{"id":82,"date":"2005-03-16T10:51:01","date_gmt":"2005-03-16T00:51:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/?p=82"},"modified":"2005-03-16T10:51:01","modified_gmt":"2005-03-16T00:51:01","slug":"scc-proposal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/2005\/03\/16\/scc-proposal","title":{"rendered":"SCC Proposal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Well, admittedly, I haven&#8217;t tried reading debian-devel for the past eight hours or so, but there still seems to be a bunch of confusion about the big scary <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel-announce\/2005\/03\/msg00012.html\">plan<\/a> to not support all architectures equally. Anyway some people seemed to find some of my followups useful, so continuing the &#8220;Today&#8217;s list posts&#8221;, faux-deli.cio.us-style, Clayton&#8217;s blogging I&#8217;ve been doing, here are some followups you might want to peruse.<\/p>\n<p>So, <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel\/2005\/03\/msg01086.html\">this mail<\/a> gives some details about what actually went on at the meeting. Not a lot, but some background&#8217;s better than none. <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel\/2005\/03\/msg01165.html\">This one<\/a> is the &#8220;babies&#8221; post that might be useful to porter&#8217;s wondering how their architecture should fit into the proposed system. These <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel\/2005\/03\/msg01139.html\">two<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel\/2005\/03\/msg01131.html\">posts<\/a> might be helpful to porters who want to think about how they might operate if their architecture doesn&#8217;t fit on the release track.<\/p>\n<p><b>UPDATE 2005\/03\/16:<\/b><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s some more links from posts after I caught up with -devel a bit more. <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel\/2005\/03\/msg01557.html\">This one<\/a> has some more on how the process might work for becoming a release architecture; and <a href=\"http:\/\/lists.debian.org\/debian-devel\/2005\/03\/msg01547.html\">this one<\/a> includes some elaboration on the N+1 rule.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Well, admittedly, I haven&#8217;t tried reading debian-devel for the past eight hours or so, but there still seems to be a bunch of confusion about the big scary plan to not support all architectures equally. Anyway some people seemed to find some of my followups useful, so continuing the &#8220;Today&#8217;s list posts&#8221;, faux-deli.cio.us-style, Clayton&#8217;s blogging [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.erisian.com.au\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}