-01-10T16:32:15 <xinxi> where is the log? no path is shown above.
2152017-01-10T16:32:46 <cfields> xinxi: ./var/build.log
2162017-01-10T16:33:16 <xinxi> there is only var/install.log
2172017-01-10T16:33:23 <xinxi> but it seems not relevant.
2182017-01-10T16:34:03 <achow101> that means that the build hasn't started yet and it was still updating stuff
2192017-01-10T16:34:34 <cfields> xinxi: wait, why did you change ubuntu -> debian?
2202017-01-10T16:34:55 <cfields> xinxi: unknown ubuntu user seems relevant in that case :)
2212017-01-10T16:34:59 <xinxi> I am compiling on debian.
2222017-01-10T16:35:23 <xinxi> let me change back.
2232017-01-10T16:35:35 <cfields> xinxi: doesn't matter, this is creating a vm for you
2242017-01-10T16:36:51 <xinxi> I just changed back and am compiling again. it seems a bit different now.
2252017-01-10T16:37:33 <btcdrak> xinxi: use pastebin/0bin please
2262017-01-10T16:37:50 <xinxi> yeah, just noticed it. sorry about that.
2272017-01-10T16:40:14 <xinxi> cfields: got a new error: http://pastebin.com/JA4rtscY
2282017-01-10T16:42:21 <cfields> xinxi: have you signed the binaries and created detached sigs?
2292017-01-10T16:42:35 <xinxi> yeah, I have.
2302017-01-10T16:43:22 <xinxi> I got the .assert and .assert.sig files.
2312017-01-10T16:43:47 <cfields> xinxi: since this isn't bitcoin related, let's go to pm
2322017-01-10T16:43:58 <instagibbs> 0.13.1 and other NODE_WITNESS only ask for txn from witness peers, right?
2332017-01-10T16:45:16 <sipa> instagibbs: i don't think so, but i forget
2342017-01-10T16:50:46 *** abpa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2352017-01-10T16:54:58 <phantomcircuit> cfields, on 9441 the indentation in ba4cae284f6acac4bbbfe08c89dcb8c2ace5da83 is screwed
2362017-01-10T16:55:33 <cfields> phantomcircuit: yea, i left the indentation alone, otherwise the diff would've been a bloodbath
2372017-01-10T16:55:54 <cfields> i'll do a whitespace follow-up
2382017-01-10T16:55:57 <phantomcircuit> cfields, also please use {} for all if statements
2392017-01-10T16:56:09 <phantomcircuit> kind of makes indentation issues less relevant
2402017-01-10T16:56:30 <phantomcircuit> the way it is now it looks like nothing will ever run because of the indentation
2412017-01-10T16:58:00 <cfields> phantomcircuit: fair enough. where in particular?
2422017-01-10T16:59:04 <phantomcircuit> the fDisconnect check mainly
2432017-01-10T16:59:34 <phantomcircuit> also probably swap the fDisconnect and !vRecvGetData.empty() checks since ProcessGetData can set fDisconnect
2442017-01-10T17:00:16 <phantomcircuit> (left these comments on github too)
2452017-01-10T17:01:36 <cfields> phantomcircuit: ah, they make more sense in context. thanks :)
2462017-01-10T17:05:24 <phantomcircuit> cfields, it seems like we should disconnect on checksum and header validation issues actually
2472017-01-10T17:05:32 <phantomcircuit> (we currently ignore them and go to the next message)
2482017-01-10T17:05:55 <cfields> phantomcircuit: there are several things that should change about the behavior there, but i tried to leave as much alone as i could for this PR
2492017-01-10T17:06:04 <phantomcircuit> alright
2502017-01-10T17:06:10 <phantomcircuit> i'll refrain
2512017-01-10T17:06:30 <cfields> phantomcircuit: agreed ofc, btw
2522017-01-10T17:36:14 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] jonasschnelli opened pull request #9502: [Qt] Add option to pause/resume block downloads (master...2017/01/autodownload) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9502
2532017-01-10T17:54:21 <instagibbs> sipa, oh right, definitely not the case since they wont relay non-std txns in general
2542017-01-10T17:54:52 <sipa> indeed
2552017-01-10T17:57:06 <jtimon> BlueMatt: it seems #9486 could use a better description, the description seems to only talk about the last commit, which seems trivial and overall unrelated to the rest, certainly I'm missing something
2562017-01-10T17:57:08 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9486 | Make peer=%d log prints consistent by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9486 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2572017-01-10T17:57:22 <sdaftuar> jtimon: see #9375
2582017-01-10T17:57:25 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9375 | Relay compact block messages prior to full block connection by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9375 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2592017-01-10T17:57:42 <sipa> jtimon: from the description "Based on #9375"
2602017-01-10T17:57:46 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9375 | Relay compact block messages prior to full block connection by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9375 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2612017-01-10T17:57:51 <sipa> ah, sdaftuar beat me
2622017-01-10T17:58:26 <jtimon> yeah, thanks, reading now, read that and then forgot and tried to exact the leitmotiv from looking at the commits
2632017-01-10T18:01:11 <jtimon> does https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9486/commits/e6111b2398ca21f0e38333236abb0be7fa48c95f really need to be based on #9375 ? it seems it could be trivially merged independently
2642017-01-10T18:01:13 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9375 | Relay compact block messages prior to full block connection by TheBlueMatt · Pull Request #9375 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2652017-01-10T18:27:03 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #9503: listreceivedbyaddress Filter Address (master...listreceivedbyaddress-filtered) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9503
2662017-01-10T18:34:29 *** xinxi has quit IRC
2672017-01-10T18:34:56 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2682017-01-10T18:39:13 *** xinxi has quit IRC
2692017-01-10T19:02:25 *** gmaxwell has quit IRC
2702017-01-10T19:08:46 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2712017-01-10T19:12:49 *** gmaxwell has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2722017-01-10T19:18:50 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 opened pull request #9504: [RPC] dumpmasterprivkey command (master...dumpmasterprivkey) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9504
2732017-01-10T19:42:07 *** PaulCapestany has quit IRC
2742017-01-10T19:42:44 <BlueMatt> gmaxwell: heh, yea, so extra is worth it as-is, will push the use-less-memory thing for 0.15?
2752017-01-10T19:44:25 <gmaxwell> BlueMatt: seems like it.
2762017-01-10T19:44:30 <BlueMatt> cool
2772017-01-10T19:46:29 *** LeMiner has quit IRC
2782017-01-10T19:48:43 *** GAit has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2792017-01-10T19:52:24 *** PaulCapestany has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2802017-01-10T20:01:13 *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
2812017-01-10T20:02:09 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] JeremyRubin opened pull request #9505: Prevector Quick Destruct (master...prevector-quick-destruct) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9505
2822017-01-10T20:06:31 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #9506: RFC: Improve style for if indentation (master...newstyle) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9506
2832017-01-10T20:19:22 *** Guest94281 is now known as thestringpuller
2842017-01-10T20:19:29 *** thestringpuller has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2852017-01-10T20:28:58 *** dermoth_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2862017-01-10T20:29:26 *** dermoth has quit IRC
2872017-01-10T20:29:28 *** dermoth_ is now known as dermoth
2882017-01-10T20:31:35 *** cbits has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2892017-01-10T20:33:06 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sdaftuar opened pull request #9507: Fix use-after-free in CTxMemPool::removeConflicts() (master...fix-mempool-useafterfree) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9507
2902017-01-10T20:34:24 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #9508: [gardening] Remove unused Python imports (master...remove-unused-python-import) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9508
2912017-01-10T20:35:50 *** paveljanik has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2922017-01-10T20:58:28 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] theuni opened pull request #9509: build: fix qt distdir builds (master...out-of-tree-build) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9509
2932017-01-10T21:02:21 *** xinxi has quit IRC
2942017-01-10T21:04:59 *** cbits has quit IRC
2952017-01-10T21:07:07 *** Sosumi has quit IRC
2962017-01-10T21:44:57 *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2972017-01-10T21:48:39 <instagibbs> what's the functional/use difference between CCoinsViewCache::GetCoins and CCoinsViewCache::AccessCoins?
2982017-01-10T21:49:04 <sipa> the latter is much faster
2992017-01-10T21:49:10 <sipa> as it doesn't copy
3002017-01-10T21:49:34 <sipa> so why would you use the first? AccessCoins only exists in CCoinsViewCache, while GetCoins exists in every CCoins implementation
3012017-01-10T21:49:41 <sipa> *every CCoinsView
3022017-01-10T21:49:56 *** waxwing has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3032017-01-10T21:50:19 <instagibbs> thanks, let me see if that explains its various uses to me
3042017-01-10T21:56:09 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #9510: [gardening] Fix typos in comments (master...fix-typos-in-comments) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9510
3052017-01-10T22:00:41 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] morcos opened pull request #9511: Don't overwrite validation state with corruption check (master...ATMPstate) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9511
3062017-01-10T22:02:44 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3072017-01-10T22:06:03 *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
3082017-01-10T22:10:35 *** molz has quit IRC
3092017-01-10T22:13:14 <gmaxwell> sipa: BlueMatt has a nit on #9472
3102017-01-10T22:13:16 <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9472 | Disentangle progress estimation from checkpoints and update it by sipa · Pull Request #9472 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3112017-01-10T22:14:59 <BlueMatt> are we gonna try to merge that for 14 too?
3122017-01-10T22:15:25 <gmaxwell> sure, it's done its ... has about zero potential to break anything.
3132017-01-10T22:15:53 <sipa> it would be nice to say that we're only using checkpoints for avoiding a memory-bloating low-difficulty header attack
3142017-01-10T22:16:01 <sipa> it would be even nicer to say we're not using them at all anymore
3152017-01-10T22:16:19 *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
3162017-01-10T22:16:50 <gmaxwell> yes, well... we could have been there, but
3172017-01-10T22:17:51 <gmaxwell> I don't have a solution for that which doesn't need something which is technically a consensus rule change.
3182017-01-10T22:18:47 <gmaxwell> https://github.com/gmaxwell/bitcoin/commit/09cef642e7d7866cb7b7026a453e1c791c191ddf
3192017-01-10T22:18:55 <gmaxwell> oops wrong commit
3202017-01-10T22:19:02 <gmaxwell> https://github.com/gmaxwell/bitcoin/commit/2db190b183c5204da23191ca642c7f6cad412ae3
3212017-01-10T22:20:29 *** emmmork has quit IRC
3222017-01-10T22:22:04 *** xinxi has quit IRC
3232017-01-10T22:25:57 *** cbits has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3242017-01-10T23:05:51 *** belcher has quit IRC
3252017-01-10T23:15:29 *** fresn3ll has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3262017-01-10T23:17:54 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] sipa opened pull request #9512: Fix various things -fsanitize complains about (master...sanitize) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9512
3272017-01-10T23:19:00 *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3282017-01-10T23:19:01 *** xinxi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3292017-01-10T23:21:44 *** NicolasDorier has quit IRC
3302017-01-10T23:22:17 *** chjj has quit IRC
3312017-01-10T23:23:13 *** mappum has quit IRC
3322017-01-10T23:25:56 *** NicolasDorier has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3332017-01-10T23:25:56 *** mappum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3342017-01-10T23:36:10 *** xinxi has quit IRC
3352017-01-10T23:36:56 <dcousens> can prioritisetransaction work on txids that aren't yet in the mempool?
3362017-01-10T23:37:17 <dcousens> I assume no, in which case, it might an idea to allow that as an option or maybe allow sendrawtransaction to have a feedelta field?
3372017-01-10T23:37:28 <dcousens> (uh, a 'virtual fee' field)
3382017-01-10T23:40:03 <sipa> yes, it can
3392017-01-10T23:40:57 <dcousens> sipa: awesome :)
3402017-01-10T23:42:08 <gmaxwell> dcousens: it writes it into mapDeltas.
3412017-01-10T23:48:57 *** fresn3ll has quit IRC
3422017-01-10T23:51:26 *** cbits has quit IRC
3432017-01-10T23:57:10 *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev