1 2017-03-25T00:34:09  <gmaxwell> oh theo, trolling about the openssl license thing by targing unrelated parties: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=149032069130072&w=2
  2 2017-03-25T00:39:48  *** MarcoFalke has quit IRC
  3 2017-03-25T00:40:58  *** MarcoFalke has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  4 2017-03-25T00:59:41  *** CubicEar_ is now known as CubicEarth_
  5 2017-03-25T01:18:53  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  6 2017-03-25T01:23:27  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
  7 2017-03-25T01:54:40  *** jtimon has quit IRC
  8 2017-03-25T02:00:22  *** chjj has quit IRC
  9 2017-03-25T02:08:33  *** tunafizz has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 10 2017-03-25T02:18:39  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 11 2017-03-25T02:30:16  *** xiangfu has quit IRC
 12 2017-03-25T02:30:57  *** xiangfu has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 13 2017-03-25T02:42:23  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 14 2017-03-25T02:52:23  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 15 2017-03-25T02:55:56  *** chjj has quit IRC
 16 2017-03-25T03:00:17  *** dcousens has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 17 2017-03-25T03:03:09  *** Victor_sueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 18 2017-03-25T03:05:28  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
 19 2017-03-25T03:08:39  *** talmai has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 20 2017-03-25T03:32:25  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
 21 2017-03-25T03:44:07  *** Ylbam has quit IRC
 22 2017-03-25T03:53:59  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 23 2017-03-25T04:16:10  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 24 2017-03-25T04:20:36  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 25 2017-03-25T04:21:30  *** Victor_sueca has quit IRC
 26 2017-03-25T04:22:38  *** Victor_sueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 27 2017-03-25T04:40:27  *** chjj has quit IRC
 28 2017-03-25T04:42:53  *** kadoban has quit IRC
 29 2017-03-25T04:47:37  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 30 2017-03-25T04:58:41  *** chris2000 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 31 2017-03-25T05:01:53  *** chris200_ has quit IRC
 32 2017-03-25T05:03:10  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
 33 2017-03-25T05:09:28  *** davec has quit IRC
 34 2017-03-25T05:16:34  <luke-jr> crap, sizefp is broken
 35 2017-03-25T05:17:09  <luke-jr> hm, or is it
 36 2017-03-25T05:18:31  <luke-jr> actually, I think it might be okay. it's possible to produce a fraud proof that lies about the tx count, but you'd never be able to make one that proves it's bigger than it really is I think
 37 2017-03-25T05:24:31  *** talmai has quit IRC
 38 2017-03-25T05:30:37  *** chjj has quit IRC
 39 2017-03-25T05:35:56  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 40 2017-03-25T05:52:12  *** davec has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 41 2017-03-25T05:54:30  *** cannon-c has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 42 2017-03-25T06:16:36  *** harrymm has quit IRC
 43 2017-03-25T06:30:55  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 44 2017-03-25T06:33:21  <da2ce7> luke-jr: what is the cost of just relaying the full oversized block. Or at least the first 1mb of the block? Most SPV wallets have enough bandwidth for 1mb
 45 2017-03-25T06:35:57  <luke-jr> da2ce7: up to 4 MB with segwit
 46 2017-03-25T06:36:44  <da2ce7> that doesn't sound unreasonable for my phone either.
 47 2017-03-25T06:38:29  <da2ce7> Is SVP fraud proof spam/dos a concern?
 48 2017-03-25T06:38:57  <gmaxwell> da2ce7: yes, because if you don't like your fraud being proven first you claim fraud falsely on every block to every client... all the time and they waste bandwidth.
 49 2017-03-25T06:39:17  <gmaxwell> and the users get pissed and change software or turn off the feature.
 50 2017-03-25T06:39:48  <gmaxwell> though you're right to say that 1mb isn't that burdensom... kinda sad that all these wallets totally screw user privacy to save a bandwidth amount the user probably doesn't care about.
 51 2017-03-25T06:44:03  <da2ce7> Banning the Peer that gives a false proof isn't sufficient?  I suppose not, because the new peer that you could connect to could give a false fraud proof again.
 52 2017-03-25T06:45:23  <gmaxwell> well once you're convinced a given block was okay, you never need to fetch it.
 53 2017-03-25T06:45:27  <gmaxwell> er again.
 54 2017-03-25T06:45:38  <gmaxwell> but it can just happen for the next block.
 55 2017-03-25T06:46:42  <gmaxwell> luke-jr: a radically different approach would be able to have miners mergemine a message [Block 0x00023023423 is oversized.]... then you have some minimum difficulty for such messages such that dos is ineffectual.
 56 2017-03-25T06:46:58  <gmaxwell> and when you get one of those messages, you just go download the whole block to check for yourself.
 57 2017-03-25T06:47:26  <da2ce7> cool
 58 2017-03-25T06:47:29  <gmaxwell> hm. well I suppose the attacker can cheaply produce false proofs for all the good blocks, scratch that idea.
 59 2017-03-25T06:49:09  <da2ce7> Banning the offending peer isn't enough? A bad peer can only send 1 bad fraud proof... You would cycle through to 8 good peers quite quickly.
 60 2017-03-25T06:52:55  <da2ce7> You can also have a rate-limit, where if you get a new peer, you won't accept a fraud proof until they have been well behaved for a certain time, (such 1/2 * time connected to longest peer).
 61 2017-03-25T06:53:18  <da2ce7> This will severely rate-limit bad fraud proofs.
 62 2017-03-25T07:09:37  *** Victor_sueca is now known as Victorsueca
 63 2017-03-25T07:14:48  *** To7 has quit IRC
 64 2017-03-25T07:23:13  <luke-jr> da2ce7: these nodes don't even accept incoming connections, so..
 65 2017-03-25T07:39:52  *** chjj has quit IRC
 66 2017-03-25T07:47:54  *** blur3d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 67 2017-03-25T08:05:40  *** dcousens has quit IRC
 68 2017-03-25T08:06:54  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] luke-jr opened pull request #10074: Block size/weight fraud proofs (master...sizefp) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10074
 69 2017-03-25T08:08:23  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/a0b1e57b20a1...530fcbd49be2
 70 2017-03-25T08:08:23  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master cc995e2 flack: add missing spaces so that markdown recognizes headline
 71 2017-03-25T08:08:24  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 530fcbd Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10063: add missing spaces so that markdown recognizes headline...
 72 2017-03-25T08:08:44  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10063: add missing spaces so that markdown recognizes headline (master...patch-1) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10063
 73 2017-03-25T08:10:23  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/530fcbd49be2...5d7eb39aecda
 74 2017-03-25T08:10:23  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master c59aedc Thomas Snider: [trivial] Dead code removal
 75 2017-03-25T08:10:24  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 5d7eb39 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #10067: [trivial] Dead code removal...
 76 2017-03-25T08:10:46  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #10067: [trivial] Dead code removal (master...tjps_dead_code) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10067
 77 2017-03-25T08:17:56  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 78 2017-03-25T08:46:52  *** Evel-Knievel has quit IRC
 79 2017-03-25T08:47:27  *** Evel-Knievel has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 80 2017-03-25T08:52:34  *** belcher has quit IRC
 81 2017-03-25T08:56:12  *** roidster has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 82 2017-03-25T09:01:58  <luke-jr> wumpus: blkindex.dat was the UTXO BDB database IIRC
 83 2017-03-25T09:04:56  <sipa> it was everything
 84 2017-03-25T09:05:08  <sipa> it has the byte position of every transactions
 85 2017-03-25T09:05:25  <sipa> and the byte position of the transaction that spent each input
 86 2017-03-25T09:05:45  <wumpus> ok
 87 2017-03-25T09:05:51  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 88 2017-03-25T09:07:34  <sipa> 12 bytes for every output ever :)
 89 2017-03-25T09:07:46  <sipa> bla bla scability
 90 2017-03-25T09:07:51  <sipa> *scalability
 91 2017-03-25T09:10:22  <wumpus> yes you did so much incredible work on that sipa :)
 92 2017-03-25T09:11:43  <wumpus> Huh! https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8218   "this issue was closed"  by whom? github admin?
 93 2017-03-25T09:12:32  <luke-jr>  ghost closed this on Jun 18, 2016
 94 2017-03-25T09:12:33  *** tunafizz has quit IRC
 95 2017-03-25T09:13:09  <wumpus> oh. I was looking at the notifications and saw "this issue was closed" at the end, assuming that was the recent activity
 96 2017-03-25T09:13:25  <gmaxwell> 'ghost' ?!
 97 2017-03-25T09:13:41  <wumpus> if it was closed in 2016 already, okay, I still don't realy understand why but that makes sense
 98 2017-03-25T09:13:47  <wumpus> ghost is github's "removed user" account
 99 2017-03-25T09:13:55  <gmaxwell> oh the opened user.
100 2017-03-25T09:14:39  <wumpus> jonasschnelli's post there still makes a lot of sense, we need a standard for these things
101 2017-03-25T09:15:33  <wumpus> anyhow, sorry for the false alarm, github confused me
102 2017-03-25T09:16:39  <da2ce7> Hello. #bitcoin-core-dev,  I've made a patch for BIP 148, unfortunately I'm not a developer so building it a secure manner is a bit over my head.  If anyone can fire-up their gitian, and help me verify the build it would be a great help for me.
103 2017-03-25T09:16:40  <da2ce7> https://github.com/da2ce7/bitcoin/commit/f0bbd97bb5db7da1f8d0019973c048646ad44dbc
104 2017-03-25T09:16:51  <da2ce7> (based upon bitcoin knots).
105 2017-03-25T09:21:14  <wumpus> one gitian builder doesn't really accomplish much, the strength in that process is to make multiple people build something and compare. Or have you gitian-built it and want to compare hashes?
106 2017-03-25T09:22:14  <da2ce7> I've only built bitcoin privately, I haven't used gitian before.  I don't want to release my private binaries.
107 2017-03-25T09:23:12  <wumpus> you shouldn't feel okay distributing someone else's gitian-built binaries either
108 2017-03-25T09:23:44  <wumpus> unless it's multiple independent people I guess
109 2017-03-25T09:23:45  <luke-jr> I wouldn't mind providing one of multiple builds (not as an endorsement).
110 2017-03-25T09:24:14  <wumpus> yes I wouldn't mind building either, but am a bit wary of subverting trust in gitian :) for the releasses we usually wait for 5 signers at least before distributing executables
111 2017-03-25T09:24:42  <luke-jr> wumpus: sadly, Knots only usually has 2 signers to work with; maybe we can improve on this in general
112 2017-03-25T09:25:14  <wumpus> luke-jr: yes, I don't mind building/signing that
113 2017-03-25T09:25:39  <da2ce7> once I have the expected hashes, then I'll ask around for many people to build and verify it.
114 2017-03-25T09:25:51  <luke-jr> wumpus: latest tag is v0.14.0.knots20170307 and the bitcoin-knots github has a sigs repo
115 2017-03-25T09:26:06  <wumpus> as you say it's not an endorsement (though I have nothing against knots either) and improves general bitcoin security so anyhow
116 2017-03-25T09:26:11  <sipa> why do we need gitian builds for a single patch?
117 2017-03-25T09:27:31  <luke-jr> sipa: I guess people want to upgrade to it sooner rather than later; da2ce7 isn't the first wanting such binaries
118 2017-03-25T09:27:40  <da2ce7> I want to release binaries that include this patch. Gitian (with many people verifying) is the only way I know that I would feel confident in doing so.
119 2017-03-25T09:29:57  *** bambum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
120 2017-03-25T09:43:05  * luke-jr wonders where to put unofficial gitian sigs
121 2017-03-25T09:43:45  <wumpus> no idea, though having an official 'unofficial gitian sigs' repository would be kind of strange :)
122 2017-03-25T09:44:02  <da2ce7> luke-jr you can just pm me. I will collect them and publish them once I have enough.  Be clear to include "unoffical" or something in the sig.
123 2017-03-25T09:44:24  * luke-jr wonders how to indicate anything in gitian sigs :P
124 2017-03-25T09:44:43  *** afk11 has quit IRC
125 2017-03-25T09:45:47  <da2ce7> maybe possible to append something to the end of the binary hash?
126 2017-03-25T09:46:26  <wumpus> the assert file is YAML, I think you can add additial fields that will be ignored by the tooling
127 2017-03-25T09:46:47  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
128 2017-03-25T09:46:49  <luke-jr> ideally GPG would print a message upon verification
129 2017-03-25T09:50:18  <wumpus> I doubt it's possible to add custom messages there
130 2017-03-25T09:51:56  <wumpus> (as mimicing GPG output there could fool scripts, or even people expecting a certain output)
131 2017-03-25T09:52:31  <luke-jr> true
132 2017-03-25T09:56:12  <bambum> any agreement / concensus between core / miners / bu regarding onchain blocksize foreseeable or do we have to wait for 1. bu hard fork or/and 2. uasf or/and 3. pow change ? I am long term holder but considering to sell now :(
133 2017-03-25T09:56:56  <wumpus> bambum: that's not a bitcoin-core-dev topic, #bitcoin please
134 2017-03-25T09:59:33  <bambum> well #bitcoin is just speculation and fud, I would be happy to see some core opinion
135 2017-03-25T10:00:07  <luke-jr> bambum: you can get that in #bitcoin too
136 2017-03-25T10:00:31  <sipa> core is a software project; we don't decide what people should run
137 2017-03-25T10:00:40  <sipa> please keep politics out of here
138 2017-03-25T10:01:03  <wumpus> amen
139 2017-03-25T10:02:30  <bambum> well you naturally dont need to answer this question. I just hoped to get some prospectics. I think its really important for bitcoin holder to know about it and i am sure you have your own view and don´t only focus on tecnical
140 2017-03-25T10:03:47  <sipa> i have my own view, but it is completely off topic here
141 2017-03-25T10:04:55  <sipa> please understand that the politics in this space severely affect people's lives here
142 2017-03-25T10:05:08  <wumpus> right, everyone has their own view, but discussing those views is of topic here for the exact reason of preventing this from becoming a "speculation and fud" channel. We had that problem with bitcoin-dev and that's why this channel was created
143 2017-03-25T10:07:33  <bambum> ok I got it, but you should also know that it also affects my life. I have almost my entire savings into bitcoin, its not so easy for me to get  allthat money into my bank account.
144 2017-03-25T10:08:11  <luke-jr> bambum: again, please take it to #bitcoin ; many of us are there as well and would answer you if you ask there
145 2017-03-25T10:08:19  <bambum> ok
146 2017-03-25T10:09:41  *** bambum has quit IRC
147 2017-03-25T10:10:43  *** bambum has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
148 2017-03-25T10:22:04  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] practicalswift opened pull request #10075: Remove unused C++ code not covered by unit tests (master...unused) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10075
149 2017-03-25T10:51:57  *** vicenteH has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
150 2017-03-25T11:15:48  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5d7eb39aecda...90dd9e6c4c0c
151 2017-03-25T11:15:48  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b1f584d Matthew Zipkin: fix build if spaces in src dir path
152 2017-03-25T11:15:49  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 90dd9e6 Wladimir J. van der Laan: Merge #9946: Fix build errors if spaces in path or parent directory...
153 2017-03-25T11:16:04  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] laanwj closed pull request #9946: Fix build errors if spaces in path or parent directory (master...dirspaces2) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9946
154 2017-03-25T11:26:10  *** Ylbam has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
155 2017-03-25T11:42:10  *** blur3d has quit IRC
156 2017-03-25T11:45:10  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
157 2017-03-25T11:53:06  *** jtimon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
158 2017-03-25T12:05:10  *** harrymm has quit IRC
159 2017-03-25T12:34:56  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
160 2017-03-25T13:00:26  *** cannon-c has quit IRC
161 2017-03-25T13:03:43  *** guyonabike has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
162 2017-03-25T13:13:06  *** roidster has quit IRC
163 2017-03-25T13:18:07  <guyonabike> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10074 <- are the names for the p2p messages accurate? I was thinking that maybe "fraud/getfraud" may be a good name to be used for other fraud proofs for spv, like tx inclusion/exclusion
164 2017-03-25T13:41:17  *** afk11 has quit IRC
165 2017-03-25T13:41:31  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
166 2017-03-25T13:48:04  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
167 2017-03-25T13:50:06  <luke-jr> guyonabike: yes, it's extensible
168 2017-03-25T13:50:14  <luke-jr> guyonabike: see the FP type
169 2017-03-25T13:51:10  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
170 2017-03-25T13:53:38  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
171 2017-03-25T14:01:36  <guyonabike> as far as i understood from the code, the fraud, but I'm not sure about getfraud, perhaps add something analogous to invtype in getinv?
172 2017-03-25T14:02:13  <guyonabike> luke-jr: sorry if I'm not making much sense, I'm relatively new in this
173 2017-03-25T14:03:05  <luke-jr> did you read BIP 180? that might help ;)
174 2017-03-25T14:12:09  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #10076: [qa] combine_logs: Use ordered list for logfiles (master...Mf1703-orderedLog) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10076
175 2017-03-25T14:19:49  *** nejon has quit IRC
176 2017-03-25T14:20:33  <guyonabike> luke-jr: thanks. i was thinking on fraud proofs for mempool txs received by spv clients, where I could ask a random node for validation, but now I think that might be dangerous and probably more aligned to be a rpc call
177 2017-03-25T14:20:36  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
178 2017-03-25T14:21:13  <guyonabike> luke-jr: thanks for writing this bip, its great work
179 2017-03-25T14:31:45  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
180 2017-03-25T14:35:18  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #10077: [qa] Add setnetworkactive smoke test (master...Mf1703-toggleNet) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10077
181 2017-03-25T15:13:14  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke pushed 2 new commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/90dd9e6c4c0c...111849345bb5
182 2017-03-25T15:13:14  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 803e6a3 Nicolas Dorier: [QA] Fix typo in fundrawtransaction test...
183 2017-03-25T15:13:15  <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 1118493 MarcoFalke: Merge #10069: [QA] Fix typo in fundrawtransaction test...
184 2017-03-25T15:13:36  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke closed pull request #10069: [QA] Fix typo in fundrawtransaction test (master...patch-3) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10069
185 2017-03-25T15:21:30  *** n1ce has quit IRC
186 2017-03-25T15:22:21  *** n1ce has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
187 2017-03-25T15:24:05  *** bitcoinreminder_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
188 2017-03-25T15:25:40  *** owowo has quit IRC
189 2017-03-25T15:30:42  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
190 2017-03-25T15:46:21  <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] MarcoFalke opened pull request #10078: [qa] Fundraw: Use named args to limit scope of names (master...Mf1703-qaNamedShadow) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10078
191 2017-03-25T16:11:29  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
192 2017-03-25T16:14:01  *** d9b4bef9 has quit IRC
193 2017-03-25T16:14:38  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
194 2017-03-25T16:15:08  *** d9b4bef9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
195 2017-03-25T16:24:02  *** guyonabike has quit IRC
196 2017-03-25T16:30:42  *** nejon has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
197 2017-03-25T17:16:55  *** Sosumi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
198 2017-03-25T17:26:14  *** roidster has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
199 2017-03-25T17:35:19  *** n1ce_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
200 2017-03-25T17:38:35  *** n1ce has quit IRC
201 2017-03-25T18:02:42  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
202 2017-03-25T18:17:04  *** bambum has quit IRC
203 2017-03-25T18:36:19  *** kadoban has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
204 2017-03-25T18:45:04  *** roidster has quit IRC
205 2017-03-25T18:53:18  *** laurentmt has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
206 2017-03-25T18:57:44  *** laurentmt has quit IRC
207 2017-03-25T19:07:35  *** RealM9 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
208 2017-03-25T19:12:09  *** harrymm has quit IRC
209 2017-03-25T19:16:41  <RealM9> So, when will you sign BIP148 binaries?
210 2017-03-25T19:22:14  *** RealM9 has quit IRC
211 2017-03-25T19:28:33  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
212 2017-03-25T19:30:52  <gmaxwell> In case "RealM9" comes back, I don't think anyone who regularly works on Bitcoin Core has even looked much at BIP148 yet.
213 2017-03-25T19:31:23  <gmaxwell> We're certantly not going to ship a consensus change proposal that is only a couple weeks old.
214 2017-03-25T19:32:58  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
215 2017-03-25T19:38:43  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
216 2017-03-25T19:49:54  *** mol has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
217 2017-03-25T19:52:05  *** moli_ has quit IRC
218 2017-03-25T19:53:31  *** afk11 has quit IRC
219 2017-03-25T19:55:00  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
220 2017-03-25T19:55:44  *** afk11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
221 2017-03-25T20:04:10  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
222 2017-03-25T20:06:32  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
223 2017-03-25T20:51:29  *** justan0theruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
224 2017-03-25T20:54:27  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
225 2017-03-25T20:58:03  *** roidster has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
226 2017-03-25T21:14:43  *** Sosumi has quit IRC
227 2017-03-25T21:27:04  *** harrymm has quit IRC
228 2017-03-25T21:39:52  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
229 2017-03-25T21:41:02  *** dodomojo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
230 2017-03-25T21:43:24  *** chjj has quit IRC
231 2017-03-25T21:49:43  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
232 2017-03-25T21:51:30  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
233 2017-03-25T21:54:49  *** chjj has quit IRC
234 2017-03-25T22:08:05  *** jtimon has quit IRC
235 2017-03-25T22:09:12  *** dodomojo has quit IRC
236 2017-03-25T22:13:35  *** harrymm has quit IRC
237 2017-03-25T22:35:24  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
238 2017-03-25T22:37:24  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
239 2017-03-25T22:39:52  *** harrymm has quit IRC
240 2017-03-25T22:57:28  *** chjj has quit IRC
241 2017-03-25T23:02:11  *** harrymm has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
242 2017-03-25T23:22:42  *** CubicEar_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
243 2017-03-25T23:22:45  *** CubicEarth_ has quit IRC
244 2017-03-25T23:23:39  *** isle2983 has quit IRC
245 2017-03-25T23:30:23  *** chjj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
246 2017-03-25T23:44:26  *** isle2983 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev