12025-06-19T00:02:46 *** Zenton <Zenton!~Zenton@user/zenton> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
22025-06-19T00:03:39 *** bitdex <bitdex!~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
32025-06-19T00:04:14 *** jespada <jespada!~jespada@r179-24-16-28.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
42025-06-19T00:07:09 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
52025-06-19T00:07:26 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
62025-06-19T00:07:45 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 pushed 6 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/5e6dbfd14ea9...9a7eece5a4a1
72025-06-19T00:07:45 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 74690f4 Sjors Provoost: validation: refactor TestBlockValidity
82025-06-19T00:07:46 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 6077157 Sjors Provoost: ipc: drop BlockValidationState special handling
92025-06-19T00:07:46 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 94959b8 Sjors Provoost: Add checkBlock to Mining interface
102025-06-19T00:07:47 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 merged pull request #31981: Add checkBlock() to Mining interface (master...2025/03/checkBlock) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/31981
112025-06-19T00:41:03 *** Zenton <Zenton!~Zenton@user/zenton> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
122025-06-19T01:30:16 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
132025-06-19T01:30:31 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
142025-06-19T01:38:11 *** dviola <dviola!~diego@user/dviola> has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
152025-06-19T01:40:19 *** diego <diego!~diego@2804:14c:5781:836f::871> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
162025-06-19T01:40:48 *** diego is now known as Guest5514
172025-06-19T01:49:37 *** Earnestly <Earnestly!~earnest@user/earnestly> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
182025-06-19T01:56:48 *** Guest5514 <Guest5514!~diego@2804:14c:5781:836f::871> has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
192025-06-19T02:01:48 *** diego <diego!~diego@2804:14c:5781:836f:3a3d:f830:e232:a495> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
202025-06-19T02:02:18 *** diego is now known as Guest8434
212025-06-19T02:19:18 *** _flood <_flood!~flooded@37.120.219.243> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
222025-06-19T02:30:29 *** Guest8434 <Guest8434!~diego@2804:14c:5781:836f:3a3d:f830:e232:a495> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
232025-06-19T02:32:12 *** diego <diego!~diego@177.34.235.126> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
242025-06-19T02:32:39 *** diego is now known as Guest6261
252025-06-19T02:38:12 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has quit IRC (Quit: ZNC 1.10.0 - https://znc.in)
262025-06-19T02:56:25 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
272025-06-19T02:56:41 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
282025-06-19T03:17:14 *** robszarka <robszarka!~szarka@2603:3003:4eac:100:39ac:1176:703a:ac6f> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
292025-06-19T03:20:39 *** szarka <szarka!~szarka@2603:3003:4eac:100:850b:8664:1549:f92c> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
302025-06-19T03:53:09 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
312025-06-19T04:01:01 *** cmirror <cmirror!~cmirror@4.53.92.114> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
322025-06-19T04:01:33 *** cmirror <cmirror!~cmirror@4.53.92.114> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
332025-06-19T04:13:31 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
342025-06-19T04:13:52 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
352025-06-19T04:18:50 *** conman <conman!~con@180-150-21-3.b49615.mel.static.aussiebb.net> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
362025-06-19T04:19:14 *** conman <conman!~con@180-150-21-3.b49615.mel.static.aussiebb.net> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
372025-06-19T04:30:46 *** saturday- <saturday-!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
382025-06-19T04:31:54 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
392025-06-19T05:37:36 *** vasild_ <vasild_!~vd@user/vasild> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
402025-06-19T05:37:44 *** vasild <vasild!~vd@user/vasild> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
412025-06-19T05:46:53 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
422025-06-19T05:47:45 *** saturday- <saturday-!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has quit IRC (Quit: ZNC 1.10.0 - https://znc.in)
432025-06-19T05:53:54 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
442025-06-19T06:16:16 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
452025-06-19T06:21:15 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
462025-06-19T06:28:53 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] maflcko opened pull request #32774: doc: Explain how to fetch commits directly (master...2506-doc-fetch-commit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32774
472025-06-19T06:35:41 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
482025-06-19T06:48:19 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
492025-06-19T07:12:45 *** Guyver2 <Guyver2!~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
502025-06-19T07:15:43 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
512025-06-19T07:24:29 *** mcey_ <mcey_!~emcy@148.252.146.150> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
522025-06-19T07:27:45 *** mcey <mcey!~emcy@148.252.128.96> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
532025-06-19T07:32:11 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
542025-06-19T07:37:40 *** mcey_ <mcey_!~emcy@148.252.146.150> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
552025-06-19T07:37:58 *** mcey_ <mcey_!~emcy@148.252.146.150> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
562025-06-19T07:52:58 *** S3RK_ <S3RK_!~S3RK@user/s3rk> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
572025-06-19T07:53:30 *** Earnestly <Earnestly!~earnest@user/earnestly> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
582025-06-19T07:56:10 *** S3RK <S3RK!~S3RK@user/s3rk> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
592025-06-19T08:14:36 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
602025-06-19T08:18:20 *** l0rinc <l0rinc!~l0rinc@user/l0rinc> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
612025-06-19T08:20:08 *** Dansken <Dansken!~quassel@213.204.245.6> has quit IRC (Quit: https://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.)
622025-06-19T08:20:35 *** Dansken <Dansken!~quassel@213.204.245.6> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
632025-06-19T08:20:49 *** Guyver2 <Guyver2!~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net> has quit IRC (Quit: Going offline, see ya! (www.adiirc.com))
642025-06-19T08:35:10 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
652025-06-19T08:54:09 *** l0rinc <l0rinc!~l0rinc@user/l0rinc> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
662025-06-19T09:02:43 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
672025-06-19T09:16:16 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Sjors opened pull request #32776: doc: taproot became always active in v24.0 (master...2025/06/taproot-bip) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32776
682025-06-19T09:18:05 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 4 commits to 28.x: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e5a9e2435f16...e44d72b6480a
692025-06-19T09:18:06 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/28.x 3cd4fdb Ava Chow: build: Bump to 28.2
702025-06-19T09:18:06 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/28.x 90f78c7 Ava Chow: docs: Regenerate manpages for 28.2
712025-06-19T09:18:06 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/28.x 7135d75 Ava Chow: docs: Release notes for 28.2
722025-06-19T09:18:08 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #32766: [28.x] Finalize 28.2 (28.x...28.2-final) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32766
732025-06-19T09:21:31 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
742025-06-19T09:43:15 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has quit IRC (Quit: ZNC 1.10.0 - https://znc.in)
752025-06-19T09:49:00 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
762025-06-19T09:49:40 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
772025-06-19T10:02:00 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #32777: doc: fix Transifex 404s (master...transifex_404) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32777
782025-06-19T10:06:13 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
792025-06-19T10:10:39 *** Cory81 <Cory81!~Cory81@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
802025-06-19T10:10:41 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory81@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
812025-06-19T10:27:48 *** darosior1 <darosior1!~darosior@109.205.214.46> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
822025-06-19T10:29:35 *** darosior <darosior!~darosior@109.205.214.46> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
832025-06-19T10:29:35 *** darosior1 is now known as darosior
842025-06-19T10:34:52 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
852025-06-19T10:40:54 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/9a7eece5a4a1...79afe6b7c092
862025-06-19T10:40:55 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 8ee8a95 Sjors Provoost: doc: taproot became always active in v24.0
872025-06-19T10:40:55 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 79afe6b merge-script: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32776: doc: taproot became always active in v24.0 (d...
882025-06-19T10:40:56 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #32776: doc: taproot became always active in v24.0 (doc/bips.md) (master...2025/06/taproot-bip) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32776
892025-06-19T10:44:01 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/79afe6b7c092...b86141925416
902025-06-19T10:44:02 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 53a996f fanquake: doc: fix transifex 404s
912025-06-19T10:44:02 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master b861419 merge-script: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32777: doc: fix Transifex 404s
922025-06-19T10:44:04 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #32777: doc: fix Transifex 404s (master...transifex_404) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32777
932025-06-19T10:44:09 *** darosior <darosior!~darosior@109.205.214.46> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 245 seconds)
942025-06-19T10:52:36 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
952025-06-19T11:01:34 *** jespada <jespada!~jespada@r179-25-212-225.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
962025-06-19T11:11:08 *** darosior <darosior!~darosior@109.205.214.46> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
972025-06-19T11:32:35 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/b86141925416...e18322eff274
982025-06-19T11:32:36 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa94fd5 MarcoFalke: doc: Explain how to fetch commits directly
992025-06-19T11:32:36 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e18322e merge-script: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32774: doc: Explain how to fetch commits directly
1002025-06-19T11:32:38 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #32774: doc: Explain how to fetch commits directly (master...2506-doc-fetch-commit) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32774
1012025-06-19T11:36:26 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1022025-06-19T11:56:58 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1032025-06-19T12:01:51 *** robszarka <robszarka!~szarka@2603:3003:4eac:100:39ac:1176:703a:ac6f> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
1042025-06-19T12:02:10 *** szarka <szarka!~szarka@2603:3003:4eac:100:39ac:1176:703a:ac6f> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1052025-06-19T12:03:20 *** Guyver2 <Guyver2!~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1062025-06-19T12:11:24 *** Guyver2 <Guyver2!~Guyver@77-174-98-73.fixed.kpn.net> has left #bitcoin-core-dev (Closing Window)
1072025-06-19T12:20:36 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1082025-06-19T12:23:06 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory81@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
1092025-06-19T12:23:42 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1102025-06-19T12:27:34 *** jespada <jespada!~jespada@r179-25-212-225.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has quit IRC (Quit: My Mac has gone to sleep. ZZZzzzâ¦)
1112025-06-19T12:34:32 *** jespada <jespada!~jespada@r179-25-212-225.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1122025-06-19T13:01:37 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2804:14d:5285:8318:1539:25a7:bdf0:b72f> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
1132025-06-19T13:18:21 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake opened pull request #32780: lsan: add more Qt suppressions (master...qt_more_lsan) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32780
1142025-06-19T13:28:07 *** Guest6261 <Guest6261!~diego@177.34.235.126> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
1152025-06-19T13:29:26 *** diego <diego!~diego@177.34.235.126> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1162025-06-19T13:29:53 *** diego is now known as Guest8072
1172025-06-19T13:55:50 *** Earnestly <Earnestly!~earnest@user/earnestly> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1182025-06-19T13:57:49 *** Earnestly <Earnestly!~earnest@user/earnestly> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1192025-06-19T14:00:22 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
1202025-06-19T14:00:37 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1212025-06-19T14:04:08 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/e18322eff274...fa183045a1ea
1222025-06-19T14:04:09 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master e285e69 zaidmstrr: test: Fix list index out of range error in feature_bip68_sequence.py
1232025-06-19T14:04:09 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master fa18304 merge-script: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32765: test: Fix list index out of range error in fe...
1242025-06-19T14:04:11 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #32765: test: Fix list index out of range error in feature_bip68_sequence.py (master...test-feature-bip68-fix) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32765
1252025-06-19T14:05:50 *** mudsip <mudsip!~mudsip@user/mudsip> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1262025-06-19T14:07:03 *** mudsip <mudsip!~mudsip@user/mudsip> has quit IRC (Client Quit)
1272025-06-19T14:07:38 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
1282025-06-19T14:07:54 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1292025-06-19T14:14:26 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake pushed 2 commits to master: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/fa183045a1ea...154b98a7aaae
1302025-06-19T14:14:27 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master cd1ae1b brunoerg: fuzz: wallet: remove FundTx from FuzzedWallet
1312025-06-19T14:14:27 <bitcoin-git> bitcoin/master 154b98a merge-script: Merge bitcoin/bitcoin#32772: fuzz: wallet: remove `FundTx` from `FuzzedWal...
1322025-06-19T14:14:28 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] fanquake merged pull request #32772: fuzz: wallet: remove `FundTx` from `FuzzedWallet` (master...2025-06-fuzz-delete-fundtx) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32772
1332025-06-19T14:31:14 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] Sjors opened pull request #32781: refactor: modernize deprecated ipc headers (master...2024/06/tidy) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32781
1342025-06-19T14:39:38 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2803:9810:484c:6110:64b5:fbd0:e6cf:c1d5> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1352025-06-19T15:07:28 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2803:9810:484c:6110:64b5:fbd0:e6cf:c1d5> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
1362025-06-19T15:09:32 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1372025-06-19T15:23:03 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2803:9810:484c:6110:64b5:fbd0:e6cf:c1d5> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1382025-06-19T15:27:35 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2803:9810:484c:6110:64b5:fbd0:e6cf:c1d5> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
1392025-06-19T15:27:55 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoincore.org] dergoegge opened pull request #1146: advisories: Add point of contact details for disclosures (master...sec-poc-details) https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoincore.org/pull/1146
1402025-06-19T15:38:04 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
1412025-06-19T15:42:07 *** OYENRAZOR369 <OYENRAZOR369!~OYENRAZOR@114.10.154.138> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1422025-06-19T15:43:14 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1432025-06-19T15:46:12 <bitcoin-git> [bitcoin] achow101 pushed tag v28.2: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/compare/v28.2
1442025-06-19T15:47:54 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
1452025-06-19T15:54:07 *** zeropoint <zeropoint!~alex@45-28-139-114.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1462025-06-19T15:57:29 *** Emc99 <Emc99!~Emc99@212.129.85.147> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1472025-06-19T15:57:41 *** Emc99 <Emc99!~Emc99@212.129.85.147> has quit IRC (Client Quit)
1482025-06-19T15:57:50 *** Emc99 <Emc99!~Emc99@212.129.85.147> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1492025-06-19T15:58:36 *** Emc99 <Emc99!~Emc99@212.129.85.147> has quit IRC (Client Quit)
1502025-06-19T15:58:39 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1512025-06-19T15:59:03 *** Emc99 <Emc99!~Emc99@212.129.85.147> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1522025-06-19T16:00:10 <achow101> #startmeeting
1532025-06-19T16:00:10 <corebot`> achow101: Meeting started at 2025-06-19T16:00+0000
1542025-06-19T16:00:11 <corebot`> achow101: Current chairs: achow101
1552025-06-19T16:00:12 <corebot`> achow101: Useful commands: #action #info #idea #link #topic #motion #vote #close #endmeeting
1562025-06-19T16:00:13 <corebot`> achow101: See also: https://hcoop-meetbot.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
1572025-06-19T16:00:14 <corebot`> achow101: Participants should now identify themselves with '#here' or with an alias like '#here FirstLast'
1582025-06-19T16:00:22 <TheCharlatan> hi
1592025-06-19T16:00:23 <achow101> #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: abubakarsadiq achow101 _aj_ ajonas b10c brunoerg cfields darosior dergoegge fanquake fjahr furszy gleb glozow hebasto hodlinator instagibbs jarolrod jonatack josibake kanzure laanwj LarryRuane lightlike luke-jr maflcko marcofleon maxedw Murch pinheadmz provoostenator ryanofsky sdaftuar S3RK stickies-v sipa sr_gi tdb3 theStack TheCharlatan vasild willcl-ark
1602025-06-19T16:01:00 <darosior> hi
1612025-06-19T16:01:12 <pinheadmz> Hi from AA3058 to PHX
1622025-06-19T16:01:19 <willcl-ark> hi
1632025-06-19T16:01:28 <sipa> hi
1642025-06-19T16:01:30 <achow101> there is one preproposed meeting topics this week. Any last minute ones to add?
1652025-06-19T16:01:45 <stickies-v> hi
1662025-06-19T16:01:58 <theStack> hi
1672025-06-19T16:02:11 <lightlike> hi
1682025-06-19T16:02:25 <achow101> #topic Kernel WG Update (TheCharlatan)
1692025-06-19T16:02:31 <TheCharlatan> Looking for review on #32317
1702025-06-19T16:02:33 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32317 | kernel: Separate UTXO set access from validation functions by TheCharlatan · Pull Request #32317 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1712025-06-19T16:02:36 <TheCharlatan> ...and some more conceptual feedback on #32427
1722025-06-19T16:02:38 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32427 | (RFC) kernel: Replace leveldb-based BlockTreeDB with flat-file based store by TheCharlatan · Pull Request #32427 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1732025-06-19T16:02:54 <sr_gi[m]1> hi
1742025-06-19T16:03:02 <TheCharlatan> I'm still not convinced by the counter proposal of writing single block files and getting rid of the block index altogether, but there have also has not been complete suggestions yet. I might try to write something up for that.
1752025-06-19T16:03:26 <TheCharlatan> that's all
1762025-06-19T16:03:39 <achow101> #topic Erlay WG Update (sr_gi, gleb)
1772025-06-19T16:05:36 <sr_gi[m]1> I've been focusing on an issue with measuring the propagation time of the warnet simulations for the last few weeks, but I think I'm hitting a wall. The results I'm getting from simulations are promising regarding bandwidth, but the times seem too good to be true. I think something may be wrong with the way I'm testing for times, or there is a bug in the implementation that makes transactions propagate faster than they should
1782025-06-19T16:06:06 <sr_gi[m]1> I think I may need some extra set of eyes here, since I haven't been able to figure it out myself
1792025-06-19T16:06:47 <sr_gi[m]1> I'm currently writing this down and making it easily reproducible in case someone wants to give it a go, whether it is checking the code or the sims
1802025-06-19T16:07:02 <achow101> is there a branch to look at?
1812025-06-19T16:07:04 <pinheadmz> sr_gi[m]1 is your warnet project repo up to date?
1822025-06-19T16:07:54 <sr_gi[m]1> achow101: yes, the full implementation branch is up to date as of yesterday. #30277
1832025-06-19T16:07:57 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30277 | [DO NOT MERGE] Erlay: bandwidth-efficient transaction relay protocol (Full implementation) by sr-gi · Pull Request #30277 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1842025-06-19T16:08:22 *** bugs_ <bugs_!~bugs@user/bugs/x-5128603> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1852025-06-19T16:08:22 *** eugenesiegel <eugenesiegel!~eugenesie@user/eugenesiegel> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1862025-06-19T16:08:59 <sr_gi[m]1> The warnet repo is not, I'll update it today. The branch I'm using for the warnet tests is tho: https://github.com/sr-gi/bitcoin/tree/202406-erlay-full-draft-warnet
1872025-06-19T16:09:11 <sr_gi[m]1> But I'll get all cleaned up and ready today
1882025-06-19T16:09:42 *** OYENRAZOR369 <OYENRAZOR369!~OYENRAZOR@114.10.154.138> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
1892025-06-19T16:09:47 <sr_gi[m]1> That's it from me. Happy to get anyone how's interested up to speed
1902025-06-19T16:10:09 *** OYENRAZOR369 <OYENRAZOR369!~OYENRAZOR@114.10.154.138> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
1912025-06-19T16:10:21 <achow101> #topic Cluster Mempool WG Update (sdaftuar, sipa)
1922025-06-19T16:11:51 <sipa> priority for review remains #31553, which got some recent review that led to discovering a bug in it (the eviction heuristic just wasn't as good as intended, fixed now, and contributed tests added)
1932025-06-19T16:11:55 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31553 | cluster mempool: add TxGraph reorg functionality by sipa · Pull Request #31553 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1942025-06-19T16:12:28 <sipa> #30605 is not urgent, but pretty close to merge, i think; it's just test / comment improvements
1952025-06-19T16:12:31 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30605 | Cluster linearization: separate tests from tests-of-tests by sipa · Pull Request #30605 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1962025-06-19T16:12:52 <sipa> it also includes a fancy ascii-art diagram
1972025-06-19T16:14:08 <sipa> i have rebased #32545 on top of 30605, as there was some overlap, and it can wait
1982025-06-19T16:14:10 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32545 | Replace cluster linearization algorithm with SFL by sipa · Pull Request #32545 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
1992025-06-19T16:14:24 <sipa> that's it for me, unless someone has questions/comments
2002025-06-19T16:14:55 <achow101> #topic MuSig2 WG Update (achow101, rkrux)
2012025-06-19T16:15:07 <achow101> bips#1867 was merged. #31244 is updated to allow duplicate participant keys, and all review has been addressed.
2022025-06-19T16:15:09 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31244 | descriptors: MuSig2 by achow101 · Pull Request #31244 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2032025-06-19T16:15:11 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/issues/1867 | 390: Allow repeated participant pubkeys and disallow ranged participants with aggregate derivation. by achow101 · Pull Request #1867 · bitcoin/bips · GitHub
2042025-06-19T16:15:17 <achow101> 31244 is still the pr to review
2052025-06-19T16:15:48 <achow101> #topic move the repo to bitcoin-core (achow101)
2062025-06-19T16:16:19 <achow101> wanted to bring this up again since there's some talk about changing CI, and having everything in one org would make that easier
2072025-06-19T16:16:34 <sipa> can you link to CI changing discussions?
2082025-06-19T16:17:09 <achow101> There was some discussion in #31965, but afaict, most is happening in signal
2092025-06-19T16:17:10 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/31965 | Revisiting us self-hosting parts of our CI · Issue #31965 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
2102025-06-19T16:17:22 <maflcko> I brought it up, but the general idea is that having two orgs will have to duplicate everything that is org-specific, not just org-teams
2112025-06-19T16:17:41 <sipa> right, of course
2122025-06-19T16:17:42 <achow101> same org lets us also share caches
2132025-06-19T16:18:32 <dergoegge> I still don't think the potential downsides are worth the minor improvements
2142025-06-19T16:18:32 <maflcko> Currently the two worker pools are set up manually to share the cache
2152025-06-19T16:19:26 <maflcko> dergoegge: Are there any specific technical downsides that I missed?
2162025-06-19T16:19:49 <dergoegge> technical no, but the main motivation afaiu was always non-technical
2172025-06-19T16:20:28 <sipa> for me the main motivation is non-technical; i don't know if that's the case for everyone
2182025-06-19T16:20:48 <darosior> This is how i understand it as well, and i tend to agree with dergoegge.
2192025-06-19T16:21:44 <sr_gi[m]1> That's also how I see it, but I won't be blocking this if there is consensus to move forward with it
2202025-06-19T16:22:18 <fanquake> Me too. (happy to take any and all of the other team/org actions, if needed. Should only be a handful extra a year)
2212025-06-19T16:22:28 <willcl-ark> Is there a problem with the status quo that is solved by moving?
2222025-06-19T16:22:30 *** OYENRAZOR369 <OYENRAZOR369!~OYENRAZOR@114.10.154.138> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
2232025-06-19T16:23:15 <sipa> people thinking that BIPs are bitcoin core thing
2242025-06-19T16:23:20 <maflcko> willcl-ark: All the technical stuff that involves doing stuff twice (CI worker pools, CI settings, CI subscriptions, org-teams, ...)
2252025-06-19T16:23:59 <fanquake> To be clear, again, that duplicated technical stuff is trivial in number compared to all other actions needed to maintain the repo
2262025-06-19T16:23:59 <achow101> maflcko: would have the ci in both orgs also cost us double since that would be 2 subscriptions?
2272025-06-19T16:24:16 <maflcko> achow101: Not sure, but I'd assume so
2282025-06-19T16:24:49 <dergoegge> what is the cost of the CI now?
2292025-06-19T16:25:15 <maflcko> dergoegge: Well, it is self-hosted right now
2302025-06-19T16:25:26 <maflcko> But there was discussion to change that (for various reasons)
2312025-06-19T16:26:43 <dergoegge> Right ok, I think the cost argument only makes sense if we know what it would actually be
2322025-06-19T16:28:18 <darosior> dergoegge: and if it's substantially higher than the cost of engineering hours spent in moving the repo and associated infrastructure
2332025-06-19T16:28:57 <achow101> I think the current plan is the new cirrus runners, which is $75/mo per machine (assuming we get the nonprofit discount)
2342025-06-19T16:29:34 <darosior> How many machines we need?
2352025-06-19T16:30:46 <maflcko> darosior: You could probably do with a single machine (everything will just be slower) for that org. Not sure if devs will be happy with that
2362025-06-19T16:31:12 <darosior> At "feature parity" with today, how many machines we need? 2?
2372025-06-19T16:31:28 <willcl-ark> Reall cirrus machines are "16 cpu", so you can split even one machine into eg 8 x 2cpu jobs.
2382025-06-19T16:31:46 <fanquake> Things being slower in the GUI repo, doesnât really seem like an issue? Given itâs running at a PR or two a week?
2392025-06-19T16:31:59 <fanquake> Probably not even that many actually
2402025-06-19T16:32:14 <maflcko> fanquake: Also, qa-assets and secp (aarch64)
2412025-06-19T16:32:57 <fanquake> Sure, qa-assets is less than that even, I guess secp256k1 slightly over gui
2422025-06-19T16:34:13 <dergoegge> secp Ci looks much less intense, e.g. the last arm64 cirrus jobs were 8 min each
2432025-06-19T16:35:11 <sipa> secp CI has a ton of CI jobs, but all fairly short
2442025-06-19T16:35:25 <maflcko> yeah, i think two runners (aarch64 + x86_64) would be enough. So that is 2k-4k per year, i'd guess
2452025-06-19T16:35:33 <achow101> I think it's probably at least 3 machines, 2 x86, 1 arm. that at least matches the current setup
2462025-06-19T16:35:40 <sipa> i can't imagine money being the problem with those numbers
2472025-06-19T16:35:42 <achow101> and per org
2482025-06-19T16:36:06 <darosior> achow101: ok thanks
2492025-06-19T16:36:09 <darosior> sipa: yeah
2502025-06-19T16:36:21 <maflcko> sipa: Yeah, it should be 10% of the other CI subscription, so money itself shouldn't be an issue
2512025-06-19T16:36:49 *** dzxzg <dzxzg!~dzxzg@user/dzxzg> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2522025-06-19T16:38:35 <maflcko> My thinking is that moving the repo should be mostly hassle free (obviously I can't promise it) and has been discussed for years, so doing it now to save some hassle when setting up the CI or in the future when handling teams seems fine.
2532025-06-19T16:40:32 <sipa> it makes sense to me, i remain of the opinion that it's just a confusing historical artifact how the orgs/repos are organized, and it's been discussed long enough to address it
2542025-06-19T16:40:32 <achow101> i expect that making sure ci is setup correctly twice will cause more issues than moving the repo
2552025-06-19T16:40:42 <darosior> I think moving the repo is a consequential decision which comports risk. Doing so today seems unnecessary and pretty bad timing.
2562025-06-19T16:40:49 <achow101> but i'm okay with revisiting this later. we previously discussed revisting during coredev
2572025-06-19T16:40:58 <sipa> but if too many people are skeptical, i'm not going to push it
2582025-06-19T16:41:09 *** abubakarsadiq <abubakarsadiq!uid602234@id-602234.hampstead.irccloud.com> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
2592025-06-19T16:41:27 <fanquake> Regardless of any technical reasons, personally, I donât think anything is gained by us trying to create some perception that doesnât currently reflect reality. I think this is also undermined by the fact that we are just going to redirect to ourselves anyways (so where is the separation?) If we did drop an org level readme in /bitcoin, would we also be listing/linking to every other implementation in there? If not, thatâd seem to
2602025-06-19T16:41:27 <fanquake> undermine the premise as well. If the plan was to move everything out, except kernel, that would be more interesting to me.
2612025-06-19T16:41:40 <maflcko> yeah, I don't want to rush or push it. Just wondering why it is bad timing
2622025-06-19T16:42:43 <sipa> fanquake: ideally there'd be a bitcoin-bips/bips and a bitcoin-core/bitcoin etc, and the bitcoin/ org remains vestigial just to avoid name squatting and for redirect
2632025-06-19T16:42:50 <darosior> I think it would be highly inadvisable for us to link people to alternate implementations that are not consensus-compatible with what 99% of the Bitcoin network runs.
2642025-06-19T16:43:21 <maflcko> yeah, the readme should just briefly say a redirect exists
2652025-06-19T16:43:24 <achow101> fanquake: ideally we wouldn't need to have redirects, but there's way too many links to bitcoin/bitcoin that breaking them would be a bad idea
2662025-06-19T16:43:47 <sipa> fanquake: i strongly disagree with the notion that kernel somehow deserves to be treated differently - it's a still just one implementation, and people can choose to use it or not
2672025-06-19T16:44:55 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 265 seconds)
2682025-06-19T16:45:29 <achow101> the point of having a redirect or links in a readme is purely to not break all existing documentation and habits, of which there are many. it's not to be an exhaustive list of implementations.
2692025-06-19T16:45:38 <sipa> achow101: +1
2702025-06-19T16:45:56 <fanquake> my point is that if /bitcoin is now meant to be neutral, why wouldnât people ask for that?
2712025-06-19T16:45:57 <darosior> sipa: i think it is an overstatement to say "it is just one implementation". Kernel de facto defines what the network today will accept.
2722025-06-19T16:46:24 <sipa> darosior: no it doesn't, bitcoin core de facto does
2732025-06-19T16:46:36 <darosior> It's what i meant
2742025-06-19T16:46:47 <sipa> people can choose to use bitcoin core or not
2752025-06-19T16:46:50 <achow101> fanquake: it's not meant to be neutral, it's meant to not exist. obviously it has to exist to not break anything existing
2762025-06-19T16:47:08 <fanquake> well /bitcoin does need to exist, to host the bips repo
2772025-06-19T16:47:25 <achow101> bips can also move
2782025-06-19T16:47:26 <sipa> fanquake: well all of this would be much more meaningful if bips moves too
2792025-06-19T16:48:02 <fanquake> Is it going to?
2802025-06-19T16:48:44 <darosior> sipa: of course but i don't think it is related
2812025-06-19T16:48:52 <achow101> no idea. I think opinions are split there as well
2822025-06-19T16:49:50 <maflcko> I'd say bips moving (or not) shouldn't affect or concern whether to move /bitcoin
2832025-06-19T16:50:09 <darosior> To be honest i feel like we are discussing whether to take a decision that could have nefarious real-world consequences just to make a philosophical point
2842025-06-19T16:50:34 <achow101> darosior: what "nefarious real-world consequences"?
2852025-06-19T16:51:00 <sipa> darosior: i understand the concern of "people who aren't familiar will search for bitcoin and be confused when they don't find a reference implementation under bitcoin/" i guess, but really, i find it categorically wrong for bitcoin core (or kernel, or any of its related projects) to somehow present itself as being "bitcoin", even though today - and hopefully for long in the future - it remains de
2862025-06-19T16:51:06 <sipa> facto what users use and thus defines the network
2872025-06-19T16:51:12 <darosior> achow101: confusing people and effectively leading them to run lower quality software to validate their money.
2882025-06-19T16:52:10 <willcl-ark> It might be good to also have a concrete answer to whether setting up and maintaining CI twice is hard/too much work, or not? Or if it's cost constraints, or something else. I've now heard that it both isn't (last year), and now that it is (so much so that it's a contributing factor for moving the r
2892025-06-19T16:52:10 <willcl-ark> epo). If it is, and we move to hosted runners, and don't move the repo then we will indeed need "double CI", but it's also unclear to me if even this is a problem (cost wise).
2902025-06-19T16:52:36 <sipa> darosior: TBH, i think it's more confusing the other direction
2912025-06-19T16:52:59 <achow101> darosior: I don't see at all how that is a possibility. links to bitcoin/bitcoin will redirect. when you go to the bitcoin org profile, there won't be a "bitcoin" repository under there. I highly doubt any new person is going to github.com/bitcoin and looking for the "bitcoin" repo when they want to start using Bitcoin
2922025-06-19T16:53:38 <dergoegge> where is the perception of separation we'd be aiming for if the redirect exists?
2932025-06-19T16:53:49 <achow101> the redirect will be permanent, and the bitcoin org owners aren't going to change in order to ensure that no new bitcoin/bitcoin that breaks the redirect
2942025-06-19T16:54:01 <sipa> darosior, achow101: yeah, this argument applies far more to bitcoin.org vs bitcoincore.org, but there the naming is already correct
2952025-06-19T16:54:23 <sipa> dergoegge: that seems like a strawman to me; over time, people will start using the bitcoin-core repo
2962025-06-19T16:55:03 <sipa> the bitcoin/ repo isn't there to to direct people (as repos won't even show up under it) to a specific implementation, it's to redirect old historical usage that hasn't updated
2972025-06-19T16:55:07 <achow101> dergoegge: any new links people generate will be the new repo. when you go to the old link, it automatically redirects you to the new repo which says "bitcoin-core/bitcoin-core" or whatever
2982025-06-19T16:55:18 <dergoegge> ok so the hope is we'd be able to remove the redirect in time?
2992025-06-19T16:55:31 <achow101> dergoegge: I'd love to be able to do that
3002025-06-19T16:55:49 <achow101> it'll probably take more than our lifetimes though
3012025-06-19T16:56:11 <Murch[m]> dergoegge, I mean, you would not be looking at the bitcoin org anymore when browsing the repository, even if you got there originally by calling up the bitcoin org
3022025-06-19T16:56:23 <maflcko> I don't think it is possible to remove a redirect (other than to create a repo on top). Personally I think it is fine to leave the redirect
3032025-06-19T16:56:24 <janb84> There is currently a view of certain people that "bitcoin-core" is trying to capture bitcoin, wouldn't moving the repo now bolster that viewpoint and give extra negative backlash ?
3042025-06-19T16:56:45 <sipa> janb84: i'd say it would do the exact opposite?
3052025-06-19T16:57:03 <Murch[m]> janb84: Could you explain why you think that, it seems like the opposite to me, too.
3062025-06-19T16:57:26 <sipa> who knows how things can be misinterpreted, of course, but logically, this is exactly moving away from the (understandable) misdirection someone might take from bitcoin core being under the bitcoin/ org
3072025-06-19T16:58:19 <achow101> anyways, we're near the end of the meeting. if there are opinions, maybe they would be best expressed in #32340
3082025-06-19T16:58:21 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/32340 | Moving this repo to bitcoin-core · Issue #32340 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3092025-06-19T16:58:24 <janb84> it's a delicate topic ofc. again the good intentions are easily misinterpreted, "look they are now 100% trying to gain control" etc
3102025-06-19T16:58:36 <darosior> I understand many (including me) are concerned with the confusion of Bitcoin and Bitcoin Core. However i don't think this means we should ignore the fact that anybody serious who wants to use Bitcoin today with real money on the line will want to use Bitcoin Core. Moving the repository is not going to change this reality.
3112025-06-19T16:59:06 <Murch[m]> At this point, anything we do seems to be represented in pretty much every possible way as there are a substantial number of Bitcoin geeks producing podcasts and blog posts that are overinvested in the OP_RETURN thingâ¦
3122025-06-19T16:59:07 <achow101> darosior: no one claimed it would change that reality?
3132025-06-19T16:59:10 <sipa> darosior: i certainly hope it doesn't!
3142025-06-19T16:59:11 <abubakarsadiq> the redirect from /bitcoin/bitcoin indicates that Bitcoin core is the dominant implementation :P
3152025-06-19T16:59:26 <darosior> sipa: :)
3162025-06-19T17:00:04 <sipa> but i don't see how bitcoin core not being under bitcoin/ would somehow mean we don't think people should use bitcoin core
3172025-06-19T17:00:06 <achow101> #endmeeting
3182025-06-19T17:00:06 <corebot`> achow101: Meeting ended at 2025-06-19T17:00+0000
3192025-06-19T17:00:07 <corebot`> achow101: Raw log: https://achow101.com/ircmeetings/2025/bitcoin-core-dev.2025-06-19_16_00.log.json
3202025-06-19T17:00:08 <corebot`> achow101: Formatted log: https://achow101.com/ircmeetings/2025/bitcoin-core-dev.2025-06-19_16_00.log.html
3212025-06-19T17:00:09 <corebot`> achow101: Minutes: https://achow101.com/ircmeetings/2025/bitcoin-core-dev.2025-06-19_16_00.html
3222025-06-19T17:00:23 *** Emc99 <Emc99!~Emc99@212.129.85.147> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3232025-06-19T17:00:29 <sipa> abubakarsadiq: just the historical one
3242025-06-19T17:00:38 <achow101> willcl-ark: do we know, concretely, what steps need to be done in order to setup the new ci? that would inform us how much work we have to duplicate
3252025-06-19T17:00:59 <darosior> achow101: it seems the push to move is at least in part fueled by thinking we would face less pressure. I think this view is incorrect and falling into the fallacy that the Github repo matters to define what the Bitcoin network is.
3262025-06-19T17:01:20 <sipa> janb84: i mean, sure, i can imagine people saying that, but... that would literally be the polar opposite of what is happening?
3272025-06-19T17:02:27 <achow101> darosior: I have had a couple of people say to me "well if you guys aren't bitcoin, why are you using bitcoin/bitcoin", so I don't think it's incorrect to say that we would face less pressure
3282025-06-19T17:02:49 <achow101> but for me, the push to move is mainly the practical of duplicating work
3292025-06-19T17:02:50 <janb84> sipa: i'm affraid that the action of "moving" can be interpreted as hostile/taking control.
3302025-06-19T17:02:56 <maflcko> willcl-ark: It should certainly be doable to setup the CI twice and cost about 2k-4k more (see above) maybe up to 10k, if we want more runners, but I think money or hassle can't be measured if people oppose this philosophically
3312025-06-19T17:02:58 <darosior> achow101: these statements are motivated by the desired conclusion. They would find another reason to annoy you even if we moved.
3322025-06-19T17:03:06 <sipa> janb84: ... moving *away* is taking control?!
3332025-06-19T17:03:20 <pinheadmz> i think before any action is taken it would be wise to do some kind of PR and i dont mean pull request
3342025-06-19T17:03:32 <Murch[m]> Probably the attack would be more along the lines of "they are moving the repository to pretend that they have less responsibility"
3352025-06-19T17:03:37 <darosior> janb84: you seem confused. The point is to move away from bitcoin/bitcoin toward bitcoin-core/bitcoin.
3362025-06-19T17:03:42 <abubakarsadiq> achow101: is that less pressure really worth the switch. I think people will just come up with yet another controversy
3372025-06-19T17:03:49 <pinheadmz> see what kind of take the tweeters have and address it in a blog or discussion to clear anything up before doing it
3382025-06-19T17:03:50 <janb84> sipa: yes, in the public eye. can 100% see that happing
3392025-06-19T17:03:55 <darosior> Murch[m]: yeah exactly
3402025-06-19T17:04:37 <sipa> janb84: yes, obviously, that can happen - but i don't think we should let our actions be determined by fear of people misrepresenting it as the polar opposite of what is happening
3412025-06-19T17:04:49 <achow101> abubakarsadiq: i mean, it's about 30 seconds of work and no one has to actually change anything...
3422025-06-19T17:05:02 <achow101> the hardest part is finding my yubikey to authorize the move
3432025-06-19T17:05:08 <janb84> darosior: i'm aware , it's the act of moving itself to some thing that is seen as controlled by core. it's deligate
3442025-06-19T17:05:16 <marcofleon> darosior: I think janb84 was saying it could be somehow misinterpreted as the "final step" in core taking control of bitcoin
3452025-06-19T17:05:18 <Murch[m]> Seeing some news that people are now mining transactions below min relay tx feerate
3462025-06-19T17:05:37 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3472025-06-19T17:05:41 <marcofleon> but agreed that whoever would see it like that, it's likely not worth caring what they think
3482025-06-19T17:05:51 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3492025-06-19T17:06:27 <janb84> marcofleon: yes that's what I mean.
3502025-06-19T17:08:22 <pinheadmz> Murch[m] mononaut tweet or it didnt happen
3512025-06-19T17:08:25 <darosior> marcofleon, janb84: i see, thanks for clarifying.
3522025-06-19T17:09:41 <janb84> darosior: no worries
3532025-06-19T17:10:06 <Murch[m]> Havenât seen a mononaut tweet yet, but: https://nitter.space/ottosch_/status/1935712233230639176
3542025-06-19T17:10:09 <Murch[m]> https://nitter.space/peterktodd/status/1935709056695775583
3552025-06-19T17:12:52 <pinheadmz> ah i thought it was gonna be a slipstream
3562025-06-19T17:16:05 *** eugenesiegel <eugenesiegel!~eugenesie@user/eugenesiegel> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3572025-06-19T17:19:00 *** vasild <vasild!~vd@user/vasild> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
3582025-06-19T17:19:42 *** vasild <vasild!~vd@user/vasild> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3592025-06-19T17:35:01 <TheCharlatan> sipa, r.e. kernel deserving to be treated differently. if it becomes the common codebase for a bunch of implementations, it would be equally weird in my eyes if it were still in the bitcoin-core org and not a shared codebase to some extent.
3602025-06-19T17:37:31 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2803:9810:484c:6110:64b5:fbd0:e6cf:c1d5> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3612025-06-19T17:41:18 *** Talkless <Talkless!~Talkless@138.199.6.197> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3622025-06-19T17:46:27 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2803:9810:484c:6110:64b5:fbd0:e6cf:c1d5> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
3632025-06-19T18:03:31 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3642025-06-19T18:03:46 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3652025-06-19T18:05:40 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
3662025-06-19T18:06:15 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3672025-06-19T18:06:51 *** Guest8072 <Guest8072!~diego@177.34.235.126> has left #bitcoin-core-dev
3682025-06-19T18:07:09 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3692025-06-19T18:08:26 *** dviola <dviola!~diego@user/dviola> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3702025-06-19T18:10:23 *** saturday- <saturday-!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3712025-06-19T18:10:25 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
3722025-06-19T18:11:24 *** saturday7 <saturday7!~saturday7@59.167.129.22> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
3732025-06-19T18:18:49 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@142.147.59.145> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3742025-06-19T18:26:56 <sr_gi[m]1> I've included a description of the approach in #30277 to make it easier to review (cc/ achow101)
3752025-06-19T18:26:58 <corebot`> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/30277 | [DO NOT MERGE] Erlay: bandwidth-efficient transaction relay protocol (Full implementation) by sr-gi · Pull Request #30277 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub
3762025-06-19T18:27:52 <sr_gi[m]1> The warnet repo is also up to date now pinheadmz: https://github.com/sr-gi/erlay-warnet
3772025-06-19T18:28:02 <pinheadmz> \m/
3782025-06-19T18:28:30 *** TheRec <TheRec!~toto@user/therec> has quit IRC ()
3792025-06-19T18:49:44 <sipa> TheCharlatan: perhaps, but even then i don't think it deserves the "bitcoin" label
3802025-06-19T18:55:08 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3812025-06-19T18:55:32 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3822025-06-19T19:11:40 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
3832025-06-19T19:17:41 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3842025-06-19T19:17:55 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3852025-06-19T19:26:48 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@142.147.59.145> has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
3862025-06-19T19:27:41 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3872025-06-19T19:32:32 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
3882025-06-19T19:40:48 *** Talkless <Talkless!~Talkless@138.199.6.197> has quit IRC (Quit: Konversation terminated!)
3892025-06-19T19:57:03 *** Guest25 <Guest25!~Guest25@2401:4900:1c6f:f288:b852:a573:fa60:3012> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3902025-06-19T19:58:34 *** Guest25 <Guest25!~Guest25@2401:4900:1c6f:f288:b852:a573:fa60:3012> has quit IRC (Client Quit)
3912025-06-19T20:03:47 *** kevkevin <kevkevin!~kevkevin@209.242.39.30> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3922025-06-19T20:23:17 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has quit IRC (Quit: Client closed)
3932025-06-19T20:23:50 *** Cory22 <Cory22!~Cory22@user/pasha> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3942025-06-19T20:24:19 *** TheRec <TheRec!~toto@84-75-224-26.dclient.hispeed.ch> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3952025-06-19T20:28:17 <TheCharlatan> sipa that's fair I guess - though I would not necessarily call that "deserves" :P
3962025-06-19T20:56:36 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
3972025-06-19T21:01:10 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
3982025-06-19T21:20:14 *** TheRec <TheRec!~toto@user/therec> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
3992025-06-19T21:20:51 *** TheRec <TheRec!~toto@user/therec> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4002025-06-19T21:23:59 *** TheRec_ <TheRec_!~toto@84-75-224-26.dclient.hispeed.ch> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4012025-06-19T21:25:09 *** TheRec <TheRec!~toto@user/therec> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 248 seconds)
4022025-06-19T21:30:49 *** abubakarsadiq <abubakarsadiq!uid602234@id-602234.hampstead.irccloud.com> has quit IRC (Quit: Connection closed for inactivity)
4032025-06-19T21:36:18 *** Guest63 <Guest63!~Guest63@41.215.171.38> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4042025-06-19T21:51:03 *** jespada <jespada!~jespada@r179-25-212-225.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 276 seconds)
4052025-06-19T21:51:37 *** jespada <jespada!~jespada@179.26.250.100> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4062025-06-19T21:54:44 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4072025-06-19T21:59:24 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
4082025-06-19T22:12:25 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4092025-06-19T22:17:50 *** bugs_ <bugs_!~bugs@user/bugs/x-5128603> has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
4102025-06-19T22:19:56 *** TheRec_ <TheRec_!~toto@84-75-224-26.dclient.hispeed.ch> has quit IRC ()
4112025-06-19T22:24:44 *** brunoerg <brunoerg!~brunoerg@2804:14d:5285:8318:c1f6:19b0:5bdc:88fd> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4122025-06-19T22:29:00 *** TheRec <TheRec!~toto@84-75-224-26.dclient.hispeed.ch> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4132025-06-19T22:46:53 *** Guest63 <Guest63!~Guest63@41.215.171.38> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds)
4142025-06-19T23:16:27 *** sbddesign <sbddesign!~sbddesign@user/sbddesign> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds)
4152025-06-19T23:37:43 *** bitdex <bitdex!~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
4162025-06-19T23:38:22 *** PaperSword <PaperSword!~Thunderbi@securemail.qrsnap.io> has quit IRC (Quit: PaperSword)
4172025-06-19T23:38:40 *** bitdex <bitdex!~bitdex@gateway/tor-sasl/bitdex> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4182025-06-19T23:41:58 *** PaperSword <PaperSword!~Thunderbi@securemail.qrsnap.io> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev
4192025-06-19T23:57:27 *** OYENRAZOR369 <OYENRAZOR369!~OYENRAZOR@114.10.155.176> has joined #bitcoin-core-dev