12018-09-25T00:00:50  *** promag has quit IRC
  22018-09-25T00:05:33  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  32018-09-25T00:10:03  *** promag has quit IRC
  42018-09-25T00:13:07  <echeveria> phantomcircuit: tig.
  52018-09-25T00:18:15  <gmaxwell> luke-jr: I think the messages you are sending out complaining about upgrades are making people more ignorant, I'm seeing a lot of posts like https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/9impf7/cant_we_just_uasf_away_from_any_nodes_that_arent/e6kt857/
  62018-09-25T00:18:48  <gmaxwell> I don't think there is anything wrong with the upgrade progress.
  72018-09-25T00:31:19  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
  82018-09-25T00:33:47  *** r8921039 has quit IRC
  92018-09-25T00:35:27  *** promag has quit IRC
 102018-09-25T00:35:30  *** so has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 112018-09-25T00:35:31  *** Kvaciral has quit IRC
 122018-09-25T00:35:36  *** opdenkamp has quit IRC
 132018-09-25T00:36:15  *** infernix has quit IRC
 142018-09-25T00:36:55  *** grafcaps has quit IRC
 152018-09-25T00:38:05  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 162018-09-25T00:45:28  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
 172018-09-25T00:45:54  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 182018-09-25T00:47:07  *** infernix has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 192018-09-25T00:48:26  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 202018-09-25T00:48:36  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 212018-09-25T00:52:58  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
 222018-09-25T00:53:06  *** promag has quit IRC
 232018-09-25T01:01:09  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 242018-09-25T01:01:21  *** keymone has quit IRC
 252018-09-25T01:01:57  *** opdenkamp has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 262018-09-25T01:03:21  *** michaelsdunn1 has quit IRC
 272018-09-25T01:05:17  *** Kvaciral has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 282018-09-25T01:05:44  *** promag has quit IRC
 292018-09-25T01:11:38  <luke-jr> gmaxwell: I don't see how that's at all related
 302018-09-25T01:13:26  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
 312018-09-25T01:16:28  <echeveria> for a start you know that your "4-5%" number is flimsy.
 322018-09-25T01:16:30  <luke-jr> the upgrade process is fine, when there isn't a publicly-known exploit we're vulnerable to..
 332018-09-25T01:17:34  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
 342018-09-25T01:18:50  *** keymone has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 352018-09-25T01:19:59  <gmaxwell> "we're" is an example of you creating confusion there.
 362018-09-25T01:20:16  <gmaxwell> it's suggesting that people are being harmed by others having not upgraded yet.
 372018-09-25T01:20:21  <luke-jr> echeveria: I just posted that after talking here, and it is a heck of a lot LESS flimsy than any 40-50% figures
 382018-09-25T01:20:42  <echeveria> luke-jr: I've always been very explicit in my comments about that number being for listening sockets.
 392018-09-25T01:21:13  <gmaxwell> For all you know virtually everyone accepting transactions or mining is already upgraded.
 402018-09-25T01:21:36  <gmaxwell> And if so, it doesn't matter when the rest upgrade if ever.
 412018-09-25T01:21:52  <luke-jr> echeveria: specifying that doesn't make it any less meaningless with an implication that it matters
 422018-09-25T01:22:52  <luke-jr> gmaxwell: uh, the attacker of this vulnerability is miner(s); that they have upgraded for now is useful, but not security
 432018-09-25T01:23:21  <luke-jr> and too many non-full nodes DOES potentially harm full nodes
 442018-09-25T01:24:45  <echeveria> you care about at least one of your peers being safe. at this point with all probability, a listening socket you are connected to is safe. the number does have significance if you are making the assumption (and you are) that most nodes are non-listening.
 452018-09-25T01:25:03  <luke-jr> that ignores the economic side of things
 462018-09-25T01:25:31  <luke-jr> if 90% of the economy is working with an invalid chain, it's the full nodes that will be left in the cold with worthless tokens
 472018-09-25T01:26:46  *** jpe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 482018-09-25T01:27:01  <echeveria> yes, but you can't measure this.
 492018-09-25T01:27:26  <echeveria> you're no doubt aware as much as me, most economic activity happens on non-validating systems.
 502018-09-25T01:27:51  <sipa> when you upgrade consciously, you make a determination that the new rules are the ones you consider valid; you don't care about what others think is valid
 512018-09-25T01:27:53  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 522018-09-25T01:28:09  <echeveria> luke-jr: if you want to get Coinbase to upgrade, go talk to Blockchain.info or Blockcypher, badgering people to upgrade their systems is admirable, and optimal, but doesn't solve your problems.
 532018-09-25T01:28:10  <luke-jr> echeveria: that's speculation, and extremely dangerous if true
 542018-09-25T01:28:11  <sipa> or at least, the point where what others think is valid is relevant, but only before you decide to upgrade
 552018-09-25T01:29:02  <luke-jr> echeveria: it would basically mean Bitcoin is just another centralised PayPal already
 562018-09-25T01:29:15  <sipa> i disagree
 572018-09-25T01:29:16  <luke-jr> sipa: you care what others think is valid, if you want to pay them
 582018-09-25T01:29:22  <sipa> luke-jr: of course
 592018-09-25T01:29:23  *** jpe__ has quit IRC
 602018-09-25T01:29:28  <echeveria> luke-jr: now that's a bold claim. lets take this one to a PM or #bitcoin.
 612018-09-25T01:29:35  <sipa> luke-jr: but that feeds into the definition of what full node software to run
 622018-09-25T01:31:54  <phantomcircuit> echeveria, yes that
 632018-09-25T01:31:54  <phantomcircuit> ty
 642018-09-25T01:31:56  <luke-jr> sipa: if you decide to softfork the CVE-2018-17144 fix by upgrading, you want everyone you pay to upgrade too
 652018-09-25T01:31:56  <luke-jr> so that you can be sure they will accept your payments
 662018-09-25T01:31:56  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 672018-09-25T01:31:57  <sipa> once you have made that determination, your definition of valid is fixed, and you don't care who upgrades or not
 682018-09-25T01:31:57  <sipa> for all you know every economically relevant node has upgraded
 692018-09-25T01:31:57  <sipa> this is indeed probably better suited for #bitcoin
 702018-09-25T01:32:07  *** promag has quit IRC
 712018-09-25T01:32:34  <luke-jr> sipa: that's possible only if the number of economically relevant nodes is dangerously low
 722018-09-25T01:33:01  <sipa> luke-jr: fair; you have an incentive to encourage economically relevant nodes to upgrade- but you can't observe which nodes are upgraded
 732018-09-25T01:33:06  <sipa> eh, which are relevant
 742018-09-25T01:33:37  <sipa> my assumption is that 90%+ of listening nodes on the network are not economically relevant at all
 752018-09-25T01:33:41  <luke-jr> I hope it's much more than 4000
 762018-09-25T01:33:56  <luke-jr> sipa: I'm looking at non-listening ones too
 772018-09-25T01:34:41  <echeveria> phantomcircuit: the options aren't obvious, `tig log` is sometimes easier for browsing the source tree, `tig grep` is far better than just using grep in my experience because you get context.
 782018-09-25T01:34:57  <luke-jr> tig?
 792018-09-25T01:38:01  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 802018-09-25T01:39:08  <echeveria> a git ncurses interface.
 812018-09-25T01:40:54  *** grubles has quit IRC
 822018-09-25T01:42:30  *** promag has quit IRC
 832018-09-25T01:45:29  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
 842018-09-25T01:45:55  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 852018-09-25T01:52:40  *** Murchone has quit IRC
 862018-09-25T01:56:33  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 872018-09-25T01:58:59  <jcorgan> +1 for tig, i use it frequently
 882018-09-25T02:00:53  *** promag has quit IRC
 892018-09-25T02:17:37  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 902018-09-25T02:21:51  *** promag has quit IRC
 912018-09-25T02:26:44  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 922018-09-25T02:30:33  *** RubenSomsen has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 932018-09-25T02:30:47  *** promag has quit IRC
 942018-09-25T02:41:43  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 952018-09-25T02:42:02  *** murrayn has quit IRC
 962018-09-25T02:45:29  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
 972018-09-25T02:45:58  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
 982018-09-25T02:46:03  *** promag has quit IRC
 992018-09-25T02:51:18  *** nullptr| has quit IRC
1002018-09-25T02:51:29  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1012018-09-25T02:52:54  <ken2812221> cfields: jonasschnelli: code signatures reminder for 0.15.2 and 0.14.3. Hope that the binaries can be released ASAP.
1022018-09-25T02:56:11  *** promag has quit IRC
1032018-09-25T03:16:36  *** treyzania has quit IRC
1042018-09-25T03:17:28  *** treyzania has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052018-09-25T03:20:20  *** nullptr| has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1062018-09-25T03:31:08  *** games_ has quit IRC
1072018-09-25T03:38:47  *** rafaeltokyo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082018-09-25T03:38:58  *** rafaeltokyo has left #bitcoin-core-dev
1092018-09-25T03:40:00  *** Fyns_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1102018-09-25T03:41:13  *** Krellan has quit IRC
1112018-09-25T03:45:29  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1122018-09-25T03:45:55  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1132018-09-25T03:50:16  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1142018-09-25T03:54:35  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1152018-09-25T04:22:53  *** Fyns_ has quit IRC
1162018-09-25T04:26:37  *** morcos has quit IRC
1172018-09-25T04:27:19  *** morcos has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1182018-09-25T04:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1192018-09-25T04:45:56  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1202018-09-25T04:57:08  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212018-09-25T05:05:06  *** promag has quit IRC
1222018-09-25T05:24:39  *** rex4539 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1232018-09-25T05:28:05  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1242018-09-25T05:32:29  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1252018-09-25T05:33:51  *** intcat has quit IRC
1262018-09-25T05:35:28  *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1272018-09-25T05:35:40  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1282018-09-25T05:40:01  *** rh0nj has quit IRC
1292018-09-25T05:40:28  *** promag has quit IRC
1302018-09-25T05:41:07  *** rh0nj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1312018-09-25T05:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1322018-09-25T05:45:56  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1332018-09-25T05:47:21  *** murrayn[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1342018-09-25T05:49:45  *** murrayn[m] has quit IRC
1352018-09-25T05:50:10  *** ken2812221_ has quit IRC
1362018-09-25T05:50:55  *** murrayn[m] has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1372018-09-25T06:13:09  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1382018-09-25T06:18:08  *** promag has quit IRC
1392018-09-25T06:18:12  *** rex4539 has quit IRC
1402018-09-25T06:35:27  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1412018-09-25T06:40:02  *** echonaut has quit IRC
1422018-09-25T06:40:06  *** promag has quit IRC
1432018-09-25T06:40:10  *** echonaut11 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1442018-09-25T06:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1452018-09-25T06:45:55  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462018-09-25T06:48:49  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1472018-09-25T06:53:20  *** promag has quit IRC
1482018-09-25T06:59:31  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492018-09-25T07:03:47  *** promag has quit IRC
1502018-09-25T07:04:07  *** setpill has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1512018-09-25T07:04:45  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522018-09-25T07:05:22  *** csknk has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1532018-09-25T07:07:20  <provoostenator> echeveria: fwif blockchain.info is upgraded
1542018-09-25T07:09:30  *** promag has quit IRC
1552018-09-25T07:20:54  <jonasschnelli> ken2812221: Yes. We'll take care about it today.
1562018-09-25T07:23:37  *** booyah has quit IRC
1572018-09-25T07:24:46  *** booyah has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1582018-09-25T07:28:50  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1592018-09-25T07:34:35  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
1602018-09-25T07:41:39  *** murrayn has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1612018-09-25T07:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1622018-09-25T07:45:57  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1632018-09-25T07:49:34  *** waxwing has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1642018-09-25T08:17:01  <booyah> how to measure disk use for UTXO and for blockchain?  tesetnet3 uses 24 GB with prune=3000, is really tesetnet UTXO that big, or some bug
1652018-09-25T08:27:51  *** timothy has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1662018-09-25T08:35:31  <echeveria> provoostenator: since when do they even run a validating node?
1672018-09-25T08:35:57  <echeveria> provoostenator: they were always just bitcoinj with validation disabled, which is why they kept showing wildly invalid transactions like the "one spending satoshi's coins".
1682018-09-25T08:38:10  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1692018-09-25T08:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1702018-09-25T08:45:56  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1712018-09-25T09:00:00  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1722018-09-25T09:20:53  <ken2812221> jonasschnelli: Thanks
1732018-09-25T09:26:43  <jonasschnelli> booyah: 25GB is without pruning....
1742018-09-25T09:26:58  <jonasschnelli> the UTXO set is ~1GB
1752018-09-25T09:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1762018-09-25T09:45:57  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1772018-09-25T10:13:17  *** promag has quit IRC
1782018-09-25T10:16:50  *** josephnicholas has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1792018-09-25T10:25:54  *** ppaqmj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1802018-09-25T10:34:53  *** josephnicholas has quit IRC
1812018-09-25T10:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1822018-09-25T10:45:58  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1832018-09-25T10:56:40  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1842018-09-25T10:59:54  *** t0adst00l has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1852018-09-25T11:00:50  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1862018-09-25T11:10:21  *** Guyver2 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1872018-09-25T11:11:46  *** csknk has quit IRC
1882018-09-25T11:33:05  *** ula has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1892018-09-25T11:44:17  *** promag has quit IRC
1902018-09-25T11:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
1912018-09-25T11:45:58  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1922018-09-25T11:49:38  *** intcat has quit IRC
1932018-09-25T11:51:24  *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1942018-09-25T12:16:22  *** rex4539 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1952018-09-25T12:17:44  *** jouke_ has quit IRC
1962018-09-25T12:18:08  *** sdaftuar has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1972018-09-25T12:18:45  *** sipa has quit IRC
1982018-09-25T12:19:04  *** sipa has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1992018-09-25T12:20:13  *** games_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2002018-09-25T12:24:18  *** ilyachesnokov has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2012018-09-25T12:24:55  <ilyachesnokov> join #bitcoin
2022018-09-25T12:26:28  <ilyachesnokov> join #bitcoin
2032018-09-25T12:28:14  <queip> ilyachesnokov: it's /join #bitcoin , bro
2042018-09-25T12:28:29  <ilyachesnokov> huh
2052018-09-25T12:29:07  <ilyachesnokov> has anybody used indexd software from bitcoinjs repo?
2062018-09-25T12:29:28  <ilyachesnokov> it is external index for bitcoin core
2072018-09-25T12:31:07  <queip> ilyachesnokov: that is a good question but for #bitcoin channel, not here, which you can join by /join #bitcoin  including the leading slash character, and writting in the new window that opens
2082018-09-25T12:31:58  <ilyachesnokov> fine will ask there
2092018-09-25T12:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
2102018-09-25T12:45:55  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2112018-09-25T12:51:35  *** SopaXorzTaker has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2122018-09-25T13:06:20  *** h1d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2132018-09-25T13:11:09  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2142018-09-25T13:34:02  *** victorSN has quit IRC
2152018-09-25T13:34:02  *** rockhouse has quit IRC
2162018-09-25T13:36:57  *** rockhouse has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2172018-09-25T13:36:58  *** victorSN has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2182018-09-25T13:45:30  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
2192018-09-25T13:45:59  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2202018-09-25T13:46:37  <sdaftuar> have there been reports of spurious test failures on the appveyor runs?  eg https://ci.appveyor.com/project/DrahtBot/bitcoin/build/master.1638
2212018-09-25T13:49:18  *** ilyachesnokov has quit IRC
2222018-09-25T14:01:39  *** Nebraskka has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2232018-09-25T14:20:39  *** phwalkr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2242018-09-25T14:21:01  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
2252018-09-25T14:29:29  *** michaelsdunn1 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2262018-09-25T14:31:21  *** sfhi has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2272018-09-25T14:38:00  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2282018-09-25T14:38:57  *** rex4539 has quit IRC
2292018-09-25T14:45:31  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
2302018-09-25T14:45:33  *** grafcaps has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2312018-09-25T14:45:58  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2322018-09-25T14:52:56  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
2332018-09-25T15:00:22  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2342018-09-25T15:13:27  *** Murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2352018-09-25T15:14:36  *** promag has quit IRC
2362018-09-25T15:19:24  *** SopaXorzTaker has quit IRC
2372018-09-25T15:35:40  *** irc_viewer_test has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2382018-09-25T15:37:36  *** irc_viewer_test has quit IRC
2392018-09-25T15:41:51  <cfields> er, I didn't think we were signing those binaries. I don't believe the Windows ones can be, at least.
2402018-09-25T15:44:53  <achow101> cfields, why?
2412018-09-25T15:44:56  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
2422018-09-25T15:45:31  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
2432018-09-25T15:45:43  <cfields> achow101: the certificate expired
2442018-09-25T15:45:58  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2452018-09-25T15:47:04  <cfields> achow101: we got a new cert for 0.16 iirc, and the build-scripts include the cert so that the wrong one can't be used on accident
2462018-09-25T15:47:51  <achow101> can't you use the new one?
2472018-09-25T15:49:18  <cfields> wumpus: thoughts on ^^? I could hack the scripts and do it manually, I *think* the gitian process would still work in that case. But I'm not sure signatures for unsupported releases is a good idea in principle.
2482018-09-25T15:49:55  <cfields> er, I suppose 0.15 is still supported until 0.17 is out the door
2492018-09-25T15:50:09  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2502018-09-25T15:51:32  <achow101> 0.14 is still technically not EOL
2512018-09-25T15:52:07  <achow101> so it's still supported for critical security fixes
2522018-09-25T15:54:41  <cfields> ugh, ok. I'll see what's possible.
2532018-09-25T15:55:22  <achow101> cfields: you can do 0.15.2 at least, it looks like the current cert is in that repo
2542018-09-25T15:55:33  <achow101> s/repo/branch
2552018-09-25T15:55:35  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2562018-09-25T15:58:44  <cfields> hmm, the history there isn't lining up the way I remembered. Maybe 0.15 used the new cert as well?
2572018-09-25T15:59:20  *** promag has quit IRC
2582018-09-25T16:00:30  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
2592018-09-25T16:01:36  <achow101> cfields: #9514
2602018-09-25T16:01:38  <gribble> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/9514 | release: Windows signing script by theuni · Pull Request #9514 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2612018-09-25T16:02:42  <achow101> hasn't changed since then
2622018-09-25T16:02:47  * cfields facepalms
2632018-09-25T16:02:55  <cfields> achow101: you're right, it's macOS that expired
2642018-09-25T16:03:40  <cfields> so win signing should be fine. Let's see what trouble that gives us instead.
2652018-09-25T16:08:54  <achow101> cfields: I think macOS signing should be fine. the cert isn't even in the repo and I believe the scripts are outdated
2662018-09-25T16:09:07  <achow101> *outdated or haven't changed in a while
2672018-09-25T16:10:02  <cfields> achow101: yes, looks like you're right.
2682018-09-25T16:10:13  <cfields> ok, building quickly.
2692018-09-25T16:26:04  *** nullptr| has quit IRC
2702018-09-25T16:27:36  *** nullptr| has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2712018-09-25T16:30:37  *** bralyclow has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2722018-09-25T16:36:09  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2732018-09-25T16:36:58  *** grubles has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2742018-09-25T16:45:31  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
2752018-09-25T16:45:59  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2762018-09-25T16:53:18  *** irc_viewer_test has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2772018-09-25T16:56:16  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2782018-09-25T16:57:35  *** jarthur has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2792018-09-25T17:00:25  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
2802018-09-25T17:05:08  *** irc_viewer_test has quit IRC
2812018-09-25T17:10:58  *** belcher has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2822018-09-25T17:11:32  *** promag has quit IRC
2832018-09-25T17:14:47  *** Guyver2 has quit IRC
2842018-09-25T17:27:16  *** Sinclair_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2852018-09-25T17:29:07  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
2862018-09-25T17:29:21  *** Sinclair6 has quit IRC
2872018-09-25T17:30:25  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2882018-09-25T17:31:18  *** rex4539 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2892018-09-25T17:44:03  *** phwalkr has quit IRC
2902018-09-25T18:00:08  *** timothy has quit IRC
2912018-09-25T18:04:22  *** intcat has quit IRC
2922018-09-25T18:06:05  *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2932018-09-25T18:18:33  *** bralyclow has quit IRC
2942018-09-25T18:22:20  *** setpill has quit IRC
2952018-09-25T18:31:43  *** jarthur has quit IRC
2962018-09-25T18:36:06  *** hebasto has quit IRC
2972018-09-25T18:45:31  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
2982018-09-25T18:45:57  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2992018-09-25T18:48:01  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
3002018-09-25T18:48:28  *** tryphe_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3012018-09-25T18:51:20  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
3022018-09-25T18:52:37  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3032018-09-25T18:57:03  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3042018-09-25T19:02:08  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC
3052018-09-25T19:13:42  *** irc_viewer_test has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3062018-09-25T19:20:18  <jonasschnelli> Building some PRs in Gitian and getting "No space left on device" errors while building linux (but there is space left on the host).
3072018-09-25T19:20:19  <jonasschnelli> https://bitcoin.jonasschnelli.ch/build/801
3082018-09-25T19:20:22  <jonasschnelli> Could this be a container size constraints issue?
3092018-09-25T19:24:03  <achow101> jonasschnelli: what virtualization are you using? that seems like the container image isn't big enough
3102018-09-25T19:24:13  <jonasschnelli> achow101: LXC
3112018-09-25T19:24:27  <jonasschnelli> Now clue how to set the container size
3122018-09-25T19:25:08  *** jarthur has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3132018-09-25T19:27:49  *** owowo has quit IRC
3142018-09-25T19:27:58  *** sfhi has quit IRC
3152018-09-25T19:28:03  <achow101> jonasschnelli: I think you will need to modify make-base-vm in gitian-builder/bin
3162018-09-25T19:29:13  <achow101> it invokes dd near the end of the lxc setup stuff. I think if you make that larger the container will be larger
3172018-09-25T19:29:40  <jonasschnelli> dd if=/dev/zero of=$OUT-lxc bs=1M count=1 seek=10240
3182018-09-25T19:30:13  <achow101> yeah, that line
3192018-09-25T19:31:03  <jonasschnelli> trying...
3202018-09-25T19:33:44  *** owowo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3212018-09-25T19:35:00  *** irc_viewer_test has quit IRC
3222018-09-25T19:54:18  *** ula has quit IRC
3232018-09-25T20:12:39  <cfields> jonasschnelli: sorry, builds are taking a while here too
3242018-09-25T20:14:11  <jonasschnelli> cfields: no worries...
3252018-09-25T20:22:18  *** jarthur has quit IRC
3262018-09-25T20:22:28  *** hex17or has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3272018-09-25T20:26:48  *** hex17or has quit IRC
3282018-09-25T20:30:09  *** RubenSomsen has quit IRC
3292018-09-25T20:31:09  <luke-jr> jonasschnelli: I have a PR for gitian-builder that lets you set disk sizes, but it doesn't support LXC
3302018-09-25T20:31:50  <jonasschnelli> luke-jr: hmm... is there a reason why it doesn't support LXC? Is it not possible or just not done?
3312018-09-25T20:32:17  <luke-jr> I don't use LXC, so I didn't even try to implement it
3322018-09-25T20:32:47  <luke-jr> I would think it's possible, but probably fundamentally different in how to implement
3332018-09-25T20:36:07  *** ghost43_ has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3342018-09-25T20:36:21  *** ghost43 has quit IRC
3352018-09-25T20:39:28  *** hex17or has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3362018-09-25T20:43:45  *** hex17or has quit IRC
3372018-09-25T20:50:03  *** hex17or has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3382018-09-25T20:52:04  *** ghost43_ has quit IRC
3392018-09-25T20:52:17  *** ghost43 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3402018-09-25T21:04:25  *** promag has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3412018-09-25T21:06:23  *** intcat has quit IRC
3422018-09-25T21:12:45  *** h1d has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3432018-09-25T21:14:42  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
3442018-09-25T21:22:20  *** tryphe_ has quit IRC
3452018-09-25T21:23:30  *** tryphe has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3462018-09-25T21:28:25  *** morcos has quit IRC
3472018-09-25T21:28:39  *** morcos has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3482018-09-25T21:28:56  *** michaelsdunn1 has quit IRC
3492018-09-25T21:30:17  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3502018-09-25T21:33:14  *** drgrid is now known as TheCharlatan
3512018-09-25T21:34:01  *** rh0nj has quit IRC
3522018-09-25T21:34:18  *** dqx has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3532018-09-25T21:34:18  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
3542018-09-25T21:35:07  *** rh0nj has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3552018-09-25T21:35:37  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3562018-09-25T21:38:31  <provoostenator> Rolling back after upgrading a pre-segwit node also blows up memory: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14289#issuecomment-424510417
3572018-09-25T21:39:11  <sipa> provoostenator: and do you know whether the same was true in 0.16?
3582018-09-25T21:40:10  <provoostenator> I kept a copy of the 0.13 database pre downgrade, so will try with 0.16 tomorrow when I'm recovered from the Ams dev meetup :-)
3592018-09-25T21:40:39  <provoostenator> I can test fixes as well.
3602018-09-25T21:42:24  <gmaxwell> it probably don't matter that much if it's also true on 0.16. We need to fix it or disable the rollback and shut down with a message that you need to sync from scratch.
3612018-09-25T21:43:02  *** phwalkr has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3622018-09-25T21:45:08  <provoostenator> Given how slow rollback is, I think that even in the first scenario the release notes could suggest syncing from scratch unless the user is really network constrained.
3632018-09-25T21:45:53  *** phwalkr has quit IRC
3642018-09-25T21:46:06  <provoostenator> (though perhaps it's faster with the memory fix)
3652018-09-25T21:46:12  <gmaxwell> rollback is as slow as it is in part because of the same thing that is causing the memory blowup.
3662018-09-25T21:46:56  <gmaxwell> I wouldn't be shocked if a sync from scratch weren't faster regardless... but IIRC without the memory blowup rollback and forward are pretty close in speed.
3672018-09-25T21:50:11  <sipa> depends how deep it is :)
3682018-09-25T21:50:23  <sipa> if your node has been offline since 1 week after segwit activated...
3692018-09-25T21:51:48  <gmaxwell> perhaps we should fix the bloat, and measure the speed ... I'd say we should remove the rollback logic if it's really a loss ignoring assumptions like that, but the rollback logic will be useful for future softforks.
3702018-09-25T21:52:40  *** AaronvanW has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3712018-09-25T21:54:16  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has quit IRC
3722018-09-25T22:03:37  <esotericnonsense> I was thinking about this just now actually. i'm syncing a node on ZFS at the moment
3732018-09-25T22:04:41  <esotericnonsense> was thinking about testing rollback by just restoring old snapshots (yes it's going to balloon my disk space)
3742018-09-25T22:05:49  <gmaxwell> for this case, you need to sync up to current with pre-segwit code.. then switch to post segwit code.
3752018-09-25T22:08:08  <esotericnonsense> re syncing from scratch; this is uninformed, but just a guess; could you reindex instead? when the segwit node hits the first block that has missing segwit data it can sync from there, right
3762018-09-25T22:08:37  <esotericnonsense> (not relevant in the long term, but right now you'd skip redownloading what, 100GB or so?)
3772018-09-25T22:11:18  *** nullptr| has quit IRC
3782018-09-25T22:12:03  *** shinohai has quit IRC
3792018-09-25T22:16:30  <gmaxwell> yes, I'm not sure that it'll delete the useless data though.
3802018-09-25T22:19:00  *** nullptr| has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3812018-09-25T22:38:32  <cfields> gitian builders: Detached sigs for v0.14.3 and v0.15.2 are pushed. My apologies for the delay.
3822018-09-25T22:39:26  *** belcher has quit IRC
3832018-09-25T22:50:25  *** Murch has quit IRC
3842018-09-25T22:51:36  *** Murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3852018-09-25T23:01:18  *** justanotheruser has quit IRC
3862018-09-25T23:01:36  *** justanotheruser has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3872018-09-25T23:01:56  *** Giszmo has quit IRC
3882018-09-25T23:14:36  *** Murch has quit IRC
3892018-09-25T23:16:30  *** Giszmo has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3902018-09-25T23:16:52  *** Murch has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3912018-09-25T23:20:47  *** Chris_Stewart_5 has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3922018-09-25T23:31:27  *** murrayn[m] has quit IRC
3932018-09-25T23:45:55  *** Victorsueca has quit IRC
3942018-09-25T23:47:11  *** Victorsueca has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3952018-09-25T23:47:55  *** intcat has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3962018-09-25T23:52:21  *** AaronvanW has quit IRC