{"id":235,"date":"2004-08-04T01:23:56","date_gmt":"2004-08-03T15:23:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/?p=235"},"modified":"2004-08-04T01:23:56","modified_gmt":"2004-08-03T15:23:56","slug":"bush-and-tenet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/2004\/08\/04\/bush-and-tenet","title":{"rendered":"Bush and Tenet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PoliPundit <a href=\"http:\/\/polipundit.com\/2004_08_01_polipundit_archive.html#109144238424957518\">raves<\/a> about Dubya&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.4president.org\/speeches\/bushcheney2000convention.htm\">acceptance speech<\/a> for the Republican nomination in 2000. An interesting line from Cheney&#8217;s remarks:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>You will never see him pointing the finger of blame for failure&#8230;you will only see him sharing the credit for success.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Ignoring the over-reaching generalisation, that comment is interesting in regard to how Bush has handled a number of pretty controversial appointments. George Tenet is the main one that comes to mind: if you&#8217;re thinking in terms of &#8220;ministerial responsibility&#8221; for departmental failures, you&#8217;d probably expect the CIA director to have been booted over the massive intelligence failure that was Sept 11. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.instapundit.com\/archives\/013724.php\">White Glenn<\/a> certainly did. But if Bush is firmly against &#8220;pointing the finger of blame&#8221;, demanding resignations like that isn&#8217;t going to happen; and indeed it didn&#8217;t: Tenet remained as CIA director for almost two more years, &#8217;til <a href=\"http:\/\/www.instapundit.com\/archives\/015894.php\">resigning<\/a> in June. While there&#8217;s speculation that &#8220;personal reasons&#8221; is just a face saving cover for being pushed, ttbomk it&#8217;s still nothing more than speculation.<\/p>\n<p>Presumably it would be pretty easy to have fired Tenet, made him a scape goat for Sept 11, and brought in some new blood to try to fix the CIA&#8217;s problems. That would certainly have had some benefits; who knows, it could have shaken things up enough that someone would&#8217;ve gotten an accurate idea of what was going in Iraq. Putting the blame for S11 on Tenet, appointed during Clinton&#8217;s term, might&#8217;ve been a politically astute way of making it look like the Democrats&#8217; fault, too. On the other hand, it&#8217;d probably have made Tenet&#8217;s life pretty unpleasant, might&#8217;ve gulled the country into thinking that the intelligence failures would be amenable to a quick fix, and might&#8217;ve been disruptive enough to the CIA so as to make it even less effective. There&#8217;s also the issue of whether putting too much focus on blame encourages more CYA activity than is desirable.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s probably reasonable to relate this to Bush&#8217;s handling of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagoboyz.net\/archives\/001312.html\">Colin Powell<\/a> and the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.instapundit.com\/archives\/013771.php\">State Department<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s an interesting question whether avoiding casting blame even when it&#8217;s warranted is actually a good idea or not.<\/p>\n<p>(For reference, a better generalisation than the one Cheney presents is probably &#8220;You will never see him pointing the finger of blame for failure at people he works with&#8221;. The converse implication is worth considering: just because you don&#8217;t see him pointing the finger of blame at a colleague, doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean he doesn&#8217;t think that guy isn&#8217;t a complete screwup and isn&#8217;t doing something about it.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PoliPundit raves about Dubya&#8217;s acceptance speech for the Republican nomination in 2000. An interesting line from Cheney&#8217;s remarks: You will never see him pointing the finger of blame for failure&#8230;you will only see him sharing the credit for success. Ignoring the over-reaching generalisation, that comment is interesting in regard to how Bush has handled a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[13],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/235\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}