19:00:21 #startmeeting 19:00:21 Meeting started Thu Aug 29 19:00:21 2019 UTC. The chair is wumpus. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. 19:00:23 hi 19:00:25 hi 19:00:39 #bitcoin-core-dev Meeting: wumpus sipa gmaxwell jonasschnelli morcos luke-jr sdaftuar jtimon cfields petertodd kanzure bluematt instagibbs phantomcircuit codeshark michagogo marcofalke paveljanik NicolasDorier jl2012 achow101 meshcollider jnewbery maaku fanquake promag provoostenator aj Chris_Stewart_5 dongcarl gwillen jamesob ken281221 ryanofsky gleb moneyball kvaciral 19:00:43 hi 19:00:47 hi 19:00:51 hi 19:00:53 hi 19:01:07 hi 19:01:12 no proposed topics in https://gist.github.com/moneyball/071d608fdae217c2a6d7c35955881d8a, anyone have any last minute topics? 19:01:13 wumpus isn't invisible this week \o/ 19:01:20 hi 19:01:22 meshcollider: hah 19:01:48 I have one about #16754 19:01:50 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16754 | Transifex organization issues · Issue #16754 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 19:02:10 fanquake: Are you here? 19:02:39 #topic High priority for review 19:02:51 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/8 5 blockers, 6 chasing concept ACK 19:02:59 hi 19:03:05 anything to add/remove, or ready for merge? 19:03:50 Can we add #16392 19:03:50 #15450 19:03:52 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16392 | WIP build: macOS toolchain update by fanquake · Pull Request #16392 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 19:03:56 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15450 | [GUI] Create wallet menu option by achow101 · Pull Request #15450 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 19:04:09 I don't think adding a WIP PR makes sense? 19:04:27 it's either WIP or ready for review, not both 19:04:36 or do you mean to chasing concept ACK? 19:04:39 Although achow101 already has a PR... 19:04:44 Yeah chasing concept ACK 19:05:01 Would like some discussion around updating the OS X SDK 19:05:07 hi 19:06:05 provoostenator: well you're proposing this one and you don't have one of your own so I guess that's okay 19:07:28 Awesome. It reduces the rebase hell I'm in for hardware wallet GUI. 19:07:46 And it's pretty much done anyway 19:08:32 great ! 19:09:37 #topic Transifex organization issues 19:09:59 so basically I don't have full access to the organization under which bitcoin core's translations are, on transifex 19:10:18 none of us has, only the person who orignally created it, 'seone', does anyone perhaps know them? 19:10:22 #16754 19:10:23 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/16754 | Transifex organization issues · Issue #16754 · bitcoin/bitcoin · GitHub 19:10:47 Could contacting transiflex eventually help? 19:11:15 They may help in such cases when the administrator left... 19:11:18 never heard of that person 19:11:20 I don't know, my proposal is to move the translations to the bitcoincore org, which already has the website translations 19:11:31 or at least, create them there starting with 0.19 19:11:45 would loosing contributors be a problem? or any other downside when moving to bitcoincore? 19:11:47 well would there be any overhead from the transition? 19:11:48 contacting transifex might help, but may take a long time to resolve 19:12:10 we're losing contributors now because I don't have access to the team page 19:12:19 and can't set language coordinators andsuch 19:12:22 Oh. Good point. 19:12:43 ack on moving from my side 19:12:59 ACK on moving or starting from scratch 19:13:40 I had hoped someone simply knew seone, I've tried contacting them through the site a few times but I think their last activity was in 2017 or so 19:13:51 You could contact transifex and just give it 3 days or so just to see what happens without waiting forever 19:13:54 not aware of any IRC or github nicks 19:13:55 In the past I knew the owner of Transifex personally but we haven't talked for years, maybe I can get his attention now. 19:14:09 oh someone on the inside of transifex would also help 19:14:27 let's set a timeout, if we can't get help by _______ then we move 19:14:51 the problem is that 0.19 translations are supposed to open in 3 days 19:15:26 so that means we skip this for 0.19, which is fine, I guess we can mess around as we did for another release 19:17:11 so are you sure enough this will work warren that it's worth that? 19:17:43 wumpus: I don't know, I haven't tried to talk to him for many years now. Transifex started as a Fedora project over a decade ago, that's how I know him. 19:17:53 oh! 19:17:57 actually we talked maybe 4 years ago 19:18:20 would it be a pain to move to the other org? would it confuse people? 19:18:21 that's longer ago than when I talked to seone :-) 19:18:39 So we wait 3 days to see if move can happy quckly, otherwise do 0.19 from a fresh account (maybe a day or two delayed)? 19:19:04 nah, could just throw a notification in the old organisation that the translations have opened, in another place 19:19:08 Given that we have to handle backports for a while, it's nice to do 0.19 the righ tway 19:19:59 I think a notification on transifex results in a mail for everyone that participates 19:20:06 but yes, let's wait a week then 19:20:07 wumpus: it's thursday now. if I can't get a response by end of Friday then assume we won't get an answer in time and plan on moving? 19:20:09 any other topics? 19:20:18 warren: sounds good to me! 19:20:21 a week? OK i'll try 19:20:45 yeah it's not a problem to open the translation a few days later, that's definitely happened before 19:22:58 no other topics, going to close the meeting then, thanks everyone 19:23:10 #endmeeting